Book contents
- Building BonesBone Formation and Development in Anthropology
- Cambridge Studies in Biological and Evolutionary Anthropology
- Building Bones
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Contributors
- Introduction
- 1 What Is a Biological ‘Trait’?
- 2 The Contribution of Angiogenesis to Variation in Bone Development and Evolution
- 3 Association of the Chondrocranium and Dermatocranium in Early Skull Formation
- 4 Unique Ontogenetic Patterns of Postorbital Septation in Tarsiers and the Issue of Trait Homology
- 5 Exploring Modern Human Facial Growth at the Micro- and Macroscopic Levels
- 6 Changes in Mandibular Cortical Bone Density and Elastic Properties during Growth
- 7 Postcranial Skeletal Development and Its Evolutionary Implications
- 8 Combining Genetic and Developmental Methods to Study Musculoskeletal Evolution in Primates
- 9 Using Comparisons between Species and Anatomical Locations to Discover Mechanisms of Growth Plate Patterning and Differential Growth
- 10 Ontogenetic and Genetic Influences on Bone’s Responsiveness to Mechanical Signals
- 11 The Havers–Halberg Oscillation and Bone Metabolism
- 12 Structural and Mechanical Changes in Trabecular Bone during Early Development in the Human Femur and Humerus
- Appendix to Chapter 3: Detailed Anatomical Description of Developing Chondrocranium and Dermatocranium in the Mouse
- References (not included in citations for Chapter 3)
- Index
- 12 Plate section
- References
5 - Exploring Modern Human Facial Growth at the Micro- and Macroscopic Levels
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 25 March 2017
Book contents
- Building BonesBone Formation and Development in Anthropology
- Cambridge Studies in Biological and Evolutionary Anthropology
- Building Bones
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Contributors
- Introduction
- 1 What Is a Biological ‘Trait’?
- 2 The Contribution of Angiogenesis to Variation in Bone Development and Evolution
- 3 Association of the Chondrocranium and Dermatocranium in Early Skull Formation
- 4 Unique Ontogenetic Patterns of Postorbital Septation in Tarsiers and the Issue of Trait Homology
- 5 Exploring Modern Human Facial Growth at the Micro- and Macroscopic Levels
- 6 Changes in Mandibular Cortical Bone Density and Elastic Properties during Growth
- 7 Postcranial Skeletal Development and Its Evolutionary Implications
- 8 Combining Genetic and Developmental Methods to Study Musculoskeletal Evolution in Primates
- 9 Using Comparisons between Species and Anatomical Locations to Discover Mechanisms of Growth Plate Patterning and Differential Growth
- 10 Ontogenetic and Genetic Influences on Bone’s Responsiveness to Mechanical Signals
- 11 The Havers–Halberg Oscillation and Bone Metabolism
- 12 Structural and Mechanical Changes in Trabecular Bone during Early Development in the Human Femur and Humerus
- Appendix to Chapter 3: Detailed Anatomical Description of Developing Chondrocranium and Dermatocranium in the Mouse
- References (not included in citations for Chapter 3)
- Index
- 12 Plate section
- References
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Building Bones: Bone Formation and Development in Anthropology , pp. 104 - 127Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2017
References
Adams, D. C., Rohlf, F. J. and Slice, D. E. (2004). Geometric morphometrics: ten years of progress following the ‘revolution’. Italian Journal of Zoology, 71, 5–16.Google Scholar
Adams, D. C., Rohlf, F. J. and Slice, D. E. (2013). A field comes of age: geometric morphometrics in the 21st century. Hystrix – Italian Journal of Mammalogy, 24, 7–14.Google Scholar
Alberch, P., Gould, S. J., Oster, G. F. and Wake, D. B. (1979). Size and shape in ontogeny and phylogeny. Paleobiology, 5, 296–317.Google Scholar
Aporta, N. B., Martinez-Maza, C., Gonzalez, P. N. and Bernal, V. (2014). Bone modeling patterns and morphometric craniofacial variation in individuals from two prehistoric human populations from Argentina. Anatomical Record – Advances in Integrative Anatomy and Evolutionary Biology, 297, 1829–1838.Google Scholar
Bastir, M. (2008). A systems-model for the morphological analysis of integration and modularity in human craniofacial evolution. Journal of Anthropological Science, 86, 37–58.Google Scholar
Bastir, M. and Rosas, A. (2004). Facial heights: evolutionary relevance of postnatal ontogeny for facial orientation and skull morphology in humans and chimpanzees. Journal of Human Evolution, 47, 359–381.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bastir, M., Rosas, A. and O’Higgins, P. (2006). Craniofacial levels and the morphological maturation of the human skull. Journal of Anatomy, 209, 637–654.Google Scholar
Björk, A. and Skieller, V. (1976). Postnatal growth and developmemt of the maxillary complex. In: McNamara, F. A. (ed.) Factors Affecting the Growth of the Midface. Craniofacial Growth Series. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press, pp. 61–69.Google Scholar
Boyde, A. (1972). Scanning Electron Microscope Studies of Bone. New York, NY: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Boyde, A. and Hobdell, M. H. (1969). Scanning electron microscopy of primary membrane bone. Zeitschrift fur Zellforschung und Mikroskopische Anatomie, 99, 98–108.Google Scholar
Bromage, T. G. (1984). Interpretation of scanning electron microscopic images of abraded forming bone surfaces. American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 64, 161–178.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bromage, T. G. (1985). Systematic inquiry in tests of negative/postive replica combinations for SEM. Journal of Microscopy, 137, 209–216.Google Scholar
Bromage, T. G. (1987). The scanning electron microscopy/replica technique and recent applications to the study of fossil bone. Scanning Microscopy, 1, 607–613.Google Scholar
Bromage, T. G. (1989). Ontogeny of the early hominid face. Journal of Human Evolution, 18, 751–773.Google Scholar
Bulygina, E., Mitteroecker, P. and Aiello, L. (2006). Ontogeny of facial dimorphism and patterns of individual development within one human population. American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 131, 432–443.Google Scholar
Coquerelle, M., Bookstein, F. L., Braga, J., et al. (2011). Sexual dimorphism of the human mandible and its association with dental development. American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 145, 192–202.Google Scholar
Dryden, I. L. and Mardia, K. V. (1998). Statistical Shape Analysis. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Enlow, D. H. (1962). A study of the post-natal growth and remodeling of bone. American Journal of Anatomy, 110, 79–101.Google Scholar
Enlow, D. H. (1963). Principles of Bone Remodeling. Springfield, IL: Charles C. Thomas Publisher.Google Scholar
Enlow, D. H. (1966a). A comparative study of facial growth in Homo and Macaca. American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 24, 293–308.Google Scholar
Enlow, D. H. (1966b). A morphogenetic analysis of facial growth. American Journal of Orthodontics, 52, 283–299.Google Scholar
Enlow, D. H. and Bang, S. (1965). Growth and remodeling of the human maxilla. American Journal of Orthodontics, 51, 446–464.Google Scholar
Enlow, D. H. and Hans, M. G. (2008). Essentials of Facial Growth. Ann Arbor, MI: Needham Press.Google Scholar
Freidline, S. E., Gunz, P., Harvati, K. and Hublin, J.-J. (2012a). Middle Pleistocene human facial morphology in an evolutionary and developmental context. Journal of Human Evolution, 63, 723–740.Google Scholar
Freidline, S. E., Gunz, P., Janković, I., Harvati, K. and Hublin, J. J. (2012b). A comprehensive morphometric analysis of the frontal and zygomatic bone of the Zuttiyeh fossil from Israel. Journal of Human Evolution 62, 225–241.Google Scholar
Freidline, S. E., Gunz, P., Harvati, K. and Hublin, J.-J. (2013). Evaluating developmental shape changes in Homo antecessor subadult facial morphology. Journal of Human Evolution 65, 404–423.Google Scholar
Freidline, S. E., Martinez-Maza, C. and Hublin, J. J. (2014). An integrative approach to studying craniofacial development in great apes and humans. American Journal of Physical Anthropology, S58, 121.Google Scholar
Freidline, S. E., Gunz, P. and Hublin, J. J. (2015). Ontogenetic and static allometry in the human face: contrasting Khoisan and Inuit. American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 158, 116–131.Google Scholar
Gunz, P. (2005). Statistical and geometric reconstruction of hominid crania: reconstructing Australopithecine ontogeny. PhD Thesis, University of Vienna.Google Scholar
Gunz, P., Mitteroecker, P. and Bookstein, F. (2005). Semilandmarks in three dimensions. In: Slice, D. E. (ed.) Modern Morphometrics in Physical Anthropology. New York, NY: Plenum Publishers, pp. 73–98.Google Scholar
Gunz, P., Mitteroecker, P., Neubauer, S., Weber, G. W. and Bookstein, F. L. (2009). Principles for the virtual reconstruction of hominin crania. Journal of Human Evolution, 57, 48–62.Google Scholar
Humphrey, L. T. (1998). Growth patterns in the modern human skeleton. American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 105, 57–72.3.0.CO;2-A>CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lacruz, R. S., de Castro, J. M., Martinon-Torres, M., et al. (2013). Facial morphogenesis of the earliest Europeans. PLoS ONE, 8, e65199.Google Scholar
Martinez-Maza, C., Rosas, A. and Nieto-Diaz, M. (2010). Brief communication: Identification of bone formation and resorption surfaces by reflected light microscopy. American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 143, 313–320.Google Scholar
Martinez-Maza, C., Rosas, A., García-Vargas, S., Estalrrich, A. and de la Rasilla, M. (2011). Bone remodelling in Neanderthal mandibles from the El Sidrón site (Asturias, Spain). Biology Letters, 7, 593–596.Google Scholar
Martinez-Maza, C., Rosas, A. and Nieto-Díaz, M. (2013). Postnatal changes in the growth dynamics of the human face revealed from bone modelling patterns. Journal of Anatomy, 223, 228–241.Google Scholar
Martinez-Maza, C., Freidline, S. E., Strauss, A. and Nieto-Diaz, M. (2015). Bone growth dynamicsof the facial skeleton and mandible in Gorilla gorilla and Pan troglodytes. Evolutionary Biology, 43, 1–21.Google Scholar
McCollum, M. A. (1999). The robust australopithecine face: a morphogenetic perspective. Science, 284, 301–305.Google Scholar
McCollum, M. A. (2008). Nasomaxillary remodeling and facial form in robust Australopithecus: a reassessment. Journal of Human Evolution, 54, 2–14.Google Scholar
McCollum, M. A. and Ward, S. C. (1997). Subnasoalveolar anatomy and hominoid phylogeny: evidence from comparative ontogeny. American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 102, 377–405.Google Scholar
Mitteroecker, P. and Gunz, P. (2009). Advances in geometric morphometrics. Evolutionary Biology, 36, 235–247.Google Scholar
Mitteroecker, P., Gunz, P., Bernhard, M., Schaefer, K. and Bookstein, F. L. (2004). Comparison of cranial ontogenetic trajectories among great apes and humans. Journal of Human Evolution, 46, 679–697.Google Scholar
Mitteroecker, P., Gunz, P., Windhager, S. and Schaefer, K. (2013). A brief review of shape, form, and allometry in geometric morphometrics, with applications to human facial morphology. Hystrix – Italian Journal of Mammalogy, 24, 59–66.Google Scholar
Moss, M. L. and Young, R. W. (1960). A functional approach to craniology. American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 18, 281–292.Google Scholar
O’Higgins, P. (2000). The study of morphological variation in the hominid fossil record: biology, landmarks and geometry. Journal of Anatomy, 197, 103–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O’Higgins, P. and Jones, N. (1998). Facial growth in Cercocebus torquatus: an application of three-dimensional geometric morphometric techniques to the study of morphological variation. Journal of Anatomy, 193, 251–272.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O’Higgins, P., Bromage, T. G., Johnson, D. R., Moore, W. J. and McPhie, P. (1991). A study of facial growth in the sooty mangabey Cercocebus atys. Folia Primatologica (Basel), 56, 86–94.Google Scholar
R Development Core Team (2010). R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing.Google Scholar
Rice, D. P. (2008). Clinical features of syndromic craniosynostosis. In: Rice, D. P. (ed.) Craniofacial Sutures: Development, Disease, and Treatment. Frontiers in Oral Biology. Basel: Karger, pp. 91–106.Google Scholar
Rosas, A. and Martinez-Maza, C. (2010). Bone remodeling of the Homo heidelbergensis mandible; the Atapuerca-SH sample. Journal of Human Evolution, 58, 127–137.Google Scholar
Scheuer, L. and Black, S. M. (2000). Developmental Juvenile Osteology. San Diego, CA: Elsevier Academic Press.Google Scholar
Slice, D. E. (2005). Modern morphometrics. In: Slice, D. E. (ed.) Modern Morphometrics in Physical Anthropology. New York, NY: Kluwer Academic, pp. 1–46.Google Scholar
Strand Viðarsdóttir, U., O’Higgins, P. and Stringer, C. (2002). A geometric morphometric study of regional differences in the ontogeny of the modern human facial skeleton. Journal of Anatomy, 201, 211–229.Google Scholar
Walters, M. and O’Higgins, P. (1992). Factors influencing craniofacial growth: a scanning electron microscope study of high resolution facial replicas. Proceedings of the Australian Society for Human Biology, 5, 391–402.Google Scholar
White, T. D., Black, M. T. and Folkens, P. A. (2012). Human Osteology. Burlington, MA: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Wiley, D. F., Amenta, N., Alcantara, D. A., et al. (2005). Evolutionary morphing. Proceedings of IEEE Visualizations.Google Scholar
Zelditch, M. L., Swiderski, D. L. and Sheets, H. D. (2012). Geometric Morphometrics for Biologists. New York, NY: Academic Press.Google Scholar
- 3
- Cited by