Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-ndmmz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-04T19:49:24.066Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

7 - Ivory, conservation, and environmental transnational coalitions

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 December 2009

Thomas Risse-Kappen
Affiliation:
Freie Universität Berlin
Get access

Summary

Environment, development, trade

Five hundred years ago, 10 million elephants populated Africa's forests and savannas, from the shore of the Mediterranean almost to the tip of Cape Good Hope. Although estimates vary, today's elephant population is believed to be one-twentieth of that figure. Recently, in just one decade, the elephant population dropped nearly 50 percent, from an estimated 1.3 million in 1979 to 625,000 in 1989. At this rate, the elephant could be extinct in many parts of Africa by the end of the century.

Although habitat loss is the greatest long-term threat to the elephant, the principal immediate cause of elephant deaths in recent years has been poaching. After the Second World War, the demand for and price of ivory rose sharply, making poaching a very lucrative business. In the 1970s, many people invested in ivory as a hedge on worldwide inflation. Prices for raw ivory in Japan, Hong Kong, and Europe, the major ivory-consuming areas, rose from between $3 and $10 a pound in the 1960s to $50 a pound by the mid-1970s. In the 1980s, ivory sold for as much as $200 a pound. At the same time, Hong Kong improved its ability to mass-produce ivory carvings. Consequently, international ivory trade and thus, elephant killing, skyrocketed. According to one estimate, poachers were killing 200–300 elephants a day.

The decline in elephant populations can be characterized as having two interactive components. One is local, where property rights to elephant harvesting and maintenance are inadequately designated and enforced. The second is international, where high income growth has led to high demand for a precious commodity (ivory).

Type
Chapter
Information
Bringing Transnational Relations Back In
Non-State Actors, Domestic Structures and International Institutions
, pp. 227 - 254
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 1995

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×