Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-5nwft Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-24T05:38:51.586Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

2 - Transnational relations and the development of European economic and monetary union

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 December 2009

Thomas Risse-Kappen
Affiliation:
Freie Universität Berlin
Get access

Summary

On February 7, 1992, in the Dutch city of Maastricht, the foreign and finance ministers of the twelve member states of the European Community signed the Treaty on European Union. The most ambitious effort ever undertaken in the Community to create new supranational institutions, and to transfer authority from the member states to those institutions, the Treaty committed the member states, among other things, to moving to full Economic and Monetary Union (EMU) by 1999 at the latest. By that date, if not before, some, if not all, of the members will move to the third and final stage of EMU, and the exchange rates between their currencies will be irrevocably locked, a single currency instituted, and a single central bank created that is charged with conducting monetary policy among the participating states.

Those who study policymaking and politics within the European Community (EC) – since November 1993, Union – typically conceive of them as the product, in varying degrees, of two forces – intergovernmentalism and supranationalism. Some accord primacy to the member states and view the policy choices of the Community as manifestations of the continuing domination of the states, acting to achieve their national interests through such institutions as the Council of Ministers and the European Council. From that perspective, Community politics and policy-making largely consist of the formation of coalitions and alliances among states, and the attainment and defeat of the interests and preferences of the states. In contrast, others accord primacy to the supranational institutions and actors within the Community, such as the Commission and the Court of Justice, and perceive its politics and policymaking as manifestations of the influence of those institutions and actors.

Type
Chapter
Information
Bringing Transnational Relations Back In
Non-State Actors, Domestic Structures and International Institutions
, pp. 37 - 78
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 1995

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×