Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-wzw2p Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-23T03:46:53.379Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

32 - Dental enamel regeneration

from Part V - Animal models and clinical applications

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 February 2015

Xanthippi Chatzistavrou
Affiliation:
University of Michigan
Petros Papagerakis
Affiliation:
University of Michigan
Peter X. Ma
Affiliation:
University of Michigan, Ann Arbor
Get access

Summary

Enamel formation

Enamel is the outermost covering of vertebrate teeth and the hardest tissue in the vertebrate body. During tooth development, ectoderm-derived ameloblast cells create enamel by synthesizing a complex protein mixture into the extracellular space where the proteins self-assemble to form a matrix that patterns the woven hydroxyapatite (Wang et al., 2007; Zhu et al., 2006). During enamel biomineralization, the assembly of the protein matrix precedes mineral replacement. The predominant protein of mammalian enamel is amelogenin, which is secreted from ameloblasts. It is a hydrophobic protein that self-assembles to form nanospheres that in turn influence the crystal type, organization, and packing of the crystallites (Du et al., 2005). In contrast to the mesenchyme-controlled biomineralization of bone, which uses collagen and remodels both the organic and the inorganic phases over a lifetime, enamel contains no collagen and does not remodel. The mature enamel composite contains hardly any protein (Smith et al., 1998) and is a tough, crack-tolerant, and abrasion-resistant tissue (White et al., 2001).

The process of enamel formation, termed amelogenesis, is the end product of a series of complex, dynamic, and programmed cellular, chemical and physiological events (Simmer et al., 2010). Enamel formation can be categorized into three distinct stages – the secretory, transition, and maturation stages. The secretory stage is characterized by active protein synthesis and secretion by the ameloblasts. Ameloblasts also deposit enamel crystals at oblique angles while they are moving in the direction of the future cusps to accommodate expansion of the enamel surface. The transition stage is of short duration and is characterized by extensive apoptosis and shortening of ameloblasts in preparation for their transition into the maturation stage. The maturation stage is characterized by removal of enamel organic materials and growth of hydroxyapatite crystals in thickness, as well as by regulated movement of ions into and out of the enamel matrix (Lu et al., 2008; Smith et al., 1998). Besides their involvement in crystal formation, ions also contribute to the color of the teeth (Yanagawa et al., 2004). Enamel in humans is characterized by a large diversity of color variations.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2014

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bayne, S. C. 2005. Dental biomaterials: where are we and where are we going? J. Dent. Educ., 69, 571–85.Google ScholarPubMed
Busch, S. 2004. Biomineralization: regeneration of human tooth enamel. Angew. Chem. Int. Edition Engl., 43, 1428–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chatzistavrou, X., Papagerakis, S. and Ma, P. X. and Papagerakis, P. 2012. Innovative approaches to regenerate enamel and dentin. Int. J. Dent., 856470.Google Scholar
Chen, H., Clarkson, B. H., Sun, K. and Mansfield, J. F. 2005. Self-assembly of synthetic hydroxyapatite nanorods into an enamel prism-like structure. J. Colloid Interface Sci., 288, 97–103.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chen, H., Sun, K., Tang, Z. et al. 2006. Synthesis of fluorapatite nanorods and nanowires by direct precipitation from solution. Cryst. Growth Design, 6, 1504–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Du, C., Falini, G., Fermani, S., Abbott, C. and Moradian-Oldak, J. 2005. Supramolecular assembly of amelogenin nanospheres into birefringent microribbons. Science, 307, 1450–4.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gaengler, P., Kremniczky, T. and Arnold, W. H. 2009. In vitro effect of fluoride oral hygiene tablets on artificial caries lesion formation and remineralization in human enamel. BMC Oral Health, 9, 25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Graham, L., Cooper, P. R., Cassidy, N. et al. 2006. The effect of calcium hydroxide on solubilisation of bioactive dentine matrix components. Biomaterials, 27, 2865–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harada, H., Kettunen, P., Jung, H. S. et al. 1999. Localization of putative stem cells in dental epithelium and their association with Notch and FGF signaling. J. Cell Biol., 147, 105–20.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Honda, M. J., Shinmura, Y. and Shinohara, Y. 2009. Enamel tissue engineering using subcultured enamel organ epithelial cells in combination with dental pulp cells. Cells Tissues Organs, 189, 261–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hu, B., Nadiri, A., Kuchler-Bopp, S. et al. 2006. Tissue engineering of tooth crown, root, and periodontiumTissue Eng., 12, 2069–75.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Huang, Z., Sargeant, T. D., Hulvat, J. F. et al. 2008. Bioactive nanofibers instruct cells to proliferate and differentiate during enamel regeneration. J. Bone Miner. Res., 23, 1995–2006.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Huang, Z., Newcomb, C. J., Bringas, P., Stupp, S. I. and Snead, M. L. 2010. Biological synthesis of tooth enamel instructed by an artificial matrix. Biomaterials, 31, 9202–11.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Iijima, M., Moriwaki, Y., Wen, H. B., Fincham, A. G. and Moradian-Oldak, J. 2002. Elongated growth of octacalcium phosphate crystals in recombinant amelogenin gels under controlled ionic flow. J. Dent. Res., 81, 69–73.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Khan, F., Li, W. and Habelitz, S. 2012. Biophysical characterization of synthetic amelogenin C-terminal peptides. Eur. J. Oral Sci., 120, 113–22.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kirkham, J., Firth, A., Vernals, D. et al. 2007. Self-assembling peptide scaffolds promote enamel remineralization. J. Dent. Res., 86, 426–30.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lu, Y., Papagerakis, P., Yamakoshi, Y. et al. 2008. Functions of KLK4 and MMP-20 in dental enamel formation. Biol. Chem., 389, 695–700.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lynch, R. J., Mony, U. and Cate, J. M. 2007. Effect of lesion characteristics and mineralizing solution type on enamel remineralization in vitro. Caries Res., 41, 257–62.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mitsiadis, T. and Papagerakis, P. 2011. Regenerated teeth: the future of tooth replacement? Regen. Med., 6, 135–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nakashima, M. and Reddi, A. H. 2003. The application of bone morphogenetic proteins to dental tissue engineering. Nature Biotechnol., 21, 1025–32.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Oshima, M., Mizuno, M., Imamura, A. et al. 2001. Functional tooth regeneration using a bioengineered tooth unit as a mature organ replacement regenerative therapy. PLoS One, 6, e21531.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ranjitkar, S., Narayana, T., Kaidonis, J. A. et al. 2009. The effect of casein phosphopeptide–amorphous calcium phosphate on erosive dentine wear. Aust. Dent. J., 54, 101–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Roveri, N., Battistella, E., Bianchi, C. L. et al. 2009. Surface enamel remineralization: biomimetic apatite nanocrystals and fluoride ions different effects. J. Nanomater., .
Ruch, J. V. 1990. Patterned distribution of differentiating dental cells: facts and hypotheses. J. Biol. Buccale, 18, 91–8.Google ScholarPubMed
Sato, T., Vries, R. G., Snippert, H. J. et al. 2009. Single Lgr5 stem cells build crypt–villus structures in vitro without a mesenchymal niche. Nature, 459, 262–5.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shinmura, Y., Tsuchiya, S., Hata, K. and Honda, M. J. 2008. Quiescent epithelial cell rests of Malassez can differentiate into ameloblastlike cells. J. Cell Physiol., 217(3), 728–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simmer, J. P., Papagerakis, P., Smith, C. E. et al. 2010. Regulation of dental enamel shape and hardness. J. Dent. Res., 89, 1024–38.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Smith, C. E. 1998. Cellular and chemical events during enamel maturation. Crit. Rev. Oral Biol. Med., 9, 128–61.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Smith, A. J., Lumley, P. J., Tomson, P. L. and Cooper, P. R. 2008. Dental regeneration and materials – a partnership. Clin. Oral Invest., 12, 103–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Van Duinen, R. N., Davidson, C. L., De Gee, A. J. and Feilzer, A. J. 2004. In situ transformation of glass-ionomer into an enamel-like material. Am. J. Dent., 17, 223–7.Google ScholarPubMed
Walker, G. D., Cai, F., Shen, P. et al. 2009. Consumption of milk with added casein phosphopeptide–amorphous calcium phosphate remineralizes enamel subsurface lesions in situ. Aust. Dent. J., 54, 245–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wang, L., Guan, X., Du, C., Moradian-Oldak, J. and Nancollas, G. H. 2007. Amelogenin promotes the formation of elongated microstructures in a controlled crystallization system. J. Phys. Chem. C, 111, 6398–404.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
White, S. N., Luo, W., Paine, M. L. et al. 2001. Biological organization of hydroxyapatite crystallites into a fibrous continuum toughens and controls anisotropy in human enamel. J. Dent. Res., 80, 321–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wiegand, A., Magalhães, A. C., Navarro, R. S. et al. 2010. Effect of titanium tetrafluoride and amine fluoride treatment combined with carbon dioxide laser irradiation on enamel and dentin erosion. Photomed. Laser Surg., 28, 219–26.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Willershausen, B., Schulz-Dobrick, B. and Gleissner, C. 2009. In vitro evaluation of enamel remineralisation by a casein phosphopeptide–amorphous calcium phosphate paste. Oral Health Prev. Dent., 7(1), 13–21.Google ScholarPubMed
Yanagawa, T., Itoh, K., Uwayama, J. et al. 2004. Nrf2 deficiency causes tooth decolourization due to iron transport disorder in enamel organ. Genes Cells, 9, 641–51.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Yan-Zhong, Z., Yan-Yan, H., Jun, Z. 2011. Characteristics of functionalized nano-hydroxyapatite and internalization by human epithelial cell. Nanoscale Res. Lett., 6, 600.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zhang, J., Jiang, D., Zhang, J., Lin, Q. and Huang, Z. 2010. Synthesis of dental enamel-like hydroxyapatite through solution mediated solid-state conversion. Langmuir, 26, 2989–94.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zhu, D., Paine, M. L., Luo, W., Bringas, P. and Snead, M. L. 2006. Altering biomineralization by protein design. J. Biol. Chem., 281, 21173–82.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×