Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-xfwgj Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-23T10:00:20.794Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

12 - Evolutionary Novelty and the Behaviour of Introduced Predators

from Part II - Behavioural Interactions Between Invaders and Native Species

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 October 2016

By
Edwin D. Grosholz  and
Elizabeth H. Wells
Edited by
Judith S. Weis  and
Daniel Sol
Judith S. Weis
Affiliation:
Rutgers University, New Jersey
Daniel Sol
Affiliation:
National Spanish Research Council (CSIC)
Get access

Summary

A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Biological Invasions and Animal Behaviour , pp. 199 - 218
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2016

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Albins, M.A. and Hixon, M.A. (2008). Invasive Indo-Pacific lionfish (Pterois volitans) reduce recruitment of Atlantic coral-reef fishes. Marine Ecology Progress Series, 367(1), 233–238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blackburn, T.M., Cassey, P., Duncan, R.P., Evans, K.L. and Gaston, K.J. (2004). Avian extinction and mammalian introductions on oceanic islands. Science, 305(5692), 1955–1958.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Blossey, B. and Notzold, R. (1995). Evolution of increased competitive ability in invasive nonindigenous plants: a hypothesis Journal of Ecology, 83(5), 887–889.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Braby, C.E. and Somero, G.N. (2006). Ecological gradients and relative abundance of native (Mytilus trossulus) and invasive (Mytilus galloprovincialis) blue mussels in the California hybrid zone. Marine Biology, 148(6), 1249–1262.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bryant, M.E. and Arnold, J.D. (2007). Diets of age-0 striped bass in the San Francisco Estuary, 1973–(2002). California Fish and Game, 93(1), 1–22.Google Scholar
Buhle, E.R. and Ruesink, J.L. (2009). Impacts of invasive oyster drills on Olympia oyster (Ostrea lurida Carpenter 1864) recovery in Willapa Bay, Washington, United States. Journal of Shellfish Research, 28(1), 87–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Callaway, R.M. and Ridenour, W.M. (2004). Novel weapons: invasive success and the evolution of increased competitive ability. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 2(8), 436–443.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carlton, J.T. (1992). Introduced marine and estuarine mollusks of North America: An end-of-the-20th-century perspective. Journal of Shellfish Research, 11(2), 489–505.Google Scholar
Carthey, A.J.R. and Banks, P.B. (2014). Naïveté in novel ecological interactions: lessons from theory and experimental evidence. Biological Reviews, 89(4), 932–949.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chapin, F.S., Zavaleta, E.S., Eviner, V.T., et al. (2000). Consequences of changing biodiversity. Nature, 405(6783), 234–242.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cheng, B. and Hovel, K. (2010). Biotic resistance to invasion along an estuarine gradient. Oecologia, 164(4), 1049–1059.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Clarke, K. and Gorley, R. (2015). PRIMER v7: User Manual/Tutorial. Plymouth, UK: PRIMER-E.Google Scholar
Cox, J.G. and Lima, S.L. (2006). Naïveté and an aquatic-terrestrial dichotomy in the effects of introduced predators. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 21(12), 674–680.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crawley, M.J. (1987). What makes a community invasible? In Colonization, Succession, and Stability: the 26th Symposium of the British Ecological Society held jointly with the Linnean Society of London, ed. Gray, A.J., Crawley, M.J. and Edwards, P.J. Boston, UK: Blackwell Scientific Publications, pp. 429–453.Google Scholar
Crooks, J.A. (2005). Lag times and exotic species: the ecology and management of biological invasions in slow-motion. Ecoscience, 12(3), 316–329.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Darwin, C. (1872). On the Origin of Species. London: John Murray.Google Scholar
de Rivera, C.E., Ruiz, G.M., Hines, A.H. and Jivoff, P. (2005). Biotic resistance to invasion: native predator limits abundance and distribution of an introduced crab. Ecology, 86(12), 3364–3376.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elton, C.S. (1958). The Ecology of Invasions by Animals and Plants. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Emlen, J.M. (1966). Role of time and energy in food preference. American Naturalist, 100(916), 611–617.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ferrari, M.C.O., Gonzalo, A., Messier, F. and Chivers, D.P. (2007). Generalization of learned predator recognition: an experimental test and framework for future studies. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 274(1620), 1853–1859.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ferrari, M.C.O., Messier, F., Chivers, D.P. and Messier, O. (2008). Can prey exhibit threat-sensitive generalization of predator recognition? Extending the predator recognition continuum hypothesis. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 275(1644), 1811–1816.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Freeman, A.S. and Byers, J.E. (2006). Divergent induced responses to an invasive predator in marine mussel populations. Science, 313(5788), 831–833.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Freeman, A.S., Dernbach, E., Marcos, C. and Koob, E. (2014). Biogeographic contrast of Nucella lapillus responses to Carcinus maenas. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology, 452, 1–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fritts, T.H. and Rodda, G.H. (1998). The role of introduced species in the degradation of island ecosystems: a case history of Guam. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 29, 113–140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grabowski, J.H. and Kimbro, D.L. (2005). Predator-avoidance behavior extends trophic cascades to refuge habitats. Ecology, 86(5), 1312–1319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grosholz, E.D. and Ruiz, G.M. (2003). Biological invasions drive size increases in marine and estuarine invertebrates. Ecology Letters, 6(8), 700–705.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grosholz, E.D. (2005). Recent biological invasion may hasten invasional meltdown by accelerating historical introductions. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 102(4), 1088–1091.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hastings, A., Cuddington, K., Davies, K.F., et al. (2005). The spatial spread of invasions: new developments in theory and evidence. Ecology Letters, 8(1), 91–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hays, W.S.T. and Conant, S. (2007). Biology and impacts of Pacific Island invasive species. 1. A worldwide review of effects of the small Indian mongoose, Herpestes javanicus (Carnivora: Herpestidae). Pacific Science, 61(1), 3–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hearn, C.J. and Largier, J.L. (1997). The summer buoyancy dynamics of a shallow Mediterranean estuary and some effects of changing bathymetry: Tomales bay, California. Estuarine Coastal and Shelf Science, 45(4), 497–506.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hierro, J.L., Maron, J.L. and Callaway, R.M. (2005). A biogeographical approach to plant invasions: the importance of studying exotics in their introduced and native range. Journal of Ecology, 93(1), 5–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jeschke, J.M. and Strayer, D.L. (2005). Invasion success of vertebrates in Europe and North America. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 102(20), 7198–7202.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Joshi, J. and Vrieling, K. (2005). The enemy release and EICA hypothesis revisited: incorporating the fundamental difference between specialist and generalist herbivores. Ecology Letters, 8(7), 704–714.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keane, R.M. and Crawley, M.J. (2002). Exotic plant invasions and the enemy release hypothesis. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 17(4), 164–170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kimbro, D.L., Largier, J. and Grosholz, E.D. (2009). Coastal oceanographic processes influence the growth and size of a key estuarine species, the Olympia oyster. Limnology and Oceanography, 54(5), 1425–1437.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kimbro, D.L., Cheng, B.S. and Grosholz, E.D. (2013). Biotic resistance in marine environments. Ecology Letters, 16(6), 821–833.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Knapp, R.A. and Matthews, K.R. (2000). Non-native fish introductions and the decline of the mountain yellow-legged frog from within protected areas. Conservation Biology, 14(2), 428–438.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kumar, A.S. and Bais, H.P. (2010). Allelopathy and exotic plant invasion. In Plant Communication from an Ecological Perspective, ed. Baluška, F. and Ninkovic, V. Berlin: Springer, pp. 61–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kushner, R.B. and Hovel, K.A. (2006). Effects of native predators and eelgrass habitat structure on the introduced Asian mussel Musculista senhousia (Benson in Cantor) in southern California. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology, 332(2), 166–177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lawler, S.P., Dritz, D., Strange, T. and Holyoak, M. (1999). Effects of introduced mosquitofish and bullfrogs on the threatened California red‐legged frog. Conservation Biology, 13(3), 613–622.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levine, J.M., Adler, P.B. and Yelenik, S.G. (2004). A meta-analysis of biotic resistance to exotic plant invasions. Ecology Letters, 7(10), 975–989.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lodge, D.M. (1993). Biological invasions: lessons for ecology. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 8(4), 133–137.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lodge, D.M., Williams, S., MacIsaac, H.J., et al. (2006). Biological invasions: recommendations for US policy and management. Ecological Applications, 16(6), 2035–2054.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Louda, S.M., Pemberton, R.W., Johnson, M.T. and Follett, P. (2003). Nontarget effects – the Achilles' heel of biological control? Retrospective analyses to reduce risk associated with biocontrol introductions. Annual Review of Entomology, 48(1), 365–396.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
MacArthur, R.H. and Pianka, E.R. (1966). On optimal use of a patchy environment. American Naturalist, 100(916), 603–609.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mack, R.N., Simberloff, D., Lonsdale, W., Evans, H., Clout, M. and Bazzaz, F.A. (2000). Biotic invasions: causes, epidemiology, global consequences, and control. Ecological Applications, 10(3), 689–710.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maron, J.L. and Vilà, M. (2001). When do herbivores affect plant invasion? Evidence for the natural enemies and biotic resistance hypotheses. Oikos, 95(3), 361–373.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McMahon, K., Conboy, A., O'Byrne-White, E., Thomas, R.J. and Marples, N.M. (2014). Dietary wariness influences the response of foraging birds to competitors. Animal Behavior, 89, 63–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McWilliam, R.A., Minchinton, T.E. and Ayre, D.J. (2013). Despite prolonged association in closed populations, an intertidal predator does not prefer abundant local prey to novel prey. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society, 108(4), 812–820.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mitchell, C.E. and Power, A.G. (2003). Release of invasive plants from fungal and viral pathogens. Nature, 421(6923), 625–627.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Müller-Schärer, H., Schaffner, U. and Steinger, T. (2004). Evolution in invasive plants: implications for biological control. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 19(8), 417–422.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ogutuohwayo, R. (1990). The decline of the native fishes of Lakes Victoria and Kyoga (East-Africa) and the impact of introduced species, especially the Nile Perch, Lates niloticus, and the Nile Tilapia, Oreochromis niloticus. Environmental Biology of Fishes, 27(2), 81–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parker, J.D., Burkepile, D.E. and Hay, M.E. (2006). Opposing effects of native and exotic herbivores on plant invasions. Science, 311(5766), 1459–1461.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pearse, I.S. and Hipp, A.L. (2009). Phylogenetic and trait similarity to a native species predict herbivory on non-native oaks. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 106(43), 18097–18102.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Perry, D.M. (1987). Optimal diet theory: behavior of a starved predatory snail. Oecologia, 72(3), 360–365.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Phillips, B.L. and Shine, R. (2004). Adapting to an invasive species: toxic cane toads induced morphological change in Australian snakes. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 101(49), 17150–17155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pierce, G.J. and Ollason, J.G. (1987). Eight reasons why optimal foraging theory is a complete waste of time. Oikos, 49(1), 111–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pimentel, D., Zuniga, R. and Morrison, D. (2005). Update on the environmental and economic costs associated with alien-invasive species in the United States. Ecological Economics, 52(3), 273–288.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pyke, G.H., Pulliam, H.R. and Charnov, E.L. (1977). Optimal foraging: selective review of theory and tests. Quarterly Review of Biology, 52(2), 137–154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reusch, T.B.H. (1998). Native predators contribute to invasion resistance to the non-indigenous bivalve Musculista senhousia in southern California, USA. Marine Ecology Progress Series, 170, 159–168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ricciardi, A. and Mottiar, M. (2006). Does Darwin's naturalization hypothesis explain fish invasions? Biological Invasions, 8(6), 1403–1407.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rittschof, D., Kieber, D. and Merrill, C. (1984). Modification of responses of newly hatched snails by exposure to odors during development. Chemical Senses, 9(3), 181–192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robbins, T.R., Freidenfelds, N.A. and Langkilde, T. (2013). Native predator eats invasive toxic prey: evidence for increased incidence of consumption rather than aversion-learning. Biological Invasions, 15(2), 407–415.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Salo, P., Korpomaki, E., Banks, P.B., Nordstrom, M. and Dickman, C.R. (2007). Alien predators are more dangerous than native predators to prey populations. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 274(1615), 1237–1243.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sih, A., Bolnick, D.I., Luttbeg, B., et al. (2010). Predator–prey naïveté, antipredator behavior, and the ecology of predator invasions. Oikos, 119(4), 610–621.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sih, A. and Christensen, B. (2001). Optimal diet theory: when does it work, and when and why does it fail? Animal Behavior, 61, 379–390.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simberloff, D. and Stiling, P. (1996). How risky is biological control? Ecology, 77(7), 1965–1974.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simberloff, D., Dayan, T., Jones, C. and Ogura, G. (2000). Character displacement and release in the small Indian mongoose, Herpestes javanicus. Ecology 81(8): 2086–2099.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, L.D. (2004). Biogeographic differences in claw size and performance in an introduced crab predator Carcinus maenas. Marine Ecology Progress Series, 276, 209–222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stiling, P. and Cornelissen, T. (2005). What makes a successful biocontrol agent? A meta-analysis of biological control agent performance. Biological Control, 34(3), 236–246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Suboski, M.D. (1992). Releaser-induced recognition learning by gastropod mollusks. Behavioral Processes, 27(1), 1–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Torchin, M.E. and Mitchell, C.E. (2004). Parasites, pathogens, and invasions by plants and animals. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 2(4), 183–190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Torchin, M.E., Lafferty, K.D., Dobson, A.P., McKenzie, V.J. and Kuris, A.M. (2003). Introduced species and their missing parasites. Nature, 421(6923), 628–630.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Trussell, G.C. (1996). Phenotypic plasticity in an intertidal snail: the role of a common crab predator. Evolution, 50(1), 448–454.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Trussell, G.C. and Nicklin, M.O. (2002). Cue sensitivity, inducible defense, and trade-offs in a marine snail. Ecology, 83(6), 1635–1647.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Turner, A.M. (2008). Predator diet and prey behavior: freshwater snails discriminate among closely related prey in a predator's diet. Animal Behavior, 76, 1211–1217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Verhoeven, K.J.F., Biere, A., Harvey, J.A. and van der Putten, W.H. (2009). Plant invaders and their novel natural enemies: who is naive? Ecology Letters, 12(2), 107–117.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Webb, J.K., Brown, G.P., Child, T., et al. (2008). A native dasyurid predator (common planigale, Planigale maculata) rapidly learns to avoid a toxic invader. Austral Ecology, 33(7), 821–829.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wells, E.H. (2013). Evolutionary novelty and naïveté in invertebrate predator-prey interactions in a benthic marine community. PhD dissertation. Davis, CA: University of California.Google Scholar
Weissburg, M., Smee, D.L. and Ferner, M.C. (2014). The sensory ecology of nonconsumptive predator effects. American Naturalist, 184(2), 141–157.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Werner, E.E. and Hall, D.J. (1974). Optimal foraging and size selection of prey by bluegill sunfish (Lepomis macrochirus). Ecology, 55(5), 1042–1052.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williamson, M. and Fitter, A. (1996). The varying success of invaders. Ecology, 77(6), 1661–1666.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×