Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-25wd4 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T17:42:09.263Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

10 - Anosognosia and denial after right hemisphere stroke

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 October 2009

By
Anne Peskine  and
Philippe Azouvi
Edited by
Olivier Godefroy  and
Julien Bogousslavsky
Anne Peskine
Affiliation:
University of Versailles-Saint-Quentin, France
Philippe Azouvi
Affiliation:
University of Versailles-Saint-Quentin, France
Olivier Godefroy
Affiliation:
Université de Picardie Jules Verne, Amiens
Julien Bogousslavsky
Affiliation:
Université de Lausanne, Switzerland
Get access

Summary

General presentation of anosognosia

Anosognosia is a puzzling condition. It refers to patients suffering from various neurological impairments who deny or lack awareness of their deficits, although these deficits may have serious consequences in their everyday life. Studying anosognosia is important for two reasons. The first one is a practical reason. Indeed, as pointed out by Heilman (1991), anosognosia is not a trivial problem. It may impair patients' motivation to engage in a rehabilitation program, and anosognosia has repeatedly been found associated with poor functional recovery from stroke. But studying anosognosia is also of great theoretical importance, as it may help our understanding of the complex relationships between brain injury and various forms of consciousness. However, despite this, anosognosia remains one of the least studied of the major neuropsychological symptoms after stroke, and its pathophysiology is still very poorly understood.

Detailed historical review of anosognosia have been published recently (Bisiach and Geminiani, 1991; Prigatano and Schacter, 1991). First observations of patients with impaired awareness of neurological deficits were reported in the late nineteenth century by von Monakow in 1885 and by Anton in 1889 in cases of cortical blindness. It seems that Pick, in 1898, was actually the first to report unawareness of left hemiplegia, but it was Joseph Babinski who first coined the term “anosognosia,” and his contribution, at a meeting held by the French Neurological Society on June 11, 1914, remains a landmark in the field (Babinski, 1914).

Type
Chapter
Information
The Behavioral and Cognitive Neurology of Stroke , pp. 198 - 214
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2007

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adair, J. C., Na, D. L., et al. (1995). Anosognosia for hemiplegia: Test of the personal neglect hypothesis. Neurology, 45, 2195–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Anderson, S. W. and Tranel, D. (1989). Awareness of disease states following cerebral infarction, dementia, and head trauma: Standardized assessment. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 3, 327–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Appelros, P., Karlsson, G. M., et al. (2002). Neglect and anosognosia after first-ever stroke: incidence and relationship to disability. J. Rehabil. Med., 34(5), 215–20.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Appelros, P., Karlsson, G. M., et al. (2003). Prognosis for patients with neglect and anosognosia with special reference to cognitive impairment. J. Rehabil. Med., 35(6), 254–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Azouvi, P., Marchal, F., et al. (1996). Functional consequences and awareness of unilateral neglect: Study of an evaluation scale. Neuropsychol. Rehabil., 6, 133–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Azouvi, P., Olivier, S., et al. (2003). Behavioral assessment of unilateral neglect: Study of the psychometric properties of the Catherine Bergego Scale. Arch. Phys. Med. Rehabil., 84, 51–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Azouvi, P., Samuel, C., et al. (2002). Sensitivity of clinical and behavioral tests of spatial neglect after right hemisphere stroke. J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry, 73, 160–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Babinski, J. (1914). Contribution à l'étude des troubles mentaux dans l'hémiplégie organique cérébrale (Anosognosie). Rev. Neurol., 27, 845–8.Google Scholar
Beis, J., Keller, C., et al. (2004). Right spatial neglect after left hemisphere stroke: Qualitative and quantitative study. Neurology, 63, 1600–5.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bergego, C., Azouvi, P., et al. (1995). Validation d'une échelle d'évaluation fonctionnelle de l'héminégligence dans la vie quotidienne: l'échelle CB. Annales de Réadaptation et de Médecine Physique, 38, 183–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berti, A., Ladavas, E., et al. (1996). Anosognosia for hemiplegia, neglect dyslexia, and drawing neglect: clinical findings and theoretical considerations. J. Int. Neuropsychol. Soc., 2(5), 426–40.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Berti, A., Ladavas, E., et al. (1998). Anosognosia for motor impairment and dissociations with patients' evaluation of the disorder: Theoretical considerations. Cogn. Neuropsychiatry, 3, 21–44.Google Scholar
Bisiach, E. and Geminiani, G. (1991). Anosognosia related to hemiplegia and hemianopia. In Awareness of Deficit after Brain Injury, ed. Prigatano, G. P. and Schacter, D. L.. New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 17–39.Google Scholar
Bisiach, E., Vallar, G., et al. (1986). Unawareness of disease following lesions of the right hemisphere: anosognosia for hemiplegia and anosognosia for hemianopia. Neuropsychologia, 24, 471–82.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cocchini, G., Beschin, N., et al. (2002). Chronic anosognosia: a case report and theoretical account. Neuropsychologia, 40(12), 2030–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Critchley, M. (1953). The Parietal Lobes. London: Hafner Press.Google Scholar
Critchley, M. (1974). Misoplegia or hatred of hemiplegia. M. Sinai J. Med., 41, 82–7.Google ScholarPubMed
Cutting, J. (1978). Study of anosognosia. J. Neurol., Neurosurg. Psychiatry, 41, 548–55.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dauriac-Le Masson, V., Mailhan, L., et al. (2002). Double dissociation entre négligence unilatérale gauche et anosognosie. Rev. Neurol., 158, 427–30.Google Scholar
Denes, G., Semenza, C., et al. (1982). Unilateral spatial neglect and recovery from hemiplegia. Brain, 105, 543–52.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ellis, S. and Small, M. (1997). Localization of lesion in denial of hemiplegia after acute stroke. Stroke, 28(1), 67–71.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fullerton, K. J., McSherry, D., et al. (1986). Albert's test: A neglected test of perceptual neglect.” Lancet, 1, 430–2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gerstmann, J. (1942). Problems of imperception of disease and of impaired body territories with organic lesions. Arch. Neurol. Psychiatry, 48, 890–913.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Geschwind, N. (1965a). Disconnexion syndromes in animals and man. I. Brain, 88(2), 237–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Geschwind, N. (1965b). Disconnexion syndromes in animals and man. II. Brain, 88(3), 585–644.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gialanella, B. and Mattioli, F. (1992). Anosognosia and extrapersonal neglect as predictors of functional recovery following right hemisphere stroke. Neuropsychol. Rehabil., 2, 169–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gilmore, R. L., Heilman, K. M., et al. (1992). Anosognosia during Wada testing. Neurology, 42(4), 925–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Heilman, K. M. (1991). Anosognosia: Possible neuropsychological mechanisms. In Awareness of Deficit after Brain Injury, ed. Prigatano, G. P. and Schacter, D. L.. New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 53–62.Google Scholar
Held, J. P., Pierrot-Deseilligny, E., et al. (1975). Devenir des hémiplégies vasculaires par atteinte sylvienne en fonction du côté de la lésion. Annales de Réadaptation et de Médecine Physique, 18, 592–604.Google Scholar
Hier, D. B., Mondlock, J., et al. (1983a). Behavioral abnormalities after right hemisphere stroke. Neurology, 33, 337–344.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hier, D. B., Mondlock, J., et al. (1983b). Recovery of behavioral abnormalities after right hemisphere stroke. Neurology, 33, 345–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hurwitz, L. J. and Adams, G. F. (1972). Rehabilitation of hemiplegia: indices of assessment and prognosis. Br. Med. J., 1(792), 94–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jehkonen, M., Ahonen, J. P., et al. (2000). Visual neglect as a predictor of functional outcome one year after stroke. Acta Neurol. Scand., 101(3), 195–201.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kalra, L., Perez, I., et al. (1997). The influence of visual neglect on stroke rehabilitation. Stroke, 28, 1386–91.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Katz, N., Hartman-Maeir, A., et al. (1999). Functional disability and rehabilitation outcome in right hemisphere damaged patients with and without unilateral spatial neglect. Arch. Phys. Med. Rehabil., 80(4), 379–84.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Levine, D. N., Calvanio, R., et al. (1991). The pathogenesis of anosognosia for hemiplegia. Neurology, 41, 1770–81.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Marcel, A. J., Tegner, R., et al. (2004). Anosognosia for plegia: specificity, extension, partiality and disunity of bodily unawareness. Cortex, 40(1), 19–40.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McGlynn, S. M. and Schacter, D. L. (1989). Unawareness of deficits in neuropsychological syndromes. J. Clin. Exp. Neuropsychol., 11(2), 143–205.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Paolucci, S., Antonucci, G., et al. (1996a). Predicting stroke in patient rehabilitation outcome: The prominent role of neuropsychological disorders. Eur. Neurol., 36, 385–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Paolucci, S., Antonucci, G., et al. (1996b). Facilitatory effect of neglect rehabilitation on the recovery of left hemiplegic stroke patients: A cross-over study. J. Neurol., 243, 308–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pedersen, P. M., Jorgensen, H. S., et al. (1996). Frequency, determinants, and consequences of ansosognosia in acute stroke. J. Neurol. Rehabil., 10, 243–50.Google Scholar
Pedersen, P. M., Jorgensen, H. S., et al. (1997). Hemineglect in acute stroke. Incidence and prognostic implications. The Copenhagen stroke study. Am. J. Phy. Med. Rehabil., 76, 122–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pia, L., Neppi-Modona, M., et al. (2004). The anatomy of anosognosia for hemiplegia: a meta-analysis. Cortex, 40(2), 367–77.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Prigatano, G. P. and Altman, I. M. (1990). Impaired awareness of behavioral limitations after traumatic brain injury. Arch. Phys. Med. Rehabil., 71, 1058–64.Google ScholarPubMed
Prigatano, G. P., Altman, I. M., et al. (1990). Behavioral limitations that traumatic-brain-injured patients tend to underestimate. Clinical Neuropsychologist, 4, 163–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prigatano, G. P. and Schacter, D. L. (1991). Awareness of Deficit after Brain Injury: Clinical and Theoretical Issues. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Rode, G., Charles, N., et al. (1992). Partial remission of hemiplegia and somatoparaphrenia through vestibular stimulation in a case of unilateral neglect. Cortex, 28, 203–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rode, G., Perenin, M. T., et al. (1998). Improvement of the motor deficit of neglect patients through vestibular stimulation: evidence for a motor neglect component. Cortex, 34(2), 253–61.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Small, M. and Ellis, S. (1996). Denial of hemiplegia: an investigation into the theories of causation. Eur. Neurol., 36(6), 353–63.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Starkstein, S. E., Fedoroff, J. P., et al. (1992). Anosognosia in patients with cerebrovascular lesions: A study of causative factors. Stroke, 23, 1446–53.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stone, S. P., Halligan, P. W., et al. (1993). The incidence of neglect phenomena and related disorders in patients with an acute right or left hemisphere stroke. Age Ageing, 22, 46–52.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sundet, K., Finset, A., et al. (1988). Neuropsychological predictors in stroke rehabilitation. J. Clin. Exp. Neuropsychol, 10(4), 363–79.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Vallar, G., Bottini, G., et al. (2003). Anosognosia for left-sided motor and sensory deficits, motor neglect, and sensory hemiinattention: is there a relationship?Prog. Brain Res., 142, 289–301.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Venneri, A. and Shanks, M. F. (2004). Belief and awareness: reflections on a case of persistent anosognosia. Neuropsychologia, 42(2), 230–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Vuilleumier, P. (2000). Anosognosia. In Behavior and Mood Disorders in Focal Brain Lesions. ed. Bogousslavsky, J. and Cummings, J. L.. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, pp. 465–519.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vuilleumier, P. (2004). Anosognosia: the neurology of beliefs and uncertainties. Cortex, 40(1), 9–17.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wade, D. T., Skilbeck, C. E., et al. (1983). Predicting Barthel ADL score at 6 months after an acute stroke. Arch. Phys. Med. Rehabil., 64, 24–8.Google ScholarPubMed
Weinstein, E. A. and Kahn, R. L. (1953). Personality factors in denial of illness. AMA Arch. Neurol. Psychiatry, 69(3), 355–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Willanger, R., Danielsen, U. T., et al. (1981). Denial and neglect of hemiparesis in right-sided apoplectic lesions. Acta Neurol. Scand., 64(5), 310–26.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×