Bibliography

Aletta J. Norval

doi:10.1017/CBO9780511490316.007

Abizadeh, A., ‘Banishing the particular. Rousseau on rhetoric, patrie, and the passions’, Political Theory 29, no. 4 (2001), 556–82.CrossRef Google Scholar

Ackerman, B. and Fishkin, J. S., ‘Deliberation day’, The Journal of Political Philosophy 10, no. 2 (2002), 129–52.CrossRef Google Scholar

Akkerman, T., ‘Urban debates and deliberative democracy’, Acta Politika 1 (2001), 71–87.Google Scholar

Aronovitch, H., ‘The political importance of analogical argument’, Political Studies 45 (1997), 78–92.CrossRef Google Scholar

Austin, J. L., How to Do Things with Words, ed. Urmson, J. O., and Sbisà, M. (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1962).Google Scholar

Badiou, A., Ethics. An Essay on the Understanding of Evil, trans. Peter Hallward (London: Verso, 2001).Google Scholar

Baker, G. P. and Hacker, P. M. S., Wittgenstein. Meaning and Understanding, Essays on the Philosophical Investigations, vol. i (Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1983).Google Scholar

Balibar, E., ‘Ambiguous universality’, Differences: A Journal of Feminist Cultural Studies 7, no. 1 (1995), 48–74.Google Scholar

Barber, B. R., Strong Democracy (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1984).Google Scholar

Barber, B. R., ‘Foundationalism and democracy’, in Benhabib, S. (ed.), Democracy and Difference. Contesting the Boundaries of the Political (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1996), pp. 348–59.Google Scholar

Basu, A., ‘Dialogic ethics and the virtue of humor’, The Journal of Political Philosophy 7, no. 4 (1999), 378–403.CrossRef Google Scholar

Barthes, R., S/Z, trans. R. Millar (Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1974).Google Scholar

Baz, A., ‘What’s the point of seeing aspects?’, Philosophical Investigations 23, no. 2 (2000), 97–121.CrossRef Google Scholar

Bender, J. and D. E. Wellbery, ‘Rhetoricality: On the modernist return of rhetoric’, in Bender, J. and Wellbery, D. E. (eds.), The Ends of Rhetoric. History, Theory, Practice (Stanford, Calif.: Stanford University Press, 1990), pp. 3–39.Google Scholar

Benhabib, S., ‘The democratic moment and the problem of difference’, in Benhabib, S. (ed.), Democracy and Difference. Contesting the Boundaries of the Political (Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 1996), pp. 3–18.Google Scholar

Benhabib, S., ‘Toward a deliberative model of democratic legitimacy’, in Benhabib, S. (ed.), Democracy and Difference. Contesting the Boundaries of the Political (Princeton, N. J.: Princeton University Press, 1996), pp. 67–94.Google Scholar

Benhabib, S., ‘Liberal dialogue versus a critical theory of discursive legitimation’, in Rosenblum, N. L. (ed.), Liberalism and the Moral Life (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1998), pp. 143–56.Google Scholar

Bernstein, R. J., The New Constellation. The Ethical–Political Horizons of Modernity/Postmodernity (Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, 1992).Google Scholar

Bernstein, R. J., ‘ “Laws, morals, and ethics”: The retrieval of the democratic ethos’, Cardozo Law Review 17 (1996), 1127–46.Google Scholar

Blaug, R., ‘New theories of discursive democracy’, Philosophy and Social Criticism 22, no. 1 (1996), 49–80.CrossRef Google Scholar

Bohman, J., ‘Emancipation and rhetoric: The perlocutions and illocutions of the social critic’, Philosophy and Rhetoric 21, no. 3 (1988), 185–204.Google Scholar

Bohman, J., ‘Critical theory and democracy’, in Rasmussen, D. M. (ed.), Handbook of Critical Theory (Oxford: Blackwell, 1996), pp. 190–215.Google Scholar

Bohman, J., Public Deliberation. Pluralism, Complexity, and Democracy (Cambridge, Mass.: The MIT Press, 1996).Google Scholar

Bohman, J., ‘Two versions of the linguistic turn: Habermas and poststructuralism’, in D’Entrèves, M. Passerin and Benhabib, S. (eds.), Habermas and the Unfinished Project of Modernity (Cambridge: Polity Press, 1996), pp. 197–220.Google Scholar

Bohman, J., ‘ “When water chokes”: Ideology, communication, and practical rationality’, Constellations 7, no. 3 (2000), 382–92.CrossRef Google Scholar

Borradori, G., Philosophy in a Time of Terror. Dialogues with Jürgen Habermas and Jacques Derrida (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2003).Google Scholar

Boraine, A., ‘Truth and reconciliation in South Africa’, in Rotberg, R. I. and Thompson, D. (eds.), Truth v. Justice. The Morality of Truth Commissions (Princeton, N. J.: Princeton University Press, 2000), pp. 141–57.CrossRef Google Scholar

Bouveresse, J., Wittgenstein Reads Freud, trans. C. Cosman (Princeton, N. J.: Princeton University Press, 1995).Google Scholar

Brennan, W. J., ‘Reason, passion and “the progress of the law”’, Cardozo Law Review 10 (1988), 3–23.Google Scholar

Brockelman, T., ‘The failure of the radical democratic imaginary: Žižek versus Laclau and Mouffe on vestigial utopia’, Philosophy and Social Criticism 29 (2003), 183–208.CrossRef Google Scholar

Butler, J., ‘Critically queer’, in Butler, J., Bodies that Matter (London: Routledge, 1993).Google Scholar

Butler, J. and Laclau, E., ‘The uses of equality’, diacritics 27, no. 1 (1995), 3–19.Google Scholar

Butler, J., Laclau, E. and Žižek, S., Contingency, Hegemony, Universality. Contemporary Dialogues on the Left, Phronesis (London: Verso, 2000).Google Scholar

Caputo, J. D., ‘Without sovereignty, without being: Unconditionality, the coming God and Derrida’s democracy to come’, Journal for Cultural and Religious Theory 4 (2003), 9–26.Google Scholar

Cavell, S., Must We Mean What We Say? (New York: Charles Scribner’s Sons, 1976).Google Scholar

Cavell, S., The Claim of Reason. Wittgenstein, Skepticism, Morality, and Tragedy (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1982).Google Scholar

Cavell, S., This New Yet Unapproachable America (Alburquerque, N. Mex.: Living Batch Press, 1989).Google Scholar

Cavell, S., Conditions Handsome and Unhandsome. The Constitution of Emersonian Perfectionism, The Carus Lectures, 1988 (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1990).Google Scholar

Cavell, S., ‘What is the Emersonian event? A comment on Kateb’s Emerson’, New Literary History, 25 (1994), 951–8.CrossRef Google Scholar

Cavell, S., Cities of Words. Pedagogical Letters on a Register of the Moral Life (Cambridge, Mass.: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, 2004).Google Scholar

Cavell, S., Philosophy the Day after Tomorrow (Cambridge, Mass.: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, 2005).Google Scholar

Cavell, S. ‘The incessance and absence of the political’, in Norris, A. (ed.), The Claim to Community. Essays on Stanley Cavell and Political Philosophy (Stanford, Calif.: Stanford University Press, 2006), pp. 263–317.Google Scholar

Chambers, S. A., ‘The language of disagreement’. Paper delivered to the Poststructuralism and Radical Politics Conferece: ‘Fidelity to the Disagreement: Jacques Rancière and the Political’, Goldsmiths College, London, 16–17 September 2003. See (www.homepages.gold.ac.uk/psrpsg/ranciere.doc).

Chambers, S. A., ‘The politics of literality’ (http://muse.jhu.edu/journals/theory_and_event/toc/archive.html#8.3).

Chambers, S., Reasonable Democracy. Jürgen Habermas and the Politics of Discourse (London: Cornell University Press, 1996).Google Scholar

Churchill, J., ‘Rat and mole’s epiphany of Pan: Wittgenstein on seeing aspects and religious belief’, Philosophical Investigations 21, no. 4 (1998), 152–72.CrossRef Google Scholar

Cohen, J., ‘Democracy and liberty’, in Elster, J. (ed.), Deliberative Democracy (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998), pp. 185–231.CrossRef Google Scholar

Coles, R., ‘Of democracy, discourse, and dirt virtue’, Political Theory 28 (2000), 540–64.CrossRef Google Scholar

Conant, J., ‘Nietzsche’s perfectionism: A reading of Schopenhauer as Educator’, in Schacht, R. (ed.), Nietzsche’s Postmoralism (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001), pp. 181–257.Google Scholar

Connolly, W. E., Identity\Difference. Democratic Negotiations of Political Paradox (Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press, 1991).Google Scholar

Connolly, W. E., ‘Democracy and contingency’, in Carens, J. H. (ed.), Democracy and Possessive Individualism. The Intellectual Legacy of C. B. Macpherson (Albany: State University of New York Press, 1993), pp. 193–219.Google Scholar

Connolly, W. E., The Ethos of Pluralization (Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1995).Google Scholar

Connolly, W. E., ‘Twilight of the idols’, Philosophy and Social Criticism 21 (1995), 127–37.CrossRef Google Scholar

Connolly, W. E., ‘Speed, concentric cultures, and cosmopolitanism’, Political Theory 28, no. 5 (2000), 596–618.CrossRef Google Scholar

Coombes, A. E., History after Apartheid. Visual Culture and Public Memory in a Democratic South Africa (Durham, N. C.: Duke University Press, 2003).CrossRef Google Scholar

Copi, I. M. and Cohen, C., Introduction to Logic, 9th edn (New York: Macmillan, 1994).Google Scholar

Cornell, D., ‘ “Convention” and critique’, Cardozo Law Review7 (1986), 679–91.Google Scholar

Critchley, S., The Ethics of Deconstruction. Derrida and Levinas (Oxford: Blackwell, 1992).Google Scholar

Critchley, S. and Marchart, O. (eds.), Laclau. A Critical Reader (Abingdon, Oxon.: Routledge, 2004).Google Scholar

Crusius, T. W., ‘Foreword’, in E. Grassi, Rhetoric as Philosophy, trans. J. M. Krois and A. Azodi (Carbondale and Edwardsville: Southern Illinois University Press, 2001), pp. xi–xviii.Google Scholar

Dallmayer, F. R., ‘Critical theory criticized’, Philosophy of the Social Sciences 2, no. 3 (1972), 211–29.Google Scholar

Dallmayr, F., ‘Laclau and hegemony: Some (post) Hegelian caveats’, in Critchley, S. and Marchart, O. (eds.), Laclau. A Critical Reader (Abingdon, Oxon.: Routledge, 2004), pp. 35–53.Google Scholar

Deranty, J. -P, ‘Jacques Rancière’s contribution to the ethics of recognition’, Political Theory, 31, no. 1 (2003), 136–56.CrossRef Google Scholar

Derrida, J., Speech and Phenomena, trans. D. B. Allison (Evanston, Ill.: Northwestern University Press, 1973).Google Scholar

Derrida, J., Of Grammatology, trans. G. Spivak (Baltimore, Md.: The Johns Hopkins University Press, 1974).Google Scholar

Derrida, J., Limited Inc. (Evanston, Ill.: Northwestern University Press, 1988).Google Scholar

Derrida, J., ‘Politics and friendship. A discussion with Jacques Derrida’, Centre for Modern French Thought, University of Sussex, 1 December 1997. At (www.hydra.umn.edu/derrida/pol+fr.html).

Derrida, J., Politics of Friendship, trans. George Collins (London: Verso, 1997).Google Scholar

Derrida, J., Rogues. Two Essays on Reason, trans. P. -A. Brault and M. Naas (Stanford, Calif.: Stanford University Press, 2005).Google Scholar

Dodds, E. R., Plato, Gorgias. A Revised Text with Introduction and Commentary (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1959).Google Scholar

Dronsfield, J. and Midgley, N. (eds.), Responsibilities of Deconstruction (PLI, Warwick Journal of Philosophy 6, University of Warwick, 1997).Google Scholar

Dryzek, J. S., ‘Political and ecological communication’, Environmental Politics 4 (1995), 10–30.CrossRef Google Scholar

Dryzek, J. S., Deliberative Democracy and Beyond, Oxford Political Theory (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000).Google Scholar

Du Bois, F., ‘ “Nothing but the truth”: The South African alternative to corrective justice in transitions to democracy’, in Christodoulidis, E. and Veitch, S. (eds.), Lethe’s Law. Justice, Law and Ethics in Reconciliation (Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2001), pp. 91–114.Google Scholar

Du Toit, A., ‘The moral foundations of the South African TRC: Truth as acknowledgment and justice as recognition’, in Rotberg, R. I. and Thompson, D. (eds.), Truth v. Justice. The Morality of Truth Commissions (Princeton, N. J.: Princeton University Press, 2000), pp. 122–40.CrossRef Google Scholar

Dyzenhaus, D., Judging the Judges, Judging Ourselves. Truth, Reconciliation and the Apartheid Legal Order (Oxford: Hart Publishing, 1998).Google Scholar

Dyzenhaus, D., ‘Survey article: Justifying the Truth and Reconciliation Commission’, Journal of Political Philosophy 8 (2000), 470–96.CrossRef Google Scholar

Edwards, J. C., Ethics without Philosophy. Wittgenstein and the Moral Life (Tampa: University Presses of South Florida, 1985).Google Scholar

Elster, J., ‘Introduction’, in Elster, J. (ed.), Deliberative Democracy (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998), pp. 1–18.CrossRef Google Scholar

Fann, K. T., Wittgenstein’s Conception of Philosophy (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1969).Google Scholar

Fearon, J., ‘Deliberation as discussion’, in Elster, John (ed.), Deliberative Democracy (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998), pp. 44–68.CrossRef Google Scholar

Ferrara, A., ‘The communicative paradigm in moral theory’, in Rasmussen, D. M. (ed.), Handbook of Critical Theory (Oxford: Blackwell, 1996), pp. 119–37.Google Scholar

Fishkin, J. S., and P. Laslett (eds.), Debating Deliberative Democracy (Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 2003).CrossRef Google Scholar

Flyvberg, B., ‘Ideal theory, real rationality: Habermas versus Foucault and Nietzsche’, Paper presented to the Political Studies Association’s 50th Annual Conference, ‘The Challenges for Democracy in the 21st Century’, London School of Economics and Political Science, 10–13 April 2000, 6–7.

Fontana, B., C. J. Nederman, and G. Remer, ‘Introduction: Deliberative democracy and the rhetorical turn’, in Fontana, B., Nederman, C. J. and Remer, G. (eds.), Talking Democracy. Historical Perspectives on Rhetoric and Democracy (Pennsylvania: Pennsylvania State University Press, 2004), pp. 1–25.Google Scholar

Forester, J., The Deliberative Practitioner (Cambridge, Mass.: The MIT Press, 1999).Google Scholar

Fraser, N., ‘Rethinking the public sphere: A contribution to a critique of actually existing democracy’, in Calhoun, C. (ed.), Habermas and the Public Sphere (Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, 1992), pp. 109–42.Google Scholar

Fraser, N., and Honneth, A., Redistribution or Recognition? (London: Verso, 2003).CrossRef Google Scholar

Freeden, M., Ideologies and Political Theory. A Conceptual Approach (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1996).Google Scholar

Gasché, R., The Tain of the Mirror. Derrida and the Philosophy of Reflection (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1986).Google Scholar

Gasché, R., ‘ “In the name of reason”: The deconstruction of sovereignty’, Research in Phenomenology 34, no. 1 (2004), 289–303.Google Scholar

Glock, H. -J., A Wittgenstein Dictionary (Oxford: Blackwell, 1996).CrossRef Google Scholar

Glynos, J., ‘Theory and evidence in the Freudian field: from observation to structure’, in Glynos, L. J. and Stavrakakis, Y. (eds.), Lacan and Science (London: Karnac Press, 2002), pp. 13–50.Google Scholar

Glynos, J. and Howarth, D., Logics of Critical Explanation in Social and Political Theory (London: Routledge, 2007).Google Scholar

Godby, M., ‘Memory and history in William Kentridge’s History of the Main Complaint’, in Nuttall, S. and Coetzee, C. (eds.), Negotiating the Past. The Making of Memory in South Africa (Cape Town: Oxford University Press, 1998), pp. 100–11.Google Scholar

Goodin, R. E., Reflective Democracy, Oxford Political Theory (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2003).CrossRef Google Scholar

Grassi, E., Rhetoric as Philosophy, trans. J. M. Krois and A. Azodi (Carbondale and Edwardsville: Southern Illinois University Press, 2001).Google Scholar

Griggs, S. and D. Howarth, ‘Populism, localism and environmental politics: The logic and rhetoric of the Stop Stansted Expansion Campaign in the United Kingdom’ (www.essex.ac.uk/centres/TheoStud/onlinepapers.asp).

Gutman A. and D. Thompson, ‘The moral foundations of truth commissions’, in Rotberg, R. I. and Thompson, D. (eds.), Truth v. Justice. The Morality of Truth Commissions (Princeton, N. J.: Princeton University Press, 2000), pp. 22–44.CrossRef Google Scholar

Habermas, J., ‘A reply to my critics’, in Thompson, J. B. and Held, D. (eds.), Habermas: Critical Debates (Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, 1982), pp. 219–83.CrossRef Google Scholar

Habermas, J., Legitimation Crisis, trans. T. McCarthy (London: Heinemann, 1976).Google Scholar

Habermas, J.Between Facts and Norms. Contributions to a Discourse Theory of Law and Democracy, trans. W. Rehg (Cambridge: Polity Press, 1997).Google Scholar

Hacker, P. M. S., Insight and Illusion (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1972).Google Scholar

Hacker, P. M. S., Wittgenstein: Meaning and Mind. Part 1: Essays (Oxford: Blackwell, 1990).Google Scholar

Hacker, P. M. S., Wittgenstein on Human Nature (London: Phoenix Paperback, 1997).Google Scholar

Hacking, I., ‘Language, truth, reason’, in Hollis, M. and Lukes, S. (eds.), Rationality and Relativism (Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1983), pp. 48–66.Google Scholar

Hacking, I., ‘Styles of scientific reasoning’, in Rajchman, J. and West, C. (eds.), Post-Analytic Philosophy (New York: Columbia University Press: 1985), pp. 145–65.Google Scholar

Hadad, S., ‘Derrida and democracy at risk’, Contretemps 4 (2004), 29–44.Google Scholar

Hall, C., ‘ “Passion and constraint”: The marginalization of passion in liberal political theory’, Philosophy and Social Criticism 28, no. 6 (2002), 727–48.CrossRef Google Scholar

Hammer, E., Stanley Cavell. Skepticism, Subjectivity and the Ordinary (Cambridge: Polity, 2002).Google Scholar

Hampshire, S., Justice is Conflict (Princeton, N. J.: Princeton University Press, 2000).Google Scholar

Harrison, B., ‘White mythology revisited: Derrida and his critics on reason and rhetoric’, Critical Inquiry 25 (1999), 505–34.CrossRef Google Scholar

Hayner, P. B., ‘Fifteen truth commissions – 1974 to 1994: A comparative study’, Human Rights Quarterly 16 (1994), 597–655.CrossRef Google Scholar

Helsloot, N., ‘Linguists of all countries … !’, Journal of Pragmatics 13 (1989), 547–66.CrossRef Google Scholar

Herwitz, D., ‘The future of the past in South Africa: On the legacy of the TRC’, Social Research 72 (2005), 531–48.Google Scholar

Hesse, M., ‘Habermas and the force of dialectical argument’, History of European Ideas 21, no. 3 (1995), 367–78.CrossRef Google Scholar

Heyes, C. J. (ed.), The Grammar of Politics. Wittgenstein and Political Philosophy (Ithaca, N. J.: Cornell University Press, 2003).Google Scholar

Honig, B., Democracy and the Foreigner (Princeton, N. J.: Princeton University Press, 2001).CrossRef Google Scholar

Honig, B., ‘The time of rights’, keynote address, Sixth Essex Graduate Conference in Political Theory, 13–14th May 2005.

Houghton, D., The Role of Analogical Reasoning in Novel Foreign Policy Situations, Cambridge Studies in International Relations (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001).Google Scholar

Howarth, D., ‘Ideology, hegemony and political subjectivity’, in Hampsher-Monk, I. and Stanyer, J. (eds.), Contemporary Political Studies 1996, vol. ii (Oxford: Political Studies Association of the UK, 1996), pp. 944–56.Google Scholar

Howarth, D., ‘Complexities of identity/difference: the ideology of black consciousness in South Africa’, Journal of Political Ideologies 2, no. 1 (1997), 51–78.CrossRef Google Scholar

Howarth, D., ‘Paradigms gained? A critique of theories and explanations of democratic transition in South Africa’, in Howarth, D. R. and Norval, A. J., South Africa in Transition (London: Macmillan, 1998), pp. 182–214.CrossRef Google Scholar

Howarth, D., Discourse (Buckingham: Open University Press, 2000).Google Scholar

Jonsen, A. R. and Toulmin, S., The Abuse of Casuistry (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1988).Google Scholar

Kahn, P. W., Putting Liberalism in its Place (Princeton, N. J.: Princeton University Press, 2005).Google Scholar

Keenan, A., Democracy in Question. Democratic Openness in a Time of Political Closure (Stanford, Calif.: Stanford University Press, 2003).Google Scholar

Kiss, E., ‘Moral ambition within and beyond political constraints: Reflections on restorative justice’, in Rotberg, R. I. and Thompson, D. (eds.), Truth v. Justice. The Morality of Truth Commissions (Princeton, N. J.: Princeton University Press, 2000), pp. 68–98.CrossRef Google Scholar

Knight, J. and J. Johnson, ‘What sort of political equality does deliberative democracy require?’, in Bohman, J. and Rehg, W. (eds.), Deliberative Democracy. Essays on Reason and Politics (Cambridge, Mass.: The MIT Press, 1997), pp. 279–320.Google Scholar

Kohn, M., ‘Language, power, and persuasion: Towards a critique of deliberative democracy’, Constellations 7, no. 3 (2000), 408–29.CrossRef Google Scholar

Krog, K., ‘The TRC and national unity’, in Dorsman, R., Hartman, H. and Notenboom-Kronemeijer, L. (eds.), Truth and Reconciliation in South Africa and the Netherlands (Utrecht: SMI Special No. 23, 1999), pp. 14–31.Google Scholar

Kuhn, T. S., The Structure of Scientific Revolutions (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1970).Google Scholar

Laclau, E. and Mouffe, C., Hegemony and Socialist Strategy. Towards a Radical Democratic Politics (London: Verso, 1985).Google Scholar

Laclau, E., New Reflections on the Revolution of Our Time (London: Verso, 1990).Google Scholar

Laclau, E., ‘Universalism, particularism and the question of identity’, in E. Laclau, Emancipation(s) (London: Verso, 1996), pp. 20–35.Google Scholar

Laclau, E., ‘Deconstruction, Pragmatism, Hegemony’, in S. Critchley, J. Derrida, E. Laclau and R. Rorty, Deconstruction and Pragmatism, ed. Mouffe, C. (London: Routledge, 1996), pp. 47–68.Google Scholar

Laclau, E., ‘Paul de Man and the politics of rhetoric’, Pretexts 7, no. 2 (1998), 153–70.Google Scholar

Laclau, E., ‘Identity and hegemony: The role of universality in the constitution of political logics’, in Butler, J., Laclau, E. and Žižek, S., Contingency, Hegemony, Universality. Contemporary Dialogues on the Left, Phronesis (London: Verso, 2000).Google Scholar

Laclau, E., ‘Structure, history and the political’, in Butler, J., Laclau, E. and Žižek, S., Contingency, Hegemony, Universality. Contemporary Dialogues on the Left, Phronesis (London: Verso, 2000), pp. 182–212.Google Scholar

Laclau, E., ‘Glimpsing the future: A reply’, in Critchley, Simon and Marchart, Oliver (eds.), Laclau. A Critical Reader (London: Routledge, 2004), pp. 279–328.Google Scholar

Laclau, E., On Populist Reason (London: Verso, 2005).Google Scholar

Laden, A. S., Reasonably Radical. Deliberative Liberalism and the Politics of Identity (Ithaca, N. Y.: Cornell University Press, 2001).Google Scholar

Lefort, C., The Political Forms of Modern Society (Oxford: Polity Press, 1986).Google Scholar

Lefort, C., Democracy and Political Theory (Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1988).Google Scholar

Lloyd, G. E. R., Polarity and Analogy (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1966).Google Scholar

Lueken, G. -L., ‘On showing in argumentation’, Philosophical Investigations 20, no. 3 (1997), 205–23.CrossRef Google Scholar

Lukes, S., ‘Of gods and demons: Habermas and practical reason’, in Thompson, J. B. and Held, D. (eds.), Habermas. Critical Debates (Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, 1982), pp. 134–48.Google Scholar

Luntley, M., Wittgenstein (Oxford: Blackwell Publishing, 2003).CrossRef Google Scholar

Macedo, S. (ed.), Deliberative Politics (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1999).Google Scholar

Majone, G., Evidence, Argument, and Persuasion in the Policy Process (New Haven, Conn.: Yale University Press, 1989).Google Scholar

Marcus, G., The Sentimental Citizen: Emotion in Democratic Politics (University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press, 2002).Google Scholar

McCarthy, T. and Studd, S. C. (eds.), Wittgenstein in America (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 2001).Google Scholar

McFee, G., ‘Wittgenstein on art and aspects’, Philosophical Investigations 22, no. 3 (1999), 262–84.CrossRef Google Scholar

Meehan, J., ‘Feminism and Habermas’ discourse ethics’, Philosophy and Social Criticism 26, no. 3 (2000), 39–52.CrossRef Google Scholar

Meintjies, S. and B. Goldblatt, ‘Gender and the Truth and Reconciliation Commission: A submission to the Truth and Reconciliation Commission’, May 1996 (www.truth.org.za/submit/gender.htm).

Mendus, S., Feminism and Emotion. Readings in Moral and Political Philosophy (New York: St Martin’s Press, 2000).Google Scholar

Miller, D., ‘Deliberative democracy and social choice’, in Held, D. (ed.), Prospects for Democracy. North, South, East, West (Cambridge: Polity Press, 1993), pp. 74–92.Google Scholar

Miller, D., ‘Is deliberative democracy unfair to disadvantaged groups’, in D’Entrèves, M. Passerin (ed.), Democracy as Public Deliberation (Manchester: Manchester University Press, 2002), pp. 201–25.Google Scholar

Minow, M., ‘The hope for healing: What can truth commissions do?’, in Rotberg, R. I. and Thompson, D. (eds.), Truth v. Justice. The Morality of Truth Commissions (Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 2000), pp. 235–60.CrossRef Google Scholar

Mouffe, C. (ed.), Gramsci and Marxist Theory (London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1979).Google Scholar

Mouffe, C. (ed.), Dimensions of Radical Democracy (London: Verso, 1992).Google Scholar

Mouffe, C., The Return of the Political (London: Verso, 1993).Google Scholar

Mouffe, C., ‘Democratic politics and the question of identity’, in Rajchman, J. (ed.), The Identity in Question (London: Routledge, 1995), pp. 33–45.Google Scholar

Mouffe, C., ‘Politics, democratic action, and solidarity’, Inquiry 39 (1995), 99–108.CrossRef Google Scholar

Mouffe, C., The Democratic Paradox (London: Verso, 2000).Google Scholar

Mouffe, C., ‘Politics and Passion: The stakes of democracy’, Centre for the Study of Democracy Perspectives, 2002.

Mulhall, S., On Being in the World. Wittgenstein and Heidegger on Seeing Aspects (London: Routledge, 1990).Google Scholar

Mulhall, S., Stanley Cavell. Philosophy’s Recounting of the Ordinary (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1994).Google Scholar

Mulhall, S., ‘Promising, consent, and citizenship: Rawls and Cavell on morality and politics’, Political Theory 25 (1997), 171–92.CrossRef Google Scholar

Mulhall, S., Inheritance and Originality. Wittgenstein, Heidegger, Kierkegaard (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 2001).Google Scholar

Ndebele, N., ‘Memory, metaphor, and the triumph of narrative’, in Nuttall, S. and Coetzee, C. (eds.), Negotiating the Past. The Making of Memory in South Africa (Cape Town: Oxford University Press, 1998), pp. 19–28.Google Scholar

Nietzsche, F., ‘Schopenhauer as Educator’, in Levy, O. (ed.), The Complete Works of Friedrich Nietzsche, vol. ii, Thoughts Out of Season, Part Two (London: T.N. Foulis, 1909).Google Scholar

Nietzsche, F., ‘On truth and lies in a nonmoral sense (1873)’, in Pearson, K. Ansell and Large, D. (eds.), The Nietzsche Reader (Oxford: Blackwell Publishing, 2006), pp. 114–23.Google Scholar

Norris, A., ‘Political revisions: Stanley Cavell and political philosophy’, Political Theory 30 (2002), 828–32.CrossRef Google Scholar

Norris, A., ‘Political revisions: Stanley Cavell and political philosophy’, in Norris, A. (ed.), The Claim to Community. Essays on Stanley Cavell and Political Philosophy (Stanford, Calif.: Stanford University Press, 2006), pp. 80–97.Google Scholar

Norval, A. J., ‘Frontiers in question’, Acta Philosophica 2 (1997), 51–76.Google Scholar

Norval, A. J., ‘Memory, identity and the (im)possibility of reconciliation: The work of the Truth and Reconciliation Commission in South Africa’, Constellations 5 (1998), 250–61.CrossRef Google Scholar

Norval, A. J., ‘Future trajectories of research in discourse theory’, in Howarth, D., Norval, A. J. and Stavrakakis, Y. (eds.), Discourse Theory and Political Analysis (Manchester: Manchester University Press, 2000), pp. 219–36.Google Scholar

Norval, A. J., ‘Radical democracy’, in Foweraker, J. and Clarke, B. (eds.), Dictionary of Democratic Thought (London: Routledge, 2001).Google Scholar

Norval, A. J., ‘Reconstructing national identity and renegotiating memory: the work of the TRC’, in Hansen, T. Blom and Stepputat, F. (eds.), States of Imagination. Ethnographic Explorations of the Post-Colonial State (Durham, N.C.: Duke University Press, 2001), pp. 182–202.CrossRef Google Scholar

Norval, A. J., ‘Hegemony after deconstruction: The consequences of undecidability’, Journal of Political Ideologies 9, no. 2 (2004), 139–57.CrossRef Google Scholar

Norval, A. J., ‘Democratic identification: A Wittgensteinian approach’, Political Theory 34 (2006), 229–55.CrossRef Google Scholar

O’Neill, M., ‘Explaining “the hardness of the logical must”: Wittgenstein on grammar, arbitrariness and logical necessity’, Philosophical Investigations 24, no. 1 (2001), 1–29.CrossRef Google Scholar

O’Neill, O., Towards Virtue and Justice (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996).CrossRef Google Scholar

O’Neill, O., ‘Political liberalism and public reason: A critical notice of John Rawls, Political Liberalism’, The Philosophical Review 106, no. 3 (1997), 417.Google Scholar

O’Neill, O., Bounds of Justice (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000).CrossRef Google Scholar

Outhwaite, W., Habermas. A Critical Introduction (Cambridge: Polity Press, 1994).Google Scholar

Owen, D., ‘Cultural diversity and the conversation of justice’, Political Theory 27, no. 5 (1999), 579–96.CrossRef Google Scholar

Owen, D., ‘Democracy, perfectionism and “undetermined messianic hope” ’, in Mouffe, C. and Nagl, L. (eds.), The Legacy of Wittgenstein: Pragmatism and Deconstruction (Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang, 2001), pp. 139–56.Google Scholar

Owen, D., ‘Genealogy as perspicuous representation’, in Heyes, C. J. (ed.), The Grammar of Politics. Wittgenstein and Political Philosophy (London: Cornell University Press, 2003), pp. 82–96.Google Scholar

Owen, D., ‘Perfectionism, parrhesia and the care of the self: Foucault and Cavell on ethics and politics’, in Norris, A. (ed.), The Claim to Community. Essays on Stanley Cavell and Political Philosophy (Stanford, Calif.: Stanford University Press, 2006), pp. 128–55.Google Scholar

Panagia, D., ‘The predicative function in ideology: On the political uses of analogical reasoning in contemporary political thought’, Journal of Political Ideologies 6, no. 1 (2001), 55–74.CrossRef Google Scholar

Panagia, D., ‘The force of political argument’, Political Theory 32, no. 6 (2004), 825–48.CrossRef Google Scholar

D’Entrèves, Passerin M. (ed.), Democracy as Public Deliberation (Manchester: Manchester University Press, 2002).Google Scholar

Pelletier, D., Kraak, V., McCullum, C., Uusitalo, U. and Rich, R., ‘The shaping of collective values through deliberative democracy: An empirical case study from New York’s North County’, Policy Sciences 32 (1999), 103–31.CrossRef Google Scholar

Pohlhaus, G. and Wright, , ‘Using Wittgenstein critically’, Political Theory 30, no. 6 (2002), 800–27.CrossRef Google Scholar

Putnam, R. D., Bowling Alone. The Collapse and Revival of American Community (New York: Simon and Schuster, 2000).Google Scholar

Rancière, J., The Names of History, trans. H. Melehy (Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1994).Google Scholar

Rancière, J., ‘Post-democracy, politics and philosophy’, interview with J. Sumič and R. Riha, in Howarth, D. and Norval, A. J. (eds.), Reconsidering the Political, special issue of Angelaki (1994), 171–8.Google Scholar

Rancière, J., On the Shores of Politics, trans. Liz Heron (London: Verso, 1995).Google Scholar

Rancière, J., Disagreement. Politics and Philosophy, trans. J. Rose (Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1999).Google Scholar

Rancière, J., ‘Ten theses on politics’, Theory and Event, trans. Davide Panagia, 5, no. 3 (2001) (http://muse.jhu.edu/journals/theory_and_event/v005/5.3ranciere.html).

Rancière, J., The Politics of Aesthetics. The Distribution of the Sensible, trans. Gabriel Rockhill (London: Continuum, 2004).Google Scholar

Rawls, J., A Theory of Justice (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1973).Google Scholar

Rehg, W., ‘Translator’s introduction’, in Habermas, J., Between Facts and Norms. Contributions to a Discourse Theory of Law and Democracy, trans. W. Rehg (Cambridge: Polity Press, 1997), pp. ix–xxxvii.Google Scholar

Renn, O., Webler, T. and Wiedemann, P. (eds.), Fairness and Competence in Citizen Participation. Evaluating Models for Environmental Discourse (Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1995).CrossRef Google Scholar

Ross, F. C., ‘On having voice and being heard: Some after–effects of testifying before the South African Truth and Reconciliation Commission’, Anthropological Theory 30 (2003), 325–41.CrossRef Google Scholar

Rousseau, J. J., The Social Contract (London: Penguin Classics, 1968).Google Scholar

Sanders, L. M., ‘Against deliberation’, Political Theory 25, no. 3 (1997), 347–76.CrossRef Google Scholar

Scheuerman, W. E., ‘Between radicalism and resignation: Democratic theory in Habermas in Between Facts and Norms’, in Dews, P. (ed.), Habermas. A Critical Reader (Oxford: Blackwell, 1999), pp. 153–77.Google Scholar

Shapiro, M. J., ‘Radicalizing democratic theory: Social space in Connolly, Deleuze and Rancière’, Paper delivered to the Poststructuralism and Radical Politics Conferece: ‘Fidelity to the disagreement: Jacques Rancière and the political’, Goldsmiths College, London, 16–17 September 2003. See (www.homepages.gold.ac.uk/psrpsg/ranciere.doc).

Shusterman, R., ‘Putnam and Cavell on the ethics of democracy’, Political Theory 25 (1997), 193–214.CrossRef Google Scholar

Skinner, Q., Reason and Rhetoric in the Philosophy of Hobbes (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996).CrossRef Google Scholar

Sparti, D., ‘Responsiveness as responsibility: Cavell’s reading of Wittgenstein and King Lear as a source for an ethics of interpersonal relationships’, Philosophy and Social Criticism 26 (2000), 81–107.CrossRef Google Scholar

Stoker, G.Why Politics Matters. Making Democracy Work (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2006).Google Scholar

Sumič, J., ‘Anachronism of emancipation or fidelity to politics’, in Critchley, S. and Marchart, O. (eds.), Laclau. A Critical Reader (Abingdon, Oxon.: Routledge, 2004), pp. 182–98.Google Scholar

Sunstein, C., ‘The law of group polarization’, The Journal of Political Philosophy 10, no. 2 (2002), 175–95.CrossRef Google Scholar

Thomson, A. J. P., Deconstruction and Democracy, Continuum Studies in Continental Philosophy (London: Continuum, 2005).Google Scholar

Thomson, A. J. P., ‘What’s to become of “democracy to come”?’, Postmodern Culture 15 (2005) (http://muse.jhu.edu/demo/postmodern_culture/v015/15.3thomson.html).

Todorov, T., Theories of the Symbol, trans. Catherine Porter (Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press, 1984).Google Scholar

Toulmin, S., Return to Reason (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 2001).Google Scholar

Tully, J., ‘Wittgenstein and political philosophy: understanding practices of critical reflection’, Political Theory 17, no. 2 (1989), 172–204.CrossRef Google Scholar

Tully, J., Strange Multiplicity. Constitutionalism in an Age of Diversity (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1995).CrossRef Google Scholar

Tully, J., ‘Political philosophy as a critical activity’, Political Theory 30, no. 4 (2002), 533–55.CrossRef Google Scholar

Tully, J., ‘Wittgenstein and political philosophy: Understanding practices of critical reflection’, in Heyes, C. J. (ed.), The Grammar of Politics. Wittgenstein and Political Philosophy (Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press, 2003), pp. 17–42.Google Scholar

Veitch, S., ‘The legal politics of amnesty’, in Christodoulidis, E. and Veitch, S. (eds.), Lethe’s Law. Justice, Law and Ethics in Reconciliation (Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2001), pp. 32–45.Google Scholar

Vickers, B., In Defence of Rhetoric (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1998).Google Scholar

Villa-Vicencio C. and W. Verwoerd, ‘Constructing a report: Writing up the “truth” ’, in Rotberg, R. I. and Thompson, D. (eds.), Truth v. Justice. The Morality of Truth Commissions (Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 2000), pp. 279–94.CrossRef Google Scholar

Waldron, J., The Dignity of Legislation (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999).CrossRef Google Scholar

Walker, B., ‘Thoreau on democratic cultivation’, Political Theory 29 (2001), 155–89.CrossRef Google Scholar

Walzer, M., ‘A critique of philosophical conversation’, The Philosophical Forum 21, no. 1–2 (1989–90), 182–96.Google Scholar

Walzer, M., Thick and Thin. Moral Argument at Home and Abroad (Notre Dame, Ind.: University of Notre Dame Press, 1994).Google Scholar

Walzer, M., Politics and Passion. Towards a More Egalitarian Liberalism (New Haven, Conn.: Yale University Press, 2004).Google Scholar

Ward, H., Norval, A. J., Landman, T. and Pretty, J., ‘Open citizens’ juries and the politics of sustainability’, Political Studies, 51 (2003), 282–99.CrossRef Google Scholar

Warren, M., ‘Democratic theory and self-transformation’, American Political Science Review 86, no. 1 (1992), 8–23.CrossRef Google Scholar

Warren, M., ‘The self in discursive democracy’, in Stephen White (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Habermas (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1995), pp. 167–200.Google Scholar

Warren, M. ‘What can democratic participation mean today?’, Political Theory 30, no. 5 (2002), 677–701.CrossRef Google Scholar

Warren, M. E., ‘What should and should not be said: Deliberating sensitive issues’, Journal of Social Philosophy 37, no. 2 (2006), 163–81.CrossRef Google Scholar

Weeks, E. C., ‘The practice of deliberative democracy: Results from four large-scale trials’, Public Administration Review 60, no. 4 (2000), 360–72.CrossRef Google Scholar

White, S. K., The Recent Work of Jürgen Habermas. Reason, Justice and Modernity (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1989).Google Scholar

White, S., Political Theory and Postmodernism (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1991).Google Scholar

White, S., ‘After Critique: Affirming subjectivity in contemporary political theory’, European Journal of Political Theory 2, no. 2 (2003), 209–26.CrossRef Google Scholar

Widder, N., Genealogies of Difference (Urbana, Ill.: University of Illinois Press, 2002).Google Scholar

Wiley, J., ‘Review essay: The impasse of radical democracy’, Philosophy and Social Criticism 28 (2002), 483–8.CrossRef Google Scholar

Wittgenstein, L., On Certainty, ed. Anscombe, G. E. M and Wright, G. H., trans. D. Paul and G. E. M. Anscombe (Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1979).Google Scholar

Wittgenstein, L., Wittgenstein’s Lectures, Cambridge 1932–35, ed. Ambrose, A. (Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1979).Google Scholar

Wittgenstein, L., Philosophical Investigations, ed. Anscombe, G. E. M. and Rhees, R., trans. G. E. M. Anscombe (1958; Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1984).Google Scholar

Wittgenstein, L., Lectures and Conversations on Aesthetics, Psychology and Religious Belief, ed. Cyril Barrett (Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1989).Google Scholar

Wollstonecraft, M., Vindication of the Rights of Woman, ed. with introduction Brody, M. (London: Penguin Books, 1983).Google Scholar

Wood, D., ‘The experience of the ethical’, in Kearney, R. and Dooley, M. (eds.), Questioning Ethics. Contemporary Debates in Philosophy (London: Routledge, 1999), pp. 105–19.CrossRef Google Scholar

Young, I. M., ‘Difference as resource for democratic communication’, in Bohman, J. and Rehg, W. (eds.), Deliberative Democracy. Essays on Reason and Politics (Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, 1997), pp. 383–406.Google Scholar

Zerilli, L. M. G., ‘ “This universalism which is not one”: A review of Ernesto Laclau’s Emancipation(s)’, Diacritics 28, no. 2 (1998), 3–20.CrossRef Google Scholar

Zerilli, L. M. G., ‘Doing without knowing: Feminisms’ politics of the ordinary’, Political Theory 26, no. 4 (1998), 434–58.CrossRef Google Scholar

Zerilli, L. M. G., Feminism and the Abyss of Freedom (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2005).Google Scholar

Zerilli, L. M. G., ‘ “We feel our freedom”: Imagination and judgment in the thought of Hannah Arendt’, Political Theory 33, no. 2 (2005), 158–88.CrossRef Google Scholar

Žižek, S., The Sublime Object of Ideology (London: Verso, 1989).Google Scholar

Žižek, S., For They Know Not What They Do. Enjoyment as a Political Factor (London: Verso, 1991).Google Scholar

Žižek, S., The Ticklish Subject (London: Verso, 1999).Google Scholar

Žižek, S., ‘Melancholy and the act’, Critical Inquiry 26 (2000), 657–81.CrossRef Google Scholar