Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-wq484 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T15:48:21.709Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

7 - Reclaiming the Past or Assimilationist Rebellion? Transforming the Self in Contemporary American Cinema

from Part Two - Politics of Culture in Popular Representations: Films and Performances

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 September 2012

Celeste A. Fisher
Affiliation:
Misericordia University, Dallas, Pennsylvania
Toyin Falola
Affiliation:
University of Texas at Austin
Augustine Agwuele
Affiliation:
Texas State University, San Marcos
Debra L. Klein
Affiliation:
Gavilan College
Emmanuel M. Mbah
Affiliation:
City University of New York, College of Staten Island
Sarah Steinbock-Pratt
Affiliation:
University of Texas at Austin
Asonzeh Ukah
Affiliation:
Universit�t Bayreuth, Germany
Get access

Summary

Introduction

Drawing on the work of pragmatic philosopher George Herbert Mead, symbolic interactionists argue that the self is a “reflexive process that includes a person's subjective stream of consciousness (perceptions, thoughts, feelings, plans, and choices) as well as his or her concept of self as a physical, social and moral being.” What is central to this perspective is that transformation, as well as the ability to sustain one's sense of self, is inextricably linked to one's relationship with others. Thus, it is through our interactions with others that we get a sense of who we are—our selfhood.

Working outside the field of symbolic interactionism, sociologist Erving Goffman has been credited with contributing to the field of symbolic interactionism with his work on role performance. In his seminal book, The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life, Goffman, the founder of dramaturgical theory, argues that the way in which we present our selves is based on what we are expected to do and be in a given situation. Relying on scripts, props, costumes, settings, and gestures, we are all performers or actors who change our behavior based on the roles that we play and our interaction with others in a given situation. This perspective presupposes multiple identities and selves that depend on the social context in which we live. Thus, according to this view, selves are not stable entities, because “we establish a new self in every situation.”

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Boydell & Brewer
Print publication year: 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×