Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-7c8c6479df-r7xzm Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-03-28T18:38:08.121Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

References

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 February 2013

Leland Timothy Long
Affiliation:
Georgia Institute of Technology
Ronald Douglas Kaufmann
Affiliation:
Spotlight Geophysical Services, Florida
Get access

Summary

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2013

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adams, Donald C., and Keller, Randy G., (1996). Precambrian basement geology of the Permian basin region of west Texas and eastern New Mexico: a geophysical perspective, Bulletin of the American Association of Petroleum Geologist, Vol. 80, 410–431.Google Scholar
ASTM Standard, D6430, 1999 (2010), “Standard guide for using the gravity method for subsurface investigation”, ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, 2010, DOI: 10.1520/D6430-99R10.CrossRef
Birch, F., (1961). The velocity of compressional waves in rocks to 10 kilobars. Part 2. Journal of Geophysical Research, Vol. 66(7), 2199–2224CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blakely, Richard J., (1995). Potential Theory in Gravity and Magnetic Applications, New York, Cambridge University Press, New York, p. 441.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brocher, T. M., (2005). Empirical relations between elastic wavespeeds and density in the Earth's crust, Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, Vol. 95(6), 2081–2092.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Butler, D. K., (1984). Microgravimetric and gravity gradient techniques for detection of subsurface cavities, doi: 10.1190/1.1441723, Geophysics, Vol. 49(7), 1084–1096.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cogbill, A. H., (1990). Gravity terrain corrections using digital elevation models. Geophysics, Vol. 55, 102–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cook, Frederick A., Brown, Larry D., Kaufman, Sidney, Oliver, Jack E., and Peterson, Todd A., (1981). COCORP seismic profiling of the Appalachian orogen beneath the coastal Plain of Georgia, Geological Society of America Bulletin, Part 1, Vol. 92, 738–748.2.0.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dobrin, Milton B., (1976). Introduction to Geophysical Prospecting, New York, New York, McGraw-Hill Bock Company, New York, New York, p. 630.Google Scholar
Dorman, L. M., and Lewis, B. T. R., (1970). Experimental isostasy, 1. Theory of the determination of the Earth's isostatic response to a concentrated load, Journal of Geophysical Research, Vol. 75, 3357–3385.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dorman, L. M., and Lewis, B. T. R., (1972). Experimental isostasy, 3, Inversion of the isostatic Green function and lateral density changes, Journal of Geophysical Research, Vol. 77, 3068–3077.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fedi, Maurizio, and Pilkington, Mark, (2012). Understanding imaging methods for potential field data, Geophysics Vol. 71(1), G13–G24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gardner, G. H. F., Gardner, L. W., and Gregory, A. R., (1974). Formation velocity and density – the diagnostic basics for stratigraphic traps. Geophysics, Vol. 39(6), 770–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hammer, S., (1939). Terrain corrections for gravimeter stations: Geophysics, Vol. 4, 184–194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hawman, R. B., (2008). Crustal thickness variations across the Blue Ridge Mountains, Southern Appalachians: An alternative procedure for migrating wide-angle reflection data, Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America Vol. 98(1), 469–475.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hawman, Robert B., Khalifa, Mohamed O., and Baker, M. Scott, (2011). Isostatic compensation for a portion of the Southern Appalachians: Evidence from a reconnaissance study using wide-angle, three-component seismic soundings. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, Vol. 124(3–4), 291–317.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heiskanen, W. A., and Meinesz, F. A. Vening, (1958). The Earth and its Gravity Field, McGraw-Hill Book Company, p. 364.Google Scholar
Heiskanen, W. A., and Moritz, H., (1967). Physical Geodesy, San Francisco, W. H. Freeman and Company, San Francisco, p. 364.Google Scholar
Heiskanen, Weikko A., and Moritz, Helmut, (1965). Physical Geodesy, San Francisco, W. H. Freeman and Company, San Francisco, p. 364.Google Scholar
Hinze, W. J., Aiken, C., Brozena, J., Coakley, B., Dater, D., Flanagan, G., Forsberg, R., Hildenbrand, T., Keller, G. R., Kellogg, J., Kucks, R., Li, X., Mainville, A., Morin, R., Pilkington, M., Plouff, D., Ravat, D., Roman, D., Urrutia-Fucugauchi, J., V´eronneau, M., Webring, M., and Winester, D., (2005). New standards for reducing gravity data: The North American gravity database, Geophysics, Vol. 70(4), J25–J32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaufmann, R. D., and Long, L. T., (1996). Velocity structure and seismicity of southeastern Tennessee, Journal of Geophysical Research, Vol. 101(B4), 8531–8542.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
LaFehr, T. R., (1991). An exact solution for the gravity curvature (Bullard B) correction: Geophysics, Vol. 56, 1179–1184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lees, J. M., and VanDecar, J. C., (1991). Seismic tomography constrained by Bouguer gravity anomalies: Applications in Western Washington, PAGEOPH, Vol. 135, 31–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lewis, B. T. R., and Dorman, L. M., (1970). Experimental isostasy, 2, An isostatic model for the U.S.A. derived from gravity and topographic data, Journal of Geophysical Research, Vol. 75, 3367–3386.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Long, L. T., and Liow, Jeih-San, (1986). Crustal thickness, velocity structure, and the isostatic response function in the Southern Appalachians, in Reflection Seismology: The Continental Crust, Geodynamics Series, American Geophysical Union, Vol. 14, 215–222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacMillan, W. D., (1958). The Theory of the Potential, New York, Dover, New York, p. 469.Google Scholar
Menke, William, (1984). Geophysical Data Analysis: Discrete Inverse Theory, New York, Academic Press, Inc., New York, p. 260.Google Scholar
Mohr, P. J., Taylor, B. N., and Newell, D. B., (2011). “The 2010 CODATA Recommended Values of the Fundamental Physical Constants” (Web Version 6.0). This database was developed by J. Baker, M. Douma, and S. Kotochigova. Available at [Friday, 22-Jul-2011 10:04:27 EDT]. National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, MD 20899.
Morelli, C., ed., (1974). The International Gravity Standardization Net, 1971, International Association of Geodesy, Special Publication 4.Google Scholar
Moritz, H., (1980). Geodetic Reference System 1980, Journal of Geodesy, Vol. 54, 395–405.Google Scholar
Nafe, J. E., and Drake, C. L., (1963). Physical properties of marine sediments. In The Sea, Vol. 3, ed. Hill, M. N.. New York, Interscience, New York, pp. 794–815.Google Scholar
Nagy, D., (1966). The gravitational attraction of a right rectangular prism, Geophysics, 31, 362–371.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Natonal Geospatial-intelligence Agency, Office of GE OINT Sciences: (2012). Gravity Reference Base Station File History. .
Nettleton, L. L., (1939). Determination of density for reduction of elevation factor. Geophysics, Vol. 4(3), 176–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parks, H. V., and Faller, J. E., (2010). A simple pendulum determination of the gravitational constant, Physical Review Letters, Vol. 105, Issue 11, id. 110801. .CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rothe, George H., and Long, L. T., (1975). Geophysical investigation of a diabase dike swarm in west-central Georgia, Southeastern Geology, 17(2), 67–79.Google Scholar
Stephenson, Randell, and Lambeck, Kurt, (1985). Isostatic response of the lithosphere with in-plane stress: application to central Australia, Journal of Geophysical Research, Vol. 90(B10), 8581–8588.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Talwani, M., and Ewing, M., (1960). Rapid computation of gravitational attraction of three-dimension bodies of arbitrary shape. Geophysics, 25(1), 203–225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Telford, W. M., Geldart, L. P., and Sheriff, R. E., (1990). Applied Geophysics, 2nd Edition, New York, Cambridge University Press, New York, p. 770, table 6.1 Average densities of common sedimentary rocks.
Watts, A. B., (2001). Isostasy and flexure of the lithosphere, Cambridge, United Kingdom, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom, 451 pp.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×