Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-ndmmz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-12T20:00:08.789Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Chapter 25 - Future Developments: Sperm Proteomics

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 April 2021

Ashok Agarwal
Affiliation:
The Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, OH
Ralf Henkel
Affiliation:
University of the Western Cape, South Africa
Ahmad Majzoub
Affiliation:
Hamad Medical Corporation, Doha
Get access

Summary

Spermatozoa are mature male gametes that are produced in the testes of a healthy man by spermatogenesis, with further maturation of sperm taking place during their transit through the epididymis. In the human, approximately 20 to 240 million sperm are produced per day [1]. Unlike other somatic cells present in the human body, spermatozoa contain a head, neck, mid-piece and tail region. The head region contains the genetic material which is transferred to the oocyte during the fertilization process. Apart from DNA, spermatozoa also deliver additional subcellular materials such as oocyte activating factors, RNA, microRNAs and exosomal proteins that are essential for the development of the oocyte into a zygote.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2021

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Plant, TM, Zeleznik, AJ. (2014). Knobil and Neill's Physiology of Reproduction. Amsterdam: Elsevier Academic Press.Google Scholar
World Health Organization. (2010). WHO Laboratory Manual for the Examination and Processing of Human Semen. Geneva: The WHO Press.Google Scholar
Agarwal, A, Gupta, S, Sharma, R. (2016). Oxidation–reduction potential measurement in ejaculated semen samples. In Agarwal, A, Gupta, S and Sharma, R, eds., Andrological Evaluation of Male Infertility: A Laboratory Guide. London: Springer International Publishing, pp. 165–70.Google Scholar
Agarwal, A, Sharma, R, Roychoudhury, S, Du Plessis, S, Sabanegh, E. MiOXSYS: a novel method of measuring oxidation reduction potential in semen and seminal plasma. Fertil Steril 2016; 106: 566–73.e510.Google Scholar
Bracke, A, Peeters, K, Punjabi, U, Hoogewijs, D, Dewilde, S. A search for molecular mechanisms underlying male idiopathic infertility. Reprod BioMed Online 2018; 36: 327–39.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Amaral, A, Lourenço, B, Marques, M, Ramalho-Santos, J. Mitochondria functionality and sperm quality. Reproduction 2013; 146: R163R174.Google Scholar
Amaral, A, Castillo, J, Estanyol, JM, Ballesca, JL, Ramalho-Santos, J, Oliva, R. Human sperm tail proteome suggests new endogenous metabolic pathways. Mol Cell Proteom 2013; 12: 330–42.Google Scholar
Amaral, A, Paiva, C, Attardo Parrinello, C, Estanyol, JM, Ballescà, JLS, Ramalho-Santos, JO, Oliva, R. Identification of proteins involved in human sperm motility using high-throughput differential proteomics. J Proteome Res 2014; 13: 5670–84.Google Scholar
Intasqui, P, Camargo, M, Del Giudice, PT, Spaine, DM, Carvalho, VM, Cardozo, KHM, Cedenho, AP, Bertolla, RP. Unraveling the sperm proteome and post-genomic pathways associated with sperm nuclear DNA fragmentation. J Assist Reprod Genet 2013; 30: 1187–202.Google Scholar
Martínez‐Heredia, J, Estanyol, JM, Ballescà, JL, Oliva, R. Proteomic identification of human sperm proteins. Proteomics 2006; 6: 4356–69.Google Scholar
Wang, S, Wang, W, Xu, Y, Tang, M, Fang, J, Sun, H, Sun, Y, Gu, M, Liu, Z, Zhang, Z. Proteomic characteristics of human sperm cryopreservation. Proteomics 2014; 14: 298310.Google Scholar
Wang, XM, Xiang, Z, Fu, Y, Wu, HL, Zhu, WB, Fan, LQ. Comparative proteomics reveal the association between SPANX proteins and clinical outcomes of artificial insemination with donor sperm. Scientific Reports 2018; 8: 6850.Google Scholar
Panner Selvam, MK, Agarwal, A, Dias, TR, Martins, AD, Baskaran, S, Samanta, L. Molecular pathways associated with sperm biofunction are not affected by the presence of round cell and leukocyte proteins in human sperm proteome. J Proteome Res 2018; 18: 1191−7.Google Scholar
Panner Selvam, MK, Agarwal, A, Dias, TR, Martins, AD, Samanta, L. Presence of round cells proteins do not interfere with identification of human sperm proteins from frozen semen samples by LC-MS/MS. Int J Mol Sci 2019; 20: 314.Google Scholar
Glish, GL, Vachet, RW. The basics of mass spectrometry in the twenty-first century. Nat Rev Drug Discov 2003; 2: 140.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zhou, T, Zhou, Z-M, Guo, X-J. Bioinformatics for spermatogenesis: annotation of male reproduction based on proteomics. Asian J Androl 2013; 15: 594.Google Scholar
Lan, N, Montelione, GT, Gerstein, M. Ontologies for proteomics: towards a systematic definition of structure and function that scales to the genome level. Curr Opin Chem Biol 2003; 7: 4454.Google Scholar
Agarwal, A, Durairajanayagam, D, Halabi, J, Peng, J, Vazquez-Levin, M. Proteomics, oxidative stress and male infertility. Reprod BioMed Online 2014; 29: 3258.Google Scholar
Johnston, DS, Wooters, J, Kopf, GS, Qiu, Y, Roberts, KP. Analysis of the human sperm proteome. Ann NY Acad Sci 2005; 1061: 190202.Google Scholar
Baker, MA, Reeves, G, Hetherington, L, Müller, J, Baur, I, Aitken, RJ. Identification of gene products present in Triton X-100 soluble and insoluble fractions of human spermatozoa lysates using LC-MS/MS analysis. Proteom Clin Appl 2007; 1: 524–32.Google Scholar
Gilany, K, Lakpour, N, Vafakhah, M, Sadeghi, MR. The profile of human sperm proteome: a mini-review. J Reprod Infertil 2011; 12: 193–9.Google Scholar
Baker, MA, Naumovski, N, Hetherington, L, Weinberg, A, Velkov, T, Aitken, RJ. Head and flagella subcompartmental proteomic analysis of human spermatozoa. Proteomics 2013;13: 6174.Google Scholar
Nixon, B, Mitchell, LA, Anderson, AL, Mclaughlin, EA, O'Bryan, MK, Aitken, RJ. Proteomic and functional analysis of human sperm detergent resistant membranes. J Cell Physiol 2011; 226: 2651–65.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
de Mateo, S, Castillo, J, Estanyol, JM, Ballescà, JL, Oliva, R. Proteomic characterization of the human sperm nucleus. Proteomics 2011; 11: 2714–26.Google Scholar
de Mateo, S, Martínez-Heredia, J, Estanyol, JM, Domíguez-Fandos, D, Vidal-Taboada, JM, Ballescà, JL, Oliva, R. Marked correlations in protein expression identified by proteomic analysis of human spermatozoa. Proteomics 2007; 7: 4264–77.Google Scholar
Kupis, Ł, Dobroński, PA, Radziszewski, P. Varicocele as a source of male infertilitycurrent treatment techniques. Cent European J Urol 2015; 68: 365–70.Google Scholar
Hosseinifar, H, Gourabi, H, Salekdeh, GH, Alikhani, M, Mirshahvaladi, S, Sabbaghian, M, Modarresi, T, Gilani, MAS. Study of sperm protein profile in men with and without varicocele using two-dimensional gel electrophoresis. Urology 2013; 81: 293300.Google Scholar
Agarwal, A, Sharma, R, Durairajanayagam, D, Ayaz, A, Cui, Z, Willard, B, Gopalan, B, Sabanegh, E. Major protein alterations in spermatozoa from infertile men with unilateral varicocele. Reprod Biol Endocrinol 2015; 13: 8.Google Scholar
Agarwal, A, Sharma, R, Durairajanayagam, D, Cui, Z, Ayaz, A, Gupta, S, Willard, B, Gopalan, B, Sabanegh, E. Spermatozoa protein alterations in infertile men with bilateral varicocele. Asian J Androl 2016; 18: 4353.Google Scholar
Agarwal, A, Sharma, R, Durairajanayagam, D, Cui, Z, Ayaz, A, Gupta, S, Willard, B, Gopalan, B, Sabanegh, E. Differential proteomic profiling of spermatozoal proteins of infertile men with unilateral or bilateral varicocele. Urology 2015; 85: 580–8.Google Scholar
Agarwal, A, Sharma, R, Samanta, L, Durairajanayagam, D, Sabanegh, E. Proteomic signatures of infertile men with clinical varicocele and their validation studies reveal mitochondrial dysfunction leading to infertility. Asian J Androl 2016; 18: 282–91.Google Scholar
Samanta, L, Agarwal, A, Swain, N, Sharma, R, Gopalan, B, Esteves, SC, Durairajanayagam, D, Sabanegh, E. Proteomic signatures of sperm mitochondria in varicocele: clinical use as biomarkers of varicocele associated infertility. J Urol 2018; 200: 414–22.Google Scholar
Siegel, RL, Miller, KD, statistics, Jemal A. Cancer. CA Cancer J Clin 2019; 69: 734.Google Scholar
Rives, N, Perdrix, A, Hennebicq, S, Saïas‐Magnan, J, Melin, MC, Berthaut, I, Barthélémy, C, Daudin, M, Szerman, E, Bresson, JL. The semen quality of 1158 men with testicular cancer at the time of cryopreservation: results of the French National CECOS Network. J Androl 2012; 33: 1394–401.Google Scholar
Dias, TR, Agarwal, A, Pushparaj, PN, Ahmad, G, Sharma, R. New insights on the mechanisms affecting fertility in men with non-seminoma testicular cancer before cancer therapy. World J Mens Health 2018; 38: 198207.Google Scholar
Dias, TR, Agarwal, A, Pushparaj, PN, Ahmad, G, Sharma, R. Reduced semen quality in patients with testicular cancer seminoma is associated with alterations in the expression of sperm proteins. Asian J Androl 2020; 22: 8893.Google ScholarPubMed
Agarwal, A, Tvrda, E, Sharma, R, Gupta, S, Ahmad, G, Sabanegh, ES. Spermatozoa protein profiles in cryobanked semen samples from testicular cancer patients before treatment. Fertil Steril 2015; 104: e260.Google Scholar
Panner Selvam, MK, Agarwal, A, Pushparaj, PN. Altered molecular pathways in the proteome of cryopreserved sperm in testicular cancer patients before treatment. Int J Mol Sci 2019; 20: 677.Google Scholar
Panner Selvam, MK, Agarwal, A, Pushparaj, PN. A quantitative global proteomics approach to understanding the functional pathways dysregulated in the spermatozoa of asthenozoospermic testicular cancer patients. Andrology 2019; 7: 454–62.Google Scholar
Hamada, A, Esteves, SC, Agarwal, A. Unexplained male infertility: potential causes and management. Hum Androl 2011; 1: 216.Google Scholar
Wallach, EE, Moghissi, KS, Wallach, EE. Unexplained infertility. Fertil Steril 1983; 39: 521.Google Scholar
Frapsauce, C, Pionneau, C, Bouley, J, Delarouziere, V, Berthaut, I, Ravel, C, Antoine, J-M, Soubrier, F, Mandelbaum, J. Proteomic identification of target proteins in normal but nonfertilizing sperm. Fertil Steril 2014; 102: 372–80.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Azpiazu, R, Amaral, A, Castillo, J, Estanyol, JM, Guimerà, M, Ballescà, JL, Balasch, J, Oliva, R. High-throughput sperm differential proteomics suggests that epigenetic alterations contribute to failed assisted reproduction. Hum Reprod 2014; 29: 1225–37.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Légaré, C, Droit, A, Fournier, F, Bourassa, S, Force, A, Cloutier, F, Tremblay, R, Sullivan, R. Investigation of male infertility using quantitative comparative proteomics. J Proteom Res 2014; 13: 5403–14.Google Scholar
Xu, W, Hu, H, Wang, Z, Chen, X, Yang, F, Zhu, Z, Fang, P, Dai, J, Wang, L, Shi, H et al. Proteomic characteristics of spermatozoa in normozoospermic patients with infertility. J Proteom 2012; 75: 5426–36.Google Scholar
Panner Selvam, MK, Agarwal, A, Pushparaj, PN, Baskaran, S, Bendou, H. Sperm proteome analysis and identification of fertility-associated biomarkers in unexplained male infertility. Genes 2019; 10: 522.Google Scholar
Giacomini, E, Ura, B, Giolo, E, Luppi, S, Martinelli, M, Garcia, RC, Ricci, G. Comparative analysis of the seminal plasma proteomes of oligoasthenozoospermic and normozoospermic men. Reprod Biomed Online 2015; 30: 522–31.Google Scholar
Herwig, R, Knoll, C, Planyavsky, M, Pourbiabany, A, Greilberger, J, Bennett, KL. Proteomic analysis of seminal plasma from infertile patients with oligoasthenoteratozoospermia due to oxidative stress and comparison with fertile volunteers. Fertil Steril 2013; 100: 355–66.e352.Google Scholar
Liu, X, Wang, W, Zhu, P, Wang, J, Wang, Y, Wang, X, Liu, J, Li, N, Lin, C, Liu, F. In-depth quantitative proteome analysis of seminal plasma from men with oligoasthenozoospermia and normozoospermia. Reprod Biomed Online 2018; 37: 467–79.Google Scholar
Martínez-Heredia, J, de Mateo, S, Vidal-Taboada, JM, Ballescà, JL, Oliva, R. Identification of proteomic differences in asthenozoospermic sperm samples. Hum Reprod 2008; 23: 783–91.Google Scholar
Nowicka-Bauer, K, Lepczynski, A, Ozgo, M, Kamieniczna, M, Fraczek, M, Stanski, L, Olszewska, M, Malcher, A, Skrzypczak, W, Kurpisz, M. Sperm mitochondrial dysfunction and oxidative stress as possible reasons for isolated asthenozoospermia. J Physiol Pharmacol 2018; 69(3). doi: 10.26402/jpp.2018.3.05Google Scholar
Parte, PP, Rao, P, Redij, S, Lobo, V, D'Souza, SJ, Gajbhiye, R, Kulkarni, V. Sperm phosphoproteome profiling by ultra performance liquid chromatography followed by data independent analysis (LC–MSE) reveals altered proteomic signatures in asthenozoospermia. J Proteom 2012; 75: 5861–71.Google Scholar
Saraswat, M, Joenväärä, S, Jain, T, Tomar, AK, Sinha, A, Singh, S, Yadav, S, Renkonen, R. Human spermatozoa quantitative proteomic signature classifies normo- and asthenozoospermia. Mol Cell Proteom 2017; 16: 5772.Google Scholar
Sinha, A, Singh, V, Singh, S, Yadav, S. Proteomic analyses reveal lower expression of TEX40 and ATP6V0A2 proteins related to calcium ion entry and acrosomal acidification in asthenozoospermic males. Life Sciences 2019; 218: 81–8.Google Scholar
Siva, AB, Kameshwari, DB, Singh, V, Pavani, K, Sundaram, CS, Rangaraj, N, Deenadayal, M, Shivaji, S. Proteomics-based study on asthenozoospermia: differential expression of proteasome alpha complex. Mol Hum Reprod 2010; 16(7): 452–62. doi: 10.1093/molehr/gaq009Google Scholar
Zhao, C, Huo, R, Wang, F-Q, Lin, M, Zhou, Z-M, Sha, J-H. Identification of several proteins involved in regulation of sperm motility by proteomic analysis. Fertil Steril 2007; 87: 436–8.Google Scholar
Cao, X, Cui, Y, Zhang, X, Lou, J, Zhou, J, Bei, H, Wei, R. Proteomic profile of human spermatozoa in healthy and asthenozoospermic individuals. Reprod Biol Endocrinol 2018;16: 16.Google Scholar
Swain, N, Samanta, L, Agarwal, A, Kumar, S, Dixit, A, Gopalan, B, Durairajanayagam, D, Sharma, R, Puspharaj, PN, Baskaran, S. Aberrant upregulation of compensatory redox molecular machines may contribute to sperm dysfunction in infertile men with unilateral varicocele: a proteomic insight. Antioxid Redox Signal 2019; 32: 504–21.Google Scholar
Hashemitabar, M, Sabbagh, S, Orazizadeh, M, Ghadiri, A, Bahmanzadeh, M. A proteomic analysis on human sperm tail: comparison between normozoospermia and asthenozoospermia. J Assist Reprod Genet 2015; 32: 853–63.Google Scholar
Liao, TT, Xiang, Z, Zhu, WB, Fan, LQ. Proteome analysis of round-headed and normal spermatozoa by 2-D fluorescence difference gel electrophoresis and mass spectrometry. Asian J Androl 2009; 11: 683–93.Google Scholar
Dam, AHDM, Feenstra, I, Westphal, JR, Ramos, L, van Golde, RJT, Kremer, JAM. Globozoospermia revisited. Hum Reprod Update 2006; 13: 6375.Google Scholar
Kovac, JR, Lipshultz, LI. The significance of insulin-like factor 3 as a marker of intratesticular testosterone. Fertil Steril 2013; 99: 66–7.Google Scholar
Oehninger, S, Franken, DR, Ombelet, W. Sperm functional tests. Fertil Steril 2014; 102: 1528–33.Google Scholar
Hamada, A, Sharma, R, du Plessis, SS, Willard, B, Yadav, SP, Sabanegh, E, Agarwal, A. Two-dimensional differential in-gel electrophoresis-based proteomics of male gametes in relation to oxidative stress. Fertil Steril 2013; 99: 1216–26.e1212.Google Scholar
Sharma, R, Agarwal, A, Mohanty, G, Hamada, AJ, Gopalan, B, Willard, B, Yadav, S, du Plessis, S. Proteomic analysis of human spermatozoa proteins with oxidative stress. Reprod Biol Endocrinol 2013; 11: 48.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ayaz, A, Agarwal, A, Sharma, R, Kothandaraman, N, Cakar, Z, Sikka, S. Proteomic analysis of sperm proteins in infertile men with high levels of reactive oxygen species. Andrologia 2018; 50: e13015.Google Scholar
Hosseinifar, H, Sabbaghian, M, Nasrabadi, D, Modarresi, T, Dizaj, AV, Gourabi, H, Gilani, MA. Study of the effect of varicocelectomy on sperm proteins expression in patients with varicocele and poor sperm quality by using two-dimensional gel electrophoresis. J Assist Reprod Genet 2014; 31: 725–9.Google Scholar
Agarwal, A, Sharma, R, Samanta, L, Durairajanayagam, D, Sabanegh, E. Proteomic signatures of infertile men with clinical varicocele and their validation studies reveal mitochondrial dysfunction leading to infertility. Asian J Androl 2016; 18: 282–91.Google Scholar
Intasqui, P, Camargo, M, Antoniassi, MP, Cedenho, AP, Carvalho, VM, Cardozo, KHM, Zylbersztejn, DS, Bertolla, RP. Association between the seminal plasma proteome and sperm functional traits. Fertil Steril 2016; 105: 617–28.Google Scholar
Schiza, CG, Jarv, K, Diamandis, EP, Drabovich, AP. An emerging role of TEX101 protein as a male infertility biomarker. EJIFCC 2014; 25: 926.Google Scholar
Bieniek, JM, Drabovich, AP, Lo, KC. Seminal biomarkers for the evaluation of male infertility. Asian J Androl 2016; 18: 426–33.Google Scholar
Huang, Z, Lin, L, Gao, Y, Chen, Y, Yan, X, Xing, J, Hang, W. Bladder cancer determination via two urinary metabolites: a biomarker pattern approach. Mol Cell Proteom 2011; 10: M111.007922.Google Scholar
Zhang, J, Mu, X, Xia, Y, Martin, FL, Hang, W, Liu, L, Tian, M, Huang, Q, Shen, H. Metabolomic analysis reveals a unique urinary pattern in normozoospermic infertile men. J Proteom Res 2014; 13: 3088–99.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×