Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-684899dbb8-8hm5d Total loading time: 0.478 Render date: 2022-05-17T05:50:33.312Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "useRatesEcommerce": false, "useNewApi": true }

Chapter One - The integrative roles of plant secondary metabolites in natural systems

a synthesis

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 August 2012

Glenn R. Iason
Affiliation:
Ecological Sciences Group, The James Hutton Institute
Marcel Dicke
Affiliation:
Laboratory of Entomology, Wageningen University
Susan E. Hartley
Affiliation:
Department of Biology, University of York
Glenn R. Iason
Affiliation:
James Hutton Institute, Aberdeen
Marcel Dicke
Affiliation:
Wageningen Universiteit, The Netherlands
Susan E. Hartley
Affiliation:
University of York
Get access

Summary

Introduction

Since Fraenkel (1959) recognised that plant secondary metabolites (PSMs) were not simply plant waste products but served to defend them against insect herbivores, numerous ecological roles for these intriguing compounds have been established, notably as defences against a broad range of herbivores and pathogens, but also as mediators of interactions with competitors and mutualists, and as a defence against abiotic stress. A single compound can influence multiple components within an ecological system, and can have effects that act across many different scales. Add to this the huge diversity of PSMs that have now been characterised, and the possible interactive effects among them, and it is clear that PSMs either individually or as groups can no longer be considered only in the context of interactions between the plant and a single other species. They are now recognised as major contributors to the bridge between genes and ecosystems, because (context-dependent) gene expression patterns influence the phenotype of a plant. The effects of PSMs are now known to affect community dynamics and to cascade through ecosystems, driving their composition and function and acting as agents of their evolution (e.g. Whitham et al., 2006). Here, we summarise the key points and emergent themes from the chapters in this book and provide a synthesis of the recent developments in the ecology and evolution of PSMs, illustrating how a range of approaches, including molecular, transgenic and metabolomic techniques, have brought us to the cusp of a new understanding of their integrative roles in ecosystems.

Distribution, allocation and evolutionary selection for PSMs

The chemical diversity of PSMs, combined with the number and complexity of potential biotic and abiotic interactions in which they are involved, has hitherto prevented these systems being predictable beyond the outcome of the strongest, pairwise and most well defined of these interactions. However, several recent developments are moving us towards a better understanding and predictability of the roles of PSMs in more complex systems.

Type
Chapter
Information
The Ecology of Plant Secondary Metabolites
From Genes to Global Processes
, pp. 1 - 9
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Agrawal, A. A. 2011 Current trends in the evolutionary ecology of plant defenceFunctional Ecology 25 420CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aharoni, A.Jongsma, M. A.Bouwmeester, H. J. 2005 Volatile science? Metabolic engineering of terpenoids in plantsTrends in Plant Science 10 594CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Baldwin, I. T.Ohnmeiss, T. E. 1994 Wound-induced changes in root and shoot jasmonic acid pools correlate with induced nicotine synthesis in Spegazzini and ComesJournal of Chemical Ecology 20 2139CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bardgett, R. D.Wardle, D. A.Teates, G. W. 1998 Linking above-ground and below-ground interactions: how plant responses to foliar herbivory influences soil organismsSoil Biology and Biochemistry 30 1867CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Becerra, J. X.Noge, K.Venable, D. L. 2009 Macroevolutionary chemical escalation in an ancient plant–herbivore arms raceProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 106 18062CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bezemer, M.Jones, T. H. 1998 Plant–insect herbivore interactions under elevated atmospheric CO2: quantitative analyses and guild effectsOikos 82 212CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Broekgaarden, C.Poelman, E. H.Voorrips, R. E.Dicke, M.Vosman, B. 2010 Intraspecific variation in herbivore community composition and transcriptional profiles in field-grown cultivarsJournal of Experimental Botany 61 807CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cates, R. G. 1996 The role of mixtures and variation in the production of terpenoids in conifer–insect–pathogen interactionsDiversity and Redundancy in Ecological Interactions: Recent Advances in Phytochemistry 30 179CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cronin, G.Hay, M. E. 1996 Induction of seaweed chemical defenses by amphipod grazingEcology 77 2287CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Czaran, T. L.Hoekstra, R. F.Pagie, L. 2002 Chemical warfare between microbes promotes biodiversityProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 99 786CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Degenhardt, J.Gershenzon, J.Baldwin, I. T.Kessler, A. 2003 Attracting friends to feast on foes: engineering terpene emission to make crop plants more attractive to herbivore enemiesCurrent Opinion in Biotechnology 14 169CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Degenhardt, J.Hiltpold, I.Kollner, T. G. 2009 Restoring a maize root signal that attracts insect-killing nematodes to control a major pestProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 106 13213CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dicke, M.Baldwin, I. T. 2010 The evolutionary context for herbivore-induced plant volatiles: beyond the ‘cry for help’Trends in Plant Science 15 167CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Firn, R. D.Jones, C. G. 2000 The evolution of secondary metabolism – a unifying modelMolecular Microbiology 37 989CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fraenkel, G. S. 1959 The of secondary plant substancesScience 129 1466CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gange, A. C.Stagg, P. G.Ward, L. K. 2002 Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi affect phytophagous insect specialismEcology Letters 5 11CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gershenzon, J. 1994 The metabolic costs of terpenoid accumulation in higher plantsJournal of Chemical Ecology 20 1281CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Grime, J. P.Cornelissen, J. H. C.Thompson, K.Hodgson, J. G. 1996 Evidence of a causal connection between anti-herbivore defence and the decomposition rate of leavesOikos 77 489CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hartley, S. E.Jones, C. G.Couper, G. C.Jones, T. H. 2000 Phenolic biosynthesis under elevated CO2Global Change Biology 6 497CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Herms, D. A.Mattson, W. J. 1992 The dilemma of plants: to grow or to defendQuarterly Review of Biology 67 283CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Iason, G. R.O’Reilly-Wapstra, J. M.Brewer, M. J.Summers, R. W.Moore, B. D. 2011 Do multiple herbivores maintain chemical diversity of Scots pine monoterpenes?Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B 366 1337CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Johnson, M. T. J.Agrawal, A. A.Maron, J. LSalminen, J. P. 2009 Heritability, covariation and natural selection on 24 traits of common evening primrose () from a field experimentJournal of Evolutionary Biology 22 1295CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, S. N.Staley, J. T.McLeod, F. A. L.Hartley, S. E. 2011 Plant-mediated effects of soil invertebrates and summer drought on above-ground multi-trophic interactionsJournal of Ecology 99 57CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jones, C. G.Hartley, S. E. 1999 A precursor competition model for phenolic allocation in plantsOikos 86 27CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaplan, I.Halitschke, R.Kessler, A. 2008 Physiological integration of roots and shoots in plant defense strategies links above- and belowground herbivoryEcology Letters 11 841CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kessler, A.Halitschke, R.Baldwin, I. T. 2004 Silencing the jasmonate cascade: induced plant defenses and insect populationsScience 305 665CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kessler, D.Gase, K.Baldwin, I. T. 2008 Field experiments with transformed plants reveal the sense of floral scentsScience 321 1200CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kos, M.Van Loon, J. J. A.Dicke, M.Vet, L. E. M. 2009 Transgenic plants as vital components of integrated pest managementTrends in Biotechnology 27 621CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lankau, R. A. 2007 Specialist and generalist herbivores exert opposing selection on a chemical defenseNew Phytologist 175 176CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lankau, R. A.Strauss, S. Y. 2008 Community complexity drives patterns of natural selection on a chemical defense of American Naturalist 171 150CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Linhart, Y. B.Keefover-Ring, K.Mooney, K. A.Breland, B.Thompson, J. D. 2005 A chemical polymorphism in a multitrophic setting: thyme monoterpene composition and food web structureAmerican Naturalist 166 517CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moles, A. T.Bonser, S. P.Poore, A. G. B.Wallis, I. R.Foley, W. J. 2011 Assessing the evidence for latitudinal gradients in plant defence and herbivoryFunctional Ecology 25 380CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moore, B. D.Lawler, I. R.Wallis, I. R.Beale, C. M.Foley, W. J. 2010 Palatability mapping: a koala’s eye view of spatial variation in habitat qualityEcology 91 3165CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Penuelas, J.Staudt, M. 2010 BVOCs and global changeTrends in Plant Science 15 133CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pineda, A.Zheng, S. J.van Loon, J. J. A.Pieterse, C. M. J.Dicke, M. 2010 Helping plants to deal with insects: the role of beneficial soil-borne microbesTrends in Plant Science 15 507CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Poelman, E. H.Broekgaarden, C.van Loon, J. J. A.Dicke, M. 2008 Early season herbivore differentially affects plant defence responses to subsequently colonizing herbivores and their abundance in the fieldMolecular Ecology 17 3352CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rhoades, D. F. 1979 Evolution of plant chemical defense against herbivoresRosenthal, G. A.Janzen, D. G.Herbivores: Their Interaction with Secondary Plant MetabolitesNew YorkAcademic PressGoogle Scholar
Rhoades, D. F. 1985 Offensive–defensive interactions between herbivores and plants – their relevance in herbivore population-dynamics and ecological theoryAmerican Naturalist 125 205CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Salminen, J. P.Karonen, M. 2011 Chemical ecology of tannins and other phenolics: we need a change in approachFunctional Ecology 25 325CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schoonhoven, L. M.van Loon, J. J. A.Dicke, M. 2005 Insect–Plant BiologyOxfordOxford University PressGoogle Scholar
Siemens, D. H.Garner, S. H.Mitchell-Olds, T.Callaway, R. M. 2002 Cost of defense in the context of plant competition: may grow and defendEcology 83 505CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smolander, A.Ketola, R. A.Kotiaho, T. 2006 Volatile monoterpenes in soil atmosphere under birch and conifers: effects on soil N transformationsSoil Biology and Biochemistry 38 3436CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Suikkanen, S.Fistarol, G. O.Graneli, E. 2004 Allelopathic effects of the Baltic cyanobacteria , and on algal monoculturesJournal of Experimental Marine Biology 308 85CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tack, A. J. M.Ovaskainen, O.Pulkkinen, P.Roslin, T. 2010 Spatial location dominates over host plant genotype in structuring an herbivore communityEcology 91 2660CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
van der Putten, W. H.Vet, L. E. M.Harvey, J. A.Wackers, F. L. 2001 Linking above- and belowground multitrophic interactions of plants, herbivores, pathogens, and their antagonistsTrends in Ecology and Evolution 16 547CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wei, J. N.Wang, L. H.Zhao, J. H. 2011 Ecological trade-offs between jasmonic acid-dependent direct and indirect plant defences in tritrophic interactionsNew Phytologist 189 557CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Whitham, T. G.Young, W. P.Martinsen, G. D. 2003 Community and ecosystem genetics: a consequence of the extended phenotypeEcology 84 559CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whitham, T. G.Bailey, J. K.Schweitzer, J. A. 2006 A framework for community and ecosystem genetics: from genes to ecosystemsNature Reviews Genetics 7 510CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zarate, S. I.Kempema, L. A.Walling, L. L. 2007 Silverleaf whitefly induces salicylic acid defenses and suppresses effectual jasmonic acid defensesPlant Physiology 143 866CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zhang, P. J.Zheng, S. J.van Loon, J. J. A. 2009 Whiteflies interfere with indirect plant defense against spider mites in Lima beanProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 106 21202CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
5
Cited by

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×