Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-45l2p Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T16:35:14.871Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Resiliency or Resignation: Paul F. Lazarsfeld, Austro-Marxism, and the Psychology of Unemployment, 1919–1933

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 July 2019

Charles H. Clavey
Charles H. Clavey*
Affiliation:
Department of History, Harvard University
*
Corresponding author. E-mail: cclavey@fas.harvard.edu
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The Unemployed of Marienthal (1933) has long been esteemed as a classic of twentieth-century social science; its portrait of the effects of joblessness on individual minds and social institutions has inspired generations of researchers. But this reception has largely overlooked the political origins and implications of the study. This essay resituates Marienthal in the context of its creation and dissemination: the distinctive Marxism of interwar Austria. Specifically, it demonstrates that Marienthal introduced social-psychological methods and findings into Marxist debates about the present state and future prospects of the working class. Led by Paul F. Lazarsfeld, the Marienthal researchers adopted the Austro-Marxist goal of creating a model proletariat through a program of “anticipatory socialism.” But by finding that unemployment confounded efforts to reform the working class, Marienthal undermined the very program it aimed to support. In fact, the essay shows, Marienthal authorized arguments that the unemployed were unreliable political actors—“declassed” workers as likely to become reactionaries as revolutionaries. The essay concludes by considering whether Marienthal embodied a distinctively Austro-Marxist “style” of thinking and research.

Type
Articles
Information
Modern Intellectual History , Volume 18 , Issue 1 , March 2021 , pp. 146 - 170
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2019

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

For their comments and guidance on earlier drafts of this essay, I would like to thank Peter E. Gordon, Samuel Moyn, Elizabeth Lunbeck, Stuart Middleton, and the reviewers and editors of Modern Intellectual History.

References

2 McMurry, Robert N., “When Men Eat Dogs,” The Nation 136/3522 (1933), 15–18Google Scholar.

3 Ibid., 16.

4 Ibid., 15.

5 Ibid., 16.

6 Ibid., 17.

7 As has recently been argued, this conception of a “locality” as simultaneously “a particular geographical area” and a “universal plane” was a characteristic of the social sciences of interwar Central Europe. See Lebow, Katherine, Mazurek, Małgorzata, and Wawrzyniak, Joanna, “Making Modern Social Science: The Global Imagination in East Central and Southeastern Europe after Versailles,” Contemporary European History 27/4 (2019), 137–42CrossRefGoogle Scholar, at 138.

8 Jahoda, Marie, Zeisel, Hans, and Lazarsfeld, Paul F., Die Arbeitslosen von Marienthal: ein soziographischer Versuch über die Wirkungen langdauernder Arbeitslosigkeit (Leipzig, 1933)Google Scholar. Unless otherwise noted, all translations are my own.

9 McMurry, “When Men Eat Dogs,” 15.

10 Ibid., 17.

11 A notable exception is Neurath, Paul, “Sixty Years since Marienthal,” Canadian Journal of Sociology 20/1 (1995), 91–105CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

12 I have borrowed this phrase from Rabinbach, Anson, “Politics and Pedagogy: The Austrian Social Democratic Youth Movement 1931–32,” Journal of Contemporary History 13/2 (1978), 337–56CrossRefGoogle Scholar; cf. Rabinbach, , The Crisis of Austrian Socialism: From Red Vienna to Civil War, 1927–1934 (Chicago, 1983), chap. 3Google Scholar.

13 Lebow, Mazurek, and Wawrzyniak, “Making Modern Social Science,” 140; cf. Dale, Gareth, Karl Polanyi: A Life on the Left (New York, 2016), 9Google Scholar.

14 For an introduction to Austro-Marxism see Bottomore, Tom, “Introduction,” in Bottomore, Tom and Goode, Patrick, eds., Austro-Marxism (Oxford, 1978), 1–44Google Scholar.

15 For an overview of these influences on Austro-Marxism see Glaser, Ernst, Im Umfeld des Austromarxismus: Ein Beitrag zur Geistesgeschichte des österreichischen Sozialismus (Vienna, 1981), 33–76Google Scholar, 115–28.

16 On the Austro-Marxists’ theory of anticipatory socialism see Rabinbach, Crisis of Austrian Socialism, 24–31; Maderthaner, Wolfgang, “Austro-Marxism: Mass Culture and Anticipatory Socialism,” Austrian Studies 14 (2006), 21–36Google Scholar.

17 On Austro-Marxists’ conception of the transition from capitalism to socialism see Bottomore, Tom, “Austro-Marxist Conceptions of the Transition from Capitalism to Socialism,” International Journal of Comparative Sociology 30/1–2 (1989), 109–20CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

18 Adler quoted in Maderthaner, “Anticipatory Socialism,” 24. Bauer quoted in Gruber, Helmut, Red Vienna: Experiment in Working-Class Culture, 1919–1934 (New York, 1991), 6Google Scholar.

19 Adler, Max, Neue Menschen: Gedanken über sozialistische Erziehung (Berlin, 1924)Google Scholar.

20 On the origins of this problem see Pierson, Stanley, Marxist Intellectuals and the Working-Class Mentality in Germany, 1887–1912 (Cambridge, 1993), chaps. 2–4Google Scholar. For its emergence in Austro-Marxism see Maderthaner, “Anticipatory Socialism”; Gruber, Red Vienna, 5–10.

21 Paul F. Lazarsfeld, Reminisces of Paul Felix Lazarsfeld, Oral History, 1962, interview by Joan Gordon and Daniel Bell, Nov. 1961, 46, Columbia Center for Oral History, Columbia University; cf. Lazarsfeld, Paul F. “Die sozialistische Erziehung und das Gemeinschaftsleben der Jugend,” Die sozialistische Erziehung 3 (1923), 191–4Google Scholar.

22 In addition to the literature cited above see Langewiesche, Dieter, Zur Freizeit des Arbeiters: Bildungsbestrebungen und Freizeitgestaltung österreichische Arbeiter im Kaiserreich und in der ersten Republik (Stuttgart, 1980)Google Scholar; Weidenholzer, Josef, Auf dem Weg zum “neuen Menschen”: Bildungs- und Kulturarbeit der österreichischen Sozialdemokratie in der Ersten Republik (Vienna, 1981)Google Scholar.

23 See Wegs, J. Robert, “Working Class Respectability: The Viennese Experience,” Journal of Social History 15/4 (1982), 621–35CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

24 For an overview of this dynamic see Frei, Alfred Georg, Rotes Wien: Austromarxismus und Arbeiterkultur: sozialdemokratische Wohnungs- und Kommunalpolitik, 1919–1934 (Berlin, 1984)Google Scholar; Gruber, Red Vienna, 46–65.

25 Details about life in the “people's palaces” can be found in Sieder, Reinhard, “Housing Policy, Social Welfare, and Family Life in ‘Red Vienna’, 1919–34,” Oral History 13/2 (1985), 35–48Google Scholar.

26 One exception is Mozetič, Gerald, Die Gesellschaftstheorie des Austromarxismus: Geistesgeschichtliche Voraussetzungen, Methodologie und soziologisches Programm (Darmstadt, 1987), chap. 6Google Scholar.

27 See e.g. Leichter, Käthe, Wie leben die Wiener Heimarbeiter? Eine Erhebung über die Arbeits- und Lebensverhältnisse von tausend Wiener Heimarbeitern (Vienna, 1923)Google Scholar; Leichter, , Mein Arbeitstag, mein Wochenende: 150 Berichte von Textilarbeiterinnen (Berlin, 1930)Google Scholar; Leichter, , So leben wir … 1320 Industriearbeiterinnen berichten ihr Leben (Vienna, 1932)Google Scholar.

28 See e.g. Rühle, Otto, Die Seele des proletarischen Kindes (Vienna, 1925)Google Scholar; Woldt, Richard, Die Lebenswelt des Industriearbeiters (Leipzig, 1926)Google Scholar.

29 An overview of this literature can be found in Wegs, J. Robert, Growing Up Working Class: Continuity and Change among Viennese Youth, 1890–1938 (University Park, PA, 1989), chap. 6Google Scholar.

30 Representative works of this literature include Schlesinger-Eckstein, Therese, Wie will und wie soll das Proletariat seine Kinder erziehen? (Vienna, 1921)Google Scholar; Bühler, Charlotte, Das Seelenleben des Jugendlichen: Versuch einer Analyse und Theorie der psychischen Pubertät (Jena, 1929)Google Scholar; Rada, Margarete, Das reifende Proletariermädchen: Ein Beitrag zur Umweltforschung (Vienna, 1931)Google Scholar; Hetzer, Hildegard, Mütterlichkeit: Psychologische Untersuchung der Grundformen mütterlicher Haltung (Leipzig, 1937)Google Scholar.

31 Hans Zeisel, “Zur Geschichte der Soziographie,” in Jahoda, Zeisel, and Lazarsfeld, Marienthal, 89–123, at 110.

32 Ibid., 109.

33 See e.g. Weiss, Hilde, “Die Enquête ouvrière von Karl Marx,” Zeitschrift für Sozialforschung 5 (1936), 76–98CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

34 Bühler presented her fully developed theory in Bühler, Charlotte, Kindheit und Jugend: Genese des Bewusstseins (Leipzig, 1931)Google Scholar.

35 For Bühler's analyses of diaries see Bühler, Charlotte, Tagebuch eines jungen Mädchens (Jena, 1922)Google Scholar; Buhlmann, Rosemarie and Bühler, Charlotte, Zwei Knabentagebücher: Mit einer Einleitung über die Bedeutung des Tagebuchs für die Jugendpsychologie (Jena, 1925)Google Scholar; Bühler, Charlotte, Zwei Mädchentagebücher (Jena, 1927)Google Scholar. For her psychobiographical study see Frenkel, Else and Bühler, Charlotte, Wunsch und Pflicht im Aufbau des menschlichen Lebens (Vienna, 1937)Google Scholar.

36 On Bühler's time in the United States see her autobiography, “Charlotte Bühler,” in Renner, Karl-Heinz and Lück, Helmut E., eds., Psychologie in Selbstdarstellungen, (Stuttgart, 1972), 9–41Google Scholar.

37 See Hetzer, Hildegard, Wolf, Käthe, and Bühler, Charlotte, Babytests: Eine Testserie für das erste Lebensjahr (Leipzig, 1928)Google Scholar; Bühler, Charlotte, Zur Psychologie des Kleinkindes experimentell-psychologische Arbeiten (Leipzig, 1928)Google Scholar; Bühler, Charlotte and Hetzer, Hildegard, Kleinkindertests: Entwicklungstests vom 1. bis 6. Lebensjahr (Leipzig, 1932)Google Scholar.

38 Beck, S. J., “Notes and Comments,” American Journal of Orthopsychiatry 4/3 (1934), 421–8CrossRefGoogle Scholar, at 422.

39 Ibid., 423.

40 For an overview of the political aspects of the center see Ash, Mitchell G., “Die Entwicklung des Wiener Psychologischen Instituts 1922–1938,” in Eschbach, Achim, ed., Karl Bühler's Theory of Language (Amsterdam, 1988), 303–25CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

41 For a description of this process see Hetzer, Hildegard, Kindheit und Armut: Psychologische Methoden in Armutsforschung und Armutsbekämpfung (Leipzig, 1929)Google Scholar; Hartmann, Hermann, Die Wohlfahrtspflege Wiens (Vienna, 1929)Google Scholar; Beck, “Notes and Comments,” 423–5.

42 Sieder, “Housing Policy,” 44.

43 Quoted in ibid.

44 Sieder, “Housing Policy,” 43–8.

45 Beck, “Notes and Comments,” 423.

46 For a description of this research program by its participants see Hetzer, Hildegard, “Kinder- und jugendpsychologische Forschung im Wiener Psychologischen Institut von 1922–1938,” Zeitschrift für Entwicklungspsychologie und Pädagogische Psychologie 14/3 (1982), 175–244Google Scholar; Schenk-Danziger, Lotte, “Zur Geschichte der Kinderpsychologie: Das Wiener Institut,” Zeitschrift für Entwicklungspsychologie und pädagogische Psychologie 16/2 (1984), 85–101Google Scholar.

47 Lazarsfeld, 1962 Oral History, 42, 183, 211; cf. Reminiscences of Paul Felix Lazarsfeld, 1975, interview by Ann K. Pasanella, Feb. 1975, 11, Columbia Center for Oral History, Columbia University.

48 Lazarsfeld, 1962 Oral History, 239.

49 Ibid., 239–40, 249.

50 Ibid., 53.

51 Lautman, Jacques and Lécuyer, Bernard-Pierre, “Interview with Marie Jahoda,” in Lautman and Lécuyer, eds., Paul Lazarsfeld (1901–1976): La sociologie de Vienne à New York (Paris, 1998), 135–40Google Scholar, at 136.

52 Lazarsfeld, 1962 Oral History, 185, 191–4, 210–11, 233–5.

53 Ibid., 199–200.

54 Ibid., 185.

55 Ibid., 211, 249.

56 Ibid., 219–21; cf. Lazarsfeld, Paul F., “An Episode in the History of Social Research: A Memoir,” in Fleming, Donald and Bailyn, Bernard, eds., The Intellectual Migration: Europe and America, 1930–1960 (Cambridge, 1969), 270–337Google Scholar, at 272–3.

57 Lazarsfeld, 1962 Oral History, 211–12, 242–3, esp. 243.

58 Zeisel, Hans, “The Vienna Years,” in Merton, Robert K., Coleman, James S., and Rossi, Peter H., eds., Qualitative and Quantitative Social Research: Papers in Honor of Paul F. Lazarsfeld (New York, 1979), 10–15Google Scholar.

59 For an overview of this trend and its critics see List, Eveline, “Austromarxismus und Psychoanalyse,” in Fisahn, Andreas, Scholle, Thilo, and Ciftci, Ridvan, eds., Marxismus als Sozialwissenschaft: Rechts- und Staatsverständnisse im Austromarxismus (Baden-Baden, 2018), 139–56CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

60 Lazarsfeld, Paul F., “Marxismus und Individualpsychologie,” Die sozialistische Erziehung 7 (1927), 98–101Google Scholar.

61 See Bernfeld, Siegfried, “Sozialismus und Psychoanalyse,” Der sozialistische Arzt 2/2 (1926), 15–22Google Scholar; Bernfeld, Siegfried, “Zur Frage: Psychoanalyse und Marxismus,” Der Klassenkampf 2/3 (1928), 93Google Scholar. On Lazarsfeld's friendship with Bernfeld see Lazarsfeld, 1975 Oral History, 12.

62 Lazarsfeld, 1962 Oral History, 46.

63 Ibid., 50–51, 219–20; Lazarsfeld, 1975 Oral History, 44.

64 There is some discrepancy about the date of the ÖWF's founding stemming from divergent recollections of the organization's members; I concur with Mitchell Ash in placing the date in 1927. See Ash, “Entwicklung des Instituts 1922–1938,” 314–15.

65 See Bühler and Hetzer, Kleinkindertests, unpaginated front matter.

66 Lazarsfeld, Paul F. and Bühler, Charlotte, Jugend und Beruf: Kritik und Material (Jena, 1931)Google Scholar.

67 Lazarsfeld, Paul F., Statistisches Praktikum für Psychologen und Lehrer (Jena, 1929), iii–ivGoogle Scholar.

68 Ibid., iv.

69 See Lazarsfeld's arguments in ibid., 43–56, 104–5, 121–77; cf. Lazarsfeld, Paul F., “Die Bedeutung der normalen Verteilungskurve für die Leistungsmessung,” Psychotechnische Zeitschrift 4 (1929), 104–7Google Scholar.

70 Lazarsfeld, Statistisches Praktikum, 26–43.

71 Ibid., chaps. 5–6.

72 Ibid., 43.

73 Ibid., 45–6. For a later elaboration of this view see Lazarsfeld, Paul F., “Notes on the History of Quantification in Sociology: Trends, Sources and Problems,” Isis 52/2 (1961), 297–311CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

74 Ibid., 299–300, 304; cf. Landau, David and Lazarsfeld, Paul F., “Quetelet, Adolphe,” in Sills, David L., ed., International Encyclopedia of the Social Sciences, vol. 13 (New York, 1968), 245–57Google Scholar.

75 Lazarsfeld, Statistisches Praktikum, 43.

76 Ibid., chap. 4.

77 For an overview of this development in the United States see Samelson, Franz, “World War I Intelligence Testing and the Development of Psychology,” Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences 13/3 (1977), 274–823.0.CO;2-K>CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed.

78 Thorndike, Edward L., The Measurement of Intelligence (New York, 1927), 1Google Scholar.

79 Lazarsfeld, “Die Bedeutung der normalen Verteilungskurve.”

80 Lazarsfeld, Statistisches Praktikum, chap. 4.

81 Ibid., 51, emphasis original.

82 Ibid., 47.

83 Ibid., 52.

84 See Porter, Theodore M., The Rise of Statistical Thinking, 1820–1900 (Princeton, 1986), chap. 6CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Desrosières, Alain, The Politics of Large Numbers: A History of Statistical Reasoning, trans. Naish, Camille (Cambridge, 2002), chaps. 3–4Google Scholar.

85 For a discussion of this interpretation see Porter, Theodore M., “Lawless Society: Social Science and the Reinterpretation of Statistics in Germany, 1850–1880,” in Krüger, Lorenz, Gigerenzer, Gerd, and Morgan, Mary S., eds., The Probabilistic Revolution: Ideas in the Sciences, vol. 1 (Cambridge, 1990), 350–75Google Scholar.

86 Lazarsfeld, “An Episode in the History of Social Research,” 279.

87 Lazarsfeld, 1962 Oral History, 143–4.

88 Jahoda, Zeisel, and Lazarsfeld, Marienthal, 1–3.

89 See, inter alia, “Das Leben in Marienthal: Forschungsreise in ein Arbeitsdorf,” Der Kuckuck, 2 July 1933, 14–16; Sternheim, Andreas, “Die Arbeitslosen von Marienthal,” Zeitschrift für Sozialforschung 2/3 (1933), 416–17Google Scholar; Ernst Friedmann, “Marienthal, die müde Gemeinschaft,” Der Morgen, 12 June 1933, 10.

90 On the debates about the difficulty of defining and measuring unemployment in this period see Garraty, John A., Unemployment in History: Economic Thought and Public Policy (New York, 1978), chap. 9Google Scholar.

91 Jahoda, Zeisel, and Lazarsfeld, Marienthal, 14–17.

92 Ibid., 11.

93 Ibid., 16–17.

94 Ibid., 1–3.

95 Steinmetz, S. R., “Die Stellung der Soziographie in der Reihe der Geisteswissenschaften,” Archiv für Rechts- und Wirtschaftsphilosophie 6/3 (1912), 492–501Google Scholar, at 493.

96 See Bortkiewicz, Ladislaus, Tönnies, Ferdinand, Günther, Adolf, Busse, Kurt H., Rumpf, Max, Heberle, Rudolf, Jahn, Georg, and Kaysenbrecht, Richard, “Diskussion über ‘Soziographie’,” in Soziologie, Deutsche Gesellschaft für, ed., Verhandlungen des 7. deutschen Soziologentages vom 28. September bis 1. Oktober 1930 in Berlin: Vorträge und Diskussionen in der Hauptversammlung und in den Sitzungen der Untergruppen (Tübingen, 1931), 207–32Google Scholar.

97 ÖWF, “Anweisung für Marienthal,” n.d., 2, Paul Felix Lazarsfeld Papers Series I (PFL Papers I), Box 34, Folder 17, Columbia Rare Book and Manuscript Library, Columbia University. The shift from “A” to “2” is original to the text.

98 Jahoda, Zeisel, and Lazarsfeld, Marienthal, 1–2; cf. Zeisel, Hans, “Zur Soziographie der Arbeitslosigkeit,” Archiv für Sozialwissenschaft und Sozialpolitik 69/1 (1933), 96–105Google Scholar.

99 For the ÖWF's implicit comparison of its own approach to these older methods see Jahoda, Zeisel, and Lazarsfeld, Marienthal, 89–123.

100 Marienthalers recorded how they passed their days on timesheets prepared and distributed by the researchers. See ÖWF, “Freizeit-Erhebung. Fragebogen der Österreichischen Wirtschaftspsychologischen Forschungsstelle,” n.d., PFL Papers I, Box 34, Folder 16. For a description of the ÖWF's observations of Marienthalers’ movements see Jahoda, Zeisel, and Lazarsfeld, Marienthal, 59–61.

101 On the use of these methods in other Central European nations see Sułek, Antoni, “The Marienthal 1931/1932 Study and Contemporary Studies on Unemployment in Poland,” Polish Sociological Review 157/1 (2007), 3–25Google Scholar; Lebow, Katherine, “Autobiography as Complaint: Polish Social Memoir between the World Wars,” Laboratorium 6/3 (2014), 13–26Google Scholar. After relocating to the United States, Lazarsfeld made this link between the two methods apparent when he collaborated with Bohan Zawadzki. See Zawadzki, Bohan and Lazarsfeld, Paul, “The Psychological Consequences of Unemployment,” Journal of Social Psychology 6/2 (1935), 224–51CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

102 ÖWF, “Instruktion,” n.d., 1–2, PFL Papers I, Box 34, Folder 17.

103 Jahoda, Zeisel, and Lazarsfeld, Marienthal, 30–31.

104 ÖWF, “Instruktion,” 2–4.

105 For a description of the charity see Jahoda, Zeisel, and Lazarsfeld, Marienthal, 5–6.

106 Ibid., 78.

107 Ibid., 8 n. 1.

108 Ibid., chap. 5.

109 Ibid., 34–6.

110 Ibid., 8.

111 Zeisel, Hans, “Market Research in Austria,” Human Factor 8/1 (1934), 29–32Google Scholar.

112 Jahoda, Zeisel, and Lazarsfeld, Marienthal, 26. See Lazarsfeld's description of this division of labor in Paul F. Lazarsfeld, “Typology of Cooperative Research,” 27 Feb. 1945, 6, PFL Papers I, Box 38.

113 Jahoda, Zeisel, and Lazarsfeld, Marienthal, 16–22.

114 On “statistical” and “interpretive” types see Leichter, Käthe and Lazarsfeld, Paul F., “Erhebung bei Jugendlichen über Autorität und Familie,” in Horkheimer, Max, ed., Studien über Autorität und Familie: Forschungsberichte aus dem Institut für Sozialforschung (Paris, 1936), 353–457Google Scholar.

115 On Lazarsfeld's role see Zeisel, “Market Research in Austria,” 8; Lautman and Lécuyer, “Interview with Marie Jahoda,” 139; cf. Lazarsfeld, Paul F., “Some Remarks on the Typological Procedures in Social Research,” Zeitschrift für Sozialforschung 6 (1937), 119–39CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

116 Jahoda, Zeisel, and Lazarsfeld, Marienthal, 47–8.

117 Ibid., 48; cf. Wegs, Growing Up Working Class, 52.

118 Jahoda, Zeisel, and Lazarsfeld, Marienthal, 48; cf. Bühler, Karl, Sprachtheorie: Die Darstellungsfunktion der Sprache (Jena, 1934), 16Google Scholar.

119 Jahoda, Zeisel, and Lazarsfeld, Marienthal, 43.

120 Ibid., 78.

121 Ibid., 48–9.

122 Desrosières has termed this conceptualization of supra-individual, social phenomena, which he attributes to Quetelet, the creation of “macrosocial objects.” Desrosières, The Politics of Large Numbers, 68, 71–81.

123 Jahoda, Zeisel, and Lazarsfeld, Marienthal, 46.

124 Ibid., 79.

125 Ibid., 84, 87.

126 Ibid., 79.

127 Ibid., 72–3.

128 Ibid., 22–4, 82.

129 Ibid., 48, 73.

130 Ibid., 72.

131 Ibid., 47–50.

132 Ibid., 69–88.

133 “Die Schrumpfung der Seele,” Arbeiter-Zeitung, 4 June 1933, 2.

134 Ibid.; cf. Käthe Leichter, “Die Frau des Arbeitslosen,” Die Frau, Oct. 1933, 9–10.

135 Jahoda, Zeisel, and Lazarsfeld, Marienthal, 69, 74.

136 Ibid., 22.

137 Marx, Karl, Capital: A Critique of Political Economy, trans. Fernbach, David, vol. 3 (London, 1981; first published 1894), part 1, chap. 2, part 3, chap. 13Google Scholar. For an overview of the theory see Heinrich, Michael, “Crisis Theory, the Law of the Tendency of the Rate of Profit to Fall, and Marx's Studies in the 1870s,” Monthly Review 64/11 (2013), 15–31CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

138 On the potentially revolutionary effects of unemployment see Elster, Jon, Making Sense of Marx (Cambridge, 1985), 528–31Google Scholar.

139 Adler, Max, “Wandlung der Arbeiterklasse? [Part I]”, Der Kampf 26/9 (1933), 367–82, at 378Google Scholar; Adler, , “Wandlung der Arbeiterklasse? [Part II]”, Der Kampf 26/10 (1933), 406–14, at 408Google Scholar.

140 Adler, “Wandlung [Part I],” 379.

141 Ibid., 407.

142 Ibid., 408.

143 Ibid.

144 Adler, “Wandlung [Part I],” 375, emphasis original.

145 Adler, “Wandlung [Part II],” 409–10, emphasis original.

146 Ibid., 410.

147 Ibid.., 411; cf. Jahoda, Zeisel, and Lazarsfeld, Marienthal, 46.

148 Adler, “Wandlung [Part II],” 411.

149 Ibid., 410.

150 See the discussion in Rabinbach, Crisis of Austrian Socialism, 141–8.

151 Reich, Wilhelm, People in Trouble (New York, 1976), 94Google Scholar.

152 Adler, Max, “Was ist Marxismus?”, in Adler, Lehrbuch der materialistischen Geschichtsauffassung: Soziologie des Marxismus, vol. 1 (Vienna, 1930), 31–3, 37–8Google Scholar.

153 Ibid., 33–5.

154 Fleck, Ludwik, Entstehung und Entwicklung einer wissenschaftlichen Tatsache: Einführung in die Lehre vom Denkstil und Denkkollektiv (Basel, 1935)Google Scholar.

155 For Lazarsfeld's characterization of his own experience of emigration as paradigmatic see Lazarsfeld, “An Episode in the History of Social Research.”

156 According to David Morrison, the statistician Daniel Cuthbertson once responded to Lazarsfeld's self-characterization during a public presentation by shouting, “And who gave you permission?” See Morrison, David, “The Transference of Experience and the Impact of Ideas: Paul Lazarsfeld and Mass Communication Research,” Communication 10/2 (1988), 185–209Google Scholar, at 191–2.

157 Lazarsfeld, 1962 Oral History, 264.

158 Ibid., 262.

159 Ibid., 265.

160 It is at this point that Lazarsfeld and other mid-century thinkers became highly critical of the “pessimistic” nature of “European” social theory, especially as manifested in European social theorists’ dim view of “mass society.” See Katz, Elihu and Lazarsfeld, Paul F., Personal Influence: The Part Played by People in the Flow of Mass Communication (New York, 1955), chap. 1Google Scholar. For an analysis of this text's role in communications research see Pooley, Jefferson, “Fifteen Pages That Shook the Field: Personal Influence, Edward Shils, and the Remembered History of Mass Communication Research,” Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 608/1 (2006), 130–56CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

161 Leichter and Lazarsfeld, “Erhebung bei Jugendlichen.”

162 Komarovsky, Mirra, The Unemployed Man and His Family: The Effect of Unemployment upon the Status of the Man in Fifty-Nine Families (New York, 1940), 116–33Google Scholar. Lazarsfeld directed this study, which began as Komarovsky's doctoral dissertation, and introduced the published text.

163 Paul F. Lazarsfeld, “Principles of Sociography,” trans. Thelma Herman 1944 [1934], 33, PFL Papers I, Box 38, Folder 10.

164 See Leichter and Lazarsfeld, “Erhebung bei Jugendlichen”; Lazarsfeld, “Some Remarks on the Typological Procedures in Social Research”; Komarovsky, The Unemployed Man, 135–45.

165 Friedmann, “Marienthal, die müde Gemeinschaft,” 10; cf. “Schrumpfung der Seele,” 2.