Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-x4r87 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T13:16:42.430Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Is an Antiracist and Decolonizing Applied Linguistics Possible?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 June 2020

Suhanthie Motha*
Affiliation:
University of Washington
*
*Corresponding author; E-mail: smotha@uw.edu

Abstract

This article argues for an uncovering of the multitude of ways in which applied linguistics has functioned as an important and effective vehicle for White supremacy and empire, with its disciplinary roots embedded in assumptions about racial inequalities and racial hierarchies and, equally importantly, the concealment of these forms of racial discrimination which often manifest as innocuous language practices. In particular, the notion of objectivity has played a guiding role in reinscribing Whiteness in much applied linguistics theorizing and research within a global context of inequitable racial power and forms of knowledge production and transmission that are steeped in colonial reasoning. In this piece, the author considers what antiracism and decolonization mean within applied linguistics and asks: Is the discipline of applied linguistics irretrievably rooted in an ontology of race and empire? Or is an antiracist and decolonizing applied linguistics possible?

Type
Short Paper
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2020. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Baquedano-Lopéz, P. (2019). Indigenous Maya families from Yucatán in San Francisco: Hemispheric mobility and pedagogies of diaspora. In Bada, X., & Gleeson, S. (Eds.), Accountability across borders: Migrant rights in North America (1st ed.). University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Bhattacharya, U., Jiang, L., & Canagarajah, S. (forthcoming). Race, representation, and diversity in the American Association for Applied Linguistics. Applied Linguistics.Google Scholar
Byrd, J. (2011). The transit of empire: Indigenous critiques of colonialism. University of Minnesota Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coulthard, G. (2014). Red skin, white masks: Rejecting the colonial politics of recognition. University of Minnesota Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flores, N. (2016). A tale of two visions: Hegemonic whiteness and bilingual education. Education Policy, 30(1), 1338.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flores, N., & Rosa, J. (2015). Undoing appropriateness: Raciolinguistic ideologies and language diversity in education. Harvard Educational Review, 85(2), 149171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guerrettaz, A., & Zahler, T. (2017). Black Lives Matter in TESOL: De-Silencing race in a second language academic literacy course. TESOL Quarterly, 51(1), 193207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haque, E., & Patrick, D. (2015). Indigenous languages and the racial hierarchisation of language policy in Canada. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development: Race and Language Learning in Multicultural Canada, 36(1), 2741.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kang, O., Rubin, D., & Lindemann, S. (2015). Mitigating U.S. undergraduates’ attitudes toward international teaching assistants. TESOL Quarterly, 49(4), 681706.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kendi, I. X. (2019). How to be an Antiracist. One World.Google Scholar
Kubota, R., & Lin, A. (2009). Race, culture, and identities in second language education: Exploring critically engaged practice. Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
la paperson. (2017). A third university is possible. University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Lee, E. (2015). Doing culture, doing race: Everyday discourses of ‘culture’ and ‘cultural difference’ in the English as a second language classroom. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 36(1), 8093.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Melamed, J. (2011). Represent and destroy: Rationalizing violence in the new racial capitalism. University of Minnesota Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Motha, S. (2014). Race, empire, and English language teaching: Creating responsible and ethical anti-racist practice. Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
Motha, S. and Lin, A. (2014). “Non-coercive rearrangements”: Theorizing desire in TESOL. TESOL Quarterly, 48(2), 331.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oluo, I. (2018). So you want to talk about race. Seal Press.Google Scholar
Pieterse, J. (1989). Empire & emancipation: Power and liberation on a world scale. Praeger Publishers.Google Scholar
Schissel, J. (2019). Social consequences of testing for language-minoritized bilinguals in the United States (Bilingual education and bilingualism: 117). Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Tuck, E. and Yang, W. (2012). Decolonization is not a metaphor. Decolonization: Indigeneity, Education & Society, 1(1), 140.Google Scholar