Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-dfsvx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-27T14:52:26.965Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
This chapter is part of a book that is no longer available to purchase from Cambridge Core

Reading List

William Shakespeare
Edited by
G. Blakemore Evans
With contributions by
Thomas Moisan
G. Blakemore Evans
Affiliation:
Harvard University, Massachusetts
Get access

Summary

A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Romeo and Juliet , pp. 264 - 266
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2003

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Andrews, J. F. (ed.). ‘Romeo and Juliet’: Critical Essays, 1993Google Scholar
Appelbaum, Robert. ‘“Standing to the Wall”: The Pressures of Masculinity in Romeo and Juliet’, SQ 48 (1997), 251–72Google Scholar
Brooke, Nicholas. Shakespeare’s Early Tragedies, 1968Google Scholar
Brown, John R. Shakespeare’s Dramatic Style, 1970Google Scholar
Buhler, Stephen M. ‘Reviving Juliet, Repackaging Romeo: Transformations of Character in Pop and Post-Pop Music’, Shakespeare After Mass Media, ed. Burt, Richard, 2002, 243–64Google Scholar
Callaghan, Dympna. ‘The Ideology of Romantic Love: The Case of Romeo and Juliet’, Callaghan, Lorraine Helms and Jyotsna Singh. The Wayward Sisters, 1994, 59–101Google Scholar
Carroll, W. C. ‘“We were born to die”: Romeo and Juliet’, Comparative Drama 15 (1981), 54–71CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Charlton, H. B. Shakespearian Tragedy, 1948Google Scholar
Clemen, W. H. The Development of Shakespeare’s Imagery, 1951Google Scholar
Colaco, Jill. ‘Lovers’ tongues by night’. The Window Scenes in ‘Romeo and Juliet’, Winthrop Sargent Prize, Harvard, 1981Google Scholar
Colie, Rosalie L. Shakespeare’s Living Art, 1974Google Scholar
Cribb, T. J. ‘The Unity of Romeo and Juliet’, S.Sur. 34 (1981), 93–104Google Scholar
Dickey, Franklin M. Not Wisely But Too Well: Shakespeare’s Love Tragedies, 1957Google Scholar
Doran, Madeleine. Shakespeare’s Dramatic Language, 1976Google Scholar
Evans, Bertrand. Shakespeare’s Tragic Practice, 1979Google Scholar
Garber, Marjorie. Coming of Age in Shakespeare, 1981Google Scholar
Gibbons, Brian. Introduction to the New Arden Romeo and Juliet, 1980Google Scholar
Goddard, H. C. The Meaning of Shakespeare, 1951Google Scholar
Granville-Barker, H. Prefaces to Shakespeare, 1951 (vol. II)Google Scholar
Halio, J. L. (ed.). Shakespeare’s ‘Romeo and Juliet’ Texts, Contexts, and Interpretation, 1995Google Scholar
Hodgdon, Barbara. ‘William Shakespeare’s Romeo + Juliet: Everything’s Nice in America?’, S.Sur. 52 (1999), 88–98Google Scholar
Holmer, Joan Ozark. ‘“Myself Condemned and Myself Excused”: Tragic Effects in Romeo and Juliet’, Studies in Philology 88 (1991), 345–62Google Scholar
Hunt, Maurice (ed.). Approaches to Teaching Romeo and Juliet, 2000Google Scholar
Kiefer, Frederick. Fortune and Elizabethan Tragedy, 1983Google Scholar
Kirsch, Arthur. The Passions of Shakespeare’s Tragic Heroes, 1990Google Scholar
Lawlor, John. ‘Romeo and Juliet’, in Brown, J. R. and Harris, B. (eds.), Early Shakespeare, 1961Google Scholar
Levenson, J. L. ‘Romeo and Juliet’. Shakespeare In Performance, 1987Google Scholar
Levin, Harry. ‘Form and formality in Romeo and Juliet’, in his Shakespeare and the Revolution of the Times, 1976Google Scholar
Mason, Harold A. Shakespeare’s Tragedies of Love, 1970Google Scholar
Moisan, Thomas. ‘Chaucer’s Pandarus and the sententious Friar Lawrence’, Publications of the Arkansas Philological Association 8 (1982), 38–48Google Scholar
Moisan, Thomas. ‘Rhetoric and rehearsal of death: the Lamentations’ scene in Romeo and Juliet’, SQ 34 (1983), 389–404CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moisan, Thomas. ‘Shakespeare’s Chaucerian allegory: the quest for death in Romeo and Juliet and the Pardoner’s Tale’, in Donaldson, E. T., et al. (eds.), Chaucerian Shakespeare: Adaptation and Transformation, 1983Google Scholar
Moisan, Thomas. ‘“O anything of nothing first create”: gender, patriarchy, and the tragedy of Romeo and Juliet’, in Kehler, Dorothea and Baker, Susan (eds.), Another Country: Feminist Perspectives on Renaissance Drama, 1991Google Scholar
Moore, Olin H. The Legend of Romeo and Juliet, 1950Google Scholar
Muir, Kenneth. Shakespeare’s Tragic Sequence, 1972Google Scholar
Nevo, Ruth. Tragic Form in Shakespeare, 1972Google Scholar
Peterson, D. L. ‘Romeo and Juliet and the art of moral navigation’, in McNeir, W. F. and Greenfield, T. N. (eds.), Pacific Coast Studies in Shakespeare, 1966Google Scholar
Porter, J. A. Shakespeare’s Mercutio. His History in Drama, 1988Google Scholar
Porter, Joseph (ed.). Critical Essays on Shakespeare’s Romeo and Juliet, 1997Google Scholar
Quinones, Ricardo J. The Renaissance Discovery of Time, 1972Google Scholar
Rabkin, Norman. Shakespeare and the Common Understanding, 1967Google Scholar
Seward, J. H. Tragic Vision in ‘Romeo and Juliet’, 1973Google Scholar
Shakespeare Survey 47, 1996 (devoted largely to Romeo and Juliet)Google Scholar
Siegel, Paul. ‘Christianity and the religion of love in Romeo and Juliet’, SQ 12 (1961), 371–92Google Scholar
Stamm, Rudolf. ‘The first meeting of the lovers in Shakespeare’s Romeo and Juliet’, English Studies 67 (1986), 2–13CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stamm, Rudolf. Shakespeare’s Theatrical Notation: The Early Tragedies, 1989Google Scholar
Stavig, Mark. The Forms of Things Unknown; Renaissance Metaphor in ‘Romeo and Juliet’ and ‘A Midsummer Night’s Dream’, 1995Google Scholar
Stewart, Stanley. ‘Romeo and necessity’, in McNeir, W. F. and Greenfield, T. N. (eds.), Pacific Coast Studies in Shakespeare, 1966Google Scholar
Wallace, Nathaniel. ‘Cultural Tropology in Romeo and Juliet’, Studies in Philology 88 (1991), 329–44Google Scholar
Wells, Stanley. ‘Juliet’s Nurse: the uses of inconsequentiality’, in Edwards, Philip, Ewbank, Inga-Stina and Hunter, G. K. (eds.), Shakespeare’s Styles. Essays in Honour of Kenneth Muir, 1980Google Scholar
Wells, Stanley (ed.). Romeo and Juliet and its Afterlife: S.Sur. 49 (1996)Google Scholar
Whitaker, Virgil. The Mirror up to Nature. The Technique of Shakespeare’s Tragedies, 1965Google Scholar
Wilson, H. S. On the Design of Shakespearian Tragedy, 1957Google Scholar
Wright, K. L. Shakespeare’s ‘Romeo and Juliet’ in Performance, 1997Google Scholar
Young, B. W. ‘Haste, consent, and age at marriage: some implications of social History for Romeo and Juliet’, Iowa State Journal of Research 62 (1988), 459–74Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×