Reading List
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 16 August 2019
Edited by
With contributions by
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Coriolanus , pp. 314 - 315Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2010
References
Arnold, Oliver. ‘Worshipful mutineers: from Demos to electorate in Coriolanus’, in The Third Citizen: Shakespeare’s Theater and the Early Modern House of Commons, 2007, pp. 179–214Google Scholar
Banerjee, Rita. ‘The common good and the necessity of war: emergent republican ideals in Shakespeare’s Henry V and Coriolanus’, Comparative Drama 40 (2006), 29–49CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bliss, Lee. ‘What hath a quarter-century of Coriolanus criticism wrought?’, in The Shakespearean International Yearbook 2, ed. Elton, W. R. and Mucciolo, John M., 2002, pp. 63–75Google Scholar
Christensen, Ann C. ‘The return of the domestic in Coriolanus’, SEL 37 (1997), 295–316CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Corti, Claudia. ‘“As if a man were author of himself”: the (re-)fashioning of the Oedipal hero from Plutarch’s Martius to Shakespeare’s Coriolanus’, in Italian Culture in the Drama of Shakespeare and his Contemporaries, ed. Marrapodi, Michele, 2007, pp. 187–95Google Scholar
Eastman, Nate. ‘The rumbling belly politic: metaphorical location and metaphorical government in Coriolanus’, Early Modern Literary Studies, 13.1 (2007), http://purl.oclc.org/emls/13-1/eastcori.htmGoogle Scholar
Elam, Keir. ‘“In what chapter his bosom?”: reading Shakespeare’s bodies’, in Alternative Shakespeares 2, ed. Hawkes, Terrence, 1996, pp. 140–63Google Scholar
Escolme, Bridget. ‘Living monuments: the spatial politics of Shakespeare’s Rome’, S.Sur. 60 (2007), 170–83Google Scholar
Garebian, Keith. ‘The menopausal and suburban: the 1997 Stratford and Shaw Festivals’, Journal of Canadian Studies 33 (1998), 154–62CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garganigo, Alex. ‘Coriolanus, the Union controversy and access to the royal person’, SEL 42 (2002), 335–59Google Scholar
Hopkins, Lisa. Review of Coriolanus, Early Modern Literary Studies 6.2 (2000), http://purl.oclc.org/emls/06-2/hopkrev.htmGoogle Scholar
Kumamoto, Chikako D. ‘Shakespeare’s Achillean Coriolanus and Heraean Volumnia: textual contamination and crossing of Homer’s Iliad in Coriolanus’, Journal of the Wooden O Symposium 7 (2007), 51–64Google Scholar
Kuzner, Mark. ‘Unbuilding the city: Coriolanus and the birth of republican Rome’, SQ 58 (2007), 174–99Google Scholar
Low, Jennifer. ‘“Bodied forth”: spectator, stage, and actor in the early modern theater’, Comparative Drama 39 (2005), 1–29CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marshall, Cynthia. ‘Coriolanus and the politics of theatrical pleasure’, in A Companion to Shakespeare’s Works, Vol. i: The Tragedies, ed. Dutton, Richard and Howard, Jean E., 2005, pp. 452–72Google Scholar
Melnikoff, Kirk. Review of Coriolanus, dir. Dillon, John, Shakespeare Bulletin 23 (2005), 174–7.Google Scholar
Mousley, Andrew. Re-Humanising Shakespeare: Literary Humanism, Wisdom, and Modernity, 2007Google Scholar
Munro, Lucy. ‘Coriolanus and the little Eyases: the boyhood of Shakespeare’s hero’, in Shakespeare and Childhood, ed. Chedgzoy, Kate, Greenhalgh, Susanne and Shaughnessy, Robert, 2007, pp. 80–95Google Scholar
Ormsby, Robert. ‘Coriolanus, antitheatricalism and audience response’, Shakespeare Bulletin 26 (2008), 43–62CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ribeyrol, Wendy. ‘Coriolanus: a natural born warrior’, in Lectures de Coriolan de William Shakespeare, ed. Lemonnier-Texier, Delphine and Winter, Guillaume, 2006, pp. 49–57Google Scholar
Sanders, Eve Rachelle. ‘The body of the actor in Coriolanus’, SQ 57 (2006), 387–412CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spotswood, Jerald W. ‘“We are undone already”: disarming the multitude in Julius Caesar and Coriolanus’, Texas Studies in Literature and Language 42.1 (2000), 61–78.Google Scholar
Wilkinson, Katherine. Review of Coriolanus, Early Modern Literary Studies 9.1 (2003), http://purl.oclc.org/emls/09-1/coriorev.htmlGoogle Scholar
Welsh, Alexander. ‘Shakespeare’s Coriolanus and Roman honour’, in The Shakespearean International Yearbook 5, ed. Elton, W. R. and Mucciolo, John M, 2005, 191–210Google Scholar