Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Dedication
- Contents
- List of Figures
- List of Tables
- Acknowledgements
- Abbreviations
- Chapter 1 Introduction
- PART I THEORETICAL FRAMEWORK OF A SPECIAL RELATIONSHIP
- Chapter 2 Making Sense of a Special Relationship
- Chapter 3 The Conceptual Foundations for a Special Relationship
- Chapter 4 The Evolution of a Special Relationship into a Pluralistic Security Community
- PART II history of indonesia–malaysia relations, 1957–2017
- Bibliography
- Index
- About the Author
Chapter 3 - The Conceptual Foundations for a Special Relationship
from PART I - THEORETICAL FRAMEWORK OF A SPECIAL RELATIONSHIP
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 08 June 2019
- Frontmatter
- Dedication
- Contents
- List of Figures
- List of Tables
- Acknowledgements
- Abbreviations
- Chapter 1 Introduction
- PART I THEORETICAL FRAMEWORK OF A SPECIAL RELATIONSHIP
- Chapter 2 Making Sense of a Special Relationship
- Chapter 3 The Conceptual Foundations for a Special Relationship
- Chapter 4 The Evolution of a Special Relationship into a Pluralistic Security Community
- PART II history of indonesia–malaysia relations, 1957–2017
- Bibliography
- Index
- About the Author
Summary
A theory needs concepts to formulate its explanations. To develop a theoretical framework of a special relationship, this chapter seeks to outline the definitional concepts that constitute such relationships. Based on the review of literature in Chapter 2, this study defines a special relationship as follows:
A special relationship exists between two states when two sources of closeness, that of the two states’ common identities and shared strategic interests, coexist in their relations.
Common identities of two states are derived from their shared culture, common language, historical ties or shared political values and institutions. Common strategic interests of two states, on the other hand, mean the two states rely on each other's material presence for survival.
Common identities of two states sharing a special relationship spawn their mutual sentimental expressions of closeness. The sentimental associations, combine with the two states’ mutual sense of closeness engendered by their common strategic interests, result in the two states sharing an understanding that their relationship is closer than their other bilateral ties. The shared understanding, in turn, stirs up the two states’ respective expectation that their relationship should be closer than their bilateral ties with others. Such an expectation leads to a higher intensity of interactions between the two states as compared with that of their other bilateral relations.
The above definition brings to light the key conceptual components that constitute a special relationship: the concepts of power, identity and expectation. This chapter hence begins with the explanations of the three concepts.
As this study looks at how a special relationship could evolve into a pluralistic security community, the defining feature of such a community, namely, dependable expectations of peaceful change, therefore also stands as one of the key conceptual components of a special relationship.
The most obvious characteristic of a pluralistic security community is the absence of war among the states involved. As such, such a community is founded on the war avoidance norms shared by the states involved. States have to learn to avoid war between them before being able to renounce their defense gesture against each other. Viewed in this light, the concept of norms has to be among the key conceptual components of a special relationship.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Special Relationship in the Malay WorldIndonesia and Malaysia, pp. 57 - 96Publisher: ISEAS–Yusof Ishak InstitutePrint publication year: 2018