The literature on Chinese overseas foreign direct investment (FDI) in theGlobal South has generally pursued a global approach or state-to-stateanalysis. However, these overlook changes at the local level as Chinese FDI hasrekindled the emergence of historical tensions among groups, local strugglesfor control, and anxieties toward globalization in the twenty-first century. Thus,this gap presents an opportunity to analyse China's engagements at multiplelevels with a variety of regional actors across different scales, places, andcontexts. This chapter shows how the patterns and practices of Chineseinvestments in Philippine mining differ from conventional multinationalmining investments. First is the method of production. Multinational miningcompanies focus on large-scale mining (LSM), but Chinese investments tendto gravitate towards artisanal small-scale mining (ASM) to evade scrutinyfrom national authorities and hostile reactions associated with currentterritorial disputes between the two countries. Second is the method ofaccumulation. While multinationals use capital-intensive, ASM capitalizeson labour-intensive extraction, community-centred and house-driven support.And last are the host country linkages. While multinational mining companiesneed the support of national government agencies to pursue resourceextraction, Chinese mining relies more on connections with overseas Chinesecommunities in the Philippines to access subnational political elites, such asregional politicians, governors, and local officials.