India was a timeless, static society whose major institutions — caste, religion, despotic rule — were impervious to change and thus largely immutable. Indian stagnation contrasted with the dynamism and progressivism of Europe.

Throughout its entire history, Indian polities had been ruled by theocratic despots (both Hindu and Muslim). This implied that Indians were accustomed to and required the guidance of firm rule. Indeed, the social, cultural and linguistic differences within India inevitably resulted in civil discourse, unrest and conflict, all of which could only be contained by “the strong hand of the British”.

All of the civilizations which had invaded and conquered India had declined under the twin impact of the intolerable climate and the inevitable degeneration resulting from miscegenation. It followed that if the British were to survive as rulers they had to remain independent of the degraded races which inhabited India.

All knowledge of Indian religious customs and law could be derived from ancient texts. It followed that the investigation of original scriptures would uncover the abiding procedures and principles by which Indian society should be regulated. A corollorary of this thesis was that all of India's problems sprang from deviation from and corruption of pristine Vedic ideals. This perspective insisted upon the primacy of Sanskrit as the sacred language of Hinduism.