Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-x24gv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-01T10:41:12.324Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

2 - Webs of Significance: an Ethnographer's Account of Anthropology at the University of Adelaide from 1973 to 2011

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 June 2013

John Gray
Affiliation:
University of Adelaide
Nick Harvey
Affiliation:
University of Adelaide
Jean Fornasiero
Affiliation:
University of Adelaide
Greg McCarthy
Affiliation:
University of Adelaide
Clem Macintyre
Affiliation:
University of Adelaide
Carl Crossin
Affiliation:
University of Adelaide
Get access

Summary

In this chapter, I spin ‘webs of significance’ — to use Geertz's well-known rendition of Max Weber's phrase — about a past of which I was and still am an active participant. I came to the Department of Anthropology in 1975 as a Tutor and will retire as Professor at the end of 2012. The account of the past I present is interpretive in a number of ways. First, it is constructed. I received several suggestions about how to periodise flow of events that took place from the establishment of the Department in 1973 to the present. Many proposed I do so around the three occupants of the Chair of Anthropology — Bruce Kapferer (1973–1985), James Weiner (1994–1999) and myself (2003—present) — on the presumption that it is the leadership of an individual that is most important in understanding the events and evolution of historical processes. My rejection of this approach was guided by Foucault's scepticism of the modern era's presupposition of the ‘sovereign subject’ whose actions provide the principal dynamic of history. Still, I include some of Kapferer's vision because it provided the starting point for the Department and consequently for my account of it. In reflecting back on the nearly forty years since the Department was established, I analyse and name one of the periods that I identify, well known within the University community, around Turner's conception of ‘social drama’, which he described as ‘a way of understanding a sequence of social events which, seen retrospectively by an observer, can be shown to have a [processual] structure’.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: The University of Adelaide Press
Print publication year: 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×