Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-7bb8b95d7b-fmk2r Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-09-06T22:12:25.726Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
This chapter is part of a book that is no longer available to purchase from Cambridge Core

3 - Competition for Editorial Control

Get access

Summary

The first number of the Quarterly Review was finally ready for publication at the end of February 1809. Murray hoped to have it appear at the same time in London and Edinburgh, but it was a forlorn hope. On 28 February, Ballantyne received printed sheets for Scott and himself. That same day, Murray sent 200 copies to his Edinburgh partners by coach, far fewer than the 650 he had promised. With unspecified problems in the printer's shop continuing to delay the production of Ballantyne's quota, Murray reluctantly decided to proceed with his London sale ahead of the journal's appearance in Scotland.

Printed by Charles Roworth of Bell-yard, Temple Bar, the number, eventually a run of 3,000, was published in London on Tuesday 1 March 1809; it was not sold in Scotland until 6 March, and then only in limited numbers. (By some unidentified agency, Constable and Jeffrey obtained a copy on 3 March.) The journal was expensive, 5 shillings, the equivalent of about £10 in today's values. Scott was ecstatic when he saw his advance copy. ‘I have just one second to say’, John Ballantyne reported to Murray, ‘that I supped with Mr Scott last night. He is transported with the Review. “Capital – most capital!” burst from him again and again.’ In Scotland, the journal sold rapidly. Only two hours after he opened his shop, John Ballantyne had cleared away all but twenty-eight of the 200 copies he had on hand. By 8 March, he had sold his whole supply and he had orders for fifty more.

James Ballantyne thought well of most of the articles in the number, but – Scott's initial enthusiasm aside – his was a sycophantic and minority view. The other co-founders considered the issue serviceable at best and all were dissatisfied with how ploddingly it had come together under Gifford's putative supervision. Bedford reflected an opinion generally held, that Ellis's important article on Spain beat Brougham's ‘Don Pedro Cevallos’ on points but that its prose was uninspiring. ‘Against such attacks as that’, he told Southey, ‘the Edinburghers need not put on mail’.

Type
Chapter
Information
Contributors to the Quarterly Review
A History, 1809–25
, pp. 37 - 62
Publisher: Pickering & Chatto
First published in: 2014

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×