Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-jbqgn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-25T05:44:15.368Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
This chapter is part of a book that is no longer available to purchase from Cambridge Core

11 - The raw materials: from matt to lustre, from grey to colour

from Part III - Contemporary cemeteries

Assaf Nativ
Affiliation:
University of Haifa
Get access

Summary

Among the raw materials from which tombstones are constructed, four recurring types were readily distinguished, each with its own unique visual effect and texture:

  1. cement — relatively rough-textured and grey, although it appears that at least sometimes it was white-washed;

  2. limestone — often polished, producing a smooth white to beige surface;

  3. Turkish marble — always polished, producing a highly lustrous pale blue to greyish surface;

  4. granite — always polished, producing a highly lustrous, dark grey to black surface.

Because these categories differ considerably from one another, the assignment to either one or sometimes two of them by direct observation was fairly easy. Most tombstones were made of a single material, sometimes accompanied by minor additions such as narrow bands or small plaques. Under these circumstances, the tombstone was labelled as consisting of the dominant raw material alone.

Alongside these, however, one also notes the presence of hybrid tombstones that combine two distinct materials in roughly similar proportions. There are two common types of these hybrid tombstones: one combines cement and limestone, and the other combines granite and either limestone or Turkish marble. The first was observed mostly in the cemeteries of Ma'abarot, Trumpeldor and Netzah. While at face value these may be considered as composite types, there is good reason to suspect that they represent episodes of repair and change. Generally speaking, cement is the least durable of the materials used for tombstone construction, prone to friability or porosity.

Type
Chapter
Information
Prioritizing Death and Society
The Archaeology of Chalcolithic and Contemporary Cemeteries in the Southern Levant
, pp. 148 - 155
Publisher: Acumen Publishing
Print publication year: 2013

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×