Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-r5zm4 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-07T21:28:09.254Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

9 - Conclusion

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 March 2019

Harald Aspen
Affiliation:
Associate Professor in Social Anthropology at the Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway
Get access

Summary

Ethiopia is still mainly a rural society. It is also one of the world's poorest countries, despite rapid development in recent years. There is good reason to believe that these two elements are linked, as indicated by repeated famines that have hit the rural, food-producing areas. Serious efforts to change this situation started in the late imperial period and became key policy aspects under the Därg and later the EPRDF. There is widespread agreement that the measures in the imperial period were too little, too late, while those under the Därg were often tragically misguided. Those of the EPRDF, still evolving, are up for discussion.

Most Ethiopian farmers are smallholders. For centuries, the rights and obligations of peasants in the land they farm have shaped Ethiopian society. Much changed with the land reform of 1975, but for the peasants concerned, these rights are as important as ever. These rights are, in our view, so much more than what can be covered by the term ‘usufruct rights’, and even if we were to accept the term as a fair description, one would still have to specify how, and under what conditions, peasants practice these usufruct rights. In order to develop its economy, Ethiopia will certainly require large investments. By contrast, good land tenure policy is not expensive, but bad policy can be very destructive, as amply illustrated by some of the programmes under the Därg. Policies are most likely to succeed if they emanate from a good understanding of the concerns and the practices of those to be reformed. It is therefore a problem that the land tenure practices of Ethiopian peasants have not been much studied.

In this book, we seek to contribute to the relevant body of knowledge in two ways: firstly by the specific descriptions and arguments we provide, and secondly by asking for more research, not the least to assess and challenge our own arguments. We hope that even those who disagree with our specific arguments may agree to the need, even urgency, for improved knowledge of peasant land tenure. We focused on the Amhara region, which is probably the region best covered in the research literature. We demonstrate that even here, there has been virtually no research on peasant land tenure practices.

Type
Chapter
Information
Land Tenure Security
State-peasant relations in the Amhara Highlands, Ethiopia
, pp. 153 - 158
Publisher: Boydell & Brewer
Print publication year: 2019

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • Conclusion
    • By Harald Aspen, Associate Professor in Social Anthropology at the Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway
  • Edited by Svein Ege
  • Book: Land Tenure Security
  • Online publication: 26 March 2019
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781787444430.013
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • Conclusion
    • By Harald Aspen, Associate Professor in Social Anthropology at the Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway
  • Edited by Svein Ege
  • Book: Land Tenure Security
  • Online publication: 26 March 2019
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781787444430.013
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • Conclusion
    • By Harald Aspen, Associate Professor in Social Anthropology at the Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway
  • Edited by Svein Ege
  • Book: Land Tenure Security
  • Online publication: 26 March 2019
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781787444430.013
Available formats
×