John Addison was one of many passengers on their voyage to or from the East Indies who protested treatment by the captains and officers of East Indiamen. Indeed, travellers’ anxieties about possible abuse was a theme that persisted across the long eighteenth century. Almost a century later Cruikshank caricatured the voyage (Plate 4.1) and Williamson's East India Vade Mecum provided extensive instructions about how to select a ship, a captain, fellow travellers and a cabin to avoid the journey to India becoming a nightmare of filth and mistreatment.

But the passage to India was not simply a matter of preparing for, or surviving, what could be a tedious, sometimes frightening and often uncomfortable trip. Travel to the East Indies was merely one, relatively brief, phase in a much more extended process. The high rate of Cumbrian engagement with the East Indies had its genesis in the comparatively high levels of educational achievement among young Cumbrians. They had to meet, too, the burden of the financial demands associated with preparation, fit-out, travel and the provision of venture capital for private trade. The passage to India was determined by the extent to which Cumbrian gentry and middling families could mobilise a network of friends to: gain patronage appointments into East India Company; financially support them in their East Indies venture; and provide care and support to preparations for an orderly and successful departure for and arrival in the East Indies. In short, the passage to India was paved by a complex interaction between what Bourdieu would describe as cultural, economic and social capital.

For Bourdieu, cultural capital is produced out of the intersection between family and the institutional structures of education. Cultural capital are assets in the form of competencies, qualifications and skills which allow (or deny) individuals opportunities to connect to the processes of economic capital accumulation. Cultural capital also provides the foundations of taste which, in turn, both constructs and maintains social distinctions. According to Bourdieu, social distinction feeds the processes of identity and identification that underpin institutionalised ‘relationships of mutual acquaintance and recognition’. It is those which bind class, kin and place networks together and generate social capital.