Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-t6hkb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-08T07:59:32.422Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Conclusion

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 May 2015

Amy Blakeway
Affiliation:
Junior Research Fellow in History at Homerton College, University of Cambridge
Get access

Summary

These Inconvenients make that it is hard aneuch for any man to live in security in Scotland during the minority of a prince …

Any hereditary monarchy in which the succession is strictly determined by primogeniture faces the prospect of a child as head of state. As we have seen, sixteenth-century Scots experienced royal minority to a far greater degree than any of their European counterparts. Moreover, they coped with the ensuing ‘inconvenients’ in a strikingly uniform way: the appointment, succession or election of an individual to become regent, an office which comprised ‘bearing the person’ of the monarch. Throughout this book numerous contemporary quotations refer to regents, with the exceptions of the two dowager queens, as ‘princes’. In some cases, such as for Albany, Arran and Moray, this title appeared in the official parliamentary record; in other instances, it emerged in informal usage. Both are revealing: by identifying regents as ‘princes’ Scots acknowledged that they were set apart from the rest of the nobility by a special set of responsibilities and privileges. Nevertheless, the title of ‘prince’ is largely absent from modern discussion of regents, and with it, the connotations of quasi-monarchical rule encompassing a sense of continuity in central governmental activities have been lost.

This book has advanced two main arguments. The first is to propose a new, historical, model of regency to replace previous static, legalistic, interpretations of the office. Understandings of regency developed during the sixteenth century. At the start of the century, the Scots selected their regents as they had done for centuries: either the dead monarch left a testament appointing a regent, or, when such provisions failed, by identifying and installing the infant monarch's heir apparent. The precedents for the estates' involvement comprised either in confirming or identifying the correct candidate for the regency on these terms, or, as happened in the final years of David II's minority, in the last resort choosing a regent.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Boydell & Brewer
Print publication year: 2015

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • Conclusion
  • Amy Blakeway, Junior Research Fellow in History at Homerton College, University of Cambridge
  • Book: Regency in Sixteenth-Century Scotland
  • Online publication: 05 May 2015
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • Conclusion
  • Amy Blakeway, Junior Research Fellow in History at Homerton College, University of Cambridge
  • Book: Regency in Sixteenth-Century Scotland
  • Online publication: 05 May 2015
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • Conclusion
  • Amy Blakeway, Junior Research Fellow in History at Homerton College, University of Cambridge
  • Book: Regency in Sixteenth-Century Scotland
  • Online publication: 05 May 2015
Available formats
×