Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-jwnkl Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-11T05:21:22.527Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Chapter 11 - Should the Regime be Discretionary or Rules-Based?

from PART III - HOW SHOULD PROPERTY BE SHARED AT THE END OF A RELATIONSHIP?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 September 2018

Joanna Miles
Affiliation:
Reader in Family Law & Policy, University of Cambridge, England
Get access

Summary

’ The history of law is many things. But one of them is the story of an unremitting struggle between rules and discretion. The tension between these two approaches to legal problems continues to pervade and perplex the law today. Perhaps nowhere is that tension more pronounced and more troubling than in family law.’

Most judges who are murdered by dissatisfied customers are killed by irate domestic litigants, not by criminals. The reason is simple: in other litigation, fewer emotional issues are involved; more important, the judge has less discretion.’

INTRODUCTION

As the opening quotations suggest, the topic explored in this chapter is neither easy nor, perhaps, for our judges even safe! I first reframe the question and clear some ground.

REFRAMING THE QUESTION

In reality, we are not confronted by a stark choice: discretion or rules. The question is better framed as the (elusive) search for the right mix of rules and discretion.

However, even that framing obscures the fact that rules and discretion are not the only juristic tools available, and that both ‘rules‘ and ‘discretion‘ come in varying degrees of ‘ruleness‘ and ‘discretionness‘. As Cass Sunstein and others have catalogued, we have at our disposal an array of legal resources including untrammeled discretion, rules, rules with excuses, presumptions, factors, standards, guidelines, principles, and analogies. To that list we might add, or highlight, formulae as a particular type of – quantitatively expressed – rule. So there is a continuum of more and less rule-like modes in which a legal proposition might be expressed; and there are weaker and stronger forms of discretion, more or less trammeled by another of the tools in the box.

Lastly, ‘the regime‘ that we are examining (or might wish to create) has (or will probably have) more than one component. The current legal framework for the division of capital assets on relationship breakdown in New Zealand itself comprises more than one mode of legal norm: a rule of equal sharing of defined property, subject to exceptions cabined by jurisdictional limits, at least one of which (Property (Relationships) Act 1976 (NZ) (‘ PRA ‘), section 15), once triggered, ultimately requires the exercise of judicial discretion to determine the extent of departure from equal shares.

Type
Chapter
Information
Law and Policy in Modern Family Finance
Property Division in the 21st Century
, pp. 261 - 292
Publisher: Intersentia
Print publication year: 2017

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×