INTRODUCTION

The question of exactly when the first signs of fundamental rights in the territory of the current Republic of Estonia were clearly established is not easy to answer. Would it be correct to begin with the Fundamental Laws of the Russian Empire from 23 April 1906, or should we begin the story about fundamental rights in Estonia with the first Constitution of the Republic of Estonia which was passed by the Constituent Assembly (Asutav Kogu) on 15 June 1920 and entered into force on 21 December 1920? Estonian legal historian T. Anepaio takes one step further and suggests that the first acts establishing certain fundamental rights were introduced with the judicial reforms of 1889 by the Emperor of Russia, Alexander II. Thus, the question is: should we draw a line between the legal acts of the Russian Empire and Estonia's own national pre-constitutional and constitutional legal acts?

New problems and possibilities for subjective interpretation arise, however, even if we frame the discussion only in terms of national Estonian legal acts. In the theory of constitutional law there have been discussions concerning which documents are, per se, pre-constitutional. In the interwar period, the Estonian leading legal theorist and specialist in administrative law, A. T. Kliimann (1899–1941), based his theory on the basic formative steps of national independence. According to Kliimann, the important pre-constitutional acts of Estonia were as follows: firstly, the decision of the Estonian National Council (Maanõukogu otsus); secondly, the Manifesto to All the Peoples of Estonia, known as the Declaration of Independence, of 24 February 1918 under which Estonia was a democratic republic from 15 November 1917, followed thirdly by the Temporary Regime of Government of the Republic of Estonia passed by the Constituent Assembly on 4 July 1919.