Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-767nl Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-11T00:25:38.314Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Conclusion

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 October 2014

Naaborko Sackeyfio-Lenoch
Affiliation:
Assistant Professor of African History at Dartmouth College
Get access

Summary

Today most visitors arrive at Accra's shores by plane to find a bustling city with more than four million residents. A building boom of high-rise buildings and new residential communities marks the city. Growing population densities with residents from all over Africa and the world; vibrant cultural, educational, and economic facilities; and the expansion of roads and motorways are all features of Accra's development as a modern African city. This expansion means a continued need for land from indigenous Ga communities. Ga chiefs, family members, individuals, and other “traditional” authorities have benefited from selling land and receiving government compensation for land acquired for public purposes. Property ownership and local authority continue to be highly contested in twenty-first-century Accra. Government control of land markets, urbanization, and internal conflicts over political titles in an increasingly modern city has exacerbated local Ga autonomy.

During the late 1990s the Ga-Dangme Council was created to agitate for better management of local lands. The group included Ga youth, chiefly authorities, Ga lawyers, intellectuals, and concerned citizens. The Ga-Dangme Council contends that particular land laws apply only to Accra and no other city or town in modern Ghana. The council claims that over the past five decades, a number of land laws have been widely abused by government officials, private citizens groups, and individuals. As a result, litigation has proliferated and conflict over land has prevailed. The laws are similar to colonial laws that allowed government officials to acquire any piece of land for “public” purposes and compensate the owners for acquisition.

Type
Chapter
Information
The Politics of Chieftaincy
Authority and Property in Colonial Ghana, 1920-1950
, pp. 167 - 174
Publisher: Boydell & Brewer
Print publication year: 2014

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×