Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-5g6vh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-27T21:22:08.382Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Chapter IV - The Formation of Tails

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 June 2016

Get access

Summary

The theory of the preceding chapter has shown how, in agreement with general ideas already arrived at by astronomers, comets consist of very large numbers of widely separated particles. With this picture of the internal structure of a comet, we come now to a simple consequence of the theory that throws considerable light on the whole question of the formation of tails. The difficulty has always been to understand why comets should more or less suddenly begin to emit material for tail formation and how they are able to go on repeating the cycle at each perihelion return more or less indefinitely.

It has been seen that as a result of gravitational forces within the accretion stream the cometary segments form initially at great distance from the sun and so give rise in the first place to long-period comets. Also, since by equation (19) of Chapter III the mass md depends on, R3/2 comets of greatest mass will tend to form at the greatest distance. Now as such a comet falls towards the sun its self-gravitation will remain unchanged, at any rate in order of magnitude, whereas the differential force on it due to the sun will increase like R-3. Since R decreases from several hundred astronomical units down to a few solar radii as the comet moves inwards, the effect of the sun's action increases by a very large factor. For example, we might have initially R = 500 a.u. = 105 solar radii, and if the comet eventually passes within about 2 solar radii of the sun's centre, the differential force would be increased as compared with the comet's internal self-gravitation by a factor of about 1014. This completely reverses the relative importance of the two effects; at great distance the internal gravitation predominates, though probably only by a moderate factor, whereas when close to the sun the internal gravitation is utterly negligible.

The same result holds good even though the comet is not a sun-grazer (i.e. q ∼ radius of the sun), and the point is of such importance to our argument that it may be worth while examining it more generally.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2013

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×