Abstract

This note highlights recent work involving the analyticity radii of solutions to the 3D Navier–Stokes equations. In particular it includes estimates for a solution's local analyticity radius at interior points of possibly bounded domains and, as an application, a conditional regularity criteria in weak-L3.

Introduction

In this note we describe recent results involving the analyticity radii of solutions to the Navier–Stokes equations. The 3D Navier–Stokes equations govern the evolution of a viscous incompressible fluid's velocity field u subjected to a forcing f and read

where the scalar valued function p represents the fluid's pressure, v is the viscosity coefficient, u0 is the initial data which is taken in an appropriate function space, and Ω ⊆ R3 is a domain. When a boundary is present, Dirichlet boundary conditions are imposed along with a normalising condition on p.

A motivation for studying the analyticity radius of solutions to the 3D NSE lies in their connection to the dissipative scale in turbulence, see Foias (1995), Henshaw, Kreiss, & Reyna (1995, 1990), Monin & Yaglom (1971). The turbulent energy cascade refers to a process in which energy is transported by inertial mechanisms from larger to smaller scales in a statistically regular manner (see Frisch, 1995). In the absence of viscosity these dynamics saturate all scales below some macroscale associated with the fluid's environment and forcing. In viscous flows, friction dissipates energy at small scales which breaks down the Eulerian cascade dynamics. The dissipative scale refers to the length at which inertial forces become subordinate to the diffusive effects of viscosity. This is realized mathematically as the exponential decay of the Fourier spectrum of an analytic solution to 3D NSE at frequencies beyond the inverse of the analyticity radius.

The real analyticity of strong solutions to 3D NSE is a classical result (see Giga, 1983, Komatsu, 1979, Masuda, 1967). Early estimates from below for a solution's analyticity radius were provided in Foias & Temam (1989), Komatsu (1979). In Foias & Temam (1989), these estimates are obtained using Gevrey classes in an L2 setting. As this approach depends heavily on Fourier analysis, it is most applicable to uniformly real analytic solutions and does not clearly extend to formulations of 3D NSE on domains possessing boundaries or where the forcing is only locally analytic.