Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-wg55d Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-30T21:53:12.892Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Bibliography

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 December 2015

Nico Stehr
Affiliation:
Zeppelin University, Germany
Get access

Summary

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Information, Power, and Democracy
Liberty is a Daughter of Knowledge
, pp. 339 - 392
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2015

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abel, Günter (2009), “Forms of knowledge problems, projects, perspective,” in Meusburger, Peter, Welker, Michael, and Wunder, Edgar (eds.), Clashes of Knowledge: Orthodoxies and Heterodoxies in Science and Religion. Heidelberg: Springer, 11–34.
Abramson, Paul R. and Inglehart, Ronald (1994), “Economic security and value change,” American Political Science Review 88: 336–354.Google Scholar
Acemoglu, Daron (2002), “Technical change, inequality, and the labour market,” Journal of Economic Literature 40:7–72.Google Scholar
Acemoglu, Daron and Robinson, James A. (2012), Why Nations Fail: The Origins of Power, Prosperity, and Poverty, New York: Crown Publishers.
Acemoglu, Daron and Robinson, James A. (2000), “Why did the West extend the franchise? Democracy, inequality, and growth in historical perspective,” The Quarterly Journal of Economics 115:1167–1199.Google Scholar
Acemoglu, Daron, Johnson, Simon, Robinson, James A., and Yared, Pierre (2008), “Income and democracy,” American Economic Review 98:808–842.Google Scholar
Acemoglu, Daron, Johnson, Simon, Robinson, James A. and Yared, Pierre (2006), “From education to democracy,” American Economic Review 95:44–49.Google Scholar
Ackerman, Peter and Rodal, Berel (2008), “The strategic dimension of civil resistance,” Survival 50:111–126.Google Scholar
Ackoff, Russell L. (1989), “From data to wisdom,” Journal of Applied Systems Analysis 16:3–9.Google Scholar
Adler, Emanuel and Bernstein, Steven (2005), “Knowledge in power: the epistemic construction of global governance,” in Barnett, Michael and Duvall, Raymond (eds.), Power in Global Governance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 294–318.
Adolf, Marian, Mast, Jason, and Stehr, Nico (2013), “The foundations of innovation in modern societies: the displacements of concepts and knowledgeability,” Mind & Society 12:11–22.Google Scholar
Adorno, Theodor W. ([1951] 1986), “Individuum und Staat”, in Gesammelte Schriften 20.1: Vermischte Schriften 1, Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp, 287–292.
Agamben, Giorgio (2014), “The power of thought,” Critical Inquiry 40:480–491.Google Scholar
Ali, Abdiweli M. and Isse, Hodan Said (2004), “Political freedom and the stability of economic policy,” Cato Journal 24:251–260.Google Scholar
Allen, John (2003), Lost Geographies of Power. Oxford: Blackwell.
Alexander, Jeffrey C. (1987), “Fundamentale Zweideutigkeiten in Max Webers Theorie der Rationalisierung: Warum erscheint Weber wie ein Marxist, obwohl er keiner ist?” in Böckler, Stefan and Weiß, Johannes (ed.), Marx oder Weber? Zur Aktualisierung einer Kontroverse. Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag, pp. 90–103.
Alford, Robert (1985), Powers of Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Allern, Elin and Pedersen, Karina (2007), “The impact of party organizational changes on democracy,” West European Politics 30:68–92.Google Scholar
Almond, Gabriel (1956), “Comparative political systems,” Journal of Politics 18:391–409.Google Scholar
Almond, Gabriel and Verba, Sidney (1963), The Civic Culture. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Alvey, James E. (2001), “Moral education as a means to human perfection and social order: Adam Smith's view of education in commercial society,” History of the Human Sciences 14:1–18.Google Scholar
Ambuehl, Sandro, Bernheim, B. Douglas, and Lusardi, Annamaria (2014), “Financial education, financial competence, and consumer welfare,” NBER Working Paper Series 20618. www.nber.org/papers/w20618.
Amidon, Debra M. (1997), Innovation Strategy for the Knowledge Economy: The Ken Awakening. London: Routledge.
Anderson, Benedict (1991), Imagined Communities. London: Verso.
Anderson, Robert (2012), “Support for democracy in cross-national perspective: The detrimental effect of economic inequality,” Research in Social Stratification and Mobility 30:389–402, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rssm.2012.04.002.Google Scholar
Ankersmit, Frank R. (2002), “Representational democracy,” Common Knowledge 8:24–46.Google Scholar
Arce, Moises and Kim, Wonik (2011), “Globalization and extra-parliamentary politics in an era of democracy,” European Political Science Review 3(2):253–278.Google Scholar
Arendt, Hannah (1961), Between Past and Future: Eight Exercises in Political Thought. New York: Penguin.
Arendt, Hannah (1953), “Understanding and politics,” Partisan Review 4: 377–392.Google Scholar
Aristotle, , (1932), Politics. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Aron, Raymond (1985), “Tocqueville and Marx,” in Aron, Raymond, History, Truth, Liberty: Selected Writings of Raymond Aron. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Aron, Raymond ([1965] 1984), “Politische Freiheit in der technisierten Gesellschaft,” in Aron, Raymond, Über die Freiheiten. Stuttgart: Klett-Cotta, 88–121.
Arrow, Kenneth J. ([1951] 1963), Social Choice and Individual Values. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Aslaksen, Silje (2010), “Oil and democracy: more than a cross-country correlation?Journal of Peace Research 47:1–11.Google Scholar
Åström, Joachim, Karlsson, Martin, Lindeand, Jonas, and Pirannejad, Ali (2012), “Understanding the rise of e-participation in non-democratic democracies: Domestic and international factors,” Government Information Quarterly 29:142–150.Google Scholar
Attewell, Paul (1992), “Technology diffusion and organizational learning: the case of business computing,” Organization Science 3:1–19.Google Scholar
Baber, Walter F. and Barlett, Robert V. (2005), Deliberative Environmental Politics: Democracy and Ecological Rationality. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Baccaro, Lucio (2001), “Union democracy revisited: decision-making procedures in the Italian labour movement,” Economic and Industrial Democracy 22:183–210.Google Scholar
Bachelard, Gaston ([1938] 1972), La Formation de l'esprit scientifique. Paris: Vrin.
Backhouse, Roger E. and Bateman, Bradley W. (2009), “Keynes and capitalism,” History of Political Economy 41:645–671.Google Scholar
Bailer, Stefanie, Bodenstein, Thilo, and Heinrich, V. Finn (2012), “Explaining the strength of civil society: evidence from cross-sectional data,” International Political Science Review 34:289–309.Google Scholar
Baiocchhi, Gianpaolo (2003), “Emergent public spheres: talking politics in participatory governance,” American Sociological Review 68:52–74.Google Scholar
Ballantyne, Tony (2011), “Paper, pen, and print: the transformation of the Kai Tahu knowledge order,” Comparative Studies in Society and History 53:232–260.Google Scholar
Barber, Benjamin (2008), “Shrunken sovereign: consumerism, globalization and American emptiness,” World Affairs 170:73–81.Google Scholar
Barber, Benjamin (2000), “Globalizing democracy,” The American Prospect 11 (September 11):16–19.Google Scholar
Barber, Benjamin (1984), Strong Democracy: Participatory Politics for a New Age. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
Barber, Bernhard (1952), Science and the Social Order. New York: Free Press.
Barnes, Barry S. (1995), The Elements of Social Theory. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Barnes, Barry S. (1988), The Nature of Power. Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press.
Barnes, Barry S. and Dolby, R. G. A., (1970), “The scientific ethos: a deviant viewpoint,” European Journal of Sociology 11:3–25.Google Scholar
Barnett, Michael and Duvall, Raylond (2005), “Power in global governance,” in Barnett, Michael and Duvall, Raymond (eds.), Power in Global Governance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1–32.
Barro, Robert J. (1999), “The determinants of democracy,” Journal of Political Economy 107:S158–S183.Google Scholar
Barro, Robert J. (1996), “Democracy and growth,” Journal of Economic Growth 1:1–27.Google Scholar
Barro, Robert and Wha, Lee Jong, (2010), “A new data set of educational attainment in the world, 1950–2010,” NBER Working Paper No. 15902.
Bartels, Larry M. (2005), “Homer gets a text cut: Inequality and public policy in the American mind,” Perspectives on Politics 3:15–31.Google Scholar
Barzeley, Michael (1992), Breaking through Bureaucracy. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
Barth, Fredrik (2002), “An anthropology of knowledge,” Current Anthropology 43:1–18.Google Scholar
Basdash, Lawrence (2000), “Science and McCarthyism,” Miverva 38:53–80.Google Scholar
Bateson, Gregory (1972), Steps to an Ecology of Mind. New York: Ballantine.
Baudrillard, Jean (1988), Selected Writings. in Poster, Mark, (ed.), Palo Alto, California, Stanford University Press.
Bauer, Martin W. (1996), “Socio-demographic correlates of DK-responses in knowledge surveys: self-attributed ignorance of science,” Social Science Information 35:39–68.Google Scholar
Bauer, Walter (2003), “On the relevance of bildung for democracy,” Educational Philosophy and Theory 32:211–225.Google Scholar
Baum, Matthew A. and Lake, David A. (2003), “The political economy of growth: democracy and human capital,” American Journal of Political Science 47:333–347.Google Scholar
Bay, Christian (1965),“Politics and pseudopolitics: a critical evaluation of some behavioral literature,” American Political Science Review 59:39–51.Google Scholar
Bearce, David H. and Laks Hutnik, Jennifer A. (2011), “Toward an alternative explanation for the resource curse: Natural resources, immigration, and democratization,” Comparative Political Studies 44:689–718.Google Scholar
Bechmann, Gotthard and Stehr, Nico (2002), “The legacy of Niklas Luhmann.” Society 39: 67–75.Google Scholar
Beck, Ulrich ([1986] 1992), The Risk Society. London: Sage.
Becker, Jeffrey (2012), “The knowledge to act: Chinese migrant labor protests in comparative perspective,” Comparative Political Studies 44:1379–1404.Google Scholar
Beckfield, Jason (2003), “Inequality in the world polity: The structure of international organization,” American Sociological Review 68:401–424.Google Scholar
Beeson, Mark (2010), “The coming of environmental authoritarianism,” Environmental Politics 19:276:264.Google Scholar
Bell, Daniel (1996), “Welcome to the post-industrial society,” Physics Today February:40–48.
Bell, Daniel ([1979] 1980), “The new class: a muddled concept,” The Winding Passage. Essays and Sociological Journeys 1960–1980. Cambridge, MA: Abt Books, pp. 144–164.
Bell, Daniel (1976), The Cultural Contradictions of Capitalism. New York: Basic Books.
Bell, Daniel (1973), The Coming of Post-Industrial Society: A Venture in Social Forecasting. New York: Basic Books.
Bell, Daniel (1971), “Technocracy and politics,” Survey 16: 1–24.Google Scholar
Bell, Daniel (1969), “Die nachindustrielle Gesellschaft,” in Grossner, Claus et al. (ed.), Das 198. Jahrzehnt. Eine Team-Prognose für 1970 bis 1980, Hamburg: Christian Wegner Verlag, S, pp. 351–363.
Bell, Daniel (1968), “The measurement of knowledge and technology,” in Sheldon, Eleanor B. and Moore, Wilbert E. (ed.), Indicators of Social Change: Concepts and Measurements. Hartford, CT: Russell Sage Foundation, pp. 145–246.
Bell, Daniel (1967), “Notes on the post-industrial society,” The Public Interest 6: 24–35.Google Scholar
Bell, Daniel (1960), The End of Ideology: on the Exhaustion of Political Ideas in the Fifties. New York: Free Press.
Bell, Daniel (1956), “The theory of mass society: a critique,” Commentary 22:75–83.Google Scholar
Benavot, Aaron, Cha, Yun-Lyung, Kamens, David, Meyer, John W., and Wong, Suk-Ying (1991), “Knowledge for the masses: world models and national curricula, 1920–1986,” American Sociological Review 56:85–100.Google Scholar
Benkler, Yochai (1999), “From consumers to users: shifting the deeper structures of regulation toward sustainable commons and user access,” Federal Communications Law Journal 52:561–579.Google Scholar
Bennett, Stephen Earl (2006), “Democratic competence, before converse and after,” Critical Review 18:105–141.Google Scholar
Bennett, Stephen Earl (2003), “Is the public's ignorance of politics trivial?Critical Review 15: 307–337.Google Scholar
Bennett, W. Lance and Iyengar, Shanto (2008), “A new era of minimal effects? The changing foundations of political communication,” Journal of Communication 58:707–731.Google Scholar
Bensaude-Vincent, Bernadette (2001), “A genealogy of the increasing gap between science and the public,” Public Understanding of Science 10:99–113.Google Scholar
Benson, Lee, Harkavy, Ira, and Puckett, John (2007), Dewey's Dream: Universities and Democracy in an Age of Education Reform. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.
Bentzen, Jeanet Sinding, Kaarsen, Nicolai, and Wingender, Asger Moll (2012), “Irrigation and democracy,” Discussion Papers. Department of Economics, University of Copenhagen, no. 12–06.
Berelson, Bernard (1952), “Democratic theory and public opinion,” Public Opinion Quarterly 16:313–330.Google Scholar
Berelson, Bernard, Lazarsfeld, Paul F., and McPhee, William N. (1954), Voting: A Study of Public Opinion in a Presidential Campaign. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Berg-Schlosser, Dirk (2003), “Comment on Welzel, Inglehart & Klingemann's ‘The theory of human development’: A cross-cultural analysis,” European Journal of Political Research 42:381–386.Google Scholar
Berger, Margaret A. and Solan, Lawrence M. (2008), “Symposium: a cross-disciplinary look at scientific truth: what's the law to do? The uneasy relationship between science and law: an essay and introduction,” Brooklyn Law Review 73:847–56.Google Scholar
Berger, Peter and Luckmann, Thomas (1966), The Social Construction of Reality: A treatise in the sociology of knowledge. Garden City, NY: Doubleday.
Berlin, Isaiah ([1998] 2002), “My intellectual path,” in Hardy, Henry (ed.), The Power of Ideas. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, pp. 1–23.
Berlin, Isaiah ([1995] 2002), “Liberty,” in Hardy, Henry (ed.), The Power of Ideas. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, pp. 111–114.
Berlin, Isaiah ([1958] 1969), “Two concepts of liberty”, in Berlin, Isaiah, Four Essays on Liberty. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 118–172.
Berlin, Isaiah (1949/1950), “Political ideas in the twentieth century,” Foreign Affairs 28:351–385.Google Scholar
Bernal, John D. (1939), The Social Functions of Science. New York: Macmillan.
Besley, John C. and Nisbet, Matthew (2011), “How scientists view the public, the media and the political process,” Public Understanding of Science, doi: 10.1177/0963662511418743.
Best, Michael L. and Wade, Keegan W. (2009), “The Internet and democracy: global catalyst or democratic dud?Bulletin of Science, Technology & Society 29:255–271.Google Scholar
Biesta, Gert (2007), “Towards the knowledge democracy? Knowledge production and the civic role of the university,” Studies in the Philosophy of Education 26:467–479.Google Scholar
Bimber, Bruce (1998), “The Internet and political transformation: populism, community, and accelerated pluralism,” Polity 31:133–160.Google Scholar
Bitros, George C. and Karayiannis, Anastassios D. (2013), Creative Crisis in Democracy and Economy. Berlin-Heidelberg: Springer.
Blair, Ann (2010), Too much to know: Managing Scholarly Information before the Modern Age. New Haven, Connecticut: Yale University Press.
Blackler, Frank (1995), “Knowledge, knowledge work and organizations: an overview and interpretation,” Organization Studies 16:1021–1046.Google Scholar
Blanchard, Troy and Matthews, Todd L. (2006), “The configuration of local economic power and civic participation in the global economy,” Social Forces 84:2241–2257.Google Scholar
Blok, Anders (2007), “Experts on public trial: on democratizing expertise through a Danish consensus conference,” Public Understanding of Science 16:163–182.Google Scholar
Blokland, Hans (2011), Pluralism, Democracy and Political Knowledge: Robert A. Dahl and His Critics on Modern Politics. London: Ashgate.
Blumer, Herbert (1948), “Public opinion and public opinion polling,” American Sociological Review 13:542–549.Google Scholar
Boas, Franz (1938), Manifesto on Freedom of Science. The Committee of the American Academy for the Advancement of Science.
Boas, Franz (1939), “Democracy and intellectual freedom.” Address delivered at a meeting sponsored by the Lincoln's Birthday Committee for Democracy and Intellectual Freedom, February 12, 1939. The American Teacher, March: 1.
Boas, Taylor C. (2000), “The dictator's dilemma? The Internet and U.S. policy toward Cuba,” The Washington Quarterly 23:57–67.Google Scholar
Böckler, Anne, Knoblich, Günther, and Sebanz, Natalie (2010), “Socializing cognition,” in Glatzeder, Britt M., Goel, Vinod, and Müller, Albrechtvon von (eds.), Towards a Theory of Thinking: Building Blocks for a Conceptual Framework. Berlin-Heidelberg: Springer, pp. 233–250.
Böhme, Gernot (1992), “Science and other types of knowledge,” in Böhme, Gernot(ed.), Coping with Science. Boulder, CO: Westview, pp. 51–63.
Bohman, James (2007), “We, heirs of enlightenment: critical theory, democracy, and social science,” in Turner, Stephen P. and Risjord, Mark W. (eds.), Philosophy of Anthropology and Sociology: Handbook of the Philosophy of Science. Amsterdam: Elsevier, pp. 711–726.
Bohman, James (1999a), “Citizenship and norms of publicity: wide public reason in cosmopolitan societies,” Political Theory 27:176–202.Google Scholar
Bohman, James (1999b), “Democracy as inquiry; inquiry as democratic: pragmatism, social science, and the cognitive division of labor,” American Journal of Political Science 43:590–607.Google Scholar
Bohman, James (1998), “The coming of age of deliberative democracy,” The Journal of Political Philosophy 6:400–425.Google Scholar
Boix, Carles (2011), “Democracy, development and the international system,” American Political Science Review 105:809–828.Google Scholar
Boix, Carles (2003), Democracy and Redistribution. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Boix, Carles and Stokes, Susan C. (2003), “Endogenous democratization,” World Politics 55:517–549.Google Scholar
Boli, John und Thomas, George M. (1997), “World Culture in the World Polity: A Century of International Non-governmental Organization,” American Sociological Review 62:171–90.Google Scholar
Boltanski, Luc and Thévenot, Laurent (1999), “The sociology of critical capacity,” European Journal of Sociology 2:359–377.Google Scholar
Borgmann, Albert (1999), Holding on to Reality: The Nature of Information at the Turn of the Millennium, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Born, Max (1968), My Life and My Views: A Nobel Prize Winner in Physics Writes Provocatively on a Wide Range of Subjects. New York: Scribner.
Borooah, Vani K. and Paldam, Martin (2007), “Why is the world short of democracy? A cross-country analysis of barriers to representative government,” European Journal of Political Economy 23:582–604.Google Scholar
Botero, Juan, Ponce, Alejandro, and Shleifer, Andrei (2012), “Education and the quality of government,” NBER Working Paper 18119.
Boulding, Kenneth (1965), The Meaning of the Twentieth Century: The Great Transition. New York: Harper & Row.
Bourdieu, Pierre (1999), “Scattered remarks,” European Journal of Social Theory 2:334–340.Google Scholar
Bourdieu, Pierre (1998), Acts of Resistance: Against the Tyranny of the Market. New York: The New Press.
Bourdieu, Pierre ([1980] 1990), The Logic of Practice. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Bourdieu, Pierre [1979] 1984, Distinction: A Social Critique of the Judgment of Taste. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Bourdieu, Pierre (1975), “The specificity of the scientific field and the social conditions of the progress of reason,” Social Science Information 14: 19–47.Google Scholar
Bourdieu, Pierre ([1973] 1993), “Public opinion does not exist,” in Sociology in Question. London: Sage, pp. 149–157.
Bourguignon, François and Verdier, Thierry (2000), “Oligarchy, democracy, inequality and growth,” Journal of Development Economics 62:285–313.Google Scholar
Boyle, James (2007), “Mertonianism unbound? Imaging free, decentralized access to most cultural and scientific material,” in Hess, Charlotte and Ostrom, Elinor (eds.), Understanding Knowledge as a Commons: From Theory to Practice. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 123–143.
Bösch, Frank und Frei, Norbert (Hg.) (2006), Medialisierung und Demokratie im 20. Jahrhundert. Goettingen: Wallstein.
Braczyk, Hans Joachim and Schienstock, Gerd (1996), “Lean Production in Baden-Württemberg: Erwartungen, Wirkungen und Folgen,” in Braczyk, Hans Joachim and Schienstock, Gerd (eds.), Kurswechsel in der Industrie. Stuttgart: Kohlhammer, pp. 121–133.
Brand, Myles (1987), “Intending and acting: toward a naturalized action theory,” Journal of Philosophy 84:49–54.Google Scholar
Braverman, Harry (1974), Labour and Monopoloy Capitalism: The Degradation of Work in the Twentieth Century. New York: Monthly Review Press.
Brecht, Arnold (1946), “Democracy –challenge to theory,” Social Research 13:195–224.Google Scholar
Broman, Thomas H. (2002), “Some preliminary considerations on science and civil society,” Osiris 17:1–21.Google Scholar
Brooks, Harvey (1965), “Scientific concepts and cultural change,” Daedalus 94:66–83.Google Scholar
Brown, John Seely and Duguid, Paul ([2000] 2002), The Social Life of Information. Boston, MA: Harvard University Press.
Brown, Mark B. (2013), “Review of Philip Kitcher ‘Science in a Democratic Society’,” Minerva 51:389–397.Google Scholar
Brown, Mark B. (2009), Science in Democracy: Expertise, Institutions, and Representation. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Brown, Mark B. (2006), “Citizen panels and the concept of representation,” The Journal of Political Philosophy 14: 203–225.Google Scholar
Brown, Mark B. (2004), “The political philosophy of science policy: Review essay of Philip Kitcher ‘Science, Truth and Democracy’,” Minerva 42:77–94.Google Scholar
Bruch, Sarah K., Ferree, Myra Marx and Soss, Joe (2010), “From policy to polity: Democracy, paternalism, and the incorporation of disadvantaged citizens,” American Sociological Review 75:205–226.Google Scholar
Bruner, Jerome S.(1990), Acts of Meaning. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Bryce, James (1901), The American Government. Vol. 2. New York: Macmillan.
Bull, Hedley (1977), The Anarchical Society: A Study of Order in World Politics. London: Macmillan.
Bullock, John G. (2011), “Elite influence on public opinion in an informed electorate,” American Political Science Review 105:496–515.Google Scholar
Bunce, Valerie (2001), “Democratization and economic reform,” Annual Review of Political Science 4:43–65.Google Scholar
Burke, Edmund ([1790] 1955), Reflections on the Revolution in France. New York: The Liberal Arts Press,
Burke, Peter (2000), A Social History of Knowledge: From Gutenberg to Diderot. Oxford: Polity Press.
Burns, Tom R. (1999), “The evolution of parliaments and societies in Europe. Challenges and prospects,” European Journal of Social Theory 2: 167–194.Google Scholar
Buroway, Michael (1985), The Politics of Production. London Verso.
Buroway, Michael (1979), Manufacturing Consent. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Burton-Jones, Alan (1999), Knowledge Capitalism: Business, Work, and Learning in the New Economy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Callon, Michel, Lascoume, Pierre, and Barthe, Yannik ([2001] 2009), Acting in an Uncertain World: An Essay on Technical Democracy. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Callon, Michel (1999), “The role of lay people in the production and dissemination of scientific knowledge,” Science, Technology & Society 4:81–94.Google Scholar
Callon, Michel (1998), “Introduction: the embeddedness of economic models in economics,” in Callon, Michel (ed.), The Laws of the Market. Oxford: Blackwell, pp. 1–57.
Cambrosio, Alberto and Keating, Peter (1988), “‘Going monoclonal’: art, science and magic in the day-to-day use of hybridoma technology,” Social Problems 35:244–260.Google Scholar
Campante, Filipe R. and Chor, Davin (2012), “Schooling, political participation, and the economy,” Review of Economics and Statistics 94:841–859.Google Scholar
Campante, Filipe R. and Chor, Davin (2011), “‘The people want the fall of the regime’: schooling, political protest, and the economy,” Harvard Kennedy School Faculty Research Paper 11–018.
Campbell, Angus, Converse, Philip E., Miller, Warren E., and Stokes, Donald E. (1960), The American Voter. New York: John Wiley.
Capaccio, Giovanni and Ziblatt, Daniel (2010), “The historical turn in democratization studies: a new research agenda for Europe and beyond,” Comparative Political Studies 43:931–968.Google Scholar
Caplan, Bryan D. (2007), The Myth of the Rational Voter: Why Democracies Chose Bad Policies. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Carey, James W. (1993), “The mass media and democracy: between the modern and the postmodern,” Journal of International Affairs 47:1–21.Google Scholar
Carey, James W., Iyengar, Shanto, Lund, Anker Brink, and Salovaara, Inka (2009), “Media system, public knowledge and democracy: a comparative study,” European Journal of Communication 25:5–26.Google Scholar
Carley, Kathleen (1986), “Knowledge acquisition as a social phenomenon,” Instructional Science 14: 381–438.Google Scholar
Carlsson, Magnus, Dahl, Gordon B., and Rooth, Dan-Ole (2012), “The effect of schooling on cognitive skills,” NBER Working Paper 18484.
Carneiro, Pedro, Crawford, Claire, and Goodman, Alissa (2007), “The impact of early cognitive and non-cognitive skills on later outcomes,” Discussion Paper no. 92, Centre Econ. Educ., London School Economics.
Caron-Finterman, J. Francisca, Broerse, Jacqueline E. W., and Bunders, Joske F. G. (2007), “Patient partnership in decision-making on biomedical research,” Science, Technology & Human Values 32:339–368.Google Scholar
Carolan, Michael S. (2006), “Science, expertise, and the democratization of the decision-making process,” Society and Natural Resources 19:661–668.Google Scholar
Carter, Stephen L. (2009), “Where's the bailout for publishing?” The Daily Beast, www.thedailybeast.com/blogs-and-stories/2009-03-17/wheres-the-bailout-for-publishing/p/.
Cartwright, Nancy, Cat, Jordi, Fleck, Lola, and Uebel, Thomas (1996), Otto Neurath: Philosophy between Science and Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Casas-Cortés, María Isabel, Osterweil, Michal, and Powell, Dana E. (2008), “Blurring boundaries: recognizing knowledge-practices in the study of social movements,” Anthropological Quarterly 81:17–58.Google Scholar
Catelló-Climent, Amparo (2008), “On the distribution of education and democracy,” Journal of Developmental Economics 87:179–190.Google Scholar
Castells, Manuel (2009), Communication Power. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Castells, Manuel (2000), The Information Age: Economy, Society and Culture. Volume III: End of Millennium, Second Edition, Oxford: Blackwell.
Castells, Manuel (1996), The Rise of Network Society. Oxford: Blackwell.
Castells, Manuel and Henderson, Jeffrey (1987), “Introduction: techno-economic restructuring, socio-political processes and spatial transformation: a global perspective.” in Henderson, Jeffrey and Castells, Manuel (eds.), Global Restructuring and Territorial Development. London: Sage, pp. 1–17.
Cerny, Philip G. (1990), The Changing Architecture of Politics: Structure, Agency and the Future of the State. London: Sage.
Chaffee, Steven H. and Metzger, Miriam J. (2001), “The end of mass communication,” Mass Communication & Society 4:365–379.Google Scholar
Champagne, Patrick (2005), “‘Making the people speak’: on the social uses of and reactions to public opinion polls,” in Wacquant, Loïc (ed.), Pierre Bourdieu and Democratic Politics. Cambridge: Polity Press, pp. 11–132.
Che, Yi, Lu, YI, Tao, Zhigang, and Wang, Peng (2012), “The impact of income on democracy revisited,” Journal of Comparative Economics, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jce.2012.05.006.
Chen, Jie and Lu, Chunlong (2011), “Democratization and the middle class in China: the middle class's attitudes toward democracy,” Political Research Quarterly 64:705–719.Google Scholar
Chen, Lincoln C., Evans, Tim G. and Cash, Richard A. (1999). “Health as a global public good,” in Kaul, Inge, Grunberg, Isabelle und Stern, Marc A. (eds.), Global Public Goods. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 284–304.
Chong, Dennis and Druckman, James N. (2010), “Dynamic public opinion: communication effects over time,” American Political Science Review 104:663–680.Google Scholar
Chong, Alberto and Gradsrein, Mark (2009), “Education and democratic preferences,” Inter-American Development Bank, Mimeo.
Chong, Dennis and Druckman, James N. (2007), “Framing public opinion in competitive democracies,” American Political Science Review 101:639–655.Google Scholar
Clegg, Stewart R. (1989), Frameworks of Power. London: Sage.
Chong, Dennis and Druckman, James N. (2007), “Framing public opinion in competitive democracies,” American Political Science Review 101:639–655.Google Scholar
Coffin, Judith G. (1999), “A ‘standard’ of living? European perspectives on class and consumption in the early twentieth century,” International Labor and Working-Class History 55:6–26.Google Scholar
Coglianese, Cary (2003), “The Internet and public participation in rulemaking,” John F. Kennedy School of Government, Harvard University, Faculty Research Working Paper Series, http://ssrn.com/abstract=421161.
Cohen, Geoffrey L. (2003), “Party over policy: The dominating impact of group influence on political beliefs,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 85:808–822.Google Scholar
Cohen, Jean L. and Arato, Andrew (1992), Civil Society and Political Theory. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Cohn, Bernard S. (1996), Colonialism and Its Form of Knowledge: The British in India. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Coleman, James S. (1988), “Social capital in the creation of human capital,” American Journal of Sociology 94:S95–S120.Google Scholar
Coleman, Stephen (1999), “Can the new media invigorate democracy?Political Quarterly 70:16–22.Google Scholar
Coleman, Stephen and Blumler, Jay G. (2009), The Internet and Democratic Citizenship: Theory, Practice, and Policy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Collins, Harry and Evans, Robert (2007), Rethinking Expertise. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Collinson, David (2000), “Strategies of resistance: Power, knowledge and subjectivity in the workplace,” in Grint, Keith (ed.), Work and Society. Cambridge: Polity Press, pp. 163–198.
Collinson, David (1994), “Strategies of resistance: Power, knowledge and subjectivity in the workplace,” in Jermier, John M., Knights, David and Nord, Walter R. (eds.), Resistance and Power in Organizations. London: Routledge, pp. 25–68.
Connolly, William E. (1991) Identity\Difference: Democratic Negotiations of Political Paradox. Ithica, New York: Cornell University Press.
Converse, Philip E. (2006), “Democratic theory and electoral reality,” Critical Review 18:297–329.Google Scholar
Converse, Philip E. ([1964] 2006), “The nature of belief systems in mass publics,” Critical Review 18:1–74.Google Scholar
Cook, Philip J. (1971), “Robert Michels’ political parties in perspective,” The Journal of Politics 33:773–796.Google Scholar
Coombs, W. Timothy and Cutbirth, Craig W. (1998), “Mediated political communication, the Internet, and the new knowledge elites: prospects and portents,” Telematics and Informatics 15:203–217.Google Scholar
Condorcet, Marquis ([1796] 1996), Outlines of an Historical View of the Progress of the Human Mind: Being a Posthumous Work of the Late M. de Condorcet. Philadelphia: Land and Ustick.
Connolly, William E. (1991), “Democracy and territoriality,” Millennium-Journal of International Studies 20: 463–484.Google Scholar
Coppedge, Michael and Gerring, John, with Altman, David, Bernhard, Michael, Fish, Steven, Hicken, Allen, Kroenig, Matthew, Lindberg, Staffan I., McMann, Kelly, Paxton, Pamela, Semetko, Holli A., Skaaning, Svend-Erik, Staton, Jeffrey, and Teorell, Jan (2011), “Conceptualizing and measuring democracy: a new approach,” Perspectives on Politics 9:247–267.Google Scholar
Couzin, Iain D., Ioannou, Christos C., Demirel, Guven, Gross, Thilo, Torney, Colin J., Hartnett, Andrew, Conradt, Larissa, Levin, Simon A., and Leonard, Naomi E. (2011), “Uninformed individuals promote democratic consensus in animal groups,” Science 334:1578–1580.Google Scholar
Crain, Robert L. and Rosenthal, Donald B. (1967), “Community status as a dimension of local decision-making,” American Sociological Review 32:970–984.Google Scholar
Cranston, Maurice (1971), “Some aspects of the history of freedom,” in von Beyme, Klaus (ed.), Theory and Politics [Theorie und Politik: Festschrift zum 70. Geburtstag für Carl Joachim Friedrich]. Haag: Martinus Nihoff, pp. 18–34.
Cress, Daniel M. and Snow, David A. (1996), “Mobilization at the margins: resources, benefactors, and the viability of homeless social movement organizations.” American Sociological Review 61:1089–1109.Google Scholar
Croissant, Jennifer and Restivo, Sal (1995), “Science, social problems, and progressive thought,” in Star, Susan Leigh (ed.), Ecologies of Knowledge: Work and Politics in Science and Technology. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press, pp. 39–87.
Crouch, Colin (2004), Post-Democracy. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Crozier, Michel ([1979] 1982), Strategies for Change: The Future of French Society. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Culliton, Barbara J. (1978), “Science's restive public,” Daedalus 107:147–156.Google Scholar
Curran, James, Iyengar, Shanto, Lund, Anker Brink, and Salovaara-Moring, Inka (2009), “Media System, Public Knowledge and Democracy,” European Journal of Communications 24: 5–26.Google Scholar
Daele, van den Wolfgang (1977), “The social construction of science: institutionalisation and definition of positive science in the latter half of the Seventeenth century,” in Mendelsohn, Everett, Weingart, Peter, and Whitley, Richard (eds.), The Social Production of Scientific Knowledge. Dordrecht: D. Reidel, pp. 27–54.
Dahl, Robert A. (2006), On Political Equality. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Dahl, Robert A. (2005), “What political institutions does large-scale democracy require?Political Science Quarterly 120:187–197.Google Scholar
Dahl, Robert A. (2000), “A democratic paradox?Political Science Quarterly 115:35–40.Google Scholar
Dahl, Robert A. (2006), On Political Equality. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Dahl, Robert A. (1999), “The shifting boundaries of democratic government,” Social Research 66:915–931.Google Scholar
Dahl, Robert A. (1998), Democracy. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Dahl, Robert A. (1994), “A democratic dilemma: system effectiveness versus citizen participation,” Political Science Quarterly 109:23–34.Google Scholar
Dahl, Robert A. (1992), “The problem of civic competence,” Journal of Democracy 3:45–59.Google Scholar
Dahl, Robert A. (1989), Democracy and its Critics. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Dahl, Robert A. (1977), “On removing certain impediments to democracy in the United States,” Political Science Quarterly 92:1–2.Google Scholar
Dahl, Robert A. (1971), Polyarchy: Participation and Opposition. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Dahl, Robert A. (1961a), “The behavioral approach in political science: epitaph for a movement to a successful protest,” American Political Science Review 55(4):763–772.Google Scholar
Dahl, Robert A. (1961b), Who Governs? Democracy and Power in an American City. New Haven, CT: Yale University.
Dahlgren, Peter (2009), Media and Political Engagement: Citizens, Communication, and Engagement. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Dahrendorf, Ralf (2002), Die Krise der Demokratie: Ein Gespräch. München: C. H. Beck.
Dahrendorf, Ralf (2000), “Die globale Klasse und die neue Ungleichheit,” Merkur 54:1057–1068.Google Scholar
Dahrendorf, Ralf (1996), “Economic opportunity, civil society, and political liberty,” Development and Change 27:229–249.Google Scholar
Dahrendorf, Ralf (1974), “Citizenship and beyond: the social dynamics of an idea,” Social Research 41:673–701.Google Scholar
Dahrendorf, Ralf ([1963] 1968), “Uncertainty, science and democracy,” in Dahrendorf, Ralf, Essays in the Theory of Society. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, pp. 232–255.
Dahrendorf, Ralf ([1957] 1959), Class and Class Conflict in Industrialized Society. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Dalton, Russell J., Shin, Doh C., and Jou, Willy (2007), “Understanding democracy: data from unlikely places,” Journal of Democracy 18:142–156.Google Scholar
Dalton, Russell J. and Ong, Hnu-Ngoc T. (2005), “Authority orientations and democratic attitudes: a test of the ‘Asian values’ hypothesis,” Japanese Journal of Political Science 6:211–231.Google Scholar
Dalton, Russell J., Kuechler, Manfred, and Bürklin, Wilhelm (1990), “The challenge of new movements”, in Dalton, Russell J., and Kuechler, Manfred (eds.), Challenging the Political Order: New Social and Political Movements in Western Democracies, New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 3–20.
Darnton, Robert (2010), Poetry and the Police: Communication Networks in Eighteenth-Century Paris. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Darr, Asaf and Warhurst, Chris (2008), “Assumptions, assertions and the need for evidence: debugging debates about knowledge workers,” Current Sociology 56:25–45.Google Scholar
Dasgupta, Partha S. and David, Paul A. (1994), “Toward a new economics of science,” Research Policy 23: 487–521.Google Scholar
Da Silva, Mario A. (2014), “The knowledge multiplier,” Economics of Innovation and New Technology 23, doi: 10.1080/10438599.2014.882138.Google Scholar
Davenport, Thomas H., De Long, David W., and Beers, Michael C. (1998), “Successful knowledge management projects,” Sloan Management Review 39: 43–57.Google Scholar
Daum, Andreas W. (2002), “Science, politics, and religion: Humboldtian thinking and the transformations of civil society in Germany, 1830–1870,” Osiris 17:107–140.Google Scholar
DeCanio, Samuel (2006), “Mass opinion and American political development,” Critical Review 18:339–356.Google Scholar
Dee, Thomas S. (2003), “Are there civic returns to education?NBER Working Paper Series 9588, www.nber.org/papers/w9588.Google Scholar
Dean, Mitchell (2001), “Michel Foucault: ‘a man in danger’,” in Ritzer, George and Smart, Barry (ed.), Handbook of Social Theory. London: Sage, pp. 324–338.
De Graaf, Nan Dirk, and Evans, Geoffrey (1996), “Why are the young more postmaterialist? A cross-national analysis of individual and contextual influences on postmaterial values,” Comparative Political Studies 28: 608–635.Google Scholar
Deininger, Klaus and Squire, Lyn (1996), “A new set data set measuring income inequality,” World Bank Economic Review 10:565–591.Google Scholar
Dell, Melissa, Jones, Benjamin F., and Olken, Benjamin A. (2012), “Climate shocks and economic growth: evidence from the last half century,” American Economic Journal: Macroeconomics 4:66–95.Google Scholar
Delli Carpini, Michael X., Cook, Fay Lomax, and Jacobs, Lawrence R. (2004), “Public deliberation, discoursive participation, and citizen engagement: A review of the empirical literature,” Annual Review of Political Science 7:315–344.Google Scholar
Delli Carpini, Michael X. and Keeter, Scott (1996), What Americans Know about Politics and Why it Matters. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Delli Carpini, Michael X. and Keeler, Scott (1993), “Measuring political knowledge: putting things first,” American Journal of Political Science 37:1179–1206.Google Scholar
Delli Carpini, Michael X. and Keeler, Scott (1991), “Stability and change in the U.S. public's knowledge of politics,” Public Opinion Quarterly 55:583–612.Google Scholar
Deht, Jan and Elff, Martin (2000), “Political involvement and apathy in Europe 1973–1998,” Arbeitspapiere – Mannheimer Zentrum für Europäische Sozialforschung 33.Google Scholar
Deutsch, Karl (1961), “Social mobilization and political development,” American Political Science Review 60:483–514.Google Scholar
Deutscher, Irving (1972), “Public and private opinions: Social situations and multiple realities,” in Nagi, S. Z. and Corwin, Ronald G. (eds.) The Social Contexts of Research. New York: Wiley, pp. 323–349.
Dewey, John (1984), The Later Works, 1925–1953. Vol. 1: Experience and Nature. Carbondale, IL: Southern Illinois University Press.
Dewey, John (1941), “Science and democracy,” The Scientific Monthly 52:55.Google Scholar
Dewey, John (1938), Logic: The Theory of Inquiry. New York: Henry Holt and Company.
Dewey, John ([1938] 1955), “Unity of science as a social problem,” in Neurath, Otto, Carnap, Rudolf, and Morris, Charles (eds.), The International Encyclopedia of Unified Science. Vol. 1. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, pp. 29–38.
Dewey, John ([1936] 1939), “Science and the future of society,” in Ratner, Joseph (ed.), Intelligence in the Modern World: John Dewey's Philosophy. New York: Modern Library, pp. 343–363.
Dewey, John (1931), “Social science and social control,” the New Republic 67:276–277.Google Scholar
Dewey, John ([1929] 1984), The Quest for Certainty: John Dewey, The Later Works (1925–1953). Vol. 4, Boydston, Jo Ann (ed.), Carbondale, Illinois: Southern Illinois University Press.
Dewey, John ([1927] 1954), The Public and Its Problems. New York: H. Holt and Co.
Dewey, John ([1916] 2005), Democracy and Education. Stilwell, KS: Dirireads.com.
Diamond, Jared (2005), Collapse: How Societies Choose to Fail or Succeed. New York: Penguin.
Diamond, Larry (2011), “Why democracies survive,” Journal of Democracy 22:17–30Google Scholar
Diamond, Larry (2010), “Liberation technology,” Journal of Democracy 21:69–83.Google Scholar
Diebolt, Claude, Mishra, Tapas, Ouattara, Bazoumana, and Parhi, Mamata (2013), “Democracy and economic growth in an interdependent world,” Review of International Economics 21:733–749.Google Scholar
DiMaggio, Paul (1997), “Culture and cognition,” Annual Review of Sociology 23:263–287.Google Scholar
DiMaggio, Paul J. und Powell, Walter W. (1983), “The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organization fields,” American Sociological Review 48:147–160.Google Scholar
Diani, Mario (1996), “Linking mobilization frames and political opportunities: Insights from regional populism in Italy,” American Sociological Review 61:1053–1069.Google Scholar
Dosi, Giovanni and Grazzi, Marco (2009), “On the nature of technologies: Knowledge, procedures, artifacts and production inputs,” Cambridge Journal of Economics 34:173–184.Google Scholar
Dosi, Giovanni (1996), “The contribution of economic theory to the understanding of a knowledge-based economy,” in Organisation for Economic Co-Operation and Development: Employment and Growth in the Knowledge-Based Economy, Paris: OECD, pp. 81–92.
Doucouliagos, Hristos and Ulubasoglu, Mehmet Ali (2008), “Democracy and economic growth: a meta-analysis,” American Journal of Political Science 52:61–83.Google Scholar
Dow, Jay K. (2011), “Political knowledge and electoral choice in the 1992–2004 United States presidential elections: are more and less informed citizens distinguishable?Journal of Elections, Public Opinion and Parties 21:381–405.Google Scholar
Downs, Anthony (1957), An Economic Theory of Democracy. New York: Harper.
Dretske, Fred (1981), Knowledge and the Flow of Information. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Drucker, Peter F. ([1989] 2003), The New Realities. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers.
Drucker, Peter F. (1968), “Worker and work in the metropolis,” Daedalus 97: 1243–1262.Google Scholar
Drucker, Peter F. (1993), “The rise of the knowledge society,” Wilson Quarterly 17:52–71.Google Scholar
Drucker, Peter F. (1989), The New Realities: In Government and Politics/In Economics and Business/In Society and World View. New York: Harper & Row.
Drucker, Peter F. (1969), The Age of Discontinuity: Guidelines to our Changing Society. New York: Harper & Row.
Drucker, Peter F. ([1968] 1992), The Age of Discontinuity: Guidelines to Our Changing Society, With a New Introduction by the Author. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Books.
Drucker, Peter F. (1939), The End of Economic Man: A Study of the New Totalitarianism. London: William Heinemann.
Dryzek, John S., Norgaard, Richard B., and Schlosberg, Davod ([2011] 2013), “Climate change and society: approaches and responses,” in Dryzek, John S., Norgaard, Eichard B., and Schlosberg, Davod (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Climate Change and Society. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 3–17.
Dryzek, John S. and Stevenson, Hayley (2011), “Global democracy and earth system governance,” Ecological Economics 70:1865–1874.Google Scholar
Duch, Raymond M. and Taylor, Michael A. (1993), “Postmaterialism and the economic condition,” American Journal of Political Science 37:747–779.Google Scholar
Dunn, John (2008), “Capitalist democracy: elective affinity or beguiling illusion,” Daedalus 136:5–13.Google Scholar
Dupré, J. Stefan and Lakoff, Sanford (1962), Science and the Nation: Policy and Politics. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Durant, Darrin (2011), “Models of democracy in social studies of science,” Social Studies of Science 41(5):691–714.Google Scholar
Durham, J, Benson, (1999), “Economic growth and political regimes,” Journal of Economic Growth 4:81–111.Google Scholar
Durkheim, Emile ([1950] 1992), Professional Ethics and Civic Morals. London: Routledge.
Durkheim, Emile ([1930 1947), The Division of Labor in Society. New York: Free Press.
Dworkin, Ronald (2002), Sovereign Virtue: The Theory and Practice of Equality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Dyrberg, Torben Bech (1997), The Circular Structure of Power: Politics, Identity, Community. London: Verso.
Eder, Klaus (1995), “Does social class matter in the study of social movements? A theory of middle-class radicalism,” in Maheu, Louis (ed.), Social Movements and Social Classes: The Future of Collective Action. London: Sage, pp. 21–54.
Easterbrook, Frank H. (1982), “Insider trading, secret agents, evidentiary privileges, and the production of information,” The Supreme Court Review 11: 309–365.Google Scholar
Edgerton, David (2011), “In praise of Luddism,” Nature 471 (March 3):27–29.Google Scholar
Edwards, Paul N., Gitelman, Lisa, Hecht, Gabrielle, Jones, Adian, Larkin, Brian, and Safier, Neil (2011), “AHR conversation: historical perspectives on the circulation of information,” American Historical Review 116:1393–1435.Google Scholar
Eggertsson, Thráinn (2009), “Knowledge and the theory of institutional change,” Journal of Institutional Economics 5:137–150.Google Scholar
Eisele, J. Christopher (1975), “John Dewey and the immigrants,” History of Education Quarterly 15:67–85.Google Scholar
Eisenstadt, Shmuel N. (1999), Paradoxes of Democracy: Fragility, Continuity, and Change. Baltimore, MD: John Hopkins University Press.
Elam, Mark and Bertilsson, Margareta (2003), “Consuming, engaging, and confronting science. The emerging dimensions of scientific citizenship,” European Journal of Social Theory 6:233–251.Google Scholar
Elias, Norbert (1984), “Knowledge and power,” in Stehr, Nico and Meja, Volker (eds.), Society and Knowledge: Contemporary Perspectives on the Sociology of Knowledge. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Books, pp. 251–292.
Elias, Norbert (1971), “Sociology of knowledge: new perspectives,” Sociology 5:149–168, 335–370.Google Scholar
Eliot, T. S. (1925), The Hollow Men. London: Faber & Gwyer.
Elo, Kimmo and Rapeli, Lauri (2010), “Determinants of political knowledge: the effects of the media on knowledge and information,” Journal of Elections, Public Opinion & Parties 20:133–146.Google Scholar
Engelmann, Stephen G. (2011), “Review article: social science against democracy,” History of the Human Sciences 24:167–179.Google Scholar
Enns, Peter K. and Kellstaft, Paul M. (2008), “Policy mood and political sophistication: why everybody moves mood,” British Journal of Political Science 38:433–454.Google Scholar
Epstein, Stephen (1996), Impure Science: AIDS, Activism and the Politics of Knowledge. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
Essed, Philomena (1991), “Knowledge and resistance: black women talk about racism in the Netherlands and the USA,” Feminism & Psychology 1:201–219.Google Scholar
Ettema, James S. and Kline, F. Gerald (1977), “Deficits, differences, and ceilings: contingent conditions for understanding the knowledge gap,” Communication Research 4:179–202.Google Scholar
Eulau, Heinz (1973), “Skill revolution and consultative commonwealth,” American Political Science Review 67:169–191.Google Scholar
Eun, Yong-Soo (2013), “The power of human beliefs over the state's behavior in world politics: an in-depth and comparative case study,” International Political Science Review 34: 372–391.Google Scholar
Eyerman, Ron and Jamison, Andrew (1991), Social Movements: A Cognitive Approach. University Park, PA: Pennsylvania State University Press.
Ezrahi, Yaron (2004), “Science and the political imagination in contemporary democracies,” in Jasanoff, Sheila (ed.), States of Knowledge: The Co-Production of Science and the Social Order. London: Routledge, pp. 254–273.
Faulkner, Wendy (1994), “Conceptualizing knowledge used in innovation: a second look at the science-technology distinction and industrial innovation,” Science, Technology & Human Values 19:425–458.Google Scholar
Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas (1998), Time Well Spent: The Declining Real Cost of Living in America. Dallas: Federal Reserve Bank.
Feng, Yi (1997), “Democracy, political stability and economic growth,” British Journal of Political Science 27:391–418.Google Scholar
Fernández, Raquel (2010), “Does culture matter?” NBER Working Paper 16277.
Feyerabend, Paul (1978), Science in a Free Society. London: New Left Review Books.
Feyerabend, Paul ([1975] 2006), “How to defend society against science,” in Selinger, Evan and Crease, Robert P. (eds.), The Philosophy of Expertise. New York, New York: Columbia University Press, pp. 358–369.
Finkel, Steven E. and Smith, Amy Erica (2011), “Civic education, political discussion, and the social transmission of democratic knowledge and values in a democracy,” American Journal of Political Science 55:417–435.Google Scholar
Finkel, Steven E. (2003), “Can democracy be taught?Journal of Democracy 14:137–151.Google Scholar
Fish, M. Steven and Brooks, Robin S. (2004), “Does diversity hurt democracy?Journal of Democracy 15:154–166.Google Scholar
Fisher, Diana R. and Green, Jessica F. (2004), “Understanding disenfrachisement: civil society and developing countries’ influence and participation in global governance for sustainable development,” Global Environmental Politics 4:65–84.Google Scholar
Florida, Richard, Mellander, Charlotta, and Stolarick, Kevin (2008), “Inside the black box of regional development: human capital, the creative class and tolerance,” Journal of Economic Geography 8:615–649.Google Scholar
Florida, Richard (2003), “Cities and the creative class,” City & Community 2:3–19.Google Scholar
Florida, Richard (2002), The Rise of the Creative Class and How It's Transforming Work, Leisure, Community and Everyday Life. New York: Basic Books.
Fogel, Robert W. (2008), “Capitalism & democracy in 2040,” Daedalus 136:87–95.Google Scholar
Forejohn, John A. and Kuklinski, James H. (1990), Information and Democratic Processes. Urbana and Chicago: University of Illinois Press.
Forey, Dominique (2006), The Economics of Knowledge. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Foucault, Michel (1984), “What is Enlightenment?” in Rabinow, Paul (ed.), The Foucault Reader. New York, Pantheon Books, 1984, pp. 32–50
Foucault, Michel (1982), “The subject and power,” in Dreyfus, Hubert L. and Rabinow, Paul (eds.), Michel Foucault: Beyond Structuralism and Hermeneutics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, pp. 208–226.
Foucault, Michel (1980), Power/Knowledge: Selected Interviews and other Writings 1972–1977. Brighton, Sussex: Harvester Press.
Foucault, Michel ([1979] 1981), “Omnes et Singulatim: towards a criticism of political reason,” in McMurrin, Sterling M. (ed.), The Tanner Lectures on Human Values. Vol. 2. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 223–254.
Foucault, Michel (1977), “Prison talk: an interview,” Radical Philosophy 16:10–15.Google Scholar
Foucault, Michel ([1976] 2000), “Truth and power,” in Foucault, Michel, Power: The Essential Works of Michel Foucault 1954–1984. Vol. 3. New York: The New Press, pp. 111–133.
Foucault, Michel ([1975] 1977), Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison. New York: Random House.
Foucault, Michel ([1973] 2000), “Truth and juridical power,” in Foucault, Michel, Power: The Essential Works of Michel Foucault 1954–1984. Vol. 3. New York: The New Press, pp. 1–89.
Foucault, Michel ([1969] 1972), The Archeology of Knowledge. London: Tavistock.
Frank, Robert H. (2007), Falling Behind: How Rising Inequality Harms the Middle Class. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
Freeman, John R. and Quinn, Dennis P. (2012), “The economic origins of democracy reconsidered,” American Political Science Review 106:58–80.Google Scholar
Frickel, Scott, Gibbon, Sahra, Ottinger, Gwen, and Hess, David (2010), “Undone science: charting social movement and civil society challenges to research agenda setting,” Science, Technology & Human Values 35:444–473.Google Scholar
Friedman, Benjamin M. (2010), “Economic well-being in a historical context,” in Pecchi, Lorenzo and Piga, Gustavo (eds.), Revisiting Keynes: Economic Possibilities for our Grandchildren. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 125–134.
Friedman, Benjamin M. (2008), “Capitalism, economic growth and democracy,” Daedalus 136:46–52.Google Scholar
Friedman, Benjamin M. (2006), “The moral consequences of economic growth,” Society 43:15–22.Google Scholar
Friedman, Benjamin M. (2005), The Moral Consequences of Economic Growth. New York: Vintage Books.
Friedman, Jonathan (1989), “Culture, identity, and world process,” Review 12:51–69.Google Scholar
Friedman, Milton (1962), Capitalism and Freedom. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Friedman, Milton (1958), “Capitalism and freedom,” in Morley, Felix (ed.), Essays on Individuality. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press, pp. 168–182.
Fuerstein, Michael (2008), “Epistemic democracy and the social character of knowledge,” Episteme 5:74–93.Google Scholar
Fukuyama, Francis (2014), Political Order and Political Decay: From the Industrial Revolution to the Globalisation of Democracy. London: Profile Books.
Fukuyama, Francis (2006), “After the ‘end of history’,” Open Democracy, www.opendemocracy.net
Fukuyama, Francis (2002), Our Posthuman Future: Consequences of the Biotechnology Revolution. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.
Fukuyama, Francis (2001), “Social capital, civil society, and development,” Third World Quarterly 22:7–28.Google Scholar
Fuller, Steve (2002), Knowledge Management Foundations. Boston, MA: Butterworth Heinemann.
Fuller, Steve (2000), “Commentary on Michael Polanyi's The Republic of Science,” Minerva 38:26–32.Google Scholar
Fuller, Steve (1994), “The constitutively social character of expertise,” The International Journal of Expert Systems 7:51–64.Google Scholar
Fuller, Steve (1988), Social Epistemology. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.
Fung, Archon and Wright, Erik Olin (2001), “Deepening democracy: innovations in empowered participatory government,” Politics & Society 29:5–41.Google Scholar
Galbraith, John K. (1967), The New Industrial State. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
Galbraith, John K. (1957), The Affluent Society. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
Galison, Peter (2004), “Removing knowledge,” Critical Inquiry 31:229–243.Google Scholar
Galison, Peter (1990), “Aufbau/Bauhaus: logical positivism and architectural modernism,” Critical Inquiry 16:709–752.Google Scholar
Gallie, Walter Bryce (1955–1956), “Essentially contested concepts,” Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society New Series 56:167–98.Google Scholar
Gallup-International (2005), Voice of the People, www.gallup-international.com/.
Galston, William A. (2001), “Political Knowledge, political engagement, and civic education,” Annual Review of Political Science 4:217–234.Google Scholar
Garcia, José María Rodríguez (2001), “Scientia potestas est – knowledge is power: Francis Bacon to Michel Foucault,” Neohelicon 38:109–122.Google Scholar
Gehlen, Arnold ([1957] 2004), “Die Seele im technischen Zeitalter: Sozialpsychologische Probleme in der industriellen Gesellschaft,” in Die Seele im technischen Zeitalter: Sozialpsychologische Probleme in der industriellen Gesellschaft. Gesamtausgabe Band 6. Frankfurt at the Main: Vittorio Klostermann, pp. 1–140.
Gehlen, Arnold ([1940] 1993), Der Mensch. Textkritische ed., Teilband 1. Frankfurt at the Main: Vittorio Klostermann.
Gellner, Ernest (1994), Conditions of Liberty: Civil Society and its Rivals. London: Hamish Hamilton.
Gellner, Ernest (1983), Nations and Nationalism. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
Genova, B. K. L. and Greenberg, Bradley S. (1979), “Interest in the news and the knowledge gap,” Public Opinion Quarterly 43:79–91.Google Scholar
Genschel, Philipp and Zangl, Bernhard (2008), “Metamophorsen des Staates – Vom Herrschaftsmonopolisten zum Herrschaftsmanager,” Leviathan 36:430–454.Google Scholar
Gerring, John, Kingstone, Peter and Lange, Matthew (2011), “Democracy, history, and economic performance: a case-study approach,” World Development 39(10):1735–1748.Google Scholar
Geuss, Raymond (2002), “Liberalism and its discontents,” Political Theory 30:320–338.Google Scholar
Giddens, Anthony (1999), BBC Reith Lectures 1999: Runaway World. Lecture 5: Democracy.
Giddens, Anthony (1990), The Consequences of Modernity. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Giddens, Anthony (1984), The Constitution of Society: Outline of the Theory of Structuration. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Giddens, Anthony (1981), A Contemporary Critique of Historical Materialism. Vol. 1: Power, Property and the State. London: Macmillan.
Gipsen, C. W. R. (1988), “German engineers and American social theory: Historical perspectives on professionalization,” Comparative Studies in Society and History 30:550–574.Google Scholar
Gilley, Bruce (2009), “Is democracy possible?Journal of Democracy 20:113–127.Google Scholar
Glaeser, Edward L., La Porta, Rafael, Lopez-de-Silanes, Floorencio, and Shleifer, Andrei (2004), “Do institutions cause growth?Journal of Economic Growth 9:271–303.Google Scholar
Glasius, Marlied and Pleyers, Geoffrey (2013), “The global movement of 2011: democracy, social justice and dignity,” Development and Change 44:547–567.Google Scholar
Glazer, Nathan (2010), “Democracy and deep divides,” Journal of Democracy 21:5–19.Google Scholar
Gleditsch, Kristian Skrede and Ward, Michael D. (2008), “Diffusion and the spread of democratic institutions,” in Simmons, Beth A., Dobbin, Frank and Garrett, Geoffrey (eds.), The Global Diffusion of Markets and Democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 261–302.
Goldman, Alvin I. (1999), Knowledge in a Social World. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Goldstone, Jack A. (2006), “A historical, not comparative, method: breakthroughs and limitations in the theory and methodology of Michael Mann's analysis of power,” in Al Hall, John and Schroeder, Ralph (eds.), An Anatomy of Power: The Social Theory of Michael Mann. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 263–282.
Goldthorpe, John H. (2007), “‘Cultural capital’: some critical observations,” Sociology Working Papers 2007–07. Oxford: Oxford University.
Goldthorpe, John H. (1966), “Social stratification in industrial society” in Bendix, Reinhard and Lipset, Seymour M. (eds.), Class, Status and Power. New York: Free Press, pp. 648–659.
Goodin, Robert E. (1979), “The development-rights trade-off: Some unwarranted economic and political assumptions,” Universal Human Rights 1:31–42.Google Scholar
Gore, Albert (2007), The Assault on Reason. New York: Penguin.
Gossner, Olivier (2010), “Ability and knowledge,” Games and Economic Behavior 69:95–106.Google Scholar
Gouldner, Alvin W. (1979), The Future of Intellectuals and the Rise of the New Class: A Frame of Reference, Theses, Conjectures, Arguments, and an Historical Perspectives on the Role of Intellectuals and Intelligentsia in the International Class Contest in the Modern Era. New York: Continuum.
Gouldner, Alvin W. (1978), “The new class project, I,” Theory and Society 6:153–203.Google Scholar
Graber, Doris (2003), “The media and democracy: beyond myths and stereotypes,” Annual Review of Political Science 6:139–160.Google Scholar
Graetz, Michael and Shapiro, Ian (2005), Death by a Thousand Cuts: The Fight over Taxing Inherited Wealth. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Green, Duncan (2008), From Poverty to Power: How Active Citizens and Effective States can Change the World. Bourton on Dunsmore: Practical Action Publishing.
Greenberg, Daniel S. (2001), Science, Money, and Politics: Political Triumph and Ethical Erosion. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Grofman, Bernard and Norrander, Barbara (1990), “Efficient use of reference group cues in a single dimension,” Public Choice 64:213–227.Google Scholar
Grosjean, Pauline and Senik, Claudia (2011), “Democracy, market liberalization, and political preferences,” The Review of Economics and Statistics 93:365–381.Google Scholar
Grint, Keith and Woolgar, Steve (1997), The Machine at Work: Technology, Work and Organisation. Oxford: Polity Press.
Grube, Norbert (2010), “Mass democracy and political governance: The Walter Lippman-John Dewey debate,” in Tröger, Daniel, Schlag, Thomas, and Osterwalder, Fritz (eds.), Pragmatism and Modernities. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers, pp. 145–161.
Gruber, Helmut (1991), Red Vienna: Experiments in Working-Class Culture 1919–1934. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Grundmann, Reiner and Stehr, Nico (2012), The Power of Scientific Knowledge. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Gunn, John Alexander Wilson (1995), “‘Public Opinion’ in modern political science,” in Farr, James, Dryzek, John S. and Leonhard, Stephen T. (eds.), Political Science in History: Research Programs and Political Traditions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 99–123.
Haber, Stephen and Menaldo, Victor (2011), “Do natural resources fuel authoritarianism? A reappraisal of the resource curse,” American Political Science Review 105:1–26.Google Scholar
Habermas, Jürgen (2006), “Political communication in media society: Does democracy still enjoy an epistemic dimension? The impact of normative theory on empirical research,” Communication Theory 16:411–424.Google Scholar
Habermas, Jürgen ([1992] 1996), Between Facts and Norms: Contributions to Discourse Theory of Law and Democracy. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Habermas, Jürgen ([1968] 1971), Knowledge and Human Interests. Boston: Beacon Press.
Habermas, Jürgen ([1962] 1989), The Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Hacking, Ian (1983), Representing and Intervening. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Haggard, Stephan and Kaufmann, Robert R. (2012), “Inequality and regime change: Democratic transitions and the stability of democratic rule,” American Political Science Review, doi: 10.1017/S0003055412000287.
Haggard, Stephan and Kaufmann, Robert R. (1997), “The political economy of democratic transitions,” Comparative Politics 29:262–283.Google Scholar
Haldane, Andrew ([2009] 2013), “Rethinking the financial network,” in Jansen, Stephan, Schröter, Eckhard and Stehr, Nico (eds.), Fragile Stabilität – stabile Fragilität. Wiesbaden: Springer VS, pp. 243–278.
Hansen, James (2010), Storms of My Grandchildren: The Truth About the Coming Climate Catastrophe and Our Last Chance to Save Humanity. New York: Bloomsbury Publishing.
Hardin, Russell J. (2006), “Ignorant democracy,” Critical Review 18:179–195.Google Scholar
Hardin, Russell J. (2003), “If it rained knowledge,” Philosophy of the Social Sciences 33:3–24.Google Scholar
Hayek, Friedrich A. ([1988] 1991), The Fatal Deceit: The Errors of Socialism. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Hayek, Friedrich A. (1960), The Constitution of Liberty. London: Routledge.
Hayek, Friedrich A. (1958), “The creative powers of a free civilization,” in Morley, Felix (ed.), Essays on Individuality. Pittsburgh: University of Pennsylvania Press, pp. 183–204.
Hayek, Friedrich A. ([1945] 1948), “The use of knowledge in society,” in Hayek, Friedrich A., Individualism and Economic Order. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, pp. 77–91.
Hayek, Friedrich A. (1945), “The use of knowledge in society,” The American Economic Review 35:519–530.Google Scholar
Hayek, Friedrich A. (1941), “Planning, science and freedom,” Nature 148:580–584.Google Scholar
Heilbroner, Robert L. (1994), “Technological determinism revisited,” in Smith, Merritt Roe and Marx, Leo (eds.), Does Technology Drive History? Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 67–78.
Heilbroner, Robert L. (1974), An Inquiry into the Human Prospect. New York: W.W. Norton.
Heilbroner, Robert L. ([1967] 1994), “Do machines make history,” in Smith, Merritt Roe and Marx, Leo (eds.), Does Technology Drive History? Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 53–66.
Held, David (1991), “Democracy, the nation-state and the global system,” Economy and Society 20:138–171.Google Scholar
Held, David (1991), “The possibilities of democracy,” Theory & Society 20:875–889.Google Scholar
Helliwell, John F. (1994), “Empirical linkages between democracy and economic growth,” British Journal of Political Science 25:225–248.Google Scholar
Hennis, Wilhelm (1977), “Zur Begründung der Fragestellung.” in Hennis, Wilhelm, Kielmansegg, Peter Graf, and Matz, Ulrich (eds.), Regierbarkeit: Studien zu ihrer Problematisierung. Band 1. Stuttgart: Klett-Cotta, pp. 9–21.
Hess, David J. (2005), “Technology- and product-oriented movements: approximating social movements studies and science and technology studies,” Science, Technology & Human Values 30:515–535.Google Scholar
Hess, David J. (1997), Science Studies. An Advanced Introduction. New York: New York University Press.
Hill, Christopher (1967), “Review of Peter Laslett's ‘The World We Have Lost’,” History and Theory 6:117–127.Google Scholar
Hillebrandt, Maarten (2008), “Rejection by referendum: a new expression of discontent in the EU,” Reinvention: a Journal of Undergraduate Research 1 (2), www2.warwick.ac.uk/go/reinventionjournal/issues/volume1issue2/Hillebrandt.Google Scholar
Hillygus, Sunshine D. (2005), “The missing link: exploring the relationship between higher education and political engagement,” Political Behavior 27:25–47.Google Scholar
Hilpinen, Risto (1970), “Knowing that one knows and the classical definition of knowledge,” Synthese 21:109–132.Google Scholar
Hippel, Eric (2006), Democratizing Innovation. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Hirschman, Albert O. (1989), “Having opinions – one of the elements of well being?”, The American Economic Review 79:75–79.Google Scholar
Hirschman, Albert O. (1970), Exit, Voice, and Loyalty. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Hisschemöller, Matthijs (2005), “Participation as knowledge production and the limits of democracy,” in Maasen, Sabine and Weingart, Peter (eds.), Democratisation of Expertise? Exploring Novel Forms of Scientific Advice in Political Decision-Making. Sociology of the Sciences Yearbook 24:189–208.Google Scholar
Hobsbawm, Eric ([2007] 2008), Globalisation, Democracy and Terrorism. London: Abacus (Little, Brown).
Hobsbawm, Eric (1996), “The future of the state,” Development and Change 27:267–278.Google Scholar
Hobsbawm, Eric ([1994] 1996), The Age of Extremes: The Short Twentieth Century, 1914–1991. London: Michael Joseph.
Högström, John (2013), “Does the choice of democracy measure matter? Comparisons between the two leading democracy indices, Freedom House and Polity IV,” Government and Opposition 48:201221.Google Scholar
Hörning, Karl H. (2001), Experten des Alltags: Die Wiederentdeckung des praktischen Wissens. Weilerswist: Velbrück Wissenschaft.
Holbrook, Thomas M. (2002), “Presidential campaigns and the knowledge gap,” Political Communication 19:437–454.Google Scholar
Hollinger, David A. ([1983] 1996), “The defense of democracy and Robert K. Merton's formulation of the scientific ethos,” in Hollinger, David A. (ed.), Science, Jews, and Secular Culture: Studies in Mid-Twentieth Century American Intellectual History. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, pp. 80–96.
Hollinger, David A. (1995), “Science as a weapon in Kulturkämpfe in the United States and after World War II,” Isis 86:440–454.Google Scholar
Hollyer, James R., Rosendorff, B. Peter, and Vreeland, James Raymond (2011), “Democracy and transparency,” The Journal of Politics 73:1206–1224.Google Scholar
Holton, Gerald (1996), Einstein, History, and Other Passions. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
Holton, Gerald (1986), “The advancement of science, and its burdens,” Daedalus 115:75, 77–104.Google Scholar
Horkheimer, Max (1947), The Eclipse of Reason. New York: Oxford University Press.
Horkheimer, Max ([1932] 1982), “Notes on science and the crisis,” in Horkheimer, Max, Critical Theory: Selected Essays. New York: Continuum, pp. 3–9.
Horkheimer, Max and Adorno, Theodor W. (1982), Dialectic of the Enlightenment. New York: Pantheon Books.
Houtman, Dick (1998), “Culture, industrialism and modernity.” Paper presented at the World Congress of Sociology, Montreal, Quebec, Canada, July 26–August 1.
Howitt, Peter ([1996] 1998) “On some problems in measuring knowledge-based growth,” in Neef, Dale (ed.), The Knowledge Economy. Boston: Butterworth-Heinemann, pp. 97–117.
Hoyman, Michele and Faricy, Christopher (2008), “It takes a village: a test of the creative class, social capital, and human capital theories,” Urban Affairs Review Online First.
Huber, Evelyne, Rueschemeyer, Dietrich, and Stephens, John D. (1993), “The impact of economic development on democracy,” Journal of Economic Perspectives 7:71–85.Google Scholar
Huber, George F. (1991), “Organization learning: the contributing processes and the literatures,” Organization Science 2:88–115.Google Scholar
Hug, Simon and Sciarini, Pascal (2000), “Referendums on European integration: Do institutions matter in voter's decision,” Comparative Political Studies 33:3–36.Google Scholar
Hulme, Mike (2011), “Reducing the future to climate: A story of climate determinism and reductionism.” Osiris 26:245–266.Google Scholar
Hulme, Mike (2009), Why We Disagree About Climate Change: Understanding Controversy, Inaction and Opportunity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Hume, David ([1777] 1985), Essays: Moral, Political and Literary. Indianapolis: Liberty Classics.
Huntington, Samuel P. (1993), “The clash of civilizations,” Foreign Affairs 72:22–49.Google Scholar
Huntington, Samuel P. (1993), “Postindustrial politics: how benign will it be?Comparative Politics 6:163–191.Google Scholar
Huntington, Samuel P. (1991), The Third Wave: Democratization in the Late Twentieth Century. Norman, OK: University of Oklahoma Press.
Huntington, Samuel P. (1987), Understanding Political Development: Boston, MA: Little, Brown.
Huntington, Samuel P. (1984), “Will more countries become democratic?Political Science Quarterly 99:193–218.Google Scholar
Huntington, Samuel P. (1975), “The United States,” in Crozier, Michel, Huntington, Samuel P. and Watanuki, Joji (eds.), The Crisis of Democracy. New York: New York University Press, pp. 55–118.
Huntington, Samuel P. (1968), Political Order in Changing Societies. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Huntington, Samuel P. (1965), “Political development and political decay,” World Politics 17:386–430.Google Scholar
Hupe, Peter and Edwards, Arthur (2012), “The accountability of power: democracy and governance in modern times,” European Political Science Review 4:177–194.Google Scholar
Hyman, Herbert and Sheatsley, Paul B. (1947), “Some reasons why information campaigns fail,” Public Opinion Quarterly 11:412–423.Google Scholar
Ibarra, Andoni and Mormann, Thomas (2003), “Engaged scientific inquiry in the Vienna Circle: the case of Otto Neurath,” Technology in Society 25:235–247.Google Scholar
Iyengar, Shanto (1991), Is Anyone Responsible? How Television Frames Political Issues. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Inglehart, Ronald and Welzel, Christian (2010), “Changing mass priorities: The link between modernization and democracy,” Perspectives on Politics 8:551–567.Google Scholar
Inglehart, Ronald and Welzel, Christian (2005), Modernization, Cultural Change and Democracy: The Human Development Sequence. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Inglehart, Ronald (2003), “How solid is mass support for democracy – and how can we measure it?PS: Political Science & Politics 36:51–57.Google Scholar
Inglehart, Ronald (1997a), Modernization and Postmodernization: Cultural, Economic and Political Change in 43 Societies. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Inglehart, Ronald (1997b), “Postmaterialist values and the erosion of institutional authority,” in Nye, Joseph S., Zelikow, Philip D. and King, David C. (eds.), Why People Don't Trust Government. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, pp. 217–236.
Inglehart, Ronald (1987), “Value change in industrial society,” American Political Science Review 81:1289–1303.Google Scholar
Inglehart, Ronald (1977), The Silent Revolution. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Inglehart, Ronald (1971), “The silent revolution in Europe: intergenerational change in post-industrial societies,” American Political Science Review 65:999–1017.Google Scholar
Innis, Harold ([1950] 2007), Empire and Communications. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
Inoguchi, Takashi (2002), “Broadening the basis of social capital in Japan,” in Putnam, Robert D. (ed.), Democracies in Flux: The Evolution of Social Capital in Contemporary Society. New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 358–392.
Irwin, Alan ([1995] 1999), “Science and citizenship,” in Scanlon, Eileen, Whitelegg, Elizabeth and Yates, Simeon (eds.), Communicating Science: Contexts and Channels. Reader 2. London: Routledge, pp. 14–36.
Jacobs, Lawrence R. (2010), “Democracy and capitalism: structure, agency, and organized combat,” Politics & Society 38:243–254.Google Scholar
Jacobson, Jo and de Soysa, Indra (2006), “Do foreign investors punish democracy? Theory and empirics, 1984–2001,” Kyklos 59:383–410.Google Scholar
Jacoby, Susan. (2008), The Age of American Unreason. New York: Pantheon Books.
Jaffer, Jameel (2010), “The mosaic theory,” Social Research 77:873–882.Google Scholar
James, William (1890), Principles of Psychology, Vol. 1. New York: Henry Holt and Company.
Jarvie, Ian C. (2001), “Science in a democratic republic,” Philosophy of Science 68:545–564.Google Scholar
Jasanoff, Sheila (2009), “The essential parallel between science and democracy,” Seed Magazine. February 17, http://seedmagazine.com/content/article/the_essential_parallel_between_science_and_democracy/.
Jasanoff, Sheila (2003), “Breaking the waves in science studies. Comment on H. M. Collins and Robert Evans ‘The third wave of science studies’,” Social Studies of Science 33:389–400.Google Scholar
Jashapara, Ashok (2007), Knowledge Management: An Integrated Approach. Harlow: Financial Times Prentice Hall.
Jeffres, Leo W., Neuendorf, Kimberly, and Atkin, David J. (2012), “Acquiring knowledge from the media in the Internet age,” Communication Quarterly, 60:59–79.Google Scholar
Jennings, M. Kent (1996), “Political knowledge over time and across generations,” Public Opinion Quarterly 60:228–252.Google Scholar
Jermier, John M., Knights, David, and Nord, Walter R. (eds.) (1994), Resistance and Power in Organizations. London: Routledge.
Jörke, Dirk (2005), “Auf dem Weg zur Postdemokratie,” Leviathan 33:482–491.Google Scholar
Jones, Gareth Stedman (2004), An End to Poverty? A Historical Debate. New York: Columbia University Press.
Judt, Tony (2005), Postwar: A History of Europe since 1945. London: William Heinemann.
Jung, Nakwon, Kim, Yonghwan, and de Zúñiga, Homero Gil (2011), “The mediating role of knowledge and efficacy in the effects of communication on political participation,” Mass Communication and Society, 14:407–430Google Scholar
Kahan, Dan M., Peters, Ellen, Wittlin, Maggie, Slovic, Paul, Ouellette, Lisa Larrimore, Braman, Donald, and Mandel, Gregory (2012), “The polarizing impact of science literacy and numeracy on perceived climate change risks,” Nature Climate Change, doi: 10.1038/NCLIMATE1547.
Kahan, Dan M., Jenkins-Smith, Hank, and Braman, Donald (2011), “Cultural cognition of scientific consensus,” Journal of Risk Analysis 14:147–174.Google Scholar
Kahan, Dan M., Slovic, Paul, Braman, Donald, and Gastil, John (2006), “Fear of democracy: a cultural evaluation of unstein on Risk,” Harvard Law Review 119:1071–1109Google Scholar
Kalleberg, Ragnvald (2007), “A reconstruction of the ethos of science,” Journal of Classical Sociology 72:137–160.Google Scholar
Kallen, Horace M. (1934), “Pragmatism,” in Seligman, Edwin R. A. (ed.), Encyclopedia of the Social Sciences. Vol. 12. New York: Macmillan.
Kam, Cindy D. and Palmer, Carl L. (2011), “Rejoinder: Reinvestigating the causal relationship between higher education and political participation,” The Journal of Politics 73:659–663.Google Scholar
Kam, Cindy D. and Palmer, Carl L. (2008), “Reconsidering the effects of education an political participation,” Journal of Politics 70:612–631.Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel ([1783] 1986), “What is enlightenment?” in Behler, Ernst (ed.), Philosophical Writings. New York: Continuum, pp. 267–281.
Kanter, Rosabeth Moss (1991), “The future of bureaucracy and hierarchy in organizational theory: a report from the field,” in Bourdieu, Pierre and Coleman, James S. (eds.), Social Theory for a Changing Society. Boulder, CO: Westview Press, pp. 63–87.
Kanter, Rosabeth Moss (1995), World Class: Thinking Locally in a Global Economy. New York: Simon & Schuster.
Kaplan, Robert D. (2012), The Revenge of Geography: What the Map Tells Us About Coming Conflicts and the Battle Against Fate. New York: Random House.
Karatnycky, Adrian and Ackerman, Peter (2005), “How freedom is won: from civic resistance to durable democracy,” Freedom House Report. Washington, DC: Freedom House.
Katz, Elihu (1987), “Communication research since Lazarsfeld,” Public Opinion Quarterly 51: S25–S45.Google Scholar
Katz, Elihu and Lazarsfeld, Paul F. (1955), Personal Influence: The Part Played by People in the Flow of Mass Communications. New York: Free Press.
Katz, Lawrence F. and Murphy, Kevin M. (1992), “Changes in relative wages, 1963–1987: supply and demand factors,” Quarterly Journal of Economics 107:35–78.Google Scholar
Katz, Richard S. and Mair, Peter (1995), “Changing models of party organizations and party democracy: the emergence of the cartel party,” Party Politics 1:5–28.Google Scholar
Kaufmann, Felix (1959), “John Dewey's theory of inquiry,” The Journal of Philosophy 56:826–836.Google Scholar
Kay, John (2010), Obliquity: Why Our Goals are Best Achieve Indirectly. London: Profile Books.
Keane, John (2009), The Life and Death of Democracy. London: Simon & Schuster.
Keller, Evelyn Fox (2011), “What are climate scientists to do?Spontaneous Generations: A Journal for the History and Philosophy of Science 5:19–26.Google Scholar
Kennedy, Duncan (2010), “Knowledge and the political: Bruno Latour's political epistemology,” Cultural Critique 74:83–97.Google Scholar
Kennedy, Robert F. (1968), Remarks of Robert F. Kennedy at the University of Kansas, March 18, 1968, John F. Kennedy Presidential Library and Museum, www.jfklibrary.org
Kennedy, Ryan (2010b), “The contradiction of modernity: a conditional model of endogenous democratization,” The Journal of Politics 72:785–798.Google Scholar
Koehane, Robert O. (2006), “Accountability in world politics,” Scandinavian Political Studies 29:75–87.Google Scholar
Kerr, Clark (1963), The Uses of the University. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Keynes, John Maynard ([1930] 1935), “Economic possibilities for our grandchildren,” in Keynes, John Maynard, Essays in Persuasion. London: Macmillan, pp. 358–374.
Keynes, John Maynard (1936), General Theory of Employment, Interest and Money. London: Macmillan.
Keynes, John Maynard ([1919] 2009), The Economic Consequences of the Peace. Rockville, MD: Serenity Publishers.
Kirchheimer, Otto (1959), “Majoritäten und Minoritäten in westeuropäischen Regierungen,” Die Neue Gesellschaft 6:256–270.Google Scholar
Kitcher, Philip (2011a), Science a Democratic Society. Amherst, NY: Prometheus Books.
Kitcher, Philip (2011b), “Public knowledge and its discontents,” Theory and Research in Education 9:103–124.Google Scholar
Kitcher, Philip (2010b), “Varieties of freedom and their distribution,” Social Research 77:857–872.Google Scholar
Kitcher, Philip (2010a), “The climate change debates,” Science 328:1230–1234.Google Scholar
Kitcher, Philip (2006), “Public knowledge and the difficulties of democracy,” Social Research 73:1205–1224.Google Scholar
Kitcher, Philip (2001), Science, Truth, and Democracy. New York: Oxford University Press.
Klapper, Leora F., Lusardi, Annamaria, and Panos, Georgios A. (2012), “Financial literarcy and the financial crisis,” NBER Working Paper Series, Working Paper 17930, www.nber.org/papers/w17930.Google Scholar
Klingemann, Hans-Dieter (1999), “Mapping political support in the 1990s: A global analysis,” in Norris, Pippa (ed.), Critical Citizens: Global Support for Democratic Governance. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 31–56.
Knight, Frank H. (1960), Intelligence and Democratic Action. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Knight, Frank H. (1949), “Virtue and knowledge: The view of Professor Polanyi,” Ethics 59:271–284.Google Scholar
Knight, Frank H. (1941), “The meaning of democracy: its politico-economic structure and ideals,” The Journal of Negro Education 10:318–332.Google Scholar
Knight, Frank H. (1938), “Lippmann's The Good Society,” Journal of Political Economy 46:864–872.Google Scholar
Knutsen, Carl Hendrick (2011), “Which democracies prosper? Electoral rules, form of government and economic growth,” Electoral Studies 30:83–90.Google Scholar
Koch, Adrienne and Peden, William (eds.) (1944), The Life and the Writings of Thomas Jefferson. New York: The Modern Library.
Koehane, Robert O. (2006), “Accountability in world politics,” Scandinavian Political Studies 29:75–87.Google Scholar
Koestner, Robert and Callison, Kevin (2011), “Adolescent cognitive and noncognitive correlates of adult health,” Journal of Human Capital 5:29–69.Google Scholar
Konings, Martijn (2010), “The pragmatist sources of modern power,” European Journal of Sociology 60:55–91.Google Scholar
Konrád, George and Szelényi, Ivan. (1979), The Intellectuals on the Road to Class Power. Brighton, Sussex: Harvester.
Kornhauser, William (1959), The Politics of Mass Society. Glencoe, IL: The Free Press.
Koselleck, Reinhart (1989), Vergangene Zukunft: Zur Semantik geschichtlicher Zeiten. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.
Krohn, Wolfgang (1988), Francis Bacon. München: C. H. Beck.
Krohn, Wolfgang (1981), “‘Wissen ist Macht’: Zur Soziogenese eines neuzeitlichen wissenschaftliches Geltungsanspruchs,” in Bayertz, Kurt (ed.), Wissenschaftsgeschichte und wissenschaftliche Revolution. Köln: Pahl-Rugenstein, pp. 29–57.
Krohn, Wolfgang and Weyer, Johanes (1994), “Society as a laboratory: the social risks of experimental research,” Science and Public Policy 21:173–183.Google Scholar
Krohn, Wolfgang and Weyer, Johanes (1989), “Gesellschaft als Labor: Die Erzeugung sozialer Risiken durch experimentelle Forschung,” Soziale Welt 40:349–373.Google Scholar
Kuhn, Robert L. (2003), “Science as democratizer,” American Scientist Online (September–October), www.americanscientist.org/template/AssetDetail/assetid/25691;jsessionid=aaa4KxL1uKYE6.
Kuklinski, James H., Quirk, Paul J., Jerit, Jennifer, and Rich, Robert F. (2001), “The political environment and citizen competence,” American Journal of Political Science 45:410–424.Google Scholar
Kuklinski, James H., Quirk, Paul J., Jeti, Jennier, Schwieder, David and Rich, Robert F. (2000), “Misinformation and the currency of democratic citizenship,” The Journal of Politics 62:790–816.Google Scholar
Kuklinski, James H. (1997), “Review of Michael X. Delli Carpini and Scott Keeter, What Americans know about Politics and why it Matters,” The Journal of Politics 59:925–999.Google Scholar
Kuklinski, James H. (1990), “Information and the study of politics,” in Forejohn, John A. and Kuklinski, James H. (1990), Information and Democratic Processes. Urbana and Chicago: University of Illinois Press, pp. 391–395.
Kuklinski, James H., Metlay, Daniel S., and Kay, W. D. (1982), “Citizen knowledge and choices on the complex issue of nuclear energy,” American Journal of Political Science 26:615–642.Google Scholar
Kurlantzick, Joshua (2013), Democracy in Retreat: The Revolt of the Middle Class and the Worldwide Decline of Representative Government. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Kuznets, Simon (1973), “Modern economic growth: findings and reflections,” American Economic Review 63:247–258.Google Scholar
Kuznets, Simon (1955), “Economic growth and income inequality,” American Economic Review 45:18–30.Google Scholar
Laird, Frank N. (1993), “Participatory analysis, democracy, and technological decision making,” Science, Technology & Human Values 18:341–361.Google Scholar
Lambert, Ronald D., Curtis, James E., Kay, Barry J., and Brown, Steven D. (1988), “The social sources of political knowledge,” Canadian Journal of Political Science/Revue canadienne de science politique 21:359–374.Google Scholar
Lane, Robert E. (1966), “The decline of politics and ideology in a knowledgeable society,” American Sociological Review 31:649–662.Google Scholar
Lane, Robert E. (1953), “Political character and political analysis,” Psychiatry 16:387–398.Google Scholar
Landes, David S. (1998), The Wealth and Poverty of Nations: Why Some are So Rich, and Some are Poor. New York: W.W. Norton.
Lakoff, Sanford A. (1971), “Knowledge, power, and democratic theory,” Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 394:4–12.Google Scholar
Lakoff, Sanford A. (1966), Knowledge and Power: Essays on Science and Government. New York: The Free Press.
Lapp, Ralph (1965), The New Priesthood: The Scientific Elite and the Uses of Power. New York: Harper and Row.
Larson, Magali Sarfatti (1990). “In the matter of experts and professionals, or how impossible it is to leave nothing unsaid,” in Torstendahl, Rolf and Burrage, Michael (eds.), The Formation of Professions. Knowledge, State and Strategy. London: Sage, pp. 24–50.
Lasswell, Harold D. (1966), The Analysis of Political Behavior: An Empirical Approach. Hamden, CT: The Shoestring Press.
Latour, Bruno (1999), Pandora's Hope: Essays on the Reality of Science Studies. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Lazarsfeld, Paul F. and Merton, Robert K. ([1948] 1957), “Mass communication, popular taste and organized social action,” in Rosenberg, Bernhard and White, David Manning (eds.), Mass Culture: The Popular Arts in America, New York: Free Press, pp. 457–473.
Lazarsfeld, Paul F. (1957), “Public opinion and the classical tradition,” Public Opinion Quarterly 21:39–53.Google Scholar
Lazarsfeld, Paul F. (1948), “Communication research and the social psychologist,” in Dennis, Wayne (ed.), Current Trends in Social Psychology. Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania: University of Pittsburg Press, pp. 218–273.
Leeson, Peter T. (2008), “Media freedom, political knowledge, and participation,” Journal of Economic Perspectives 22:155–169.Google Scholar
Leibholz, Gerhard (1938), “The nature and various forms of democracy,” Social Research 5:84–100.Google Scholar
Leighninger, Matt (2006), The Next Form of Democracy: How Expert Rule is Giving Way to Shared Governance and Why Politics will Never be the Same. Nashville, TN: Vanderbilt University Press.
Leijonhufvud, Axel (2008), “Spreading the bread thin on the butter,” in Pechci, Lorenzo and Piga, Gustavo (eds.), Revisiting Keynes: Economic Possibilities for our Grandchildren. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 117–124.
Lemann, Nichols (2012), “Evening the odds,” The New Yorker, April 23.
Lemert, Charles C. and Gillan, Garth (1982), Michel Foucault: Social Theory as Transgression. New York: Columbia University Press.
Lerner, Daniel (1959), “Social science: whence and whither?” in Lerner, Daniel (ed.), The Human Meaning of the Social Sciences: Original Essays on the History and the Application of the Social Sciences. Cleveland, OH: The World Publishing Company, pp. 13–39.
Lerner, Daniel (1958), The Passing of Tradition Society. Glencoe, IL: Free Press.
Levi, Margaret and Stoker, Laura (2000), “Political trust and trustworthiness,” Annual Review of Political Science 3:475–507.Google Scholar
Leyshon, Andrew and Thrift, Nigel (1997), Money/Space: Geographies of Monetary Transformation. London: Routledge.
Liberatore, Angela and Funtowicz, Silvio (2003), “‘Democratising’ expertise, ‘expertising’ democracy: what does it mean, and why bother?Science and Public Policy 30:146–150.Google Scholar
Liebowitz, Stan J. and Zentner, Alejando (2012), “Clash of the titans: does internet use reduce television viewing?Review of Economics and Statistics 94:234–245.Google Scholar
Lindblom, Charles E. (2001), The Market System: What it is, How it Works, and What to Make of it. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Lindblom, Charles E. (1995), “Market and democracy – obliquely,” PS: Political Science & Politics 28: 684–688.Google Scholar
Linos, Katerina (2011), “Diffusion through democracy,” American Journal of Political Science 55:678–695.Google Scholar
Lippmann, Walter ([1922] 1992), Public Opinion. New York: Free Press.
Lipset, Seymour Martin ([1960] 1963), Political Man: The Social Basis of Politics. Arden City, NY: Anchor.
Lipset, Seymour Martin (1959), “Some social requisites of democracy: economic development and political legitimacy,” American Political Science Review 53:69–105.Google Scholar
Lipset, Seymour Martin, Trow, Martin, and Coleman, James S. ([1956] 1962), Union Democracy: The Internal Politics of the International Typographical Union. New York: Doubleday & Company.
Lipsky, Michael (1968), “Protest as a political resource,” American Political Science Review 62:1144–1158.Google Scholar
Lijphart, Arend (1977), Democracy in Plural Societies. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Loader, Brian D. and Mercea, Dan (2011), “Social media innovations and participatory politics,” Information, Communication & Society 14:757–769.Google Scholar
Lorenz, Edward and Lundvall, Bengt-Åke (2011), “Accounting for creativity in the European Union: A multi-level analysis of individual competence, labour market structure, and systems of education and training,” Cambridge Journal od Economics 35:269–294.Google Scholar
Lovelock, James (2009), The Vanishing Face of Gaia: A Final Warning: New York: Basic Books.
Lovelock, James (2006), The Revenge of Gaia: Why the Earth is Fighting Back – and How We Can Still Save Humanity. London: Allen Lane.
Lowe, Adolph (1971), “Is present-day higher learning ‘relevant’?Social Research 38:563–580.Google Scholar
Loxbo, Karl (2013), “The fare of intra-party democracy: Leadership autonomy and activist influence in the mass party and cartel party,” Party Politics 19:537–554.Google Scholar
Luckmann, Thomas (1982), “Individual action and social knowledge,” in von Cranach, Mario and Harré, Rom (eds.), The Analysis of Action. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 247–266.
Luhmann, Niklas (2002a), Einführung in die Systemtheorie. Heidelberg: Carl-Auer-Systeme Verlag.
Luhmann, Niklas (2002b), Das Erziehungssystem der Gesellschaft. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.
Luhmann, Niklas (2002c), Theories of Distinction: Redescribing the Descriptions of Modernity. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
Luhmann, Niklas (1997), Die Gesellschaft der Gesellschaft. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.
Luhmann, Niklas ([1992] 1998), Observations on Modernity. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
Luhmann, Niklas ([1992] 1994]), “The modernity of science,” New German Critique 61:9–23.Google Scholar
Luhmann, Niklas (1990), Die Wissenschaft der Gesellschaft. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.
Luhmann, Niklas (1987), “Enttäuschungen und Hoffnungen. Zur Zukunft der Demokratie,” in Luhmann, Niklas (ed.), Soziologische Aufklärung 4. Beiträge zur funktionalen Differenzierung der Gesellschaft. Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag, pp. 133–141.
Luhmann, Niklas ([1986] 1987), “Die Zukunft der Demokratie,” in Luhmann, Niklas, Soziologische Aufklärung 4. Beiträge zur funktionalen Differenzierung der Gesellschaft. Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag, pp. 126–132.
Luhmann, Niklas ([1981] 1987), “Gesellschaftsstrukturelle Bedingungen und Folgeprobleme des naturwissenschaftlich-technischen Fortschritts,” in Luhmann, Niklas, Soziologische Aufklärung 4. Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag, pp. 47–63.
Luhmann, Niklas (1970), “Selbststeuerung der Wissenschaft,” in Luhmann, Niklas, Soziologische Aufklärung: Avfsätze zur Theorie sozialer Systeme. Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag, pp. 232–252.
Luhmann, Niklas (1969), “Normen in soziologischer Perspektive,” Soziale Welt 20:28–48.Google Scholar
Luhmann, Niklas and Schorr, Karl Eberhard (1979), Reflexionsprobleme im Erziehungssystem. Stuttgart: Klett-Cotta.
Lukes, Steven (2007), “The problem of apparently irrational beliefs,” in Turner, Stephen P. and Risjord, Mark W. (eds.), Philosophy of Anthropology and Sociology. Handbook of the Philosophy of Science. Amsterdam: Elsevier, pp. 591–606.
Lukes, Steven (1977), Essays in Social Theory. New York: Columbia University Press.
Lupia, Arthur and McCubbins, Mathew D. (1998), The Democratic Dilemma. Can Citizens Learn What They Need To Know. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Lupu, Noam and Pontusson, Jonas (2011), “The structure of inequality and the politics of redistribution,” American Political Science Review 105:316–336.Google Scholar
Lusardi, Annamaria (2013), “Financial literacy and high-cost borrowing in the United States,” NBER Working Paper 18969, www.nber.org/papers/w18854.
Luskin, Robert C. (1987), “Measuring political sophistication,” American Journal of Political Science 31:856–899.Google Scholar
Lyotard, Jean-François ([1979] 1984), The Postmodern Condition: A Report on Knowledge. Minnesota: University of Minnesota Press.
Maasen, Sabine and Weingart, Peter (2004), Democratization of Expertise: Exploring Novel Forms of Scientific Advice in Political-Decision-Making. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
MacCrae, Duncan Jr. (1981).“Science and the formation of policy in a democracy,” in Kuehn, Thomas J. and Porter, Alan L. (eds.), Science, Technology and National Policy. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, pp. 496–514.
Machlup, Fritz (1984), The Economics of Information and Human Capital. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Machlup, Fritz (1983), “Semantic quirks in studies of information,” in Machlup, Fritz and Mansfield, Una (eds.), The Study of Information. New York: Wiley.
Machlup, Fritz (1962), Function and Distribution of Knowledge in the United States. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
MacKenzie, Donald (2006), An Engine, Not a Camera: How Financial Models Shape Markets. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
MacLeod, Roy (1997), “Science and democracy: historical reflections on present discontents,” Minerva 35:369–384.Google Scholar
Magalhães, Pedro C. (2013), “Government effectiveness and support for democracy,” European Journal of Political Research, doi: 10.1111/1475–6765.12024.
Macpherson, Crawford B. (1962), The Political Theory of Possessive Individualism. New York: Oxford University Press.
Magnusson, Warren (1996), The Search for Political Space: Globalization, Social Movements, and the Urban Political Experience. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
Maier, Hans (1971), “Zur neueren Geschichte des Demokratiebegriffs,” in von Beyme, Klaus (ed.), Theory and Politics [Theorie und Politik. Festschrift zum 70. Geburtstag für Carl Joachim Friedrich]. Haag: Martinus Nihoff, pp. 127–161.
Malik, Suheil (2005), “Information and knowledge,” Theory, Culture & Society 22:29–49.Google Scholar
Mann, Michael (1999), “The dark side of democracy: The modern tradition of ethic and political cleansing,” New Left Review 235:18–45.Google Scholar
Mann, Michael (1986), The Sources of Social Power: A History of Power from the Beginning to AD 1760. Vol. 1. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Mannheim, Karl (1940), Man and Society in an Age of Reconstruction. London: Routledge.
Mannheim, Karl (1935), Mensch und Gesellschaft im Zeitalter des Umbaus. Leiden: A. W. Sijhoff.
Mannheim, Karl ([1929] 1936), Ideology and Utopia. London: Routledge.
Mannheim, Karl ([1928] 1993), “The problem of generations,” in Wolff, Kurt H. (ed.), From Karl Mannheim. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Books, pp. 351–395.
Mansell, Robin (2002), “From digital divides to digital entitlements in knowledge societies,” Current Sociology 50:407–426.Google Scholar
Mansfield, Edward D. and Pevehouse, Jon (2006), Democratization and the Varieties of International Organizations, Conference on The New Science of International Organizations, University of Pennsylvania.
Marcuse, Herbert ([1964] 1989), Der eindimensionale Mensch: Studien zur Ideologie der fortgeschrittenen Industriegesellschaft. Schriften 7, Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.
Markoff, John (2011), “A moving target: democracy,” European Journal of Sociology 52: 239–276.Google Scholar
Markoff, John (1986), “Literacy and revolt: some empirical notes on 1789 in France,” American Journal of Sociology 92:323–349.Google Scholar
Marks, Abigal and Baldry, Chris (2009), “Stuck in the middle with who? The class identity of knowledge workers,” Work, Employment and Society 23:49–65.Google Scholar
Marlin-Bennett, Renée (2011), “I hear America tweeting and other themes for a virtual polis: rethinking democracy in the global infotech age,” Journal of Information Technology & Politics 8:129–145.Google Scholar
Marsh, Robert M. (1988), “Sociological Explanations of Economic Growth,” Studies in Comparative International Development, 23:41–76.Google Scholar
Marshall, Monty G. and Jaggers, Keith (2005), “Polity IV project: Political regime characteristics and transitions, 1800– 2003,” www.systemicpeace.org/polity/polity4.htm
Marshall, Thomas H. (1950), Citizenship and Social Class. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Mayer, Alexander K. (2011), “Does education increase political participation,” The Journal of Politics 73:633–645.Google Scholar
McCarthy, John D. and Zald, Mayer N. (1977), “Resource mobilization and social movements,” American Journal of Sociology 82:1212–1241.Google Scholar
McGinnes, John O. (2006), “Age of the empirical,” Policy Review 137:47–58.Google Scholar
McLuhan, Marshall (1964), Understanding Media. New York: McGraw Hill.
McNair, Brian (2000), Journalism and Democracy: An Evaluation of the Political Public Sphere. London: Routledge.
Mead, George H. (1964), “Two unpublished manuscripts,” The Review of Metaphysics 17: 536–556.Google Scholar
Mead, George H. (1923), “Scientific method and the moral sciences,” International Journal of Ethics 33:229–247.Google Scholar
Meghir, Costas, Palme, Mårten and Simeonova, Emilia (2013), “Education, cognition and health: evidence from a social experiment,” NBER Working Paper 19002, www.nber.org/papers/w19002.
Megill, Allan (1985), Prophets of Extremity: Nietzsche, Heidegger, Foucault, Derrida. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
Merton, Robert K. (1995), “The Thomas theorem and the Matthew Effect,” Social Forces 74:379–424.Google Scholar
Merton, Robert K. (1988), “The Matthew Effect in science, II: cumulative advantage and the symbolism of intellectual property,” Isis 79:606–623.Google Scholar
Merton, Robert K. (1976), Sociological Ambivalence and Other Essays. New York: Free Press.
Merton, Robert K. (1968), “The Matthew Effect in science,” Science 1959:56–63.Google Scholar
Merton, Robert K. (1966), “Dilemmas of democracy in the voluntary associations,” American Journal of Nursing 66:1055–1061.Google Scholar
Merton, Robert K. (1957a), “Karl Mannheim and the sociology of knowledge,” in Merton, Robert K. (ed.), Social Theory and Social Structure. Revised and Enlarged Edition. New York: Free Press, pp. 489–508.
Merton, Robert K. (1957b), “Introduction: Studies in the sociology of science,” in Merton, Robert K. (ed.), Social Theory and Social Structure. Revised and Enlarged Edition. New York: Free Press, pp. 531–556.
Merton, Robert K. ([1957] 1973), “Priorities in scientific discoveries,” in Merton, Robert K., The Sociology of Science: Theoretical and Empirical Investigations. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, pp. 286–324.
Merton, Robert K. (1952), “Introduction,” in Barber, Bernard (ed.), Science and the Social Order. New York: Free Press, pp. xi–xxiii.
Merton, Robert K. ([1942] 1973), “The normative structure of science,” in Merton, Robert K. (ed.), The Sociology of Science: Theoretical and Empirical Investigations. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, pp. 267–278.
Merton, Robert K. ([1942] 1996), “The ethos of science,” in Sztompka, Piotr (ed.), On Social Structure and Science. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, pp. 267–276.
Merton, Robert K. (1942), “A note on science and democracy,” Journal of Legal and Political Sociology 1:115–126.Google Scholar
Merton, Robert K. ([1938] 1973), “Science and the social order,” in Merton, Robert K. (ed.), The Sociology of Science: Theoretical and Empirical Investigations. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, pp. 254–266.
Mettler, Suzanne (2007), “Bringing government back into civic engagement: considering the role of public policy,” International Journal of Public Administration 30:643–650.Google Scholar
Mettler, Suzanne and Soss, Joe (2004), “The consequences of public policy for democratic citizenship: bridging policy studies and mass politics,” Perspectives on Politics, 55–73.
Meyer, John W., Boli, John, Thomas, George M., and Ramirez, Francisco O. (1997), “World society and the nation-state,” American Journal of Sociology 103:144–81.Google Scholar
Meyer, John W., Kamens, D. and Benavot, Aaron (1992), School Knowledge for the Masses. Washington, DC: Falmer.
Michel, Patrick (1992), “Religious renewal or political deficiency: religion and democracy in Central Europe,” Religion, State and Society 20: 339–344.Google Scholar
Michels, Robert ([1915] 1949), Political Parties: A Sociological Study of the Oligarchical Tendencies of Modern Democracy. New York: Free Press.
Michels, Robert ([1915] 1970), Zur Soziologie des Parteiwesens in der modernen Demokratie: Untersuchungen über die oligarchischen Tendenzen des Gruppenlebens. Stuttgart: Alfred Kröner Verlag.
Mihailidis, Paul and Thevenin, Benjamin (2013), “Media literacy as a core competency for engaged citizenship in participatory democracy,” American Behavioral Scientist 57:1611–1622.Google Scholar
Milanovic, Brank (2012), “Global income inequality by the numbers: In history and now,” Policy Research Working Paper 6259. Washington, DC: The World Bank.
Miljkoviv, Dragan and Rimal, Arbindra (2008), “The impact of socio-economic factors on political stability,” Journal of Socio-Economics 37:2454–2463.Google Scholar
Milward, Alan S. (1992), The European Rescue of the Nation-State. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Mill, John Stuart ([1869] 2010), On Liberty. London: Longman, Roberts & Green.
Mill, John Stuart ([1873] 2009), Autobiography. Auckland, New Zealand: Floating Press.
Mill, John Stuart ([1861] 1977), “Considerations on representative government,” in Robson, J. M. (ed.), Essays on Politics and Society. Volume 19 of Collected Works of John Stuart Mill. Toronto, Canada: University of Toronto Press, pp. 371–613.
Miller, Melissa K. and Orr, Shannon K. (2008), “Experimenting with a ‘third way’ in estimating political knowledge,” Public Opinion Quarterly 72:768–780.Google Scholar
Miller, Steve (2001), “Public understanding of science at the crossroads,” Public Understanding of Science 10:115–120.Google Scholar
Milligan, Kevin, Moretti, Enrico, and Oreopoulos, Philip (2003), “Does education improve citizenship? Evidence from the U.S. and the U.K.,” NBER Working Paper Series 9584, www.nber.org/papers/w9584.Google Scholar
Mills, C. Wright (1959), The Sociological Imagination. New York: Oxford University Press.
Mills, C. Wright (1956a), The Power Elite. New York: Oxford University Press.
Mills, C. Wright (1956b), White Collar: The American Middle Class. New York: Oxford University Press.
Mills, C. Wright ([1955] 1967), “On knowledge and power,” in Horowitz, Irving Louis (ed.), Power, Politics & People: The Collected Essays by C. Wright Mills. New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 599–613.
Milner, Henry (2002), Civic Literacy: How Informed Citizens Make Democracy Work. Hanover, CT: United Press of New England.
Minier, Jenny A. (1998), “Democracy and growth: alternative approaches,” Journal of Economic Growth 3:241–266.Google Scholar
Minogue, Kenneth (2010), “Morals & servile mind,” The New Criterion 28:4–9.Google Scholar
Mirowski, Philip (2004), “The scientific dimension of social knowledge and their distant echoes in 20th-century American philosophy of science,” Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 35:283–326.Google Scholar
Misa, Thomas J. (1988), “How machines make history and how historians (and others) help them do so,” Science, Technology, and Human Values 13:308–331.Google Scholar
Mises, Ludwig (1922), Die Gemeinwirtschaft: Untersuchungen über den Sozialismus. Jena: Gustav Fischer.
Mitchell, Timothy (2009), “Carbon democracy,” Economy and Society 38:399–432.Google Scholar
Mokyr, Joel (1990), The Lever of Riches. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Montaigne, Michel ([1580] 1998), Essais. Frankfurt am Main: Eichborn Verlag.
Montesquieu, Charles ([1748] 2007), The Spirit of the Laws. New York: Cosimo.
Mooney, Chris (2010), Do Scientists Understand the Public? Cambridge, Massachusetts: American Academy of Arts and Sciences.
Moore, Barrington (1966), The Social Origins of Dictatorship and Democracy. Boston: Beacon Press.
Morgenthau, Hans J. (1970), “Reflections on the end of the republic,” New York Review of Books 15 (September 23):38–41.Google Scholar
Morozov, Evgeny (2011), The Net Delusion: The Dark Side of Internet Freedom. New York: Public Affairs.
Morris, Charles (1948), The Open Self. New York: Prentice-Hall.
Morris, Aldon D. and Mueller, Carol McClurg (eds.) (1992), Frontiers in Social Movement Theory. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Moynihan, Daniel P. (1970), “The role of social scientists in action research,” SSRC Newsletter.
Mahdavy, Hussein (1970), “The Patterns and Problems of Economic Development in Rentier States: The Case of Iran,” in Cook, M.A. (ed.), Studies in the Economic History of the Middle East. London: Oxford University Press.
Mullainathan, Senhil and Shafir, Eldar (2013), Scarcity: Why Having too little Means so much. New York: Times Books.
Mullan, Bob (1997), “Anthony Giddens,” in Bryant, Christopher and Jary, David (eds.), Anthony Giddens. Critical Assessments. Bd. 1. London: Routledge, pp. 74–94.
Murnane, Richard J., Willett, John B., and Levy, Frank (1995), “The growing importance of cognitive skills in wage determination,” Review of Economics and Statistics 77:251–266Google Scholar
Murphy, Kevin M. and Welch, Finis (1993), “Inequality and relative wages,” The American Economic Review: Papers and Proceedings. 83:104–109Google Scholar
Murphy, Kevin M. and Welch, Finis (1992), “Industrial change and the rising importance of skill,” in Danziger, Sheldon and Gottschalk, Peter (eds.), Uneven Tides: Rising Inequality in the 1980s. New York: Russell Sage Foundation, pp. 101–132.
Nagel, Ernest (1936a), “Impressions and appraisals of analytic philosophy in Europe I,” Journal of Philosophy 33:5–24.Google Scholar
Nagel, Ernest (1936b), “Impressions and appraisals of analytic philosophy in Europe II,” Journal of Philosophy 33:25–53.Google Scholar
Nannestad, Peter (2008), “What have we learned about generalized trust, if anything?Annual Review of Political Science 11:413–436.Google Scholar
Nanoka, Ikujiro (1994), “A dynamic theory of organization knowledge creation,” Organization Science 5: 14–37.Google Scholar
Narayan, Paresh, Narayan, Seema, and Smith, Russel (2011), “Does democracy facilitate economic growth or does economic growth facilitate democracy? An empirical study of Sub-Saharan Africa,” Economic Modeling 28:900–910.Google Scholar
Naumann, Friedrich (1909), “Von wem werden wir regiert?Neue Rundschau 20:625–636.Google Scholar
Nelkin, Dorothy (1984), “Science and technology policy and the democratic process,” in Peterson, James C. (ed.), Citizen Participation in Science Policy. Amherst, MA: University of Massachusetts Press, pp. 18–39.
Nelkin, Dorothy (1979), “Scientific knowledge, public policy, and democracy: a review essay,” Science Communication 1:106–122.Google Scholar
Nelkin, Dorothy (1975), “The political impact of technical expertise,” Social Studies of Science 5:35054.Google Scholar
Nelson, Michael A. and Singh, Ram D. (1998), “Democracy, economic freedom, fiscal policy and growth in LCDs: a fresh look,” Economic Development and Cultural Change 46:677–696.Google Scholar
Nelson, Richard R. (2008), “What enables rapid economic progress: what are the needed institutions?Research Policy 37:1–11.Google Scholar
Nemeth, Elisabeth (1994), “Utopien für eine wissenschaftliche Sicht der Welt und des Wissens,” in Neurath, Paul and Nemeth, Elisabeth (eds.), Otto Neurath oder Die Einheit von Wissenschaft und Gesellschaft. Wien: Böhlau, pp. 97–129.
Neurath, Otto (1946), “After six years,” Synthese 5:77–82.Google Scholar
Neurath, Otto ([1945] 1996), “Visual education: humanisation versus popularisation,” in Manninen, Juha, Nemeth, Elisabeth, and Stadler, Friedrich (eds.), Encyclopedia and Utopia: The Life and Work of Otto Neurath. Dordrecht: Kluwer, pp. 248–335.
Neurath, Otto (1944), Foundations of the Social Sciences. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Neurath, Otto ([1942] 1973), “International planning for freedom,” in Neurath, Otto (ed.), Empiricism and Sociology. Dordrecht: Reidel, pp. 422–330.
Neurath, Otto ([1937] 2004), “Inventory of the standard of living,” in Uebel, Thomas E. and Cohen, Robert S. (eds.), Otto Neurath: Economic Writings, Selections 1904–1945. Dordrecht: Kluwer, pp. 513–526.
Neurath, Otto ([1931] 1983), “Sociology in the framework of physicalism,” in Cohen, Robert S. and Neurath, Marie (eds.), Otto Neurath: Philosophical Papers 1913–1946. Dordrecht: D. Reidel, pp. 58–90.
Neurath, Otto (1931), Empirische Soziologie. Der wissenschaftliche Gehalt der Geschichte und Nationalökonomie. Wien: Julius Springer.
Neurath, Otto ([1930/31] 1994), “Wege der wissenschaftlichen Weltanschauung,” Erkenntnis 1:106–125, [also pp. 351–367 in Paul Neurath and Elisabeth Nemeth (eds.), Otto Neurath oder Die Einheit von Wissenschaft und Gesellschaft. Wien: Böhlau.]Google Scholar
Neurath, Otto (1919), “Zur Einführung,” Wirtschaft und Lebensordung 1 (qtd. in Uebel 2004:58).Google Scholar
Neurath, Otto ([1908] 1998), “Die allgemeine Einführung des volkswirtschaftlichen und staatsbürgerlichen Unterrichts,” in Haller, Rudolf and Höfer, Ulf, Gesammelte ökonomische, soziologische und sozialpolitische Schriften, 1. Wien: Hölder-Pichler-Temsky, pp. 119–132.
Newman, Edward and Rich, Roland (2004), The UN Role in Promoting Democracy. New York: United Nations University Press.
Niethammer, Lutz ([1989] 1992), Posthistory. Has History Come to an End? London: Verso.
Noah, Timothy (2012), The Great Divergence: America's Growing Inequality Crisis and What Can be Done About It. New York: Bloomsbury Press.
Noelle-Neuman, Elisabeth ([1968] 1984), The Spiral of Silence: Public Opinion-Our Social Skin. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Nolte, Ernst (1993), “Die Fragilität des Triumphs: Zur Lage des liberalen Systems nach der neuen Weltordnung.” Franfurter Allgemeine Zeitung 151, July 3.Google Scholar
Nordhaus, Ted and Shellenberger, Michael (2009), “Apocalypse Fatigue: Losing the Public on Climate Change,” Environment 360, http://e360.yale.edu/content/feature.msp?id=2210.Google Scholar
Norris, Pippa (2011a), Democratic Deficit: Critical Citizens Revisited. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Norris, Pippa (2011b), “Making democratic governance work: the consequences of prosperity,” Harvard Kennedy School Research Working Paper RWP11–035.
Norris, Pippa (ed.) (1999), Critical Citizens: Global Support for Democratic Governance. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Norris, Pippa (1996), “Does television erode social capital? A reply to Putnam,” PS: Political Science and Politics 29:474–480.Google Scholar
Norris, Pippa and Inglehart, Ronald (2002), “Islamic culture and democracy: testing the ‘clash of civilizations’ thesis,” Comparative Sociology 1:235–263.Google Scholar
Nowotny, Helga (1979), Kernenergie: Gefahr oder Notwendigkeit? Anatomie eines Konflikts. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.
Nussbaum, Martha C. (2000), Women and Human Development: The Capabilities Approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Nussbaum, Martha C. and Sen, Amartya (1993), The Quality of Life. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Nye, Joseph S. Jr. (1997), “Introduction: the decline of confidence in government,” in Nye, Joseph S. Jr., Zelikow, Philip D., and King, David C. (eds.), Why People Don't Trust Government. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, p. 118.
Nye, Joseph S. Jr. (1990), Bound to Lead: The Changing Nature of American Power. New York: Basic Books.
Ober, Josiah (2012), “Democracy's dignity,” American Political Science Review 104:827–846.Google Scholar
Ober, Josiah (2010), Democracy and Knowledge: Innovation and Learning in Classical Athens. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
OECD (2011), Divided We Stand: Why Inequality Keeps Rising. Paris: OECD.
Oelkers, Jürgen (2000), “Democracy and education: about the future of a problem,” Studies in Philosophy and Education 19:3–19.Google Scholar
Offe, Claus (2013), “Ungovernability,” in Jansen, Stephan, Schröter, Eckhard, and Stehr, Nico (eds.), Stabile Fragilität – Fragile Stabilität. Wiesbaden: Springer VS, pp. 77–88.
Offe, Claus (1979), “‘Unregierbarkeit’: Zur Renaissance konservativer Krisentheorien,” in Habermas, Jürgen (ed.), Stichworte zur ‘Geistigen Situation der Zeit’. Band 1: Nation und Republik. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp, pp. 294–318.
O'Donnell, Guillermo A. (1978), “Reflections on the Patterns of Change in the Bureaucratic Authoritarian States,” Latin American Research Review 13:3–36.Google Scholar
O'Donnell, Guillermo A. (1973), Modernization and Bureaucratic-Authoritarianism. Berkeley, CA: Institute for International Studies.
O'Donnell, Guillermo A. and Schmitter, Philippe C. (1986), “Concluding (but not capitulating) with a metaphor,” in O'Donnell, Guillermo A. and Schmitter, Philippe C. (eds.), Transitions from Authoritarian Rule: Tentative Conclusions about Uncertain Democracies. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press, pp. 65–72.
Oelkers, Jürgen (2000), “Democracy and education: about the future of a problem,” Studies in Philosophy and Education 19:3–19.Google Scholar
Oliver, Pamela E. and Marwell, Gerald (1992), “Mobilizing technologies for collective action,” in Morris, Aldon D. and Mueller, Carol M. (eds.), Frontiers in Social Movement Theory. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, pp. 252–272.
Olson, Mancur (2000), “Dictatorship, democracy, and development,” in Olson, Mancur and Kähkönen, Satu (eds.), A Not-So Dismal Science: A Broader View of Economics and Society. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 119–137.
Olson, Mancur (1982), The Rise and Decline of Nations: Economic Growth, Stagflation, and Social Rigidities. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Olson, Mancur (1965), The Logic of Collective Action. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
O'Neill, John (1999), “Socialism, ecology and Austrian economics,” in Nemeth, Elisabeth and Heinrich, Richard (eds.), Otto Neurath: Rationalität, Planung, Vielfalt. Wien: Oldenbourg, pp. 123–145.
Oppenheim, Felix E. (1961), Dimensions of Freedom: An Analysis. New York: St. Martin's Press.
Oppenheim, Felix E. (1960), “Degrees of power and freedom,” American Political Science Review 54:437–446.Google Scholar
Oyama, Susan (2000), Evolution's Eye. A Systems View of the Biology – Culture Divide. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
Pachero, Gail and Lange, Thomas (2010), “Political participation and life satisfaction: a cross-European analysis,” International Journal of Social Economics 37:686–702.Google Scholar
Palmer, R. R. (1953), “Notes on the use of the word ‘democracy’ 1979–1799,” Political Science Quarterly 68:203–226.Google Scholar
Panitch, Leo (1993), “A different kind of state?” in Albo, Gregory, Langille, David, and Panitch, Leo (eds.), A Different Kind of State? Popular Power and Democratic Administration. Toronto: Oxford University Press, pp. 2–16.
Paras, Eric (2006), Foucault 2.0: Beyond Power and Knowledge. New York: The Other Press.
Park, Robert E. (1940), “News as a form of knowledge: a chapter in the sociology of knowledge,” American Journal of Sociology 45: 669–686.Google Scholar
Parsons, Talcott (1963), “On the concept of political power,” Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society 107:232–262.Google Scholar
Parsons, Talcott (1957), “The distribution of power in American society,” World Politics 10:123–143.Google Scholar
Pateman, Carole (1970), Participation and Democratic Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Peck, Jamie (2005), “Struggling with the creative class,” International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 29:740–770.Google Scholar
Perrin, Andrew J. and McFarland, Katherine (2011), “Social theory and public opinion,” Annual Review of Sociology 37:87–107.Google Scholar
Persaud, Avinash (2001), “The knowledge gap,” Foreign Affairs 80:107–117.Google Scholar
Persson, Torsten and Tabellini, Guido (2007), “The growth effect of democracy: Is it heterogeneous and how can it be estimated?” NBER Working Paper 13150, www.nber.org/papers/w13150.
Persson, Torsten and Tabellini, Guido (2006), “Democracy and development: the devil in the details,” American Economic Review 96:319–324.Google Scholar
Petersen, Michael Bang and Aarøe, Lene (2013), “Politics in the mind's eye: imagination as a link between social and political cognition,” American Political Science Review 107: 275–293.Google Scholar
Pew Research Center (2009), “Public praises science; scientists fault public, media. Scientific achievements less prominent than a decade ago,” http://people-press.org/report/528/.
Pielke, Roger A. Jr. (2010), The Climate Fix. New York: Basic Books.
Pielke, Roger A. Jr. (2007), The Honest Broker. Making Sense of Science in Policy and Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Pinker, Steven (2013), “Science is not your enemy,” New Republic August 6.Google Scholar
Pipes, Richard (1955), “Max Weber and Russia,” World Politics 7:371–401.Google Scholar
Pitkin, Hanna (1967), The Concept of Representation. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
Plessner, Helmuth ([1924] 1985), “Zur Soziologie der modernen Forschung und ihrer Organisation in der Deutschen Universität – Tradition und Ideologie,” in Plessner, Helmuth, Schriften, Gesammelte. Band X: Schriften zur Soziologie und Sozialphilosophie, Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp, pp. 7–30.
Plotke, David (1997), “Representation is democracy,” Constellations 4:19–34.Google Scholar
Poggi, Gianfranco (1982), “The modern state and the idea of progress”, in Almond, Gabriel A., Chodorow, Marvin and Pearce, Roy Harvey (eds.), Progress and its Discontents. Berkeley: University of California Press, pp. 337–369.
Polanyi, Michael (1967), The Tacit Dimension. New York: Doubleday.
Polanyi, Michael ([1962] 2000), “The republic of science: its political and economic theory,” Minerva 38:1–32.Google Scholar
Polanyi, Karl (1947), “Our obsolete market mentality: our civilization must find a new thought pattern,” Commentary 3:109–117.Google Scholar
Polèse, Mario (2011), “Urban-development legends. Grand theories to little to revive cities,” www.city-journal.org/2011/21_4_urban-development.html
Pool, Ithiel (1990), Technologies without Boundaries: On Telecommunication in a Global Age. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Pool, Ithiel (1983), Technologies of Freedom. On Free Speech in an Electronic Age. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Popkin, Samuel L. (1991), The Reasoning Voter: Communication and Persuasion in Presidential Campaigns. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Popper, Karl ([2008] 2012), After the Open Society. London: Routledge.
Popper, Karl (1973), “Memories of Otto Neurath,” in Neurath, Otto, Empiricism and Sociology, Neurath, Marie and Cohen, Robert S., eds. Dordrecht: D. Reidel, pp. 51–56.
Popper, Karl ([1963] 2012), “The open society and the democratic state,” in Popper, Karl, After the Open Society. London: Routledge, pp. 231–248.
Popper, Karl ([1960] 1968), “On the sources of knowledge and of ignorance,” in Popper, Karl (ed.), Conjectures and Refutations: The Growth of Scientific Knowledge. New York: Harper and Row, pp. 3–30.
Posner, Richard (2003), Law, Pragmatism, and Democracy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Potter, David M. ([1954] 1958), People of Plenty: Economic Abundance and the American Character. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Pratt, Andy C. (2008), “Creative cities: the cultural industries and the creative class,” Geografiska Annaler: Series B, Human Geography 90:107–117.Google Scholar
Prewitt, Kenneth (2010), “Introduction: Limits to knowledge? No easy answer,” Social Research 77:901–904.Google Scholar
Prewitt, Kenneth and Eulau, Heinz (1969), “Political matrix and political representation: prolegomenon to a new departure from an old problem,” American Political Science Review 63:427–441.Google Scholar
Prins, Gwyn, Galiana, Isabel, Green, Christopher, Grundmann, Reiner, Hulme, Mike, Korhola, Atte, Laird, Frank, Nordhaus, Ted, Pielke, Roger Jr., Rayner, Steve, Sarewitz, Daniel, Shellenberger, Michael, Stehr, Nico, and Tezuka, Hiroyuki (2010), Hartwell Paper I. London: London School of Economics.
Prior, Markus and Lupia, Arthur (2008), “Money, time, and political knowledge: Distinguishing quick recall and political learning skills,” American Journal of Political Science 52: 169–183.Google Scholar
Przeworski, Adam (2004), “Democracy and economic development,” in Mansfield, Edward D. and Sisson, Richard (eds.), Political Science and the Public Interest. Columbus: Ohio State University Press (cited from the version of the paper found on the Internet pages of the author).
Przeworski, Adam (1991), Democracy and the Market: Political and Economic Reforms in Eastern Europe and Latin America. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Przeworski, Adam and Limongi, Fernando (1993), “Political regimes and economic growth,” Journal of Economic Perspectives 7:51–69.Google Scholar
Przeworski, Adam, Alvarez, Michael, Cheibub, José A., and Limongi, Fernando (2000), Democracy and Development: Political Institutions and Material Well-Being in the World, 1950–1990. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Pupin, Michael ([1922] 2007), From Immigrant to Inventor. New York: Cosimo.
Purdy, Jedediah (2009), “The politics of nature: climate change, environmental law, and democracy,” The Yale Law Journal 119:1122–1192.Google Scholar
Putnam, Robert D. (2002), “Conclusion,” in Putnam, Robert D., (ed.), Democracies in Flux: The Evolution of Social Capital in Contemporary Society. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 391–418.
Putnam, Robert D. (2000), Bowling Alone: The Collapse and Revival of American Community. New York: Simon & Schuster.
Putnam, Robert D. (1996), “The strange disappearance of civic America,” Policy 12:3–13.Google Scholar
Putnam, Robert D. (1995a), “Tuning in, tuning out: the strange disappearance of social capital in America,” PS: Political Science and Politics 28:664–683.Google Scholar
Putnam, Robert D. (1995b), “Bowling alone: America's declining social capital,” Journal of Democracy 6:65–78.Google Scholar
Putnam, Robert D. (1993), Making Democracy Work. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Putnam, Robert D. and Goss, Kristin A. (2002), “Introduction,” in Putnam, Robert D., (ed.), Democracies in Flux: The Evolution of Social Capital in Contemporary Society. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 3–19.
Radder, Hans (1986), “Experiment, technology and the intrinsic connection between knowledge and power,” Social Studies of Science 16:663–683.Google Scholar
Ramsey, Kristopher W. (2011), “Revisiting the resource course: natural disasters, the price of oil, and democracy,” International Organization 65:507–529.Google Scholar
Ranis, Gustav, Stewart, Frances, and Samman, Emma (2006), “Human development: beyond the human development index,” Journal of Human Development and Capabilities 7:323–358.Google Scholar
Rayner, Steve (2003), “Democracy in an age of assessment: reflections on the roles of expertise and democracy in public-sector decision making,” Science and Public Policy 30:163–170.Google Scholar
Ravetz, Jerome (1986), “Useable knowledge, useable ignorance,” in Clark, William C. and Munn, R. E. (eds.), Sustainable Development of the Biosphere. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 415–432.
Rawls, John (1997), “The idea of public reason revisited,” The University of Chicago Law Review 64:765–807.Google Scholar
Rawls, John (1971), A Theory of Justice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Reenock, Christopher, Staton, Jeffrey K., and Radean, Marius (2013), “Legal institutions and democratic survival,” The Journal of Politics 75:491–505.Google Scholar
Reeves, Richard (2007), John Stuart Mill: Victorian Firebrand. London: Atlantic Books.
Reich, Robert B. (2007), Supercapitalism: The Transformation of Business, Democracy, and Everyday Life. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.
Reichenbach, Hans (1951), The Rise of Scientific Philosophy. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Reisch, George A. (2005), How the Cold War Transformed Philosophy of Science: The Icy Slopes of Logic. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Rhodes, R. A. W. (1996), “The new governance: governing without government,” Political Studies 44: 652–667.Google Scholar
Richey, Sean (2008), “The autoregressive influence of social networks political knowledge on voting behavior,” British Journal of Political Science 38:527–542.Google Scholar
Riesman, David ([1950] 1961), The Lonely Crowd: A Study of the Changing American Character. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Ringen, Stein (2010), “The measurement of democracy: toward a new paradigm,” Society 48:12–16.Google Scholar
Ringen, Stein (2008), “Do we need self-knowledge in order to live as free citizens,” in Stehr, Nico (ed.), Knowledge & Democracy: A 21st Century Perspective. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Books, pp. 25–37.
Rittel, Horst W. J. and Webber, Melvin (1973), “Dilemmas in the general theory of planning”, Policy Sciences, 4:154–59.Google Scholar
Roberts, Kenneth M. (2008), “The mobilization of opposition to economic liberalization,” Annual Review of Political Science 11:327–349.Google Scholar
Robinson, James A. (2006), “Economic development and democracy,” Annual Review of Political Science 9:503–527.Google Scholar
Robinson, James A., Torvik, Ragnar, and Verdier, Thierry (2006), “Political foundations of the resource curse,” Journal of Development Economics 79:447–468.Google Scholar
Robinson, James Harvey (1923), The Humanizing of Knowledge. New York: George H. Doran.
Rogers, Melvin L. (2007), “Action and inquiry in Dewey's philosophy,” Transactions of the Charles Pierce Society 43:90–115.Google Scholar
Rosanvallon, Pierre ([2011] 2013), The Society of Equals. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Rosanvallon, Pierre ([2006] 2008), Counter-Democracy: Politics in an Age of Distrust. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Rosanvallon, Pierre (2006), Democracy: Past and Future. New York: Columbia University Press.
Rose, Nikolas (1999), Powers of Freedom: Reframing Political Thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Rose, Nikolas (1994), “Expertise and the government of conduct,” Studies in Law, Politics and Society 14:359–397.Google Scholar
Rose, Nikolas (1993), “Government, authority and expertise in advanced liberalism,” Economy and Society 22:283–299.Google Scholar
Rose, Nikolas and Miller, Peter (1992), “Political power beyond the state: problematics of government,” British Journal of Sociology 43:173–205.Google Scholar
Rose, Richard (1979), “Pervasive problems of governing: an analytic framework.” in Matthes, Joachim (ed.), Sozialer Wandel in Westeuropa. Verhandlungen des 19. Deutschen Soziologentages, Berlin 1979. Frankfurt: Campus, pp. 29–54.
Rosenberg, Morris (1954–1955), “Some determinants of political apathy,” Public Opinion Quarterly 18:349–366.Google Scholar
Rosenberg, Morris (1951), “The meaning of politics in mass society,” Public Opinion Quarterly 15:5–15.Google Scholar
Rosenfeld, Sophia (2008), “Before democracy: the production and uses of common sense,” The Journal of Modern History 80:1–54.Google Scholar
Ross, Michael L (2001), “Does oil hinder democracy?World Politics 53(3):325–361.Google Scholar
Roszak, Theodore (1972), Where the Wasteland Ends: Politics and Transcendence in Postindustrial Society. New York: Doubleday.
Rowley, Jennifer (2007), “The wisdom hierarchy: representations of the DIWW hierarchy,” Journal of Information Science 33:163–180.Google Scholar
Runciman, David (2013a), “Democracy's dual dangers,” Chronicle of Higher Education November 18, 2013, http://chronicle.com/article/Democracys-Dual-Dangers/142971/.
Runciman, David (2013b), The Confidence Trap: A History of Democracy in Crisis from World War I to the Present. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Runciman, David (2005), “Tax breaks for rich murderers: review of Michael Graetz and Ian Shapiro, Death by a Thousand Cuts,” London Review of Books 27(11): www.lrb.co.uk/v27/n11/runc01_.html (accessed September 11, 32013).Google Scholar
Rushforth, Scott (1994), “Political resistance in a contemporary hunter-gatherer society: more about Bearlake Athabaskan knowledge and authority,” American Ethnologist 21:335–352.Google Scholar
Rustow, Dankwart A. (1970), “Transitions to democracy: toward a dynamic model,” Comparative Politics 2:337–363.Google Scholar
Ryle, Gilbert ([1949] 2002), The Concept of Mind. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Ryle, Gilbert (1945/46), “Knowing how and knowing that,” Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 46:1–16.Google Scholar
Sachs, Jeffrey D., McArthur, John W., Schmidt-Traub, Guido, Kruk, Margaret, Bahadur, Chandrika, Faye, Michael, and McCord, Gordon (2004), “Ending Africa's poverty trap,” Brookings Papers on Economic Activity 1:117–240.Google Scholar
Sagoff, Mark ([1988] 2008), The Economy of the Earth. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Salisbury, Robert H. (1975), “Research on political participation,” American Journal of Political Science 19:323–341Google Scholar
Salamon, Lester M., and Anheier, Helmut K. (1997), Defining the Nonprofit Sector: A Cross-National Analysis. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
Salomon, Jean-Jacques (2000), “Science, technology and democracy,” Minerva 38:33–51.Google Scholar
Sander, Thomas H. and Putnam, Robert D. (2010), “Still bowling alone? The post 9/11 split,” Journal of Democracy 21:9–16.Google Scholar
Santerre, Lise (2008), “From democratization of knowledge to bridge building between science, technology and society,” in Cheng, Donhong, Claessens, Michel and Gascoigne, Nicholas R. J. (eds.), Communicating Science in Social Contexts. Heidelberg, Springer, pp. 287–300
Sands, Gary and Reese, Laura A. (2008), “Cultivating the creative class: And what about Nanaimo?Economic Development Quarterly 22:8–23.Google Scholar
Sarewitz, Daniel (2010), “Normal science and the limits on knowledge: what we seek to know, what we choose not to know, what we don't bother knowing,” Social Research 77:997–1010.Google Scholar
Sarewitz, Daniel and Nelson, Richard P. (2008), “Progress in know-how: its origins and limits,” Innovation 3:101–117.Google Scholar
Sartori, Giovanni (1968), “Democracy,” in Sills, Davis (ed.), International Encyclopedia of the Social Sciences. Volume 4. New York: Macmillan and Free Press, pp. 112–121.
Sartori, Giovanni (1962), Democratic Theory. Detroit, MI: Wayne State University Press.
Sassi, Sinikka (2005), “Cultural differentiation or social segregation: four approaches to digital divide,” New Media & Society 7:684–700Google Scholar
Saward, M. (1993), “Green democracy,” in Dobson, Andrew and Lucardie, Paul (eds.), The Politics of Nature: Explorations in Green Political Theory. London: Routledge, pp. 63–80.
Scaff, Lawrence A. (1981), “Max Weber and Robert Michels,” American Journal of Sociology 86:1269–1286.Google Scholar
Scheler, Max ([1925] 1960), “The forms of knowledge and culture,” in Scheler, Max, Philosophical Perspectives. Boston: Beacon Press, pp. 13–49.
Scheler, Max ([1926] 1992), On Feeling, Knowing, and Valuing. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Schelsky, Helmut. (1976), “Die metawissenschaftlichen Wirkungen der Soziologie,” in Becker, Werner and Hübner, Kurt (eds.) Objektivität in den Natur-und Geisteswissenschaften. Hamburg: Hoffmann und Campe, pp. 171–182.
Schelsky, Helmut. (1975), Die Arbeit tun die anderen: Klassenkampf und Priesterherrschaft der Intellektuellen. Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag.
Schelsky, Helmut. ([1961] 1965), “Der Mensch in der wissenschaftlichen Zivilisation,” in Schelsky, Helmut, Auf der Suche nach der Wirklichkeit. Gesammelte Aufsätze. Düsseldorf: Diederichs, pp. 171–182.
Schelsky, Helmut. (1955), Wandlungen der deutschen Familie in der Gegenwart. Dritte, durch einen Anhang erweiterte Auflage. Stuttgart: Ferdinand Enke.
Scherer, Bonnie A. (2004–2005), “Footing the bill for a sound education in New York City: the implementation of campaign for fiscal equity v. state,” Fordham Urban Law Journal 32:901–935.Google Scholar
Schieder, Theodor (1977), “Einmaligkeit oder Wiederkehr: Historische Dimensionen der heutigen Krise.” in Hennis, Wilhelm, Kielmansegg, Peter Graf, and Matz, Ulrich (eds.), Regierbarkeit: Studien zu ihrer Problematisierung. Band 1. Stuttgart: Klett-Cotta, pp. 22–42.
Schieman, Scott and Plickert, Gabriele (2008), “How knowledge is power: the sense of control,” Social Forces 87:153–183.Google Scholar
Schiller, Dan (1997). “The information commodity: a preliminary view,” in Davis, Jim, Hirschl, Thomas A., and Stack, Michael (eds.), Cutting Edge: Technology, Information Capitalism and Social Revolution. London: Verso, pp. 103–120.
Schleicher, Andreas (2006), The Economics of Knowledge: Why Education is Key for Europe's Success. Paris: Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development, www.oecd.org/dataoecd/43/11/36278531.pdf.
Schlozman, Kay Lehmann, Verba, Sidney, and Brady, Henry E. (2010), “Weapon of the strong? Participatory inequality and the internet,” Perspectives on Politics 8:487–509.Google Scholar
Schmitt, Carl (1984), Politische Theologie II. Die Legende von der Erledigung jeder politischen Theologie. . Berlin: Duncker & Humblot.
Schmitter, Phillipe C. (2010a), “Twenty-five years, fifteen findings,” Journal of Democracy 21:17–28.Google Scholar
Schmitter, Phillipe C. (2010b), “Review of Pierre Rosanvallon ‘Counter Democracy’: politics in an age of distrust,” Perspectives on Politics 8:887–889.Google Scholar
Schneider, Stephen H. (2009), Science as a Contact Sport: Inside the Battle to Save the Earth's Climate. Washington: National Geographic.
Schon, David A. ([1963] 1967), Invention and the Evolution of Ideas. London: Tavistock.
Schudson, Michael (2006), “The trouble with experts – and why democracies need them,” Theory & Society 35:491–506.Google Scholar
Schuman, Howard and Corning, Amy D. (2000), “Collective knowledge of public events: the Soviet era from the great purge to glasnost,” American Journal of Sociology 105:913–956.Google Scholar
Schumpeter, Joseph A., (1942), Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy. New York: Harper-Collins.
Schutz, Alfred (1975), “Some structures of the life-world,” in Schutz, Ilse (ed.), Collected Papers III: Studies in Phenomenological Philosophy. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff.
Schutz, Alfred (1946), “The well-informed citizen: an essay on the social distribution of knowledge,” Social Research 13:463–478.Google Scholar
Scott, James C. (2012), Two Cheers for Anarchism: Six Easy Pieces on Autonomy, Dignity, and Meaningful Work and Play. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Scott, James C. (1998), Seeing Like a State: How Certain Schemes to Improve the Human Condition Have Failed. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Scott, James C. (1990), Domination and the Arts of Resistance: Hidden Transcripts. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Scott, James C. (1985), Weapons of the Weak: Everyday Forms of Peasant Resistance. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Sen, Amartya (2003), “Democracy and its global roots: why democratization is not the same as Westernization,” The New Republic 229:28–36.Google Scholar
Sen, Amartya (1999), “Democracy as a universal value,” Journal of Democracy 10:3–17.Google Scholar
Sen, Amartya (1994), “Markets and the freedom to choose,” in Siebert, Horst (ed.), The Ethical Foundations of the Market. Tübingen: Siebeck Mohr, pp. 123–138.
Sen, Amartya (1993a), “Markets and freedoms: achievements and limitations of the market mechanism in promoting individual freedoms,” Oxford Economic Papers 45:519–541.Google Scholar
Sen, Amartya (1993b), “Capability and well-being,” in Nussbaum, Martha C. and Sen, Amartya (eds.), The Quality of Life. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 30–53.
Sen, Amartya (1992), Inequality Reexamined. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Sen, Amartya (1985), “Well-being, agency and freedom,” Journal of Philosophy 82:169–221.Google Scholar
Sen, Amartya (1984a), Resources, Values and Development. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
Sen, Amartya (1983), “Development: which way now?Economic Journal 93:745–762.Google Scholar
Shaker, Lee (2012), “Local political knowledge and assessments of citizen competence,” Public Opinion Quarterly 76:525–537.Google Scholar
Shannon, Claude (1948), “A Mathematical Theory of Communication,” Bell System Technical Journal 28:656–715.Google Scholar
Shannon, Lyle E. (1958), “Is level of development related to capacity for self-government? An analysis of the economic characteristics of self-governing and non-self-governing areas,” American Journal of Economics and Sociology 17:367–382.Google Scholar
Shapin, Steven (1990) “Science and the Public,” in Hodge, Jonathan, Olby, Robert, and Olby, R. C. (eds.), Companion to the History of Modern Science. London: Routledge, pp. 990–1007.
Shapiro, Ian (1994), “Three ways to be a democrat,” Political Theory 22:124–151.Google Scholar
Shearman, David and Smith, Joseph Wayne (2007), The Climate Change Challenge and the Failure of Democracy. Westport, CT: Praeger.
Shin, Doh Chull (2007), “Democratization: perspectives from global citizenries,” in Dalton, Russell J. and Klingemann, Hans-Dieter (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Political Behavior. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 259–282.
Shin, Doh Chull (1994), “On the third wave of democratization: A synthesis and evaluation of recent theory and research,” World Politics 47:135–170.Google Scholar
Sibley, Mulford Q. (1973), “Utopian thought and technology,” American Journal of Political Science 17:255–281.Google Scholar
Sidgwick, Henry ([1895] 1905), “The philosophy of common sense,” in Henry Sidgwick, Lectures on the Philosophy of Kant and other Philosophical Lectures and Essays. London: Macmillan, pp. 406–430.
Siemsen, Hayo (2001), “The Mach-Planck debate revisited: democratization of science or elite knowledge,” Public Understanding of Science 19:293–310.Google Scholar
Silver, Nate (2012), The Signal and the Noise: Why so Many Predictions Fail – But Some don't. New York: Penguin.
Simmel, Georg ([1908] 1992), Soziologie: Untersuchungen über die Formen der Vergesellschaftung. Gesamtausgabe Band 11. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.
Simmel, Georg ([1907] 1989), Philosophie des Geldes. Gesamtausgabe Band 6, Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.
Simmel, Georg ([1907] 1978), The Philosophy of Money. Bottomore, Tom and Frisby, David, trans. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
Sirowy, Larry and Inkeles, Alex (1990), “The effects of economic growth on democracy and inequality: A review,” Studies in Comparative International Development 25:126–157.Google Scholar
Skidelsky, Robert and Skidelsky, Edward (2012), How much is enough? Money and the good life. New York: Other Press.
Skinner, Quentin (1973), “The empirical theorists of democracy and their critics: a plague on both of their houses,” Political Theory 1:287–306.Google Scholar
Skocpol, Theda (2004), “Voice and inequality: the transformation of American civic democracy,” Perspectives on Politics 2:3–20.Google Scholar
Skolnikoff, Eugene B. (1976), “The governability of complexity”, in Cooper, Chester L. (ed.), Growth in America. Westport, CT: Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars, pp. 75–88.
Smith, Adam ([1776] 2000), The Wealth of Nations. New York: Random House.
Smith, Anthony (1982), “Information technology and the myth of abundance.” Daedalus 111:1–16.Google Scholar
Smith, Stephen Samuel and Kulynych, Jessica (2002), “It may be social, but why is it capital? The social construction of social capital and the politics of language,” Politics & Society 30:149–186.Google Scholar
Smith, Roger and Wynne, Brian, eds. (1989), Expert Evidence: Interpreting Science in the Law. London: Routledge.
Snow, Charles Percy ([1959] 1964), The Two Cultures, A Second Look: An Expanded Version of the Two Cultures and the Scientific Revolution. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Snow, Stephanie J. (2012), “Translating new knowledge into practices: reconceptualising stroke as an emergency condition,” Chronic Illness, doi: 10.1177/1742395312464663.
Sörlin, Sverker (2002), “Cultivating the places of knowledge,” Studies in Philosophy and Education 21:377–388.Google Scholar
Solt, Frederick (2008), “Economic inequality and democratic political engagement,” American Journal of Political Science 51:48–60.Google Scholar
Soltan, Karol Edward (1999), “Introduction: civic competence, democracy, and the good society,” in Elkin, Stephen L., and Soltan, Karol Edward, (eds.), Citizen Competence and Democratic Institutions. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press, pp. 2–16.
Sombart, Werner (1934), Deutscher Sozialismus. Berlin: Buchholz & Weisswange.
Somer, Murat (2011), “Does it take democrats to democratize? Lessons from Islamic and secular elite values in Turkey,” Comparative Political Studies 44:511–545.Google Scholar
Somin, Ilya (2009), Democracy and the Problem of Political Ignorance. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
Somin, Ilya (2006), “Knowledge about ignorance: new directions in the study of political information,” Critical Review 18:255–278.Google Scholar
Sorensen, Georg (2010), “Democracy and democratization,” in Leicht, Kevin T. and Jenkins, J. Craig (eds.), Handbook of Politics. Heidelberg: Springer, pp. 441–458.
Soss, Joe (1999), “Lessons of welfare: policy design, political learning, and political action,” American Political Science Review 93:363–380.Google Scholar
Sowell, Thomas (1980), Knowledge and Decisions. New York: Basic Books.
Snow, David A. and Benford, Robert D. (1992), “Master frames and cycles of protest,” in Morris, Aldon D. and Mueller, Carol McClurg (eds.), Frontiers in Social Movement Theory. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, pp. 133–155.
Spittler, Gerd (1980), “Abstraktes Wissen als Herrschaftsbasis. Zur Entstehungsgeschichte bürokratischer Herrschaft im Bauernstaat Preussen,” Kölner Zeitschrift für Soziologie und Sozialpsychologie 32:574–604.Google Scholar
Sprague, Jo and Rudd, Gary L. (1988), “Boat-rocking in the high-technology culture.” American Behavioral Scientist 32:169–193.Google Scholar
Starbuck, William H. (1992), “Learning by knowledge-intensive firms,” Journal of Management Studies 29:713–740.Google Scholar
Starr, Paul (2004), The Creation of the Media: Political Origins of Modern Communications. New York: Basic Books.
Stehr, Nico (2012a), “An inconvenient democracy: Knowledge and climate change,” Society 50: 55–60.Google Scholar
Stehr, Nico (2012b), “Education, knowledgeability, and the labour market,” in Tröhler, Daniel and Barbu, Ragnhild (eds.), The Future of Education Research. Vol. 1. Amsterdam: Sense Publishers, pp. 145–162.
Stehr, Nico (2012c), “Knowledge and non-knowledge,” Science, Technology & Innovation Studies 8:313.Google Scholar
Stehr, Nico (2008), Moral Markets. Boulder, CO: Paradigm Publishers.
Stehr, Nico (2005), Knowledge Politics. Governing the Consequences of Science and Technology. Boulder, CO: Paradigm Publishers.
Stehr, Nico (2002), Knowledge and Economic Conduct: The Social Foundations of the Modern Economy. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
Stehr, Nico (2001), The Fragility of Modern Societies: Knowledge and Risk in the Information Age. London: Sage.
Stehr, Nico (2000), “The productivity paradox: ICT's Knowledge and the labour market,” in de la Mother, John and Parquet, Gilles (eds.), Information, Innovation and Impacts. Dordrecht: Kluwer, pp. 255–271.
Stehr, Nico (1999), “The future of inequality,” Society 36:54–59.Google Scholar
Stehr, Nico (1997), “Les limites du possibles: la postmodernité et les sociétés du savoir,” Sociétiés 58:101–124.Google Scholar
Stehr, Nico (1994), Knowledge Societies. London: Sage.
Stehr, Nico (1994), “Max Weber and the Lutheran Social Congress: the authority of discourse and the discourse of authority,” History of the Human Sciences 7:21–39.Google Scholar
Stehr, Nico (1991), “The power of scientific knowledge – and its limits,” Canadian Review of Sociology and Anthropology 29:460–482.Google Scholar
Stehr, Nico (1989), “Von den Tugenden sozialwissenschaftlichen Wissens: Max Weber und der evangelisch-soziale Kongress”, Sociologia Internationalis 27:129–214.Google Scholar
Stehr, Nico (1978), “The ethos of science revisited,” Sociological Inquiry 48:172–196.Google Scholar
Stehr, Nico and Adolf, Marian (2011), “Die Macht der neuen Öffentlichkeit,” Vorgänge 192:4–15.Google Scholar
Stehr, Nico and Adolf, Marian (2009), “Die neue Macht der Kreativität. Wissensklassen in modernen Gesellschaften,” in Jansen, Stephan, Schröter, Eckard, and Stehr, Nico (eds.), Rationalität der Kreativität? Multidisziplinäre Beiträge zur Analyse der Produktion, Organisation und Bildung von Kreativität. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften, pp. 185–206.
Stehr, Nico and Grundmann, Reiner (2011), Experts: The Knowledge and Power of Expertise. London: Routledge.
Stehr, Nico, Henning, Christoph, and Weiler, Bernd (eds.) (2006), The Moralization of the Markets. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Books.
Stehr, Nico and Meja, Volker (2005), “Introduction: the development of the sociology of knowledge and science,” in Stehr, Nico and Meja, Volker (eds.), Society & Knowledge: Contemporary Perspectives in the Sociology of Knowledge and Science. . New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Books, pp. 1–30.
Stehr, Nico and Meja, Volker (1998), “Robert K. Merton's structural analysis,” in Mongardini, Carlo and Tabboni, Simotta (eds.), Robert K. Merton and Contemporary Sociology. London: Transaction Books, pp. 21–43.
Steiner, George (2011), “Interview: a certain idea of knowledge,” presseurop.eu, www.presseurop.eu/en/content/article/1320071-george-steiner-certain-idea-knowledge.
Stephan, Alfred, Linz, Juan J., and Yadow, Yogendra (2010), “The rise of ‘state-nations’,” Journal of Democracy 21:50–68.Google Scholar
Stevenson, Hayley and Dryzek, John S. (2012), “The discursive democratisation of global climate governance,” Environmental Politics 21:189–210.Google Scholar
Stewart, Mark B. (2011), “The changing picture of earnings inequality in Britain and the role of regional and sectoral differences,” National Institute Economic Review 218:R20–R32.Google Scholar
Stewart, Thomas A. (1997), Intellectual Capital: The New Wealth of Organizations. New York: Doubleday.
Stigler, George J. (1978), “Wealth and possibly liberty,” Journal of Legal Studies 7:213–217.Google Scholar
Stiglitz, Joseph E. (2008), “Toward a general theory of consumerism: reflections on Keynes's economic possibilities for our grandchildren,” in Pechci, Lorenzo and Piga, Gustavo (eds.), Revisiting Keynes: Economic Possibilities for our Grandchildren. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 41–85.
Stiglitz, Joseph E. (2005), “The ethical economist,” Foreign Affairs 84:128–134.Google Scholar
Stocklmayer, Susan M. and Bryant, Chris (2012), “Science and the public – What should people know?International Journal of Science Education, Part B 2:81–101.Google Scholar
Stolle, Dietlind and Gidengil, Elisabeth (2010), “What do women really know? A gendered analysis of varieties of political knowledge,” Perspectives on Politics 8:93–109.Google Scholar
Stone, Lawrence (1969), “Literacy and education in England, 1640–1900,” Past and Present 42:69–139.Google Scholar
Strauss, Anselm L., Schatzman, Leonard, Bucher, Ruth, Ehrlich, Danuta, and Sabshin, Melvin (1964), Psychiatric Ideologies and Institutions. New York: Free Press.
Sunstein, Cass (2001), “The daily we: is the Internet really a blessing for democracy?” The Boston Review: http://bostonreview.net/BR26.3/sunstein.php.
Sturgis, Patrick, Allum, Nick, and Smith, Patten (2008), “An experiment on the measurement of political knowledge in surveys,” Public Opinion Quarterly 85:90–102.Google Scholar
Sturgis, Patrick and Allum, Nick (2004), “Science in society: re-evaluating the deficit model of public attitudes,” Public Understanding of Science 13:55–74.Google Scholar
Sturgis, Patrick and Allum, Nick (1986), “Culture in action: symbols and strategies,” American Sociological Review 51:273–286.Google Scholar
Tarrow, Sidney (1998), Power in Movement: Social Movements and Contentious Politics. . Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Taylor, Charles (2004), Social Imageries. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
Tenbruck, Friedrich H. ([1977] 1996), “Fortschritt der Wissenschaft,” in Tenruck, Friedrich H., Kultursoziologie, Perspektiven der. Gesammelte Aufsätze. Wiesbaden: Westdeutscher Verlag, pp. 158–194.
Tenbruck, Friedrich H. (1977), “Grenzen der staatlichen Planung,” in Hennis, Wilhelm, Kielmansegg, Peter Graf, and Matz, Ulrich (eds.), Regierbarkeit: Studien zu ihrer Problematisierung. Band 1. Stuttgart: Klett-Cotta, pp. 134–149.
Tenbruck, Friedrich H. ([1972] 1996), “Soziologie und Planung: Grenzen der Planung,” in Tenbruck, Friedrich H., Perspektiven der Kultursoziologie: Gesammelte Aufsätze. Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag, pp. 219–234.
Tenbruck, Friedrich H. (1969), “Regulative Funktionen der Wissenschaft in der pluralistischen Gesellschaft,” in Scholz, Herbert (ed.), Die Rolle der Wissenschaft in der modernen Gesellschaft. Berlin: Duncker & Humblot, pp. 61–85.
Teorell, Jan and Hadenius, Axel (2006), “Democracy without democratic values: A rejoinder to Welzel and Inglehart,” Studies in Comparative International Development 41:95–111.Google Scholar
Termeer, Katrien, Breeman, Gerard, Lieshout, Maartje van, and Pot, Wieke (2010), “Why more knowledge could thwart democracy: configurations and fixations in the Dutch mega-stables debate,” in Roel in 't Veld (ed.), Knowledge Democracy. Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag, pp. 99–110.
Tetlock, Philip E. (2002), “Social-functionalist frameworks for judgment and choice: the intuitive politician, theologian, and prosecutor,” Psychological Review 109:451–472.Google Scholar
Thorpe, Charles (2009), “Community and the market in Michael Polanyi's philosophy of science,” Modern Intellectual History 6:59–89.Google Scholar
Tichenor, Phillip J., Donohue, George A., and Olien, Clarice N. (1980), Community Conflict and the Press. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
Tichenor, Phillip J., Donohue, George A., and Olien, Clarice N. (1970), “Mass media flow and differential growth in knowledge,” Public Opinion Quarterly 34:159–170.Google Scholar
Tilly, Charles (2007), Democracy. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Tilly, Charles (2003a), “Inequality, democratization, and de-democratization,” Sociological Theory 21:37–43.Google Scholar
Tilly, Charles (2003b), “Changing forms of inequality,” Sociological Theory 21:31–36.Google Scholar
Tilly, Charles (1999), “Now where?” in Steinmetz, George (ed.), State/Culture: State-Formation after the Cultural Turn. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, pp. 407–419.
Tilly, Charles (1995), Popular Contention in Great Britain, 1758–1834. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Timmons, Jeffrey F. (2010), “Does democracy reduce economic inequality?British Journal of Political Science 40:741–757.Google Scholar
Timonen, Antti (2013), “Digital democracy in the EU,” European View 12:103–112.Google Scholar
Tocqueville, Alexis ([1835–40] 2000), Democracy in America. Translated, edited, and with an introduction by Mansfield, Harvey C. and Winthrop, Debra. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Torfason, Magnus Thor and Ingram, Paul (2010), “The global rise of democracy: a network account,” American Sociological Review 75:355–377.Google Scholar
Touraine, Alain (2001), “Knowledge, power and self as distinct spheres,” in Viale, Riccardo (ed.), Knowledge and Politics. Heidelberg: Physica-Verlag, pp. 119–136.
Touraine, Alain (1977) The Self-Production of Society. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Touraine, Alain ([1992] 1995), Critique of Modernity. Oxford: Blackwell.
Treisman, Daniel (2011), “Income, democracy, and the cunning of reason,” NBER Working Paper 17132.
Trepte, Sabine and Boecking, Benjamin (2009), “Was wissen die Meinungsführer?Medien und Kommunikationswissenschaft 57:443–463.Google Scholar
Tsui, Kevin K. (2010), “More oil, less democracy: evidence from worldwide crude oil discoveries,” Economic Journal 121:80–115.Google Scholar
Turner, Stephen (2007), “Merton's ‘norms’ in political and intellectual context,” Classical Sociology 7:161–178.Google Scholar
Turner, Stephen (2001), “What is the problem with experts?Social Studies of Science 31:123–149.Google Scholar
Uebel, Thomas E. (2004), “Education, enlightenment and positivism: the Vienna Circle's scientific world-conception,” Science & Education 13:41–66.Google Scholar
Uebel, Thomas E. (2000), “Logical empiricism and the sociology of knowledge: the case of Neurath and Frank,” Philosophy of Science Proceedings. Part II 67:138–150.Google Scholar
Ungar, Sheldon (2008), “Ignorance as an under-identified social problem,” British Journal of Sociology 59:301–326.Google Scholar
Urbinati, Nadia (2006), Representative Democracy: Principles & Genealogy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Urbinati, Nadia (2000), “Representation as democracy: a study of democratic deliberation,” Political Theory 28:758–786.Google Scholar
Urbinati, Nadia and Warren, Mark E. (2008), “The concept of representation in contemporary democratic theory,” Annual Review of Political Science 11:387–412.Google Scholar
Uslaner, Eric M. (1998), “Social capital, television, and the ‘mean world’: trust, optimism, and civic participation,” Political Psychology 19: 441–467.Google Scholar
Van Bouwel, Jeroen (ed.) (2009), The Social Sciences and Democracy. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Van der Meer, T. W. G. and van Ingen, E. J. (2009), “Schools of democracy? Disentangling the relationship between civic participation and political action in 17 European countries,” European Journal of Political Research 48:281–308.Google Scholar
Vanhanen, Tatu (2003), Democratization: A Comparative Analysis of 170 Countries. London: Routledge.
Verein, Ernst Mach ([1929] 1981), “Wissenschaftliche Weltauffassung. Der Wiener Kreis,” in Neurath, Otto, Gesammelte philosophische und methodologische Schriften. Band 1. Wien: Hölder-Pichler-Temsky, pp. 299–316.
Viereck, Peter (1956), Conservative Thinkers: From John Adams to Winston Churchill, Princeton, NJ: Van Nostrand.
Virchow, Rudolf ([1848] 1907), Briefe an meine Eltern 1839–1864. Leipzig: Engelmann.
Vlas, Natalia and Gherghina, Sergiu (2012), “Where does religion meet democracy? A comparative analysis in Europe.” International Political Science Review 33:336–351.Google Scholar
Ward, Janelle and de Vreese, Claes (2011), “Political consumerism, young citizens and the Internet,” Media, Culture & Society 33:399–413.Google Scholar
Ward, Stephen, Gibson, Rachel, and Lusoli, Wainer (2003), “Online participation and mobilisation in Britain: hype, hope and reality,” Parliamentary Affairs 56:652–668.Google Scholar
Walker, Edward T., Martin, Andrew W., and McCarthy, John D. (2008), “Confronting the state, the corporation, and the academy: the influence of institutional targets on social movement repertoires,” American Journal of Sociology 114:35–76.Google Scholar
Wallerstein, Immanuel (2004), The Uncertainties of Knowledge. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.
Weaver, Warren (1949), “Recent contributions to the mathematical theory of communication,” http://isites.harvard.edu/fs/docs/icb.topic933672.files/Weaver%20Recent%20Contributions%20to%20the%20Mathematical%20Theory%20of%20Communication.pdf.
Weber, Max (1949), The Methodology of the Social Sciences, trans. and ed. by Shils, Edward A. and Finch, Henry A., With a Foreword by Edward A. Shils, Fifth printing, 1969. New York: Free Press.
Weber, Max (1946), Essays in Sociology. New York: Oxford University Press.
Weber, Max ([1922] 1978), Economy and Society. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
Weber, Max ([1922] 1964), The Theory of Social and Economic Organization. Edited with an Introduction by Parsons, Talcott. New York: Free Press.
Weber, Max ([1918] 1994), “Parliament and government in Germany under a new political order,” in Weber, Max, Political Writings. Edited by Lassman, Peter and Spiers, Ronald. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 130–271.
Weber, Max ([1917] 1994), “Suffrage and democracy in Germany,” in Max Weber, Political Writings. Edited by Lassman, Peter and Spiers, Ronald. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 80–129.
Weber, Max ([1906] 1994), “On the situation of constitutional democracy in Russia,” in Max Weber, Political Writings. Edited by Lassman, Peter and Spiers, Ronald. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 29–74.
Weber, Max ([1906] 1980), “Zur Lage der bürgerlichen Demokratie in Rußland,” in Weber, Max, Gesammelte politische Schriften. Tübingen: J. C. B. Mohr (Paul Siebeck), pp. 33–68.
Weber, Max ([1904] 1952), “Kapitalismus und Agrarverfassung,” Zeitschrift für die gesamte Staatswissenschaft 108:431–452.Google Scholar
Webster, Frank (1999), “Knowledgeablity and democracy in an information age,” Library Review 48:373–383.Google Scholar
Weede, Erich and Kämpf, Sebastian (2002), “The impact of intelligence and institutional improvements on economic growth,” Kyklos 55: 361–380.Google Scholar
Wehling, Peter (2009), “Nichtwissen: Bestimmungen, Abgrenzungen, Bewertungen,” EWE 20:95–106.Google Scholar
Wehling, Peter (2006), Im Schatten des Wissens? Perspektiven der Soziologie des Nichtwissens. Konstanz: UVK Verlagsgesellschaft.
Weinberger, David (2011), Too Big to Know: Rethinking Knowledge Now That the Facts Aren't the Facts, Experts Are Everywhere, and the Smartest Person in the Room. New York: Basic Books.
Weinberger, David (2008), Everything is Miscellaneous: The Power of Digital Disorder. New York: Henry Holt.
Weingart, Peter (1983), “Verwissenschaftlichung der Gesellschaft – Politisierung der Wissenschaft,” Zeitschrift für Soziologie 12:225–241.Google Scholar
Weir, Margarete (1992), “Ideas and the politics of bounded innovation,” pp. 188–216 in Steinmo, Sven, Thelen, Kathleen and Longstreth, Frank (eds.), Structuring Politics. Historical Institutionalism in Comparative Perspective. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Wejnert, Barbara (2005), “Diffusion, development, and democracy,” American Sociological Review 70:53–81.Google Scholar
Welzel, Christian and Inglehart, Ronald (2006), “Emancipative values and democracy: Response to Hadenius and Teorell,” Studies in Comparative International Development 41:74–94.Google Scholar
Welzel, Christian and Inglehart, Ronald (2005), “Demokratisierung und Freiheitsstreben: Die Perspektive der Humanentwicklung,” Politische Vierteljahreschrift 46:62–85.Google Scholar
Welzel, Christian, Inglehart, Ronald, and Klingemann, Hans-Dieter ([2001] 2003), “The theory of human development: a cross-cultural analysis,” European Journal of Political Research 42:341–379.Google Scholar
Westhoff, Laura M. (1995), “The popularization of knowledge: John Dewey on experts and American democracy,” History of Education Quarterly 35:27–47.Google Scholar
White, Richard (1995), The Organic Machine: The Remaking of the Columbia River. New York: Hill & Wang.
Whitehead, Laurence (2011), “Enlivening the concept of democratization: the biological metaphor,” Perspectives on Politics 9:291–299.Google Scholar
Wikström, Solveig and Normann, Richard (1994), Knowledge and Value: A New Perspective on Corporate Transformation. London: Routledge.
Wilkinson, Richard and Pickett, Kate (2009), The Spirit Level: Why More Equal Societies Almost Always Do Better. London: Penguin.
Williams, Raymond (1988), “Democracy,” in Williams, Raymond (ed.), Keywords. London: Fontana Press, pp. 93–98.
Wilson, William Julius (1987), The Truly Disadvantaged: The Inner City, the Underclass, and Public Policy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Wittgenstein, Ludwig (1969), On Certainty. Oxford: Blackwell.
Wittman, Donald (1989), “Why democracies produce efficient results,” The Journal of Political Economy 97:1395–1424.Google Scholar
Wittman, Donald (1995), The Myth of Democratic Failure: Why Political Institutions are Efficient. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Wittvogel, Karl August (1957), Oriental Despotism: A Comparative Study of Total Power. New Haven, Connecticut: Yale University Press.
Wnuk-Lipinski, Edmund (2007), “Civil society and democratization,” in Dalton, Russell J. and Klingemann, Hans-Dieter (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Political Behavior. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 675–692.
Woodberry, Robert D. (2012), “The missionary roots of liberal democracy,” American Political Science Review 106:244–274.Google Scholar
Wolak, Jennifer and McDevitt, Michael (2011), “The roots of the gender gap in political knowledge,” Political Behavior 33:505–533.Google Scholar
Wolfinger, Raymond E. and Rosenstone, Steven F. (1980), Who votes? New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Wolin, Sheldon S. (2001), Tocqueville between two Worlds: The Making of a Political and Theoretical Life. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Wolin, Sheldon S. (1994), “Fugitive democracy,” Constellations 1:11–25.Google Scholar
World Bank (1999), World Development Report: Knowledge for Development. New York: Oxford University Press.
Wu, Tim (2011), The Master Switch: The Rise and Fall of Information Empires. New York, New York: Knopf.
Young, Michael (1961), The Rise of Meritocracy. London: Penguin Books.
Zakaria, Fareed (2013), “Can America be fixed? The new crisis of democracy,” Foreign Affairs 92:22–33.Google Scholar
Zald, Meyer M. and McCarthy, John D. (eds.) (1987), Social Movements in an Organizational Society. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Books.
Zelenyi, Milan (1987), “Management support systems: Toward an integrated knowledge management,” Human Systems Management 7:59–70.Google Scholar
Ziman, John (2000), “Commentary on Michael Polanyi's The Republic of Science,” Minerva 38:21–25.Google Scholar
Zmerli, Sonja and Newton, Ken (2008), “Social trust and attitudes toward democracy,” Public Opinion Quarterly 72:706–724.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • Bibliography
  • Nico Stehr
  • Book: Information, Power, and Democracy
  • Online publication: 05 December 2015
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781316343159.011
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • Bibliography
  • Nico Stehr
  • Book: Information, Power, and Democracy
  • Online publication: 05 December 2015
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781316343159.011
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • Bibliography
  • Nico Stehr
  • Book: Information, Power, and Democracy
  • Online publication: 05 December 2015
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781316343159.011
Available formats
×