Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-nr4z6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-30T10:15:42.568Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

2 - What defines ecosystem services-based approaches?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 May 2015

Julia Martin-Ortega
Affiliation:
The James Hutton Institute
Diídac Jorda-Capdevila
Affiliation:
Autonomous University of Barcelona
Klaus Glenk
Affiliation:
Scotland's Rural College (SRUC)
Kirsty L. Holstead
Affiliation:
The James Hutton Institute
Julia Martin-Ortega
Affiliation:
The James Hutton Institute, Scotland
Robert C. Ferrier
Affiliation:
The James Hutton Institute, Scotland
Iain J. Gordon
Affiliation:
The James Hutton Institute, Scotland
Shahbaz Khan
Affiliation:
United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO), France
Get access

Summary

2.1 INTRODUCTION

It has long been held that human life depends on the existence of a finite natural resource base, and that nature contributes to the fulfilment of human needs (Malthus 1888; Meadows et al. 1972). This knowledge has led to different and evolving ways of understanding the relationship between humans and nature (Raymond et al. 2013). The notion of ecosystem services is one of these, which began to be developed in the late 1960s (King 1966; Helliwell 1969; Study of Critical Environmental Problems 1970; Odum and Odum 1972). How human needs and well-being interact with quantities and qualities of the finite natural resource base, and how changes to the natural environment impact on human activities and vice versa, are key questions underlying the conceptual development of ecosystem services and related concepts.

In 2000, the Secretary-General of the United Nations called for a worldwide initiative, the Millennium Ecosystem Assessment, ‘to assess the consequences of ecosystem change for human wellbeing and the scientific basis for action needed to enhance the conservation and sustainable use of those systems’ (Millennium Ecosystem Assessment 2003). Ecosystem services were defined as ‘the benefits that people obtain from ecosystems’ and the Millennium Ecosystem Assessment emphasised the need to incorporate the value of ecosystem services into decision-making to reverse increasing degradation of ecosystems. Since the publication of the Millennium Ecosystem Assessment in 2005, economic approaches to the understanding and management of natural resources based on the notion of ecosystem services have been increasingly discussed in the scientific literature (Fisher et al. 2009; Norgaard 2010; Ojea et al. 2012). The Millennium Ecosystem Assessment was followed by a number of other initiatives to assess ecosystem services, the most significant global assessment being The Economics of Ecosystem Services and Biodiversity (Kumar 2010). Other national-level assessments, for example, the UK National Ecosystem Assessment (2011; see Schaafsma et al., this book) and the Spanish Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (EME 2011) have also been published.

Type
Chapter
Information
Water Ecosystem Services
A Global Perspective
, pp. 3 - 14
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2015

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Azqueta, D. & Delacámara, G. (2006). Ethics, economics and environmental management. Ecological Economics 56(4), 524–533.Google Scholar
Bateman, I. J., Mace, G. M., Fezzi, C., et al. (2011). Economic analysis for ecosystem service assessments. Environmental and Resource Economics 48(2), 177–218.Google Scholar
Bingham, G., Bishop, R., Brody, M., et al. (1995). Issues in ecosystem valuation: improving information for decision making. Ecological Economics 4, 73–90.Google Scholar
Bockstael, N. E., Freeman, A. M., Koop, R. J., et al. (2000). On measuring economic values for nature. Environmental Science & Technology 34(8), 1384–1389.Google Scholar
Boyd, J. & Banzhaf, S. (2007). What are ecosystem services? The need for standardized environmental accounting units. Ecological Economics 63(2–3), 616–626.Google Scholar
Brouwer, R., Tesfaye, A., & Pauw, P. (2011). Meta-analysis of institutional-economic factors explaining the environmental performance of payments for watershed services. Environmental Conservation 38, 380–392.Google Scholar
Byg, A. (2015). Non-monetary valuation of ecosystem services. Report for the Scottish Government Research Portfolio Workpackage 1.2: The value of ecosystem services. The James Hutton Institute. http://www.hutton.ac.uk/research/themes/safeguarding-natnal-capital/research-outputs.
Common International Classification of Ecosystem Service (2012). Consultation on Version 4, August–December 2012. EEA Framework Contract No EEA/IEA/09/003. http://cices.eu (last accessed 5 June 2014).
Convention on Biological Diversity. (2006). Decision adopted by the conference of the 451 parties to the convention on biological diversity at its eighth meeting; VIII/9. 452 Implications of the findings of the millennium ecosystem assessment.
Corbera, E. & Pascual, U. (2012). Ecosystem services: heed social goals. Science 335(10), 355–356.Google Scholar
Costanza, R. & Daly, H. E. (1992). Natural capital and sustainable development. Conservation Biology 6(1), 37–46.Google Scholar
Costanza, R., d'Arge, R., De Groot, R. S., et al. (1997). The value of the world's ecosystem services and natural capital. Nature 387(6630), 253–260.Google Scholar
Daily, G. C. (1997). Nature's Services: Societal Dependence on Natural Ecosystems. Island Press, Washington, DC.
De Groot, R. S. (1992). Functions of Nature: Evaluation of Nature in Environmental Planning, Management and Decision Making. Wolters-Noordhoff, Groningen.
De Groot, R. S., Wilson, M. A., & Boumans, R. M. J. (2002). A typology for the classification, description and valuation of ecosystem functions, goods and services. Ecological Economics 41(3), 393–408.Google Scholar
Ecosystem Markets Task Force. (2013). Realising Nature's Value: Final Report. Available at www.defra.gov.uk/ecosystem-markets/files/Ecosystem-Markets-Task-Force-Final-Report-.pdf (last accessed 8 July 2013).
Edens, B. & Hein, L. (2013). Towards a consistent approach for ecosystem accounting. Ecological Economics 90, 41–52.Google Scholar
Ehrlich, P. R. & Ehrlich, A. H. (1992). The value of biodiversity. Ambio 21(3), 219–226.Google Scholar
Ehrlich, P. R. & Mooney, H. A. (1983). Extinction, substitution, and ecosystem services. BioScience 33(4), 248–254.Google Scholar
Ehrlich, P. R. & Wilson, E. O. (1991). Biodiversity studies: science and policy. Science 253, 758–762.Google Scholar
El Serafy, S. (1998). Pricing the invaluable: the value of the world's ecosystem services and natural capital. Ecological Economics 25(1), 25–27.Google Scholar
EME (Spanish Millennium Ecosystem Assessment) (2011). Ecosistemas y biodiversidad para el bienestar humano. Evaluación de los Ecosistemas del Milenio de España. Fundación Biodiversidad, Ministerio de Medio Ambiente y Medio Rural y Marino, Madrid.
Engel, S., Pagiola, S., & Wunder, S. (2008). Designing payments for environmental services in theory and practice: an overview of the issues. Ecological Economics 65(4), 663–674.Google Scholar
Fisher, B. & Turner, K. R. (2008). Ecosystem services: classification for valuation. Biological Conservation 141(5), 1167–1169.Google Scholar
Fisher, B., Turner, R. K., & Morling, P. (2009). Defining and classifying ecosystem services for decision making. Ecological Economics 68(3), 643–653.Google Scholar
Fu, B. J., Su, C. H., Wei, Y. P., et al. (2011). Double counting in ecosystem services valuation: causes and countermeasures. Ecological Research 26(1), 1–14.Google Scholar
Gómez-Baggethun, E., De Groot, R. S., Lomas, P. L., et al. (2010). The history of ecosystem services in economic theory and practice: from early notions to markets and payment schemes. Ecological Economics 69(6), 1209–1218.Google Scholar
Haines-Young, R. & Potschin, M. (2010). The links between biodiversity, ecosystem services and human well-being. In Ecosystem Ecology: A New Synthesis, ed. Raffaelli, D & Frid, C.. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 1–31.
Helliwell, D. R. (1969). Valuation of wildlife resources. Regional Studies 3, 41–49.Google Scholar
Houdet, J., Trommetter, M., & Weber, J. (2012). Understanding changes in business strategies regarding biodiversity and ecosystem services. Ecological Economics 73, 37–46.Google Scholar
Houdet, J., Burritt, R., Farrell, K., et al. (2014). What natural capital disclosure for integrated reporting? Designing & modelling an Integrated Financial–Natural Capital Accounting and Reporting Framework. Synergiz–ACTS, Working Paper 2014-01.
Ibarra, J. T., Barreau, A., del Campo, C., et al. (2011). When formal and market-based conservation mechanisms disrupt food sovereignty: impacts of community conservation and payments for environmental services on an indigenous community of Oaxaca, Mexico. International Forestry Review 13(3), 318–337.Google Scholar
Kenter, J. O., Bryce, R., Davies, A., et al. (2013). The Value of Potential Marine Protected Areas in the UK to Divers and Sea Anglers. UNEP-WCMC, Cambridge. http://uknea.unep-wcmc.org/LinkClick.aspx?fileticket=Mb8nUAphh%2BY%3D&tabid=82 (last accessed 21 October 2014).
King, R. T. (1966). Wildlife and man. NY Conservationist 20(6), 8–11.Google Scholar
Kosoy, N. & Corbera, E. (2010). Payments for ecosystem services as commodity fetishism. Ecological Economics 69, 1228–1236.Google Scholar
Kumar, P. (ed.) (2010). The Economics of Ecosystems and Biodiversity (TEEB): Ecological and Economic Foundations. Earthscan, London and Washington, DC.
Landell-Mills, N. & Porras, I. T. (2002). Silver Bullet or Fools’ Gold? A global Review of Markets for Forest Environmental Services and their Impact on the Poor. International Institute for Environment and Development, London.
Lele, S. (2009). Watershed services of tropical forests: from hydrology to economic valuation to integrated analysis. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability 1(2), 148–155.Google Scholar
Limburg, K. E. & Folke, C. (1999). The ecology of ecosystem services: introduction to the special issue. Ecological Economics 29(2), 179–182.Google Scholar
Malthus, T. R. (1888). An Essay on the Principle of Population: Or, A View of its Past and Present Effects on Human Happiness. Reeves and Turner, London.
Martinez-Alier, J., Munda, G., & O'Neill, J. (1998). Weak comparability of values as a foundation for ecological economics. Ecological Economics 26(3), 277–286.Google Scholar
Martin-Ortega, J. (2012). Economic prescriptions and policy applications in the implementation of the European Water Framework Directive. Environmental Sciences and Policy 24, 83–91.Google Scholar
Martin-Ortega, J., Ojea, E., & Roux, C. (2013). Payments for water ecosystem services in Latin America: a literature review and conceptual framework. Ecosystem Services (in press).
Meadows, D. H., Meadows, D. L., Randers, J., et al. (1972). Limits to Growth. Universe Books, New York.
Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (2003). Ecosystems and Human Well-being: A Framework for Assessment. Island Press, Washington, DC.
Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (2005). Ecosystems and Human Well-being: General Synthesis. Island Press, Washington, DC.
Ministry of Local Government and Rural Development of Malawi (2012). Revised decentralized environmental guidelines.
Nahlik, A. M., Kentula, M. E., Fennessy, M. S., et al. (2012). Where is the consensus? A proposed foundation for moving ecosystem service concepts into practice. Ecological Economics 77, 27–35.Google Scholar
Norgaard, R. B. (2010). Ecosystems services: from eye-opening metaphor to complexity blinder. Ecological Economics 69, 1219–1127.Google Scholar
Norgaard, R. B. & Bode, C. (1998). Next, the value of God, and other reactions. Ecological Economics, 25(1), 37–39.Google Scholar
Odum, E. P. & Odum, H. T. (1972). Natural areas as necessary components of man's total environment. Wildlife Management Institute, North American Wildlife and Natural Resources Conference, Washington, DC, Proceedings 37.
Ojea, E., Martin-Ortega, J., & Chiabai, A. (2012). Defining and classifying ecosystem services for economic valuation: the case of forest water services. Environmental Science & Policy 19–20, 1–15.Google Scholar
Pavese, H., Ceotto, P., & Ribeiro, F. (2012). TEEB for the Brazilian Business Sector: Preliminary Report. Conservation International.
Pearce, D. W. & Turner, R. K. (1989). Economics of Natural Resources and the Environment. Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, MD.
Peterson, M. J., Hall, D. M., Feldpausch-Parker, A. M., et al. (2010). Obscuring ecosystem function with application of the ecosystem services concept. Conservation Biology 24(1), 113–119.Google Scholar
Porras, I., Aylward, B., & Dengel, J. (2013). Monitoring Payments for Watershed Services Schemes in Developing Countries. International Institute for Environment and Development. http://pubs.iied.org/pdfs/16525IIED.pdf (last accessed 21 October 2014).
Porras, I., Dengel, J., & Aylward, B. (2012). Monitoring and evaluation of Payment for Watershed Service Schemes in developing countries. In: Proceedings of the 14th Annual BioEcon Conference on ‘Resource Economics, Biodiversity Conservation and Development’, 18–20 September 2012, Kings College, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
Proops, J. L. (1989). Ecological economics: rationale and problem areas. Ecological Economics 1(1), 59–76.Google Scholar
Raymond, C. M., Singh, G. G., Benessaiah, K., et al. (2013). Ecosystem services and beyond: using multiple metaphors to understand human–environment relationships. American Institute of Biological Sciences 63(7), 536–546.Google Scholar
Schomers, S. & Matzdorf, B. (2013). Payments for ecosystem services: a review and comparison of developing and industrialized countries. Ecosystem Services 6, 16–30.Google Scholar
Scott, A., Carter, C., Hölzinger, O., et al. (2014). Tools – applications, benefits and linkages for ecosystem science (TABLES). Report for the National Ecosystem Assessment follow-on.
Spangenbergh, J. H. & Settele, J. (2010). Precisely incorrect? Monetising the value of ecosystem services. Ecological Complexity 7(3), 327–337.Google Scholar
Study of Critical Environmental Problems (1970). Man's Impact on the Global Environment. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA and London.
UK National Ecosystem Assessment (2011). The UK National Ecosystem Assessment: Synthesis of the Key Findings. UNEP-WCMC, Cambridge.
UK National Ecosystem Assessment (2014). The UK National Ecosystem Assessment Follow-on: Synthesis of the Key Findings. UNEP-WCMC, Cambridge.
Wallace, K. J. (2007). Classification of ecosystem services: problems and solutions. Biological Conservation 139(3), 235–246.Google Scholar
Waylen, K. & Martin-Ortega, J. (2013). Report on Knowledge Exchange Workshops on an Ecosystem Services Approach. WATERS Project: Towards Equitable Resource Management Strategies, Malawi. Available at www.hutton.ac.uk/research/themes/managing-catchments-and-coasts/ecosystem-services/water-futures (last accessed 8 July 2013).
Waylen, K. A., Blackstock, K., & Holstead, K. L. (2013). Exploring experiences of the Ecosystem Approach. Research report, available at www.hutton.ac.uk/sites/default/files/files/Report on EcA review Final.pdf (last accessed 21 October 2014).
Waylen, K. A., Hastings, E., Banks, E., et al. (2014). The need to disentangle key concepts from Ecosystem Approach jargon. Conservation Biology (in press).
WBCSD (2014). Website available at www.wbcsd.org/home.aspx (last accessed 10 April 2014).
Westman, W. E. (1977). How much are nature's services worth? Science 197(4307), 960.Google Scholar
Wunder, S., Engel, S., & Pagiola, S. (2008). Taking stock: a comparative analysis of payments for environmental services programs in developed and developing countries. Ecological Economics 65(4), 834–852.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×