Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-r5zm4 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-01T21:47:26.611Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

3 - Pharmacology of local anesthetics in children

from Section 1 - Principles and practice

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 September 2015

Christina Van Horn
Affiliation:
Creighton University Medical Center, Omaha, NE, USA
Mark D. Reisbig
Affiliation:
Creighton University Medical Center, Omaha, NE, USA
Stephen Mannion
Affiliation:
University College Cork
Gabrielle Iohom
Affiliation:
University College Cork
Christophe Dadure
Affiliation:
Hôpital Lapeyronie, Montpellier
Mark D. Reisbig
Affiliation:
Creighton University Medical Center, Omaha, Nebraska
Arjunan Ganesh
Affiliation:
Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia
Get access

Summary

Introduction

Regional anesthesia has been shown to have a number of benefits including a reduction in stress response and inflammation, reduced opioid consumption and related side effects, and better post-operative analgesia (Roberts, 2006).

The use of local anesthetic (LA) is a prerequisite for successful nerve blockade; however, adverse outcomes such as prolonged neural blockade and systemic LA toxicity (LAST) may occur.

The safe performance of regional anesthesia requires a thorough knowledge and understanding of LA pharmacology. There are a number of important pharmacologic properties of LAs in pediatric patients, especially neonates and infants (<1 year of age) that differ from the adult patient.

This chapter will highlight these important differences, as well as the basic principles of LA pharmacology.

Mechanism of action (pharmacodynamics)

LAs exist in two forms, ionized hydrophilic (BH+) and non-ionized lipophilic (B). The non-ionized lipophilic form passes through the hydrophobic cell membrane rapidly. Once in the cytoplasm, the non-ionized and ionized fractions reach equilibrium (B + H+ ⇌ BH+). The ionized fraction is active and binds to the membrane-bound, voltage-gated sodium channels involved in the propagation of signaling. The sodium channel exists in one of three conformational states. The channel is closed when “resting” or “inactivated,” and open when “activated.” The membrane potential affects the conformational state, with depolarization leading to more open channels. LAs have a greater affinity for the sodium channel when it is in the “activated” conformation; thus, when nerve signals fire more frequently, LA affinity for the sodium channel increases. This results in an increased portion of blocked channels (Figure 3.1).

The channels become activated after chemical, mechanical, or electrical stimuli (i.e. pain impulse). As sodium ions enter into the cell an action potential is generated that is conducted as a nerve impulse (Figure 3.2). LAs bind and inhibit the sodium channels From inside the cell via reversible ionic interactions with the alpha subunit of the sodium channel. It is the ionized fraction that binds with higher affinity and dissociates from the channel subunit at a slower rate. This prevents cell membrane depolarization by blocking sodium ions from entering into the cell and preventing the channel from changing its conformation. The resulting interruption of signal conduction blocks pain transmission and can also lead to motor blockade.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2015

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Berde, C. (2004) Local anesthetics in infants and children: an update. Paediatr Anaesth. 14,387–93.Google Scholar
Berde, C, Greco, C. (2012) Pediatric regional anesthesia: drawing inferences on safety from prospective registries and case reports. Anesth Analg. 115 (6),1259–62.Google Scholar
Berde, C, Strichartz, G. (2010) Local anesthetics. In Miller, R. ed. Miller's Anesthesia, . Philadelphia, PA: Churchill Livingstone.
Dalens, B. (2010) Regional anesthesia in children. In Miller, R. ed. Miller's Anesthesia, . Philadelphia, PA: Churchill Livingstone.
Davis, P, Bosenberg, A, Davidson, A, et al. (2011) Pharmacology of pediatric anesthesia. In Davis, P, Cladis, F, Motoyama, E. eds. Smith's Anesthesia for Infants and Children, . Philadelphia, PA: Elsevier Mosby.
Lönnqvist, PA. (2012) Toxicity of local anesthetic drugs: a pediatric perspective. Paediatr Anaesth. 22,39–43.Google Scholar
Marhofer, P, Frickey, N. (2006) Ultrasonographic guidance in pediatric regional anesthesia part 1: theoretical. Paediatr Anaesth. 16,1008–18.Google Scholar
Mazoit, JX, Dalens, B. (2004) Pharmacokinetics of local anaesthetics in infants and children. Clin Pharmacokinet. 43(1),17–32.Google Scholar
Meunier, JX, Goujard, E, Dubousset, AM, Kamran, S. (2011) Pharmacokinetics of bupivacaine after continuous epidural infusion in infants with and without biliary atresia. Anesthesiology. 95(1),87–95.Google Scholar
Neal, J, Bernards, C, Butterworth, J, et al. (2010) ASRA practice advisory on local anesthetic systemic toxicity. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 35(2),152–61.Google Scholar
Polaner, DM, Zuk, J, Luong, K, Pan, Z. (2010). Positive intravascular test dose criteria in children during total intravenous anesthesia with propofol and remifentanil are different than during inhaled anesthesia. Anesth Analg. 110,41–5.Google Scholar
Polaner, DM, Taenzer, A, Walker, B, et al. (2012) Pediatric regional and network (PRAN) a multi-institutional study of the use and incidence of complications in pediatric regional anesthesia. Anesth Analg. 115(6),1352–64.Google Scholar
Presley, J, Chyka, P. (2013) Intravenous lipid emulsion to reverse acute drug toxicity in pediatric patients. Ann Pharmacother. 47,735–43.Google Scholar
Roberts, S. (2006) Ultrasonographic guidance in pediatric regional anesthesia. Part 2: techniques. Paediatr Anaesth. 16,1112–24.Google Scholar
Stoelting, R, Hillier, S. (2006) Pharmacology & Physiology in Anesthetic Practice, . Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×