Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-25wd4 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-27T18:19:22.012Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

7 - The coalition and energy policy

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 April 2015

Dieter Helm
Affiliation:
University of Oxford
Anthony Seldon
Affiliation:
Wellington College, Berkshire
Mike Finn
Affiliation:
Liverpool Hope University
Get access

Summary

The coalition came to power with a ready-made energy policy developed under Labour. The Secretary of State was Ed Miliband, and his policy as it played out under the coalition was to prove the basis of a return to a level of state intervention not seen since the days of the CEGB, British Gas and the nationalized industries. By the general election in 2015, an almost complete U-turn had been performed, abandoning most of the liberalized and competitive structures that had been the hallmark of British energy policy for a quarter of a century.

How did a Conservative-dominated government come to preside over such a profound reversal to their policy heritage from the Thatcherite years? Why did they allow this to happen? The answers lie in the path dependency which Labour had created towards ever-greater intervention and the ceding by the Conservatives of energy policy to the Liberal Democrats as part of the price of coalition. It was something the Conservatives would come to regret, forcing the Chancellor and his allies to fight a rearguard action. Worse still, the coalition was to preside over a big increase in the coal burn, a rise in carbon dioxide emissions in 2013, a political rebellion on prices, and come perilously close to provoking a security of supply crisis. No one could describe coalition energy policy as a success.

The Labour legacy

Labour in government had agonized over energy policy. Having reviewed regulation following the 1997 election, there were major energy policy reviews after both the 2001 and the 2005 general elections. The 2001 policy review came after the Royal Commission on Environmental Pollution (RCEP) had recommended a 60 per cent cut in emissions over the next fifty years. The 2005 review was a battle as much about the role of nuclear (which Blair favoured) and finding a way back for coal on security of supply grounds as it was about climate change.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2015

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×