Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-n9wrp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-17T17:35:45.849Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

3 - Ideological Origins of Open Standards II: American Standards, 1910s–1930s

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 June 2014

Andrew L. Russell
Affiliation:
Stevens Institute of Technology, New Jersey
Get access

Summary

We do not leave to Congress, or to the vote of 110,000,000 people, the decision whether a bridge shall be built in the city of Oshkosh. We leave it to the people of Oshkosh, who will walk over it and ride over it, and who will have to pay for it. Why should not the very limited groups directly interested in each of the innumerable industrial problems with which they are faced, themselves solve these problems through coöperative effort?

– Paul Gough Agnew “A Step Toward Industrial Self-Government,” 1926

In the late afternoon of June 15, 1922, Herbert Hoover dropped in to a meeting of forty-four engineers who had assembled in a conference room at his Department of Commerce in Washington, D.C. Hoover, who earned international fame as the “Great Humanitarian” by guiding relief efforts during World War I, turned his talents and energies toward the American economy when he was named secretary of commerce by Warren Harding in 1921. Hoover was, in the pre-Depression era, a living and breathing icon of the triumph of rationality, organization, and the progressive spirit of the engineering profession – the “engineering method personified” in the words of one admiring colleague.

Several of Hoover’s contemporaries – such as the social theorist Thorstein Veblen and the radical engineers Howard Scott and Morris Cooke – believed that technical expertise could reform society and engineer a new age of efficiency and abundance. But the meeting at the Department of Commerce was not some sort of revolutionary “Soviet of Technicians.” Instead, it was a meeting of the leaders of the American Engineering Standards Committee (AESC), a private group of engineers who had a more modest and pragmatic goal: to order the inconsistent patchwork of codes, tests, and standards used in American industrial practice. Although the AESC sought (and found) support from Hoover and other government officials, their method of work – consistent with the American mentality that Tocqueville observed in the mid-nineteenth century – depended on private cooperation to create standards that would, in turn, be adopted on a voluntary basis throughout American industry. Unlike their peers abroad, they did not depend on kings (Tocqueville’s “men of rank”) or presidents (“men of government”). Instead, their success would hinge on their ability to convince industrial managers and executives that industry standards would make business less wasteful and more profitable.

Type
Chapter
Information
Open Standards and the Digital Age
History, Ideology, and Networks
, pp. 58 - 94
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2014

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Agnew, P. G., “A Step toward Industrial Self-Government,” The New Republic (March 17, 1926), 95Google Scholar
Cooke, Morris L., quoted in Layton, Edwin T., The Revolt of the Engineers: Social Responsibility and the American Engineering Profession (Cleveland, OH: Press of Case Western Reserve University, 1971), 179Google Scholar
Galambos, Louis, “Technology, Political Economy, and Professionalization: Central Themes of the Organizational Synthesis,” Business History Review 57 (1983): 471–493CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Diner, Steven J., A Very Different Age: Americans of the Progressive Era (New York: Hill and Wang, 1998)Google Scholar
Rodgers, Daniel T., Atlantic Crossings: Social Politics in a Progressive Age (Boston: Harvard University Press, 2000)Google Scholar
Noble, David F., America by Design: Science, Technology, and the Rise of Corporate Capitalism (New York: Oxford University Press, 1977)Google Scholar
Adams, Comfort A., “Industrial Standardization,” Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 82, Industries in Readjustment (1919): 292–296CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rowland, Henry A., “Screw,” Encyclopedia Britannica Ninth Edition, Volume XXI (1900), 506–511Google Scholar
Cochrane, Rexmond C., Measures for Progress: A History of the National Bureau of Standards (Washington, DC: Department of Commerce, 1966), 84–86Google Scholar
Rice, Calvin W., quoted in LePage, Clifford B., “Twenty-Five Years – The American Standards Association (1. Origins),” Industrial Standardization (1943): 318Google Scholar
Maistre, Charles le, “Summary of the Work of the British Engineering Standards Association,” Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 82 (1919): 247–252CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yates, JoAnne and Murphy, Craig N., “Charles Le Maistre: Entrepreneur in International Standardization,” Enterprises et Histoire 51 (2008): 10–57CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maistre, Charles le, “Standardization,” Transactions of the AIEE 35 (1916): 489–500Google Scholar
Adams, Comfort A., “National Standards Movement – Its Evolution and Future,” in Reck, Dickson, ed. National Standards in a Modern Economy (New York: Harper, 1956)Google Scholar
Agnew, P. G., “Twenty Years of Standardization,” Industrial Standardization (1938): 229Google Scholar
Adams, Comfort A., “How the AESC Was Organized,” Industrial Standardization (1938): 237–238Google Scholar
Tate, Jay, “National Varieties of Standardization,” in Hall, Peter A. and Soskice, David, eds., Varieties of Capitalism: The Institutional Foundations of Comparative Advantage (New York: Oxford University Press, 2001), 442–473CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cuff, Robert D., The War Industries Board: Business-Government Relations during World War I (Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press, 1973), 15–30Google Scholar
Tobey, Ronald C., The American Ideology of National Science, 1919–1930 (Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press, 1971), xii, 3–96Google Scholar
Agnew, Paul G., “Historical Memoranda to H (for Mrs. Moffett), 9/3/48, in Agnew, P. G., Historical and Policy Papers (New York: American Standards Association, 1920–1952), 335Google Scholar
May, Henry, The End of American Innocence: A Study of the First Years of Our Own Time, 1912–1917 (New York: Knopf, 1959)Google Scholar
Kargon, Robert H., “Introduction,” in Kargon, Robert H., ed., The Maturing of American Science (Washington, DC: American Association for the Advancement of Science, 1974), 1–29Google Scholar
Skocpol, Theda et al., “Patriotic Partnerships: Why Great Wars Nourished American Civic Voluntarism,” in Katznelson, Ira and Shefter, Martin, eds., Shaped by War and Trade: International Influences on American Political Development (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2002), 134–180Google Scholar
Skowronek, Stephen, Building a New American State: The Expansion of National Administrative Capacities, 1877–1920 (New York: Cambridge University Press, 1982)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sklar, Martin J., The Corporate Reconstruction of American Capitalism, 1890–1916: The Market, the Law, and Politics (New York: Cambridge University Press, 1988)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaidanovsky, S. P., “Personalia: Dr. P. G. Agnew,” Standards World 1 (1949): 113–114Google Scholar
Agnew, P. G., “A Study of the Current Transformer with Particular Reference to Iron Loss,” Bulletin of the Bureau of Standards 7 (1911): 423–474CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Agnew, P. G., “A Device for Measuring the Torque of Electrical Instruments,” Bulletin of the Bureau of Standards 7 (1911): 45–48CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Agnew, P. G., Stannard, W. H., and Fearing, J. L., “A System of Remote Control for an Electric Testing Laboratory,” Scientific Papers of the Bureau of Standards, No. 291 (Washington, DC: Government Printing Office, 1916)Google Scholar
Agnew, P. G., “A New Form of Vibration Galvanometer,” Scientific Papers of the Bureau of Standards, No. 370 (Washington, DC: Government Printing Office, 1920)Google Scholar
Agnew, P. G., “The Work of the Bureau of Standards,” Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 82 (1919): 278–288CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Agnew, P. G., “The Movement for Standards for Consumer Goods,” Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 137 (1934): 60–69CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wolf, Irwin D., “Consumer Goods Standards – the Retailer’s Viewpoint,” both in Reck, ed., National Standards in a Modern Economy, 125–136 and 269–274
Agnew, P. G., “Standardization,” Encyclopedia Britannica, 14th ed. (1940), reprinted as “Standards in Our Social Order,” Industrial Standardization and Commercial Standards Monthly 11 (1940): 7Google Scholar
Tanner, William R., “Secretary of Commerce Hoover’s War on Waste, 1921–1928,” in Krog, Carl E. and Tanner, William R., eds., Herbert Hoover and the Republican Era: A Reconsideration (New York: University Press of America, 1984), 1–35Google Scholar
Aldrich, Mark, Safety First: Technology, Labor, and Business in the Building of American Work Safety, 1870–1939 (Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press, 1997)Google Scholar
Knowles, Scott Gabriel, The Disaster Experts: Mastering Risk in Modern America (Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lloyd, M. G., “The Safety Code Work of the Bureau of Standards,” Industrial Standardization (1933): 203–206Google Scholar
Schaack, David van, “Development of Standard Safety Codes,” Safety Engineering 56 (September 1928): 83–86Google Scholar
Agnew, P. G., “Twenty-Five Years – The American Standards Association (2. Development of the ASA),” Industrial Standardization (1943): 322Google Scholar
Agnew, P. G., “The National Safety Code Program,” Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 123 (1926): 51–54CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Agnew, P. G., “Twenty Years of Standardization,” 232–233; “States Curb Loss of Life by Using American Standard Safety Codes,” Industrial Standardization 6 (1935): 266–270Google Scholar
Peat, Leslie, “The Place of Safety Codes in the Industries,” Safety Engineering 70 (1935): 173–174Google Scholar
Whitney, Albert Wurts, The Place of Standardization in Modern Life (Washington, DC: Government Printing Office, 1924)Google Scholar
Agnew, P. G., “Results of Standardization of Supplies,” Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 133 (1924): 269–271CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chase, Stuart and Schlink, F. J., “A Few Billions for Consumers,” The New Republic (December 20, 1925): 153–155Google Scholar
Chase, Stuart and Schlink, F. J., “A Few Billions for Consumers,” The New Republic (January 6, 1926): 180–182Google Scholar
Agnew, P. G., “Can Industry Make Its Own Law?Mining Congress Journal 13 (1927): 257–259Google Scholar
Agnew, P. G., “Work of the American Engineering Standards Committee,” Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 137 (1928): 13–16CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coonley, Howard and Agnew, P. G., The Role of Standards in the System of Free Enterprise: A Study of Voluntary Standards as Alternative to Legislative and Commission Control. Prepared by Request of the Temporary National Economic Committee (New York: American Standards Association, 1941)Google Scholar
Agnew, P. G., “How Business Is Policing Itself,” The Nation’s Business (December 1925), 41–43Google Scholar
Briggs, Lyman J., “The American Standards Association and The National Bureau of Standards,” Industrial Standardization (1938): 239Google Scholar
Agnew, P. G., “Labor Representation and Membership in ASA,” XX 766, April 20, 1949, Historical and Policy Papers, 483–485Google Scholar
Montgomery, David, Workers’ Control in America: Studies in the History of Work, Technology, and Labor Struggles (New York: Cambridge University Press, 1979), 113–134Google Scholar
Slaton, Amy E., Reinforced Concrete and the Modernization of American Building, 1900–1930 (Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press, 2001)Google Scholar
Downey, Gregory J., Telegraph Messenger Boys: Labor, Technology, and Geography, 1850–1950 (New York: Routledge, 2002)Google Scholar
Moskowitz, Marina, Standard of Living: The Measure of the Middle Class in Modern America (Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press, 2004)Google Scholar
Hoyt, Homer, “Standardization and Its Relation to Industrial Concentration,” Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 82, Industries in Readjustment (1919): 271–277CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ford, Henry, with Crowther, Samuel, Moving Forward (Garden City, NJ: Doubleday, Doran & Co., 1930), 28–29Google Scholar
Hoover, Herbert, “The Crusade for Standards,” in Reck, Dickson, ed., National Standards in a Modern Economy (New York: Harper and Brothers, 1956)Google Scholar
Hawley, Ellis W., “Herbert Hoover, the Commerce Secretariat, and the Vision of an ‘Associative State,’ 1921–1928,” Journal of American History 61 (1974): 116–140CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hawley, Ellis W., “Three Facets of Hooverian Associationalism: Lumber, Aviation, and Movies, 1921–1930,” in McCraw, Thomas K., ed., Regulation in Perspective: Historical Essays (Boston: Harvard University Press, 1981), 95–123Google Scholar
Hart, David M., Forged Consensus: Science, Technology, and Economic Policy in the United States, 1921–1953 (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1998)Google Scholar
Hart, David M., “Herbert Hoover’s Last Laugh: The Enduring Significance of the ‘Associative State,’” Journal of Policy History 10 (1998): 419–444CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Federated American Engineering Societies, Waste in Industry (New York: McGraw-Hill, 1921), vi, ix, 33Google Scholar
Hudson, Ray M., “Organized Effort in Simplification,” Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 137 (1928): 1–8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jones, Franklin D., Trade Association Activities and the Law: A Discussion of the Legal and Economic Aspects of Collective Action through Trade Organizations (New York: McGraw-Hill, 1922)Google Scholar
National Industrial Conference Board, Trade Associations, Their Economic Significance and Legal Status (New York: National Industrial Conference Board, 1925)Google Scholar
Montague, Gilbert H., “New Opportunities and Responsibilities of Trade Associations as a Result of Recent United States Supreme Court Decisions,” Proceedings of the Academy of Political Science in the City of New York 11 (1926): 27CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Galambos, Louis, Cooperation and Competition: The Emergence of a National Trade Association (Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press, 1966), 80–101Google Scholar
Barber, William J., From New Era to New Deal: Herbert Hoover, the Economists, and American Economic Policy, 1921–1933 (New York: Cambridge University Press, 1985), 7–13CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carrott, M. Browning, “The Supreme Court and Trade Associations, 1921–1925,” Business History Review 44 (1970): 320–338CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whitney, Simon N., Trade Associations and Industrial Control: A Critique of the NRA (New York: Central Book Company, 1934), 32–60Google Scholar
Olshan, Marc A., “Standards-Making Organizations and the Rationalization of American Life,” The Sociological Quarterly 34 (1993): 319–335CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Serrill, William J., “President’s Report,” American Standards Year Book (New York: American Standards Association, 1930), 9–10Google Scholar
Chandler, Alfred D., Jr. The Visible Hand: The Managerial Revolution in American Business (Cambridge, MA: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, 1977)Google Scholar
Hughes, Thomas P., American Genesis: A Century of Invention and Technological Enthusiasm, 1870–1970 (New York: Penguin, 1990)Google Scholar
Brady, Robert A., Industrial Standardization (New York: National Industrial Conference Board, 1929), 101 (emphasis added)Google Scholar
Harriman, Norman F., Standards and Standardization (New York: McGraw-Hill, 1928)Google Scholar
Meiksins, Peter, “The ‘Revolt of the Engineers’ Reconsidered,” Technology and Culture 29 (1988): 219–246CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Akin, William E., Technocracy and the American Dream: The Technocrat Movement, 1900–1941 (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1977)Google Scholar
Ninkovich, Frank, “Ideology, the Open Door, and Foreign Policy,” Diplomatic History 6 (1982): 185–208CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×