Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-x5gtn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-01T16:50:53.333Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

6 - Between Merit and Pedigree

Evolution of the Concept of “Elevating the Worthy” in Pre-imperial China

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 June 2014

Daniel A. Bell
Affiliation:
Tsinghua University, Beijing
Chenyang Li
Affiliation:
Nanyang Technological University, Singapore
Get access

Summary

Western admirers of Chinese civilization – from the French intellectuals of the age of Enlightenment, to the doyen of modern Sinology, John K. Fairbank (1907–91), to countless current scholars – remain fascinated with China's perceived ideology and practice of meritocracy. Doubtlessly, these admirers have the point. The idea of “elevating the worthy” (shang xian 尚賢) became one of the cornerstones of China's political ideology ever since the Warring States period (Zhanguo 戰國, 453–221 b.c.e.); through much of the imperial period most of the males were technically legible for promotion into the government apparatus; and Chinese history provides not a few examples of persons from a relatively humble background who made their way to the top of the political ladder. In all these aspects, Chinese civilization differs markedly from aristocratic cultures elsewhere, such as medieval Europe, in which the pedigree normally played the decisive role in determining one's future.

This background makes it tempting to proclaim meritocracy to be an essential feature of Chinese civilization, such as, supposedly, the family-oriented ethics, ritual-based social hierarchy and the monarchic political system. Yet a closer look at Chinese history would disclose not only that meritocratic ideas and practices did not develop before the Warring States period, but also that their introduction was accompanied by multiple tensions. These tensions, for example, between the principle of “elevating the worthy” and the ongoing importance of family and of pedigree; between meritocratic government and the hereditary monarchy; and, most significantly, among conflicting views of “worth” (xian 賢) and “merits” (gong 功) stand at the focus of my chapter. In what follows, through highlighting ideological debates over these issues during the Warring States period, the formative age of Chinese political tradition, and through contextualizing these debates in contemporaneous political practices, I hope to demonstrate the essentially contradictory nature of “elevating the worthy” discourse.

Type
Chapter
Information
The East Asian Challenge for Democracy
Political Meritocracy in Comparative Perspective
, pp. 161 - 202
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2013

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Creel, Herrlee G., The Origins of Statecraft in China (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1970), pp. 22–3Google Scholar
Fairbank, John K. and Reischauer, Edwin O., China: Transition and Transformation: Revised Edition (Boston: Houghton Mifflin Company, 1989), p. 69.Google Scholar
Li, Feng, Bureaucracy and the State in Early China: Governing the Western Zhou (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2008), pp. 190–234Google Scholar
Shaughnessy, , “Western Zhou History,” in Loewe, Michael and Shaughnessy, Edward L., eds., The Cambridge History of Ancient China (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999), pp. 315–17.Google Scholar
Schaberg, David C., A Patterned Past: Form and Thought in Early Chinese Historiography (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Asia Center, 2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yuri, Pines, Foundations of Confucian Thought: Intellectual Life in the Chunqiu Period, 722–453 B.C.E. (Honolulu: University of Hawai'i Press, 2002)Google Scholar
Wai-yee, Li, The Readability of the Past in Early Chinese Historiography (Harvard East Asian Monographs; Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Asia Center, 2007)Google Scholar
Zhu Fenghan, 朱鳳瀚, Shang Zhou jiazu xingtai yanjiu 商周家族形態研究 (Tianjin: Guji chubanshe, 1990), pp. 450–593Google Scholar
Falkenhausen, Lothar von, Chinese Society in the Age of Confucius (1050–250 B.C.): The Archeological Evidence (Los Angeles: Cotsen Institute of Archaeology at UCLA, 2006), pp. 29–73Google Scholar
Pines, Yuri, “Disputers of the Li: Breakthroughs in the Concept of Ritual in Preimperial China,” Asia Major Third Series, vol. 13, no. 1 (2000), 1–41Google Scholar
Hsu, Cho-yun, Ancient China in Transition: An Analysis of Social Mobility, 722–222 B.C. (Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1965), pp. 26–31Google Scholar
Chunqiu Zuo zhuan zhu 春秋左傳注, annotated by Yang, Bojun 楊伯峻 (Beijing: Zhonghua shuju, 1981, hereafter Zuo)
Qian, Zongfan 錢宗範, “Xi Zhou Chunqiu shidai de shilu shiguan zhidu ji qi pohuai” 西周春秋時代的世祿世官制度及其破壞, Zhongguoshi yanjiu中國史研究, no. 3 (1989), pp. 20–30Google Scholar
Mattos, Gilbert L. (“Eastern Zhou Bronze Inscriptions,” in Shaughnessy, Edward L., ed., New Sources of Early Chinese History: An Introduction to Reading Inscriptions and Manuscripts [Berkeley: Society for Study of Early China, 1997], pp. 86–7)Google Scholar
Boxiong, Zhao 趙伯雄, Zhoudai guojia xingtai yanjiu 周代國家形態研究 (Changsha: Hunan jiaoyu, 1990), pp. 237–51.Google Scholar
Falkenhausen, Lothar von, “Social Ranking in Chu Tombs: The Mortuary Background of the Warring States Manuscript Finds,” Monumenta Serica vol. 51 (2003), pp. 439–526CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yin, Qun 印群, Huanghe zhongxiayou diqu de Dong Zhou muzang zhidu 黃河中下游地區的東周墓葬制度 (Beijing: Shehui kexue chubanshe, 2001)Google Scholar
Yuri, Envisioning Eternal Empire: Chinese Political Thought of the Warring States Era (Honolulu: University of Hawai'i Press, 2009), pp. 116–9Google Scholar
Yu, Yingshi 余英時, Shi yu Zhongguo wenhua 士與中國文化 (Shanghai: Shanghai renmin chubanshe, 1987), pp. 26–33Google Scholar
Lewis, Mark E., Writing and Authority in Early China (Albany: State University Press of New York, 1999), pp. 53–97Google Scholar
Liu, Zehua 劉澤華, Xian Qin shi ren yu shehui 先秦士人與社會, rev. ed. (Tianjin: Tianjin renmin chubanshe, 2004), pp. 22–39 and 113–19Google Scholar
Lunyu yizhu 論語譯注, annotated by Yang Bojun 楊伯峻 (Beijing: Zhonghua shuju, 1992)
John, Makeham, “The Formation of Lunyu as a Book,” Monumenta Serica vol. 44, (1996), pp. 1–24Google Scholar
Bruce E, Brooks, and Taeko, A. Brooks, The Original Analects: Sayings of Confucius and His Successors (New York: Columbia University Press, 1998)Google Scholar
Goldin, Paul R. (“Confucius and His Disciples in the Analects: Or, Why the Traditional Chronology is Right,” Paper presented at Princeton University, 2011)
Pu Maozuo 濮茅左, in Shanghai bowuguan cang Zhanguo Chu zhushu, vol. 5 [2006], pp. 193–235)
Mozi jiaozhu 墨子校注, compiled and annotated by Yujiang, Wu 吳毓江 (Beijing: Zhonghua shuju, 1994)
yizhu 孟子譯注, annotated by Yang Bojun楊伯峻 (Beijing: Zhonghua shuju, 1992)
Graham, Angus C., Disputers of the Tao: Philosophical Argument in Ancient China (La Salle, IL: Open Court, 1989), p. 115.Google Scholar
Xianghui, Wang 王向輝, “Xian Qin Rujia shangxian guannian de fazhan qianxi” 先秦儒家尚賢觀念的發展淺析, Shangluo xueyuan xuebao 商洛學院學報, no. 1 (2008), pp. 59–60.Google Scholar
Garet, Olberding, ed., Facing the Monarch: Modes of Advice in the Early Chinese Court (Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press 2013), pp. 69–99.
Goldin, Paul R., Rituals of the Way: The Philosophy of Xunzi (Chicago: Open Court, 1999)Google Scholar
Sato, Masayuki, The Confucian Quest for Order: The Origin and Formation of the Political Thought of Xun Zi (Leiden: Brill, 2003)Google Scholar
Henry, Eric, “The Motif of Recognition in Early China,” Harvard Journal of Asiatic Studies, vol. 47 (1987), pp. 5–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Galvany, Albert, “Sly Mouths and Silver Tongues: The dynamics of psychological persuasion in ancient China,” Extrême-Orient, Extrême-Occident 34 (2012), pp. 15–40.
Yi Zhou shu 逸周書, annotated by Zhang Wenyu 張聞玉 (Guiyang: Guizhou renmin chubanshe, 2000)
Richter, Matthias, Guan ren: Texte der altchinesischen Literatur zur Charakterkunde und Beamtenrekrutierung (Welten Ostasiens 3; Bern: Peter Lang, 2005)Google Scholar
Scott, Cook, “The Lüshi chunqiu and the Resolution of Philosophical Dissonance,” Harvard Journal of Asiatic Studies, vol. 62 (2002), pp. 307–45.Google Scholar
Lüshi chunqiu jiaoshi 呂氏春秋校釋, compiled and annotated by Chen Qiyou 陳奇猷 (Shanghai: Xuelin, 1990)
Nei Menggu minzu daxue xuebao (shehui kexue ban) 内蒙古民族大學學報(社會科學版) no. 4 (2004), pp. 42–4
Pines, Yuri, “Lexical changes in Zhanguo texts,” Journal of the American Oriental Society vol. 122, no. 4 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chunlong, Zhang 張春龍, “Cili Chu jian gaishu” 慈利楚簡概述, in Xin chu jianbo yanjiu 新出簡帛研究, eds. Sarah Allan (Ailan 艾蘭) and Xing Wen 邢文 (Beijing: Wenwu, 2004), pp. 4–11Google Scholar
Yuri, Pines, “Disputers of Abdication: Zhanguo Egalitarianism and the Sovereign's Power,” T’oung Pao, vol. 91 (2005), pp. 243–300Google Scholar
The Shen-tzu Fragments, compiled by Thompson, P. M. (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1979)Google Scholar
Shang jun shu zhuizhi 商君書錐指, annotated by Lihong, Jiang 蔣禮鴻 (Beijing: Zhonghua shuju, 1996)Google Scholar
Han Feizi xin jiaozhu 韩非子新校, compiled by Qiyou, Chen 陳奇猷 (Shanghai: Guji chubanshe, 2009)Google Scholar
Boshu Laozi jiaozhu 帛書老子校注, compiled and annotated by Gao Ming 高明 (Beijing: Zhonghua shuju, 1996)
Zhuangzi jinzhu jinyi 莊子今注今譯, Annotated by Chen Guying 陳鼓應, (Beijing: Zhonghua shuju, 1994)
Goldin, Paul R., “Persistent Misconceptions about Chinese ‘Legalism,’Journal of Chinese Philosophy, vol. 38 (2011), pp. 64–80CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yuan, Lihua 袁禮華, “Zhong xian bu shang xian, yong xian qie fang xian: Han Fei xiannengguan chutan” 重賢不尚賢 用賢且防賢 – 韓非賢能觀初探, Nanchang daxue xuebao (renwen shehui kexueban) 南昌大學學報(人文社會科學版), vol. 1 (2005), pp. 59–63Google Scholar
Hebei xuekan 河北學刊, vol. 5 (2010), pp. 63–6
Goldin, Paul R., “Han Fei's Doctrine of Self-Interest,” in idem, After Confucius: Studies in Early Chinese Philosophy (Honolulu: University of Hawai'i Press, 2005), pp. 58–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yuri, Pines with Falkenhausen, Lothar von, Shelach, Gideon and Yates, Robin D.S., “General Introduction: Qin History Revisited,” in: Pines, Yuri, Falkenhausen, Lothar von, Shelach, Gideon and Yates, Robin D.S., eds., Birth of an Empire: The State of Qin Revisited (Berkeley: University of California Press, forthcoming).
Yan, Xuetong, Ancient Chinese Thought, Modern Chinese Power, Bell, Daniel A. and Zhe, Sun, eds., Edmund, Ryden, trans. (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2011), p. 14.Google Scholar
Kazuki, Moriya 森谷一樹, “Senkoku Shin no sōhō ni tsuite” 戰國秦の相邦について, Tōyōshi kenkyū 東洋史研究, vol. 60 (2001), pp. 1–29Google Scholar
Liuzhu, Huang 黃留珠, Qin Han lishi wenhua lungao 秦漢歷史文化論稿 (Xi'an: San Qin chubanshe, 2002), pp. 41–50
Michael, Loewe, “The Orders of Aristocratic Rank of Han China,” T’oung Pao, vol. 48 (1960), pp. 97–174Google Scholar
Gao, Min 高敏, “Qin de cijue zhidu shitan” 秦的賜爵制度試探, in idem, Qin Han shi lunji 秦漢史論集 (Zhengzhou: Zhongzhou shuhuashe, 1982), pp. 1–32Google Scholar
Michael, Loewe, “Social Distinctions, Groups and Privileges,” in China's Early Empires: A Re-appraisal, Michael, Nylan and Michael, Loewe eds. (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010), pp. 296–307.Google Scholar
Wei, Chen 陳偉, ed., Liye Qin jiandu jiaoshi (di yi juan) 里耶秦簡牘校釋 (第一卷) (Wuhan: Wuhan daxue chubanshe, 2012)Google Scholar
Yates, Robin D. S., “Social Status in the Ch'in: Evidence from the Yün-meng Legal Documents. Part One: Commoners,” Harvard Journal of Asiatic Studies, vol. 47 (1987), pp. 197–236CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhangjiashan Hanmu zhujian (er si qi hao mu) 張家山漢墓竹 簡 (二四七號墓), published by Zhangjiashan Hanmu zhujian zhengli xiaozu張家山漢墓竹簡整理小組 (Beijing: Wenwu chubanshe, 2001)
Xiaoqiang, Wu 吳小強, ed., Qin jian Ri shu jishi 秦簡日書集釋 (Changsha: Yuelu, 2000); Yates, Robin D.S. “Slavery in Early China: A Socio-cultural Perspective,” Journal of East Asian Archaeology, vol. 3, nos. 1--2 (2002), 283–331, on p. 310.Google Scholar
Hulsewé, A. F. P., Remnants of Ch'in Law: An Annotated Translation of the Ch'in Legal and Administrative Rules of the 3rd Century B.C. Discovered in Yün-meng Prefecture, Hu-pei Province, in 1975 (Leiden: Brill, 1985), D164, p. 174.Google Scholar
Petersen, Jens Østergard, “Which Books Did the First Emperor of Ch'in Burn? On the Meaning of Pai Chia in Early Chinese Sources,” Monumenta Serica, vol. 43 (1995), pp. 1–52CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martin, Kern, The Stele Inscriptions of Ch'in Shih-huang: Text and Ritual in Early Chinese Imperial Representation (New Haven: American Oriental Society, 2000), pp. 183–96.Google Scholar
Lewis, Mark E., “The Han Abolition of Universal Military Service,” in de Ven, Hans Van, ed., Warfare in Chinese History (Leiden: Brill, 2000), pp. 33–76.Google Scholar
Michael, Nylan, “Confucian Piety and Individualism in Han China,” Journal of the American Oriental Society, vol. 116 (1996), pp. 1–27.Google Scholar
Ebrey, Patricia B., “Toward a Better Understanding of the Later Han Upper Class,” in Dien, Albert E., ed., State and Society in Early Medieval China (Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1990), pp. 49–72.Google Scholar
Herbert, Penelope A., Examine the Honest, Appraise the Able: Contemporary Assessments of Civil Service Selection in Early T’ang China (Canberra: Faculty of Asian Studies, Australian National University Press, 1998)Google Scholar
Elman, Benjamin A., A Cultural History of Civil Examinations in Late Imperial China (Berkeley: University of California Press, 2000)Google Scholar
Rowe, William T., Saving the World: Chen Hongmou and Elite Consciousness in Eighteenth-Century China (Stanford: Stanford University Press, 2001), pp. 339–44Google Scholar
Reed, Bradly W., Talons and Teeth: County Clerks and Runners in the Qing Dynasty (Stanford: Stanford University Press, 2000)Google Scholar
Extrême-Orient, Extrême-Occident, vol. 34 (2012), pp. 79–110
Zizhi tongjian 資治通鑒, by Sima Guang 司馬光, annotated by Hu Sanxing 胡三省 (Beijing: Zhonghua shuju, 1992)
Bol, Peter K., “Government, Society and State: On the Political Visions of Ssu-ma Kuang and Wang An-shih,” in Hymes, Robert R. and Schirokauer, Conrad, eds., Ordering the World: Approaches to State and Society in Sung Dynasty China (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1993), pp. 128–92Google Scholar
Huang, Ray. 1587: A Year of No Significance (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1981).Google Scholar
Svistunova, Natalia P., Agrarnaia Politika Dinastii Min, XIV vek (Moscow: Nauka, 1996)Google Scholar
Dreyer, Edward L., Early Ming China: A Political History, 1355–1435 (Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1982), pp. 122–31Google Scholar
Pines, , The Everlasting Empire: Traditional Chinese Political Culture and Its Enduring Legacy (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2012)Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×