Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-84b7d79bbc-5lx2p Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-27T12:41:17.517Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

17 - Switchable electrodes and biofuel cells logically controlled by chemical and biochemical signals

from Part III - Fuel cells

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 September 2015

Evgeny Katz
Affiliation:
Clarkson University
Sandro Carrara
Affiliation:
École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne
Krzysztof Iniewski
Affiliation:
Redlen Technologies Inc., Canada
Get access

Summary

Introduction

Rapid development of novel electrochemical systems was achieved in the 1970–80s when a new concept of chemically modified electrodes was introduced [1,2]. Application of organic chemistry methods to the functionalization of electrode surfaces [3] and later pioneering of novel self-assembly methods [4–6] fostered the development of numerous modified electrodes with properties unusual for bare conducting surfaces. While attempts were made to harness enhanced catalytic properties of electrodes and their selective responses to different redox species [1–6], the modified electrodes rapidly became important components of various electroanalytical systems [7] and fuel cells [8]. Novel bioelectrochemical systems [9,10], particularly used in biosensors [11,12] and biofuel cells [13,14], have emerged upon introduction of modified electrodes with bioelectrocatalytic properties. To continue this remarkable success, electrodes functionalized with various signal-responsive materials (including molecular [15], supramolecular [16], and polymeric species [17]) attached to electrode surfaces as monolayers or thin films were pioneered to allow switchable/tunable properties of the functional interfaces controlled by external signals [18].

Over the past two decades, sustained advances in chemical modification of the electrodes have given us a large variety of electrodes, switchable by various physical and/or chemical signals between electrochemically active and inactive states [15–18]. However, very few of them were used in biofuel cells [19,20]. Different mechanisms were involved in the transition of the electrode interfaces between the active and inactive states depending on the properties of the modified surfaces and the nature of the applied signals. The activity of the switchable electrodes was usually controlled by physical signals (optical [21–23], electrical [24,25] or magnetic [26–29]) which failed to provide direct communication between the electrodes and their biochemical environment in biofuel cells. Switchable electrodes controlled by biochemical rather than physical signals are needed to design a biofuel cell adjustable to its biochemical environment according to the presence or absence of biochemical substances. A new approach became possible when a polymer-modified electrode switchable between ON/OFF states by pH values [30] was coupled to biochemical reactions generating pH changes in situ [31]. This allowed transduction of biochemical input signals (e.g. glucose concentration) to the pH changes governing the electrochemical activity of the switchable electrode [32].

Type
Chapter
Information
Handbook of Bioelectronics
Directly Interfacing Electronics and Biological Systems
, pp. 215 - 238
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2015

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Murray, RW. Chemically modified electrodes. Acc Chem Res 1980; 13:135–141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wrighton, MS. Surface functionalization of electrodes with molecular reagents. Science 1986; 231:32–37.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Abruña, HD. Coordination chemistry in two dimensions: chemically modified electrodes. Coord Chem Rev 1988; 86:135–189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bain, CD, Troughton, EB, Tao, Y-T et al. Formation of monolayer films by the spontaneous assembly of organic thiols from solution onto gold. J Am Chem Soc 1989; 111:321–335.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nuzzo, RG, Fusco, FA, Allara, DL. Spontaneously organized molecular assemblies. 3. Preparation and properties of solution adsorbed monolayers of organic disulfides on gold surfaces. J Am Chem Soc 1987; 109:2358–2368.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chen, D, Li, JH.Interfacial design and functionization on metal electrodes through self-assembled monolayers. Surf Sci Rep 2006; 61:445–463.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zen, JM, Kumar, AS, Tsai, D-M. Recent updates of chemically modified electrodes in analytical chemistry. Electroanalysis 2003; 15:1073–1087.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Handbook of Fuel Cells – Fundamentals, Technology, Applications, (Eds.: Vielstich, W, Gasteiger, H, Lamm, A), Chichester, Wiley, 2003.
Rusling, JF, Forster, RJ.Electrochemical catalysis with redox polymer and polyion–protein films. J Colloid Interface Sci 2003; 262:1–15.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Willner, I, Katz, E. Integration of layered redox-proteins and conductive supports for bioelectronic applications. Angew Chem Int Ed 2000; 39:1180–1218.3.0.CO;2-E>CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wang, J.In vivo glucose monitoring: Towards ‘Sense and Act’ feedback-loop individualized medical systems. Talanta 2008; 75:636–641.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gooding, JJ. Advances in interfacial design for electrochemical biosensors and sensors: Aryl diazonium salts for modifying carbon and metal electrodes. Electroanalysis 2008; 20:573–582.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moehlenbrock, MJ, Minteer, SD. Extended lifetime biofuel cells. Chem Soc Rev 2008; 37:1188–1196.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Barton, SC, Gallaway, J, Atanassov, P. Enzymatic biofuel cells for implantable and microscale devices. Chem Rev 2004; 104:4867–4886.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Katz, E, Willner, B, Willner, I.Light-controlled electron transfer reactions at photoisomerizable monolayer electrodes by means of electrostatic interactions: Active interfaces for the amperometric transduction of recorded optical signals. Biosens Bioelectron 1997; 12:703–719.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flood, AH, Ramirez, RJA, Deng, WQ et al. Meccano on the nanoscale – a blueprint for making some of the world’s tiniest machines. Aust J Chem 2004; 57:301–322.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Motornov, M, Sheparovych, R, Katz, E, Minko, S.Chemical gating with nanostructured responsive polymer brushes: mixed brush versus homopolymer brush. ACS Nano 2008; 2:41–52.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pita, M, Katz, E. Switchable electrodes: How can the system complexity be scaled up?Electroanalysis 2009; 21:252–260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Katz, E, Willner, I. A biofuel cell with electrochemically switchable and tunable power output. J Am Chem Soc 2003; 125:6803–6813.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Katz, E, Pita, M. Biofuel cells controlled by logically processed biochemical signals: Towards physiologically regulated bioelectronic devices. Chem Eur J 2009; 15:12554–12564.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Willner, I, Lion-Dagan, M, Marx-Tibbon, S, Katz, E.Bioelectrocatalyzed amperometric transduction of optical signals using monolayer-modified Au-electrodes. J Am Chem Soc 1995; 117:6581–6592.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liu, NG, Dunphy, DR, Atanassov, P et al. Photoregulation of mass transport through a photoresponsive azobenzene-modified nanoporous membrane. Nano Lett 2004; 4:551–554.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liu, ZF, Hashimoto, K, Fujishima, A. Photoelectrochemical information storage using an azobenzene derivative. Nature 1990; 347:658–660.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zheng, L, Xiong, L.Layer-by-layer assembly of PA-EDTA/PAH multilayer films and their potential-switchable electrochemistry. Colloids Surf A 2006; 289:179–184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chegel, VI, Raitman, OA, Lioubashevski, O et al. Redox-switching of electrorefractive, electrochromic and conducting functions of Cu2+/polyacrylic acid films associated with electrodes. Adv Mater 2002; 14:1549–1553.3.0.CO;2-C>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Katz, E, Baron, R, Willner, I.Magnetoswitchable electrochemistry gated by alkyl-chain-functionalized magnetic nanoparticles: Controlling of diffusional and surface-confined electrochemical process. J Am Chem Soc 2005; 127:4060–4070.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Katz, E, Sheeney-Haj-Ichia, L, Willner, I. Magneto-switchable electrocatalytic and bioelectrocatalytic transformations. Chem Eur J 2002; 8:4138–4148.3.0.CO;2-Z>CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Laocharoensuk, R, Bulbarello, A, Mannino, S, Wang, J.Adaptive nanowire–nanotube bioelectronic system for on-demand bioelectrocatalytic transformations. Chem Commun 2007; 3362–3364.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Loaiza, OA, Laocharoensuk, R, Burdick, J et al. Adaptive orientation of multifunctional nanowires for magnetic control of bioelectrocatalytic processes. Angew Chem Int Ed 2007; 46:1508–1511.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tam, TK, Ornatska, M, Pita, M, Minko, S, Katz, E. Polymer brush-modified electrode with switchable and tunable redox activity for bioelectronic applications. J Phys Chem C 2008; 112:8438–8445.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pita, M, Minko, S, Katz, E. Enzyme-based logic systems and their applications for novel multi-signal-responsive materials. J. Mater Sci: Materials in Medicine 2009; 20:457–462.Google ScholarPubMed
Tam, TK, Zhou, J, Pita, M, et al. Biochemically controlled bioelectrocatalytic interface. J Am Chem Soc 2008; 130:10888–10889.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Strack, G, Pita, M, Ornatska, M, Katz, E.Boolean logic gates using enzymes as input signals. ChemBioChem 2008; 9:1260–1266.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Baron, R, Lioubashevski, O, Katz, E, Niazov, T, Willner, I.Logic gates and elementary computing by enzymes. J Phys Chem A 2006; 110:8548–8553.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Baron, R, Lioubashevski, O, Katz, E, Niazov, T, Willner, I.Elementary arithmetic operations by enzymes: A model for metabolic pathway based computing. Angew Chem Int Ed 2006; 45:1572–1576.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Katz, E, Privman, V. Enzyme-based logic systems for information processing. Chem Soc Rev 2010; 39:1835–1857.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Strack, G, Ornatska, M, Pita, M, Katz, E.Biocomputing security system: Concatenated enzyme-based logic gates operating as a biomolecular keypad lock. J Am Chem Soc 2008; 130:4234–4235.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Niazov, T, Baron, R, Katz, E, Lioubashevski, O, Willner, I.Concatenated logic gates using four coupled biocatalysts operating in series. Proc Natl Acad USA 2006; 103:17160–17163.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Privman, M, Tam, TK, Pita, M, Katz, E. Switchable electrode controlled by enzyme logic network system: Approaching physiologically regulated bioelectronics. J Am Chem Soc 2009; 131:1314–1321.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wang, X, Zhou, J, Tam, TK, Katz, E, Pita, M.Switchable electrode controlled by Boolean logic gates using enzymes as input signals. Bioelectrochemistry 2009; 77:69–73.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Amir, L, Tam, TK, Pita, M, et al. Biofuel cell controlled by enzyme logic systems. J Am Chem Soc 2009; 131:826–832.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tam, TK, Pita, M, Ornatska, M, Katz, E. Biofuel cell controlled by enzyme logic network – approaching physiologically regulated devices. Bioelectrochemistry 2009; 76:4–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tam, TK, Strack, G, Pita, M, Katz, E. Biofuel cell logically controlled by antigen-antibody recognition: Towards immune regulated bioelectronic devices. J Am Chem Soc 2009; 131:11670–11671.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Katz, E, Minko, S, Halámek, J, MacVittie, K, Yancey, K. Electrode interfaces switchable by physical and chemical signals for biosensing, biofuel and biocomputing applications. Anal Bioanal Chem 2013, in press.
Pita, M, Privman, M, Katz, E.Biocatalytic enzyme networks designed for binary-logic control of smart electroactive nanobiointerfaces. Topics in Catalysis 2012; 55:1201–1216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Katz, E.Electrode interfaces switchable by physical and chemical signals operating as a platform for information processing. In: Molecular and Supramolecular Information Processing: From Molecular Switches to Logic Systems, Katz, E (Ed.), Weinheim, Germany: Wiley-VCH, 2012, Chapter 14, pp. 333–354.Google Scholar
Bocharova, V, Katz, E. Switchable electrode interfaces controlled by physical, chemical and biological signals. Chemical Record 2012; 12:114–130.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Diamond, D, McKervey, MA. Calixarene-based sensing agents. Chem Soc Rev 1996; 25:15–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yang, DH, Ju, M-J, Maeda, A et al. Design of highly efficient receptor sites by combination of cyclodextrin units and molecular cavity in TiO2 ultrathin layer. Biosens Bioelectron 2006; 22:388–392.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gabai, R, Sallacan, N, Chegel, V et al. Characterization of the swelling of acrylamidophenylboronic acid – acrylamide hydrogels upon interaction with glucose by Faradaic impedance spectroscopy, chronopotentiometry, quartz-crystal microbalance (QCM) and surface plasmon resonance (SPR) experiments. J Phys Chem B 2001; 105:8196–8202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Minko, S.Responsive polymer brushes. Polym Rev 2006; 46:397–420.Google Scholar
Luzinov, I, Minko, S, Tsukruk, V. Adaptive and responsive surfaces through controlled reorganization of interfacial polymer layers. Prog Polym Sci 2004; 29:635–698.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tokarev, I, Orlov, M, Katz, E, Minko, S. An electrochemical gate based on a stimuli-responsive membrane associated with an electrode surface. J Phys Chem B 2007; 111:12141–12145.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Motornov, M, Tam, TK, Pita, M et al. Switchable selectivity for gating ion transport with mixed polyelectrolyte brushes: Approaching “smart” drug delivery systems. Nanotechnology 2009; article no. 434006.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tam, TK, Pita, M, Motornov, M et al. Modified electrodes with switchable selectivity for cationic and anionic redox species. Electroanalysis 2010; 22:35–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tam, TK, Pita, M, Trotsenko, O et al. Reversible “closing” of an electrode interface functionalized with a polymer brush by an electrochemical signal. Langmuir 2010; 26:4506–4513.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tam, TK, Pita, M, Motornov, M et al. Electrochemical nanotransistor from mixed polymer brush. Adv Mater 2010; 22:1863–1866.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bocharova, V, Tam, TK, Halámek, J, Pita, M, Katz, E.Reversible gating controlled by enzymes at nanostructured interface. Chem Commun 2010; 46:2088–2090.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pita, M, Tam, TK, Minko, S, Katz, E. Dual magneto-biochemical logic control of electrochemical processes based on local interfacial pH changes. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 2009; 1:1166–1168.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Baron, R, Onopriyenko, A, Katz, E et al. An electrochemical/photochemical information processing system using a monolayer-functionalized electrode. Chem Commun 2006; 2147–2149.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Katz, E, Willner, I.A quinone-functionalized monolayer electrode in conjunction with hydrophobic magnetic nanoparticles acts as a “Write-Read-Erase” information storage system. Chem Commun 2005; 5641–5643.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
de Silva, AP, Uchiyama, S.Molecular logic and computing. Nat Nanotechnol 2007; 2:399–410.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Szacilowski, K. Digital information processing in molecular systems. Chem Rev 2008; 108:3481–3548.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Credi, A. Molecules that make decisions. Angew Chem Int Ed 2007; 46:5472–5475.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pischel, U. Chemical approaches to molecular logic elements for addition and subtraction. Angew Chem Int Ed 2007; 46:4026–4040.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Andreasson, J, Pischel, U. Smart molecules at work – mimicking advanced logic operations. Chem Soc Rev 2010; 39:174–188.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Molecular and Supramolecular Information Processing: From Molecular Switches to Logic Systems, Katz, E. (Ed.), Weinheim, Germany: Wiley-VCH, 2012.CrossRef
Biomolecular Information Processing – From Logic Systems to Smart Sensors and Actuators, Katz, E. (Ed.), Weinheim, Germany: Wiley-VCH, 2012.CrossRef
Baron, R, Lioubashevski, O, Katz, E, Niazov, T, Willner, I.Two coupled enzymes perform in parallel the “AND” and “InhibAND” logic gates operations. Org Biomol Chem 2006; 4:989–991.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Baron, R, Lioubashevski, O, Katz, E, Niazov, T, Willner, I.Logic gates and elementary computing by enzymes. J Phys Chem A 2006; 110:8548–8553.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Baron, R, Lioubashevski, O, Katz, E, Niazov, T, Willner, I.Elementary arithmetic operations by enzymes: A model for metabolic pathway based computing. Angew Chem Int Ed 2006; 45:1572–1576.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Privman, V, Zhou, J, Halámek, J, Katz, E.Realization and properties of biochemical-computing biocatalytic XOR gate based on signal change. J Phys Chem B 2010; 114:13601–13608.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Melnikov, D, Strack, G, Zhou, J et al. Enzymatic AND logic gates operated under conditions characteristic of biomedical applications. J Phys Chem B 2010; 114:12166–12174.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zhou, J, Arugula, MA, Halámek, J, Pita, M, Katz, E.Enzyme-based NAND and NOR logic gates with modular design. J Phys Chem B 2009; 113:16065–16070.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Privman, V, Arugula, MA, Halámek, J, Pita, M, Katz, E. Network analysis of biochemical logic for noise reduction and stability: A system of three coupled enzymatic AND gates. J Phys Chem B 2009; 113:5301–5310.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tam, TK, Pita, M, Katz, E. Enzyme logic network analyzing combinations of biochemical inputs and producing fluorescent output signals: Towards multi-signal digital biosensors. Sens Actuat B 2009; 140:1–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Minko, S, Katz, E, Motornov, M, Tokarev, I, Pita, M. Materials with built-in logic. J Comput Theor Nanosci 2011; 8:356–364.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tokarev, I, Gopishetty, V, Zhou, J et al. Stimuli-responsive hydrogel membranes coupled with biocatalytic processes. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 2009; 1:532–536.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wang, J, Katz, E. Digital biosensors with built-in logic for biomedical applications. Isr J Chem 2011; 51:141–150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wang, J, Katz, E. Digital biosensors with built-in logic for biomedical applications – Biosensors based on biocomputing concept. Anal Bioanal Chem 2010; 398:1591–1603.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zhou, J, Halámek, J, Bocharova, V, Wang, J, Katz, E. Bio-logic analysis of injury biomarker patterns in human serum samples. Talanta 2011; 83:955–959.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Halámek, J, Bocharova, V, Chinnapareddy, S et al. Multi-enzyme logic network architectures for assessing injuries: Digital processing of biomarkers. Mol BioSyst 2010; 6:2554–2560.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Halámek, J, Windmiller, JR, Zhou, J et al. Multiplexing of injury codes for the parallel operation of enzyme logic gates. Analyst 2010; 135:2249–2259.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Privman, M, Tam, TK, Bocharova, V et al. Responsive interface switchable by logically processed physiological signals – Towards “smart” actuators for signal amplification and drug delivery. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 2011; 3:1620–1623.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gallaway, J, Wheeldon, I, Rincon, R et al. Oxygen-reducing enzyme cathodes produced from SLAC, a small laccase from Streptomyces coelicolor. Biosens Bioelectron 2008; 23:1229–1235.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bartlett, PN, Tebbutt, P, Whitaker, RC. Kinetic aspects of the use of modified electrodes and mediators in bioelectrochemistry. Prog React Kinet 1991; 16:55–155.Google Scholar
Melnikov, D, Strack, G, Pita, M, Privman, V, Katz, E.Analog noise reduction in enzymatic logic gates. J Phys Chem B 2009; 113:10472–10479.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Privman, V, Strack, G, Solenov, D, Pita, M, Katz, E. Optimization of enzymatic biochemical logic for noise reduction and scalability: How many biocomputing gates can be interconnected in a circuit?J Phys Chem B 2008; 112:11777–11784.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Strack, G, Chinnapareddy, S, Volkov, D et al. Logic networks based on immunorecognition processes. J Phys Chem B 2009; 113:12154–12159.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Halámek, J, Tam, TK, Chinnapareddy, S, Bocharova, V, Katz, E.Keypad lock security system based on immune-affinity recognition integrated with a switchable biofuel cell. J Phys Chem Lett 2010; 1:973–977.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Halámek, J, Tam, TK, Strack, G, et al. Self-powered biomolecular keypad lock security system based on a biofuel cell. Chem Commun 2010; 46:2405–2407.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Katz, E. Biofuel cells with switchable power output. Electroanalysis 2010; 22:744–756.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Halámková, L, Halámek, J, Bocharova, V, et al. Implanted biofuel cell operating in living snail. J Am Chem Soc 2012; 134:5040–5043.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Szczupak, A, Halámek, J, Halámková, L, et al. Living battery – Biofuel cells operating in vivo in clams. Energy & Environmental Science 2012; 5:8891–8895.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacVittie, K, Halámek, J, Halámková, L, et al. From “cyborg” lobsters to a pacemaker powered by implantable biofuel cells. Energy & Environmental Science 2013; 6:81–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Strack, G, Luckarift, HR, Nichols, R, et al. Bioelectrocatalytic generation of directly readable code: harnessing cathodic current for long-term information relay. Chem Commun 2011; 47:7662–7664.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×