Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-c4f8m Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-19T06:11:28.805Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Chapter 18 - Trauma cases

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 July 2014

Rhys Thomas
Affiliation:
Swansea Morriston NHS Trust (AMBU Health Board)
Wayne Sapsford
Affiliation:
The Royal London Hospital
Jane Sturgess
Affiliation:
Addenbrooke’s Hospital, Cambridge
Justin Davies
Affiliation:
Addenbrooke’s Hospital, Cambridge
Kamen Valchanov
Affiliation:
Papworth Hospital, Cambridge
Get access

Summary

Introduction

There are few areas in medicine which have changed as much in the past ten to 20 years as the management of the severely traumatised patient, driven for the most part by the complexity and severity of the trauma in recent military conflicts. Few patients offer a greater challenge than the critically injured patient. The acuity and uncertainty of the extent of the injuries require the anaesthetist to be both vigilant and methodical as the case progresses. Rapid changes in the patient’s condition occur commonly and constant communication between anaesthetist, surgeon and the rest of the team is vital. The anaesthetist should take an active lead in the operating theatre, in combination with the senior surgeon present, as he/she has the greatest situational awareness and needs to be aware of the resources at his/her disposal. Therefore, the traditional metaphorical ‘blood brain barrier’ or physical drape that still exists between the surgeon and anaesthetist in some elective surgery has been replaced by constant communication, supporting an integrated damage-control philosophy. There are three central tenets to the damage-control philosophy: permissive hypotension, damage-control or haemostatic resuscitation, and damage-control surgery.

The damage-control philosophy was initially conceived as a surgical approach to the multiply injured patient when it was realised that such patients lacked the physiological reserve to survive complex reconstructive surgery and restoration of anatomy. Damage-control surgery is confined to that surgery which is necessary to control haemorrhage and limit contamination. Temporary cavity closure further abbreviates the surgery and the patient is then normalised physiologically in the intensive care unit before definitive anatomical repair 24 to 72 hours later. However, such an approach to a severely traumatised patient cannot be used in isolation. Haemostatic resuscitation and permissive hypotension also contribute to the philosophy of damage control in an effort to limit the development of the ‘lethal triad’. An institutional massive transfusion protocol for trauma is also required.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2014

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bickel, WH, Wall, MJ, Pepe, PE, et al. Immediate versus delayed fluid resuscitation for hypotensive patients with penetrating torso injuries. N Engl J Med 1994; 331: 1105–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boffard, KD, Riou, B, Warren, B, et al. Recombinant factor VIIa as adjunctive therapy for bleeding control in severely injured trauma patients: two parallel randomized, placebo controlled, double-blind clinical trials. J Trauma 2005; 59: 8–15.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Borgman, MA, Spinella, PC, Perkins, JG, et al. The ratio of blood products transfused affects mortality in patients receiving massive transfusions at a combat support hospital. J Trauma 2007; 63: 805–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brohi, K, Singh, J, Heron, M, Coats, T. Acute traumatic coagulopathy. J Trauma 2003; 54: 1127–30.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brohi, K, Cohen, MJ, Gunter, MT, et al. Acute coagulopathy of trauma: hypoperfusion induces anti-coagulation and hyperfibrinolysis. J Trauma 2008; 64: 1211–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
CRASH-2 Trial Collaborators. Effects of tranexamic acid on death, vascular occlusive events, and blood transfusion in trauma patients with significant haemorrhage (CRASH-2): a randomised, placebo-controlled trial. Lancet 2010; 376(9734): 23–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rontondo, MF, Zonies, DH. The damage-control sequence and underlying logic. Surg Clin N Am 1997; 77: 761–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×