Afsarinejad, K. (1983). Balanced repeated measurements designs. Biometrika, 70(1), 199–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Anderson, V. L. and McLean, R. A. (1974). Design of Experiments. Marcel Dekker Inc.: New York.Google Scholar

Andreasen, J. T., Henningsen, K., Bate, S. T., Christiansen, S. and Wiborg, O. (2011). Nicotine reverses anhedonic-like response and cognitive impairment in the rat chronic mild stress model of depression: comparison with sertraline. Journal of Psychopharmacology, 25(8), 1134–41.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Armitage, P., Berry, G. and Matthews, J. N. S. (2002). Statistical Methods in Medical Research, 4th edition. Wiley-Blackwell: Malden, MA.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Aylott, M., Bate, S. T., Collins, S., Jarvis, P. and Saul, J. (2011). Review of the statistical analysis of the dog telemetry study. Pharmaceutical Statistics, 10(3), 236–49.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Bailey, R. A. (2008). Design of Comparative Experiments. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bartlett, M. S. (1937). Properties of sufficiency and statistical tests. Proceedings of the Royal Statistical Society Series A – Mathematical and Physical Sciences, 160(901), 268–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Barton, N. J., Strickland, I. T., Bond, S. M., et al. (2007). Pressure application measurement (PAM): a novel behavioural technique for measuring hypersensitivity in a rat model of joint pain. Journal of Neuroscience Methods, 163(1), 67–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bate, S. T. and Boxall, J. (2008). The construction of multi-factor crossover designs in animal husbandry studies. Pharmaceutical Statistics, 7(3), 179–94.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Bate, S. T. and Jones, B. (2008). A review of uniform cross-over designs. Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference, 138(2), 336–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Belluzzi, J. D., Lee, A. G., Oliff, H. S. and Leslie, F. M. (2004). Age-dependent effects of nicotine on locomotor activity and conditioned place preference in rats. Psychopharmacology, 174, 389–95.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Benjamini, Y. and Hochberg, Y. (1995). Controlling the false discovery rate: a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, 57, 289–300.Google Scholar

Bennett, C. M., Wolford, G. L. and Miller, M. B. (2009). The principled control of false positives in neuroimaging. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 4(4), 417–22.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Bianchi, M. and Baulieu, E. E. (2012). 3β-methoxy-pregnenolone (MAP4343) as an innovative therapeutic approach for depressive disorders. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 109(5), 1713–18.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Biggers, J. D., Baskar, J. F. and Torchiana, D. F. (1981). Reduction of fertility of mice by the intrauterine injection of prostaglandin antagonists. Journal of Reproduction and Fertility, 63, 365–72.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Bison, S., Carboni, L., Arban, R., et al. (2009). Differential behavioral, physiological, and hormonal sensitivity to LPS challenge in rats. International Journal of Interferon, Cytokine and Mediator Research, 1, 1–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Blakesley, R. E., Mazumdar, S., Dew, M. A., et al. (2009). Comparisons of methods for multiple hypothesis testing in neuropsychological research. Neuropsychology, 23(2), 255–64.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Bonferroni, C. E. (1936). Teoria statistica delle classi e calcolo delle probabilita. Pubblicazioni del R Istituto Superiore di Scienze Economiche e Commerciali di Firenze, 8, 3–62.Google Scholar

Box, G. E. P. (1953). Non-normality and tests on variance. Biometrika, 40(3/4), 318–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Boxall, J., Heath, S., Bate, S. and Brautigam, J. (2004). Modern concepts of socialisation for dogs: implications for their behaviour, welfare and use in scientific procedures. ATLA. Alternatives to Laboratory Animals, 32, 81–93.Google ScholarPubMed

Brammer, R. J. (2003). Modelling covariance structure in ascending dose studies of isolated tissues and organs. Pharmaceutical Statistics, 2(2), 103–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bright, J., Aylott, M., Bate, S., et al. (2011). Recommendations on the statistical analysis of the Comet assay. Pharmaceutical Statistics, 10(6), 485–93.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Brooks, K. J., Bunce, K. T., Hasse, M. V., et al. (2005). MRI quantification in vivo of corticosteroid induced thymus involution in mice: correlation with ex vivo measurements. Steroids, 70(4), 267–72.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Brown, M. B. and Forsythe, A. B. (1974). Robust tests for equality of variances. Journal of the American Statistical Society, 69(346), 364–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Burden, R. L. and Faires, J. D. (2011). Numerical Analysis, 9th edition. Brooks/Cole Publishing: Pacific Grove, CA.Google Scholar

Button, K. S., Ioannidis, J. P., Mokrysz, C., et al. (2013). Power failure: why small sample size undermines the reliability of neuroscience. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 14, 365–76.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Chaves, A. A., Keller, W. J., O’Sullivan, S., et al. (2006). Cardiovascular monkey telemetry: sensitivity to detect QT interval prolongation. Journal of Pharmacological and Toxicological Methods, 54(2), 150–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Clark, R. A., Shoaib, M., Hewitt, K. N., Stanford, S. C. and Bate, S. T. (2012). A comparison of InVivoStat with other statistical software packages for analysis of data generated from animal experiments. Journal of Psychopharmacology, 26(8), 1136–42.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Clarke, G. M. and Kempson, R. E. (1997). Introduction to the Design and Analysis of Experiments. Arnold: London.Google Scholar

Cochran, W. G. and Cox, G. M. (1957). Experimental Designs, 2nd edition. Wiley & Sons, Inc.: New York, London.Google Scholar

Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioural Sciences, 2nd edition. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates: Hillsdale, NJ.Google Scholar

Crowder, M. J. and Hand, D. J. (1990). Analysis of Repeated Measures. Chapman and Hall/CRC: London.Google Scholar

Cumming, G., Fidler, F. and Vaux, D. L. (2007). Error bars in experimental biology. The Journal of Cell Biology, 177(1), 7–11.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Curran-Everett, D. (2000). Multiple comparisons: philosophies and illustrations. American Journal of Physiology – Regulatory, Integrative and Comparative Physiology, 279(1), R1–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Curtin, L. I., Grakowsky, J. A., Suarez, M., et al. (2009). Evaluation of buprenorphine in a postoperative pain model in rats. Comparative Medicine, 59(1), 60–71.Google Scholar

Downie, D., Antipatis, C., Delday, M. I., Maltin, C. A. and Sneddon, A. A. (2005). Moderate maternal vitamin A deficiency alters myogenic regulatory protein expression and perinatal organ growth in the rat. American Journal of Physiology – Regulatory, Integrative and Comparative Physiology, 288(1), 73–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Dudchenko, P. A., Wood, E. R. and Eichenbraum, H. (2000). Neurotoxic hippocampal lesions have no effect on odor span and little effect on odor recognition memory but produce significant impairments on spatial span, recognition, and alteration. The Journal of Neuroscience, 20(8), 2964–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Duncan, D. B. (1955). Multiple range and multiple F tests. Biometrics, 11(1), 1–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dunnett, C. W. (1955). A multiple comparison procedure for comparing several treatments with a control. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 50(272), 1096–121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dunnett, C. W. (1964). New tables for multiple comparisons with a control. Biometrics, 20(3), 482–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Elashoff, J. D. (1981). Down with multiple t-tests!Gastroenterology, 80, 615–20.Google ScholarPubMed

Festing, M. F. W. (1994). Reduction of animal use: experimental design and quality of experiments. Laboratory Animals, 28(3), 212–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Festing, M. F. W. (2003a). Principles: the need for better experimental design. Trends in Pharmacological Sciences, 24(7), 341–5.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Festing, M. F. W. (2003b). We should be designing better experiments. Veterinary Anaesthesia and Analgesia, 30, 58–60.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Festing, M. F. W. and Altman, D. G. (2002). Guidelines for the design and statistical analysis of experiments using laboratory animals. ILAR Journal, 43(4), 244–58.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Festing, M. F. W., Diamanti, P. and Turton, J. A. (2001). Strain differences in haematological response to chloroamphenicol succinate in mice: implications for toxicological research. Food and Chemical Toxicology, 39(4), 375–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Festing, M. F. W., Overend, P., Gaines Das, R., Cortina-Borja, M. and Berdoy, M. (2002). The Design of Animal Experiments: Reducing the Use of Animals in Research through Better Experimental Design. Royal Society of Medicine Press: London.Google Scholar

Field, A. (1998). A bluffer’s guide to… sphericity. The British Psychological Society: Mathematical, Statistical & Computing Section Newsletter, 6, 13–22.Google Scholar

Findlay, J. W. A. and Dillard, R. F. (2007). Appropriate calibration curve fitting in ligand binding assays. The AAPS Journal, 9(2), E260–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Ford, D. J. (1977). Effect of autoclaving and physical structure of diets on their utilization by mice. Laboratory Animals, 11(4), 235–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Gaines Das, R. (2004). ‘Statistics’ is not a sausage machine: a statistician’s viewpoint and some comments on experimental design. ATLA. Alternatives to Laboratory Animals, 32(2), 5–8.Google Scholar

Gaines Das, R., Fry, D., Preziosi, R. and Hudson, M. (2009). Planning for reduction. ATLA. Alternatives to Laboratory Animals, 37(1), 27–32.Google ScholarPubMed

Giesbrecht, F. G. and Gumpertz, M. L. (2004). Planning, Construction, and Statistical Analysis of Comparative Experiments. Wiley & Sons, Inc.: Hoboken, NJ.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Godolphin, J. D. (2004). Simple pilot procedures for the avoidance of disconnected experimental designs. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series C (Applied Statistics), 53(1), 133–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gore, K. H. and Stanley, P. J. (2005). An illustration that statistical design mitigates environmental variation and ensures unambiguous study conclusions. Animal Welfare, 14(4), 361–5.Google Scholar

Grayson, B., Idris, N. F. and Neill, J. C. (2007). Atypical antipsychotics attenuate a sub-chronic PCP-induced cognitive deficit in the novel object recognition task in the rat. Behavioural Brain Research, 184(1), 31–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Green, C. R., Ham, K. N. and Tange, J. D. (1969). Kidney lesions induced in rats by p-aminophenol. British Medical Journal, 18(1), 162–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Harris, R. B. S., Zhou, J., Youngblood, B. D., et al. (1998). Effect of repeated stress on body weight and body composition of rats fed low- and high-fat diets. American Journal of Physiology – Regulatory, Integrative and Comparative Physiology, 275(6), R1928–38.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Hatcher, P. D., Brown, V. J., Tait, D. S., et al. (2005). 5-HT6 receptor antagonists improve performance in an attentional set shifting task in rats. Psychopharmacology, 181(2), 253–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hedenqvist, P., Roughan, J. V., Antunes, L., Orr, H. and Flecknell, P. A. (2001). Induction of anaesthesia with desflurane and isoflurane in the rabbit. Laboratory Animals, 35(2), 172–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Hille, C., Bate, S., Davis, J. and Gonzalez, M. I. (2008). 5-HT4 receptor agonism in the five-choice serial reaction time task. Behavioural Brain Research, 195(1), 180–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Hochberg, Y. (1988). A sharper Bonferroni procedure for multiple tests of significance. Biometrika, 75(4), 800–3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hoenig, J. M. and Heisey, D. M. (2001). The abuse of power: the pervasive fallacy of power calculations for data analysis. The American Statistician, 55(1), 19–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Holland, B. S. and Copenhaver, M. D. (1988). Improved Bonferroni-type multiple testing procedures. Psychological Bulletin, 104(1), 145–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Holm, S. (1979). A simple sequentially rejective multiple test procedure. Scandinavian Journal of Statistics, 6, 65–70.Google Scholar

Holson, R. R., Freshwater, L., Maurissen, J. P. J., Moser, V. C. and Phang, W. (2008). Statistical issues and techniques appropriate for developmental neurotoxicity testing: a report from the ILSI Research Foundation/Risk Science Institute expert working group on neurodevelopmental endpoints. Neurotoxicology and Teratology, 30(4), 326–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hommel, G. (1988). A stagewise rejective multiple test procedure based on a modified Bonferroni test. Biometrika, 75(2), 383–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hsu, J. (1996). Multiple Comparisons: Theory and Methods. Chapman and Hall/CRC: London.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hulshoff, J. E. G, Van Dijk, K., van der Waerden, J. P. C. M., et al. (1996). Evaluation of plasma-spray and magnetron-sputter Ca-P-coated implants: an in vivo experiment using rabbits. Journal of Biomedical Materials Research, 31(3), 329–37.3.0.CO;2-O>CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ingram-Ross, J. L., Curran, A. K., Miyamoto, M., et al. (2012). Cardiorespiratory safety evaluation in non-human primates. Journal of Pharmacological and Toxicological Methods, 66, 114–24.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Jones, B. and Kenward, M. G. (2003). Design and Analysis of Cross-Over Trials. Chapman and Hall/CRC: London.Google Scholar

Kalinichev, M., Bate, S. T. and Jones, D. N. C. (2009). Models of aspects of schizophrenia: behavioral sensitization induced by subchronic phencyclidine administration. Current Protocols in Pharmacology, 45, 5.54.1–13.Google Scholar

Karp, N. A., Segonds-Pichon, A., Gerdin, A. K. B., Ramirez-Solis, R. and White, J. K. (2012). The fallacy of ratio correction to address confounding factors. Laboratory Animals, 46(3), 245–52.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Keuls, M. (1952). The use of the ‘studentized range’ in connection with an analysis of variance. Euphytica, 1(2), 112–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kilkenny, C., Brown, W. J., Cuthill, I. C., Emerson, M. and Altman, D. G. (2010). Improving bioscience research: the ARRIVE guidelines for reporting animal research. PLoS Biol, 8(6), e1000412.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Kilkenny, C., Parsons, N., Kadyszewski, E., et al. (2009). Survey of the quality of experimental design, statistical analysis and reporting of research using animals. PLoS One, 4(11), e7824.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Kleinbaum, D. G. and Klein, M. (2005). Survival Analysis: A Self-Learning Text, 2nd edition. Springer: New York.Google Scholar

Kolmogorov, A. N. (1933). Sulla determinazione empirica di una legge di distribuzione. Giornale dell’Istituto Italiano degli Attuari, 4(1), 83–91.Google Scholar

Kramer, C. Y. (1956). Extension of multiple range tests to group means with unequal numbers of replications. Biometrics, 12(3), 307–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kuentz, M., Rothlisberger, D. and Richter, W. (2003). Design of experiment (DoE) methods maximize information from a minimal number of animals in special cases of preclinical bioavailability testing. Pharmaceutical Development and Technology, 8(4), 453–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Kwan, K. Y., Allchome, A. J., Vollrath, M. A., et al. (2006). TRPA1 contributes to cold, mechanical, and chemical nociception but is not essential for hair-cell transduction. Neuron, 50, 277–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lazic, S. E. (2010). The problem of pseudoreplication in neuroscientific studies: is it affecting your analysis?BMC Neuroscience, 11(1), 5.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Lehmann, E. L. (1999). Elements of Large-Sample Theory. Springer: New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Levene, H. (1960). Robust tests for equality of variances. In Contributions to Probability and Statistics: Essays in Honor of Harold Hotelling, editors Olkin, I., Ghurye, S. G., Hoeffding, W., Madow, W. G. and Mann, H. B.278–292. Stanford University Press: Stanford, CA.Google Scholar

Liao, J. J. Z. and Liu, R. (2009). Re-parameterization of five-parameter logistic function. Journal of Chemometrics, 23(5), 248–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ludbrook, J. (1998). Multiple comparison procedures updated. Clinical and Experimental Pharmacology and Physiology, 25(12), 1032–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Macleod, M. R., Fisher, M., O’Collins, V., et al. (2009). Reprint: good laboratory practice: preventing introduction of bias at the bench. Journal of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism, 29, 2213.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Maheswaran, S., Barjat, H., Rueckert, D., et al. (2009). Longitudinal regional brain volume changes quantified in normal aging and Alzheimer’s APP × PS1 mice using MRI. Brain Research, 1270, 19–32.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Manser, C. E., Broom, D. M., Overend, P. and Morris, T. H. (1998). Investigations into the preferences of laboratory rats for nest-boxes and nesting materials. Laboratory Animals, 32(1), 23–35.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Mathew, G., Watson, D. I., Rofe, A. M., et al. (1996). Wound metastases following laparoscopic and open surgery for abdominal cancer in a rat model. British Journal of Surgery, 83(8), 1087–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mauchly, J. W. (1940). Test for sphericity of a normal n-variate distribution. Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 11(2), 204–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

McCance, I. (1995). Assessment of statistical procedures used in papers in the Australian Veterinary Journal. Australian Veterinary Journal, 72(9), 322–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

McQuade, R., Creton, D. and Stanford, S. C. (1999). Effect of novel environmental stimuli on rat behaviour and central noradrenaline function measured by in vivo microdialysis. Psychopharmacology, 145(4), 393–400.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Mead, R. (1988). The Design of Experiments: Statistical Principles for Practical Applications. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge.Google Scholar

Mead, R., Curnow, R. N. and Hasted, A. M. (2003). Statistical Methods in Agriculture and Experimental Biology, 3rd edition. Chapman and Hall/CRC: London.Google Scholar

Miller, R. G. (1981). Simultaneous Statistical Inference, 2nd edition. Springer-Verlag: New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Milliken, G. A. and Johnson, D. E. (2002). Analysis of Messy Data Volume III: Analysis of Covariance. Chapman & Hall/CRC: New York.Google Scholar

Miyazaki, H., Watanabe, H., Kitayama, T., et al. (2005). QT PRODACT: sensitivity and specificity of the canine telemetry assay for detecting drug-induced QT interval prolongation. Journal of Pharmacological Sciences, 99, 523–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Montgomery, D. C. (1997). Design and Analysis of Experiments, 4th edition. Wiley: New York.Google Scholar

Morris, T. R. (1999). Experimental Design and Analysis in Animal Sciences. CABI Publishing: Wallingford, UK.Google Scholar

Murphy, N., Bruckdorfer, K. R., Grimsditch, D. C., et al. (2003). Temporal relationships between circulating levels of CC and CXC chemokines and developing atherosclerosis in Apolipoprotein E*3 Leiden mice. Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology, 23, 1615–20.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Nakagawa, S. (2004). A farewell to Bonferroni: the problems of low statistical power and publication bias. Behavioral Ecology, 15(6), 1044–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Nesnow, S., Mass, M. J., Ross, J. A., et al. (1998). Lung tumourigenic interactions in strain A/J mice of five environmental polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons. Environmental Health Perspectives, 106(Suppl 6), 1337–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Newman, D. (1939). The distribution of range in samples from a normal population, expressed in terms of an independent estimate of standard deviation. Biometrika, 31(1/2), 20–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Nieuwenhuis, S., Forstmann, B. U. and Wagenmakers, E. J. (2011). Erroneous analyses of interactions in neuroscience: a problem of significance. Nature Neuroscience, 14(9), 1105–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Onyango, E. M. and Adeola, O. (2011). Dietary cholecalciferol lowers the maximal activity of intestinal mucosa phytase in ducklings fed low-phosphorus diets. Canadian Journal of Animal Science, 91(3), 399–404.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Parkin, S. L., Pritchett, J. P., Grimsditch, D. C., et al. (2004). Circulating levels of the chemokines JE and KC in female C3H apolipoprotein-E-deficient and C57BL apolipoprotein-E-deficient mice as potential markers of atherosclerosis development. Biochemical Society Transactions, 32(1), 128–30.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Patel, S. R., Murphy, K. G., Thompson, E. L., et al. (2008). Pyroglutamylated RFamide peptide 43 stimulates the hypothalamic-pituitary-gonadal axis via gonadotropin-releasing hormone in rats. Endocrinology, 149(9), 4747–54.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Pinheiro, J., Bates, D., DebRoy, S. and Sarkar, D. (2008). The R Development Core Team. nlme: linear and nonlinear mixed effects models. R package version 3.1–93. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. .

Plackett, R. L. and Burman, J. P. (1946). The design of optimal multifactorial experiments. Biometrika, 33(4), 305–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Pugh, P. L., Richardson, J. C., Bate, S. T., Upton, N. and Sunter, D. (2007). Non-cognitive behaviours in an APP/PS1 transgenic model of Alzheimer’s disease. Behavioural Brain Research, 178(1), 18–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

R Development Core Team (2012). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. ISBN 3–900051–07–0, .Google Scholar

Rooke, E. D. M., Vesterinen, H. M., Sena, E. S., Egan, K. J. and Macleod, M. R. (2011). Dopamine agonists in animal models of Parkinson’s disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Parkinsonism and Related Disorders, 17(5), 313–20.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Rosnow, R. L. and Rosenthal, R. (1989). Statistical procedures and the justification of knowledge in psychological science. American Psychologist, 44(10), 1276–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rumble, R., Saville, M., Simmons, L., et al. (2005). The preference of the common marmoset for nest boxes made from three different materials – wood, plastic, metal. Animal Technology and Welfare, 4(3), 185–7.Google Scholar

Russell, W. M. S. and Burch, R. L. (1959). The Principles of Humane Experimental Technique. Methuen & Co. Ltd: London.Google Scholar

Ruxton, G. G. and Colegrave, N. (2006). Experimental Design for the Life Sciences. OxfordUniversity Press: Oxford.Google Scholar

Scheffé, H. (1953). A method for judging all contrasts in the analysis of variance. Biometrika, 40(1–2), 87–110.Google Scholar

Schleiss, M. R., Anderson, J. L. and McGregor, A. (2006). Cyclic cidofovir (cHPMPC) prevents congenital cytomegalovirus infection in a guinea pig model. Virology Journal, 3, 9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Seacat, A. M., Thomford, P. J., Hansen, K. J., et al. (2002). Subchronic toxicity studies on perfluorooctanesulfonate potassium salt in cynomolgus monkeys. Toxicological Sciences, 68(1), 249–64.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Semela, D., Piguet, A. C., Kolev, M., et al. (2007). Vascular remodeling and antitumoral effects of mTOR inhibition in a rat model of hepatocellular carcinoma. Journal of Hepatology, 46(5), 840–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sena, E. S., van der Worp, H. B., Bath, P. M. W., Howells, D. W. and Macleod, M. R. (2010). Publication bias in reports of animal stroke studies leads to major overstatement of efficacy. PLoS Biol, 8(3), e1000344.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Shaffer, J. P. (1995). Multiple hypothesis testing. Annual Review of Psychology, 46, 561–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Shapiro, S. S. and Wilk, M. B. (1965). An analysis of variance test for normality (complete samples). Biometrika, 52(3–4), 591–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Shaw, R. (2004). Reduction in laboratory animal use by factorial design. Alternatives to Laboratory Animals: ATLA, 32(2), 49–51.Google ScholarPubMed

Shaw, R., Festing, M. F. W., Peers, I. and Furlong, L. (2002). Use of factorial designs to optimize animal experiments and reduce animal use. ILAR Journal, 43(4), 223–32.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Shoaib, M., Sidhpura, N. and Shafait, S. (2003). Investigating the actions of bupropion on dependence-related effects of nicotine in rats. Psychopharmacology 165, 404–12.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Shirley, E. A. C. (1977). The analysis of organ weight data. Toxicology, 8, 13–22.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Šidák, Z. (1967). Rectangular confidence regions for the means of multivariate normal distributions. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 62(318), 626–33.Google Scholar

Singleton, K. D. and Wischmeyer, P. E. (2003). Distance of cecum ligated influences mortality, tumor necrosis factor-alpha and interleukin-6 expression following cecal ligation and puncture in the rat. European Surgical Research, 35(6), 486–91.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Sjödin, L., Visser, S. and Al-Saffar, A. (2011). Using pharmacokinetic modeling to determine the effect of drug and food on gastrointestinal transit in dogs. Journal of Pharmacological and Toxicological Methods, 64(1), 42–52.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Skene, S. S. and Kenward, M. G. (2010). The analysis of very small samples of repeated measurements I: an adjusted sandwich estimator. Statistics in Medicine, 29(27), 2825–37.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Slob, W. (2002). Dose-response modeling of continuous endpoints. Toxicological Sciences, 66(2), 298–312.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Slotten, H. A., Kalinichev, M., Hagan, J. J., Marsden, C. A. and Fone, K. C. F. (2006). Long-lasting changes in behavioural and neuroendocrine indices in the rat following neonatal maternal separation: gender-dependent effects. Brain Research, 1097(1), 123–32.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Smirnov, N. V. (1939). Estimation of deviation between empirical distribution functions in two independent samples. Bulletin Moscow University, 2(2), 3–16.Google Scholar

Smith, P. F. (2012). A note on the advantages of using linear mixed model analysis with maximal likelihood estimation over repeated measures ANOVAs in psychopharmacology: comment on Clark et al. (2012). Journal of Psychopharmacology, 26(12), 1605–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Smith, C. C., Adkins, D. J., Martin, E. A. and O’Donovan, M. R. (2008). Recommendations for design of the rat comet assay. Mutagenesis, 23(3), 233–40.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Snedecor, G. W. and Cochran, W. G. (1989). Statistical Methods, 8th edition. Iowa State University Press: Ames, IA.Google Scholar

Stufken, J. (1996). Optimal crossover designs. In Handbook of Statistics 13: Design and Analysis of Experiments, editors Ghosh, S. and Rao, C. R.63–90. North-Holland: Amsterdam.Google Scholar

Tallarida, R. J. (2000). Drug Synergism and Dose-Effect Data Analysis. Chapman and Hall/CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Tallarida, R. J. and Jacob, L. S. (1979). The Dose-Response Relation in Pharmacology. Springer-Verlag: New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Teng, Y. D., Lavik, E. B., Qu, X., et al. (2002). Functional recovery following traumatic spinal cord injury mediated by a unique polymer scaffold seeded with neural stem cells. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 99(5), 3024–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Toothaker, L. E. (1993). Multiple Comparison Procedures. No. 89. SAGE Publications Inc.: London, UK.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Torrallardona, D., Conde, M. R., Badiola, I., Polo, J. and Brufau, J. (2003). Effect of fishmeal replacement with spray-dried animal plasma and colistin on intestinal structure, intestinal microbiology, and performance of weanling pigs challenged with Escherichia coli K99. Journal of Animal Science, 81(5), 1220–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Tufte, E. R. (1983). The Visual Display of Quantitative Information. Graphics Press: Cheshire, CT.Google Scholar

Tukey, J. W. (1953). The Problem of Multiple Comparisons. Unpublished Notes, Princeton University.Google Scholar

van der Worp, H. B., Howells, D. W., Sena, E. S., et al. (2010). Can animal models of disease reliably inform human studies?PLoS Medicine, 7(3), e1000245.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Vesterinen, H. M., Sena, E. S., ffrench-Constant, C., et al. (2010). Improving the translational hit of experimental treatments in multiple sclerosis. Multiple Sclerosis, 16(9), 1044–55.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Wiklund, S. J. and Agurell, E. (2003). Aspects of design and statistical analysis in the Comet assay. Mutagenesis, 18(2), 167–75.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Williams, E. J. (1949). Experimental designs balanced for the estimation of residual effects of treatments. Australian Journal of Scientific Research Series A, 2, 149–68.Google Scholar

Wolfram, S., Raederstorff, D., Preller, M., et al. (2006). Epigallocatechin gallate supplementation alleviates diabetes in rodents. The Journal of Nutrition, 136, 2512–18.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Woolley, M. L., Pemberton, D. J., Bate, S., Corti, C. and Jones, D. N. C. (2008). The mGlu2 but not the mGlu3 receptor mediates the actions of the mGluR2/3 agonist, LY379268, in mouse models predictive of antipsychotic activity. Psychopharmacology, 196(3), 431–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar