Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-6d856f89d9-jrqft Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-16T08:21:28.223Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

15 - Modification

from Part III - Temporal and aspectual ontology and other semantic structures

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 July 2016

Louise McNally
Affiliation:
Universitat Pompeu Fabra
Maria Aloni
Affiliation:
Universiteit van Amsterdam
Paul Dekker
Affiliation:
Universiteit van Amsterdam
Get access

Summary

Introduction

The term modifier (and modification, the function a modifier carries out) is difficult to define in intuitive terms. A first informal approximation might be, for example, to say that a modifier adds additional, non-essential descriptive content to that contributed by the expression that it combines with; in this respect, a modifier would contrast with an argument, which would provide descriptive content that is somehow required by the expression it combines with. For instance, one could try to argue that in (1), the content contributed by delightful is less essential to determining the referent of the whole nominal than that contributed by of Susan, and thus we could conclude that the former is a modifier, while the latter is an argument:

(1) the delightful mother of Susan

However, this sort of reasoning has long been known to be problematic, as the large literature on the argument/nonargument distinction in the argument structure literature makes clear. For example, consider (2):

(2) the younger sister of Susan

If Susan has two sisters, the content contributed by the adjective is arguably as important as that contributed by the prepositional phrase for identifying the referent of the nominal. However, such adjectives are universally treated as modifiers, not arguments. A classic example from the verbal domain involves the verbs buy, sell, rent, and lease: Money is an essential participant in the situations these verbs describe, and yet the for-phrase in (3) is not treated as an argument (see, e.g., Jackendoff, 1972, for an early discussion of this problem):

(3) We sold the car (to the dealer) for 2000 euros.

Syntactic obligatoriness is even more problematic as a criterion for defining modifiers, asmany expressions that linguists would agree are arguments are syntactically elidable (such as to the dealer in (3)), and sometimes modifiers are obligatory, if arguably only for pragmatic reasons (see, e.g.,??a built house vs. a well-built house, Goldberg and Ackerman, 2001). Consequently, in this article, modifier and modification will be defined in strictly formal terms.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2016

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • Modification
  • Edited by Maria Aloni, Universiteit van Amsterdam, Paul Dekker, Universiteit van Amsterdam
  • Book: The Cambridge Handbook of Formal Semantics
  • Online publication: 05 July 2016
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139236157.016
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • Modification
  • Edited by Maria Aloni, Universiteit van Amsterdam, Paul Dekker, Universiteit van Amsterdam
  • Book: The Cambridge Handbook of Formal Semantics
  • Online publication: 05 July 2016
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139236157.016
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • Modification
  • Edited by Maria Aloni, Universiteit van Amsterdam, Paul Dekker, Universiteit van Amsterdam
  • Book: The Cambridge Handbook of Formal Semantics
  • Online publication: 05 July 2016
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139236157.016
Available formats
×