Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-c9gpj Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-08T11:12:13.711Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

3 - Rural poverty and human–elephant conflicts in Sri Lanka

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 July 2013

Pieter J. H. van Beukering
Affiliation:
Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam
Elissaios Papyrakis
Affiliation:
Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam
Jetske Bouma
Affiliation:
Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam
Roy Brouwer
Affiliation:
Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam
Get access

Summary

Introduction

The conflict between wild elephants and rural farmers is of great concern for wildlife management and rural development in most parts of Asia and Africa. In Sri Lanka, the conflict is at a very acute stage, as revealed by the fact that between 1992 and 2001 a total of 536 people were killed by wild elephants and that elephant mortality has reached a level of more than three elephant losses per week. Habitat destruction caused by illegal human encroachments and settlements, interruption of elephant corridors and scarcity of food and water in the national parks are some of the causes that have led to the increase of the human–elephant conflicts (HEC) in all wildlife regions in Sri Lanka. Rapid economic development in the dry zone of the country led to large-scale deforestation. In addition, the civil war further increased the conflict by forcing elephants to shift from forests and national parks in the north and east to the south and the west. As their habitats are increasingly lost, wild elephants often have no other choice than invading nearby farm fields causing damage to crops, trees, storage, houses and other properties, sometimes also resulting in the loss of human lives. In response, farm households are compelled to retaliate in various ways to protect their crops, including the killing of elephants. As stated by Heffernan (2005), the factors driving HECs are complex and case specific to environmental and social variables. The intensity of the HEC depends on elephant-related parameters such as aggressiveness to post-traumatic stress disorder or propensity to feed on field crops instead of the more difficult to find forest plants. Thus, HECs are created in the interaction between the forest environment and people’s actions such as encroachment and land claims.

Elephant are the largest terrestrial animal on earth and they require approximately 130–300 kg of feed and 100–200 l of water per day (WWF 2002). As their natural habitats become fragmented, elephants move from one forest patch to the other for food and water, travelling about 20–25 km per day. In Asian countries, including Bangladesh, Bhutan, China, Cambodia, India, Indonesia, Laos, Myanmar, Malaysia, Nepal, Sri Lanka, Thailand and Vietnam, elephants are restricted to a few isolated and fragmented populations, a total number of approximately 35 000–50 000 elephants thus being affected by rapid population growth (Santiapillai and Jackson 1990, Sukumar 1989). In fact, 70% of elephant habitats in Asia were lost between 1960–2000 (Wickramasinghe and Santiapillai 2000).

Type
Chapter
Information
Nature's Wealth
The Economics of Ecosystem Services and Poverty
, pp. 56 - 73
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2013

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bandara, R. (2005). The economics of human-elephant conflict. Area Management and Wildlife Conservation Project, Ministry of Environmental and Natural Resources, Sri Lanka.Google Scholar
Bandara, R. and Tisdell, C. (2004). The net benefit of saving the Asian elephant: a policy and contingent valuation study. Ecological Economics, 48: 93–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bulte, E. and Rondeau, D. (2000). A bioeconomic model of community incentives for wildlife management before and after CAMPFIRE. WWF-International, Gland, Switzerland.Google Scholar
Desai, A. (1998). Conservation of elephants and human-elephant conflict. Technical report. Department of Wildlife and Conservation, Colombo, Sri Lanka.Google Scholar
De Silva, M. (1998). Status and conservation of the elephant and the alleviation of man–elephant conflict in Sri Lanka. Gajah, 19: 1–25.Google Scholar
Fernando, P. (1998). Genetics, ecology, and conservation of the Asian elephant. PhD thesis. University of Oregon, OR, USA.Google Scholar
Fernando, P. (1999). Elephants in Sri Lanka: past, present and future, Loris, 22(2): 38–44.Google Scholar
Fernando, P., Vidya, T. N. C., Linda Ng, S. G., Schikler, P. and Melnick, D. J. (2003). Conservation genetic analysis of the Asian elephant: a range-wide study. Proceedings of the Symposium for Human–Elephant Relationships and Conflicts, Colombo, August 2003.
Gunaratne, L. H. P., Ayoni, V. D. N., Premaratne, P. K. et al. (2006). Final report of the Poverty Reduction and Environmental Management # 14, Sri Lanka. IVM Institute for Environmental Studies, VU University Amsterdam, the Netherlands.Google Scholar
Heffernan, J. (2005). Elephants of Cabinda: Mission Report, Angola, April 2005. Fauna and Flora International and United Nations Development Programme in Cooperation with the Department of Urban Affairs and Environment, Canada.Google Scholar
Janssen, R. (1992). Multiobjective Decision Support for Environmental Management. Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Janssen, R. and van Herwijnen, M. (2011). DEFINITE 3.1 A system to support decisions on a finite set of alternatives (Software package and user manual). IVM Institute for Environmental Studies, VU University Amsterdam, the Netherlands.Google Scholar
Osborn, F. V. and Anstey, S. (2002). Human–elephant conflict and community development around the Niassa Reserve, Mozambique. Report for WWF and SARPO.
Ray, D. (1998). Development Economics. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Santiapillai, C. and Jackson, P. (1990). The Asian elephant: an action plan for its conservation. IUCN SSC Action Plan.Google Scholar
Sukumar, R. (1989). The Asian Elephant: Ecology and Management. Cambridge Studies in Applied Ecology and Resource Management. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Wickramasinghe, C. S. and Santipillai, C. (2000). Can wildlife pay for its conservation?Loris, 22: 18–22.Google Scholar
WWF (2002). WWF Fact Sheet, 12th Meeting of the Conference of the Parties to CITES Santiago, 3–15 November 2002, WWF-International, Gland, Switzerland.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×