Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-vsgnj Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-24T14:30:22.639Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

References

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 May 2013

Mark I. Lichbach
Affiliation:
University of Maryland, College Park
Get access

Summary

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2013

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abbott, Andrew. 2001. The Chaos of Disciplines. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Acemoglu, Daron and Robinson, James A.. 2006. Economic Origins of Dictatorship and Democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Aldrich, John H., Alt, James E., and Lupia, Arthur. 2008. “The EITM Approach: Origins and Interpretations.” In Box-Steffensmeier, Janet M., Brady, Henry E., and Collier, David, Eds. The Oxford Handbook of Political Methodology. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 828–843.Google Scholar
Almond, Gabriel. 1988. “Separate Tables: Schools and Sects in Political Science.” PS 21, no. 4: 828–842.Google Scholar
Almond, Gabriel A. and Powell, Jr G. Bingham. 1966. Comparative Politics: A Developmental Approach. Boston: Little, Brown.Google Scholar
Almond, Gabriel A. and Verba, Sidney. 1963. The Civic Culture: Political Attitudes and Democracy in Five Nations. Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arendt, Hannah. 1958. The Human Condition. Second Ed. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Aristotle, . 1981. The Politics. Revised Ed. New York: Penguin.Google Scholar
Arrow, Kenneth J. 1951. Social Choice and Individual Values. Second Ed. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Barber, Benjamin. 1988. The Conquest of Politics: Liberal Philosophy in Democratic Times. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Barry, Brian. 1970. Sociologists, Economists, and Democracy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Bendix, Reinhard. 1969. Nation Building and Citizenship: Studies of Our Changing Social Order. Garden City, NY: Anchor.Google Scholar
Benhabib, Seyla. 1995. “Response.” Political Theory 23 (November): 674–681.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berlin, Isaiah. 1958. “Two Concepts of Liberty.” In Berlin, Isaiah. Liberty: Incorporating Four Essays on Liberty. 2002. Second Ed. London: Oxford University Press, pp. 166–217.Google Scholar
Bevir, Mark. 2008. “Meta-Methodology: Clearing the Underbrush.” In Box-Steffensmeier, Janet M., Brady, Henry E., and Collier, David, Eds. The Oxford Handbook of Political Methodology. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 48–70.Google Scholar
Bevir, Mark. 2010. Democratic Governance. Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Box-Steffensmeier, Janet M., Brady, Henry E., and Collier, David. 2008. “Political Science Methodology.” In Box-Steffensmeier, Janet M., Brady, Henry E., and Collier, David, Eds. The Oxford Handbook of Political Methodology. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 3–34.Google Scholar
Brady, Henry. 2008. “Causation and Explanation in Social Science.” In Box-Steffensmeier, Janet M., Brady, Henry E., and Collier, David, Eds. The Oxford Handbook of Political Methodology. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 217–270.Google Scholar
Cartwright, Nancy. 1989. Nature’s Capacities and Their Measurement. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam. 1959. “Review of Verbal Behavior,” Language, 35: 26–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cleary, Mathew R. and Stokes, Susan C.. 2006. Democracy and the Culture of Skepticism: Political Trust in Argentina and Mexico. New York: Russell Sage.Google Scholar
Collier, David and Elman, Colin. 2008. “Qualitative and Multimethod Research: Organizations, Publication, and Reflections on Integration.” In Box-Steffensmeier, Janet M., Brady, Henry E., and Collier, David, Eds. The Oxford Handbook of Political Methodology. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 779–795.Google Scholar
Collins, Randall. 1998. The Sociology of Philosophies: A Global Theory of Intellectual Change. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Dahl, Robert A. 1956. A Preface to Democratic Theory. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Dahl, Robert A. 1957. “The Concept of Power.” Behavioral Science 2 (July): 201–215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dahl, Robert A. 1971. Polyarchy: Participation and Opposition. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Dahl, Robert A. and Lindblom, Charles E.. 1953. Politics, Economics, and Welfare: Planning and Politico-Economic Systems Resolved into Basic Social Processes. New York: Harper Torchbooks.Google Scholar
Deutsch, Karl. 1966. The Nerves of Government: Models of Political Communication and Control. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Downs, Anthony. 1957. An Economic Theory of Democracy. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
Dunn, John. 1999. “Democracy and Development?” In Shapiro, Ian and Hacker-Cordón, Casiano, Eds. Democracy’s Value. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 132–140.Google Scholar
Durkheim, Emile. [1893] 1933. The Division of Labor in Society. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Eagleton, Terry. 2008. Literary Theory: An Introduction. Anniversary Edition. Malden, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Easton, David. 1953. The Political System. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Eckstein, Harry. 1966. Division and Cohesion in Democracy: A Study of Norway. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Eckstein, Harry. 1971. The Evaluation of Political Performance: Problems and Dimensions. Beverly Hills: Sage.Google Scholar
Eckstein, Harry. 1980. “Theoretical Approaches to Explaining Collective Political Violence.” In Gurr, Ted Robert, Ed. Handbook of Political Conflict: Theory and Research, New York: Free Press, pp. 135–165.Google Scholar
Eckstein, Harry and Gurr, Ted Robert. 1975. Patterns of Authority: A Structural Basis for Political Inquiry. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Elster, Jon. 2007. Explaining Social Behavior. More Nuts and Bolts for the Social Sciences. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fish, Stanley. 2011. How To Write a Sentence and How To Read One. New York: Harper.Google Scholar
Friedman, Thomas. 2005. “The Country We Got.” New York Times, 1/6/05, p. A27.
Fung, Archon. 2007. “Democratic Theory and Political Science: A Pragmatic Method of Constructive Engagement.” American Political Science Review 101 (August): 443–458.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gellner, Ernest. 1995. Anthropology and Politics: Revolutions in the Sacred Grove. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Goodin, Robert E. and Tilly, Charles, Eds. 2006. Oxford Handbook of Contextual Political Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef
Gurr, Ted Robert. 1974. “Persistence and Change in Political Systems: 1800–1971.” American Political Science Review 68 (December): 1482–1504.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hamilton, Alexander, Jay, John, and Madison, James. [1787–88] 1961. The Federalist: A Commentary on the Constitution of the United States. New York: Random House.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Habyarimana, James, Humphreys, Macartan, Posner, Daniel N., and Weinstein, Jeremy M.. 2009. Coethnicity: Diversity and the Dilemmas of Collective Action. New York: Russell Sage.Google Scholar
Habermas, Jürgen (1989). The Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere: An Inquiry into a Category of Bourgeois Society. Trans. Burger, Thomas, Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Hacking, Ian. 1983. Representing and Intervening: Introductory Topics in the Philosophy of Natural Science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hobbes, Thomas. [1651] 1988. Leviathan. London: Penguin.Google Scholar
Holland, Paul W. 1986. “Statistics and Causal Inference.” Journal of the American Statistical Association 81 (December): 945–960.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huntington, Samuel P. 1968. Political Order in Changing Societies. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Ingelhart, Ronald and Welzel, Christian. 2005. Modernization, Cultural Change, and Democracy: The Human Development Sequence. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kalyvas, Stathis N. 2006. The Logic of Violence in Civil War. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Katznelson, Ira. 2003. Desolation and Enlightenment. Political Knowledge After Total War, Totalitarianism, and the Holocaust. New York: Columbia University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Katznelson, Ira. 2009. “Strong Theory, Complex History: Structure and Configuration in Comparative Politics Revisited.” In Lichbach, Mark Irving and Zuckerman, Alan, Eds. Comparative Politics: Rationality, Culture, and Structure. Second Ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 96–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kern, Stephen. 2004. A Cultural History of Causality. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
King, Gary, Keohane, Robert O., and Verba, Sidney. 1994. Designing Social Inquiry: Scientific Inference in Qualitative Research. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Kohli, Atul. 2004. State-Directed Development: Political Power and Industrialization in the Global Periphery. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kuhn, Thomas S. 1970. The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Second Ed., enlarged. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Kurki, Milja. 2008. Causation in International Relations: Reclaiming Causal Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Laitin, David D. 2007. “Culture, Rationality, and the Search for Discipline.” In Munck, Gerardo L. and Snyder, Richard, Eds. Passion, Craft, and Method in Comparative Politics. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, pp. 601–648.Google Scholar
LaPalombara, Joseph. 1970. “Parsimony and Empiricism in Comparative Politics: An Anti-Scholastic View.” In Holt, Robert H. and Turner, John E., Eds. The Methodology of Comparative Research. New York: Free Press, pp. 123–149.Google Scholar
Lasswell, Harold Dwight. 1950. Politics: Who Gets What, When, How. New York: P. Smith.Google Scholar
Lichbach, Mark. 1995. The Rebel’s Dilemma. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lichbach, Mark. 2003. Is Rational Choice Theory All of Social Science?Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lichbach, Mark. 2005. “How to Organize Your Mechanisms: Research Programs, Stylized Facts, and Historical Narratives.” In Davenport, Christian, Johnston, Hank, and Mueller, Carol, Eds. Repression and Mobilization, Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, pp. 227–243.Google Scholar
Lichbach, Mark. 2008. “Modeling Mechanisms of Contention: McTT’s Positivist Constructivism.” Qualitative Sociology 31 (December): 345–354.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lichbach, Mark. 2009. “Thinking and Working in the Midst of Things: Discovery, Explanation, and Evidence in Comparative Politics.” In Lichbach, Mark Irving and Zuckerman, Alan S., Eds. Comparative Politics: Rationality, Culture, and Structure, Second Ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 18–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lichbach, Mark. 2010. “Charles Tilly’s Problem Situations: From Class and Revolution to Mechanisms and Contentious Politics.” Perspectives on Politics 8 (June): 543–549.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lichbach, Mark Irving and Kopstein, Jeffrey, Eds. 2009. Comparative Politics: Institutions, Identities, and Interests in Today’s Small World. Third Ed. Cambridge: Cambridge: University Press.CrossRef
Lichbach, Mark Irving and Lebow, Ned, Eds. 2007. Theory and Evidence in Comparative Politics and International Relations. New York: Palgrave-Macmillan.
Lichbach, Mark Irving and Seligman, Adam. 2000. Market and Community: The Bases of Social Order, Revolution, and Relegitimation. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press.Google Scholar
Lichbach, Mark Irving and Zuckerman, Alan. 2009. Comparative Politics: Rationality, Culture, and Structure. Second Ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lijphart, Arend. 1975. The Politics of Accommodation: Pluralism and Democracy in the Netherlands. Second Ed. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Lijphart, Arend. 1999. Patterns of Democracy: Government Forms and Performance in Thirty-Six Countries. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Linz, Juan J. [1975] 2000. Totalitarian and Authoritarian Regimes. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner.Google Scholar
Lipset, Seymour Martin. 1963. Political Man: The Social Bases of Politics. New York: Anchor Books.Google Scholar
Lipset, Seymour Martin and Rokkan, Stein. 1967. “Cleavage Structures, Party Systems, and Voter Alignments: An Introduction.” In Lipset, Seymour Martin and Rokkan, Stein, Eds. Party Systems and Voter Alignments. New York: Free Press, pp. 1–64.Google Scholar
Locke, John. 1988. Two Treatises of Government. Laslett, Peter, Ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lukes, Steven. 1985. Emil Durkheim His Life and Work: A Historical and Critical Study. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
MacCallum, Gerald C.., 1967. “Negative and Positive Freedom.” Philosophical Review 76 (July): 312–334.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Machiavelli, Niccolo. [1514] 1961. The Prince. London: Penguin.Google Scholar
Madison, James, Hamilton, Alexander, and Jay, John. [1788] 1987. The Federalist Papers. Kramnick, Issac, Ed. New York: Penguin.Google Scholar
Mansbridge, Jane J. 1980. Beyond Adversary Democracy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Mansbridge, Jane J. 1996. Using Power/Fighting Power: The Polity. In Benhabib, Seyla, Ed. Democracy and Difference: Contesting the Boundaries of the Political. Princeton: Princeton University Press, pp. 46–66.Google Scholar
Marx, Karl. [1845] 1998. The German Ideology, Including Theses on Feuerbach. New York: Prometheus Books.Google Scholar
Marx, Karl. [1869] 1963. The 18th Brumaire of Louis Bonaparte. New York: International Publishers.Google Scholar
May, Kenneth O. 1952. “A Set of Independent, Necessary and Sufficient Conditions for Simple Majority Decision.” Econometrica 20 (October): 680–684.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McAdam, Doug, Tarrow, Sidney, and Tilly, Charles. 2001. Dynamics of Contention. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Menard, Louis. 2001. The Metaphysical Club: A Story of Ideas in America. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.Google Scholar
Michels, Robert. [1919] 1962. Political Parties: A Sociological Study of the Oligarchical Tendencies of Modern Democracy. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Montesquieu, . 1989. The Spirit of Laws. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Moore, Barrington. 1966. Social Origins of Dictatorship and Democracy: Lord and Peasant in the Making of the Modern World. Boston: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
Moore, Barrington. 1978. Injustice: The Social Bases of Obedience and Revolt. White Plains, NY: M. E. Sharpe.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moore, Barrington, Jr. 2007. “The Critical Spirit and Comparative Historical Analysis.” In Munck, Gerardo L. and Snyder, Richard, Eds. Passion, Craft, and Method in Comparative Politics. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, pp. 86–112.Google Scholar
Mosca, Gaetano. 1939. The Ruling Class. Trans. Livingston, Arthur. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Neiman, Susan. 2009. Moral Clarity: A Guide for Grown-Up Idealists. Revised Ed. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
North, Douglass C. and Weingast, Barry R. (1989). “Constitutions and Commitment: The Evolution of Institutions Governing Public Choice in Seventeenth-Century England.” Journal of Economic History 49 (December): 803–832.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Olson, Mancur. 1965. The Logic of Collective Action: Public Goods and the Theory of Groups. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Ostrom, Elinor. 1990. Governing the Commons: The Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pareto, Vilfredo. [1920] 1980. Compendium of General Sociology. Abridged by Farina, Giulio, Edited by Abbott, Elisabeth. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Parsons, Talcott. 1951. The Social System. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Pettit, Philip. 1997. Republicanism: A Theory of Freedom and Government. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Pitkin, Hanna. 1967. The Concept of Representation. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Plato, . 1974. The Republic. Second Ed. New York: PenguinGoogle Scholar
Powell, G. Bingham. 1982. Contemporary Democracies: Participation, Stability, and Violence. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Przeworski, Adam. 2007. “Is the Science of Comparative Politics Possible?” In Boix, Carles and Stokes, Susan C., Ed. Oxford Handbook of Comparative Politics. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 147–171.Google Scholar
Przeworski, Adam. 2010. Democracy and the Limits of Self-Government. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Przeworski, Adam, Alvarez, Michael E., Cheibub, José Antonio, and Limongi, Fernando. 2000. Democracy and Development. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rapoport, Anatol. 1960. Fights, Games, and Debates. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Rawls, John. 1971. A Theory of Justice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Rawls, John. 1993. Political Liberalism. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Riker, William H. 1982. Liberalism Against Populism: A Confrontation Between the Theory of Democracy and the Theory of Social Choice. San Francisco: W. H. Freeman.Google Scholar
Rorty, Richard. 1982. Consequences of Pragmatism (Essays, 1972–1980). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Rorty, Richard. 1999. Philosophy and Social Hope. Harmondsworth, UK: Penguin.Google Scholar
Rousseau, Jean-Jacques. [1762] 1968. The Social Contract. New York: Penguin.Google Scholar
Rubin, Donald B. 1974. “Estimating Causal Effects of Treatments in Randomized and Nonrandomized Studies.” Journal of Educational Psychology 66: 688–701.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Samuelson, Paul A. 1947. Foundations of Economic Analysis. Enlarged Ed. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Schmitter, Philippe C. 2007. “Corporatism, Democracy, and Conceptual Traveling.” In Munck, Gerardo L. and Snyder, Richard, Eds. Passion, Craft, and Method in Comparative Politics. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, pp. 305–350.Google Scholar
Schotter, Andrew and Schwödiauer, G.. 1980. “Economics and the Theory of Games: A Survey. Journal of Economic Literature 18 (June): 479–527.Google Scholar
Schumpeter, Joseph A. 1950. Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy. Third Ed. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
Schwartz, Barry. 2004. The Paradox of Choice: Why More Is Less. New York: ECCO.Google Scholar
Schweinitz, Karl de. 1964. Industrialization and Democracy. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Scott, James C. 1985. Weapons of the Weak: Everyday Forms of Peasant Resistance. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Shapiro, Ian. 1990. Political Criticism. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Shapiro, Ian. 2002. “The State of Democratic Theory.” In Katznelson, Ira, and Milner, Helen V., Eds. Political Science: The State of the Discipline. New York: W.W. Norton & Company, pp. 235–265.Google Scholar
Shapiro, Ian. 2003. The State of Democratic Theory. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Shapiro, Ian. 2005. The Flight From Reality in the Human Sciences. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Shaw, George Bernard. [1902] 2010. Man and Superman. New York: Create Space.Google Scholar
Shklar, Judith. 1984. Ordinary Vices. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Skinner, Quentin. 1974. “Some Problems in the Analysis of Political Thought and Action.” Political Theory 2 (August): 277–303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Skocpol, Theda. 1979. States and Social Revolutions: A Comparative Analysis of France, Russia and China. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sniderman, Paul M. and Hagendoorn, Louk. 2007. When Ways of Life Collide: Multiculturalism and Its Discontents in the Netherlands. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Stinchcombe, Arthur L. 2005. The Logic of Social Research. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Stokes, Susan C. 2001. Mandates and Democracy: Neoliberalism by Surprise in Latin America. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tarrow, Sidney G. 2011. Power in Movement: Social Movements and Contentious Politics. Revised and Updated Third Ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taylor, Charles. 1985. “Philosophy and the Human Sciences.” Philosophical Papers 2. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thompson, Dennis F. 2008. “Deliberative Democratic Theory and Empirical Political Science.” Annual Review of Political Science 11: 497–520.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tilly, Charles. 1975. “Reflections on the History of European State-Making.” In Tilly, Charles Ed. The Formation of National States in Western Europe. Princeton: Princeton University Press, pp. 3–83.Google Scholar
Tilly, Charles. 2003. The Politics of Collective Violence. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tilly, Charles. 2004. Social Movements, 1768–2004. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Tilly, Charles. 2007. Democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tilly, Charles. 2008. Contentious Performances. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tilly, Charles and Tarrow, Sidney. 2007. Contentious Politics. Boulder, CO: Paradigm.Google Scholar
Tocqueville, Alexis de. [1850] 1969. Democracy in America. Lawrence, George, Trans. New York: Anchor Books.Google Scholar
Trotsky, Leon. [1932] 1980. The History of the Russian Revolution. New York: Pathfinder.Google Scholar
Tsai, Lily L. 2007. “Solidarity Groups, Informal Accountability, and Local Public Goods Provision in Rural China.” American Political Science Review 101 (May): 355–372.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Unger, Roberto Mangabeira. 1987. Social Theory: Its Situation and Its Task. London: Verso.Google Scholar
Vonnegut, Kurt. 1966. Mother Night. New York: Avon.Google Scholar
Weber, Max. [1924] 1968. Economy and Society. Two volumes. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Weber, Max. 1946a. “Politics as a Vocation.” In Gerth, H. H. and Mills, C. Wright, Eds. From Max Weber: Essays in Sociology. New York: Oxford, pp. 77–128.Google Scholar
Weber, Max. 1946b. “Science as a Vocation.” In Gerth, H. H. and Mills, C. Wright, Eds. From Max Weber: Essays in Sociology. New York: Oxford, pp. 129–156.Google Scholar
Weber, Max. 1946c. “Religious Rejections of the World and Their Directions.” In Gerth, H. H. and Mills, C. Wright, Eds. From Max Weber: Essays in Sociology. New York: Oxford, pp. 323–359.Google Scholar
Wedeen, Lisa. 2004. “Concepts and Commitments in the Study of Democracy.” In Shapiro, Ian, Smith, Rogers, and Masoud, Tarek E., Eds. Problems and Methods in the Study of Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 274–306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wedeen, Lisa. 2008. Peripheral Visions: Publics, Power, and Performance in Yemen. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wittgenstein, Ludwig. 2009. Philosophical Investigations. Fourth Ed. Hacker, P. M. S. and Schulte, Joachim, Eds. and Trans. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Wolin, Sheldon S. 1996. “Fugitive Democracy.” In Benhabib, Seyla, Ed. Democracy and Difference: Contesting the Boundaries of the Political. Princeton: Princeton University Press, pp. 31–45.Google Scholar
Zuckerman, Alan S. 1975. “Political Cleavage: A Conceptual and Theoretical Analysis.” British Journal of Political Science 5 (April): 231–248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zuckerman, Alan S. 1989. “The Bases of Political Cohesion: Apply and Reconstructing Crumbling Theories.” Comparative Politics 21 (July): 473–495.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • References
  • Mark I. Lichbach, University of Maryland, College Park
  • Book: Democratic Theory and Causal Methodology in Comparative Politics
  • Online publication: 05 May 2013
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139198820.014
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • References
  • Mark I. Lichbach, University of Maryland, College Park
  • Book: Democratic Theory and Causal Methodology in Comparative Politics
  • Online publication: 05 May 2013
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139198820.014
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • References
  • Mark I. Lichbach, University of Maryland, College Park
  • Book: Democratic Theory and Causal Methodology in Comparative Politics
  • Online publication: 05 May 2013
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139198820.014
Available formats
×