Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-5g6vh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-27T23:26:47.878Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

35 - The Discourses of Practitioners in Eighteenth- to Twentieth-Century Russia and Soviet Union

from PART VI - THE DISCOURSES OF PRACTITIONERS ON MEDICAL ETHICS

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 May 2012

Robert B. Baker
Affiliation:
Union College, New York
Laurence B. McCullough
Affiliation:
Baylor College of Medicine
Get access

Summary

INTRODUCTION

For historical and geographical reasons, medical ethics in Russia prior to the Revolution of 1917 has distinctive characteristics. As Peter Chaadaev wrote in 1829 “we lived and continue to live only to give a certain important lesson for generations to come which will be able to understand it; in any case, at the present moment we constitute a gap in a moral universe. I cannot but be amazed by this unusual emptiness and uniqueness of our social being” (Chadaaev 1906, 14). For centuries Russia was a backward rural country. Obshina (community) was the basis of social life. One can track from this origin of the emergence to supremacy of the community over the individual, the state over the personality. Such terms as sobornost and soviety (“The Soviet power”) are absent from other European languages (Makshantseva 2001, 112–19). Correlatively, one does not find a Russian analog for privacy – this term simply does not exist in the language.

Christianity was adopted in Russia in 988 in its Byzantine or Orthodox version. From the thirteenth to the fifteen centuries, Mongolian hordes occupied most of the country. These two factors contributed to a prolonged isolation of Russia from the mainstream of European civilization. Complicating matters further, from the fourteenth to the twentieth centuries, Russia was at war 329 of 525 years (Makshantseva 2001, 114). Under these circumstances the value attributed to human life was significantly eroded. Severe spiritual and political censorship hindered the development of secular philosophical thought.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×