Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-qxdb6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-28T00:56:25.560Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Bibliography

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 March 2012

David Palmeter
Affiliation:
Sidley Austin Brown & Wood
Petros C. Mavroidis
Affiliation:
Université de Neuchâtel, Switzerland
Get access

Summary

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Dispute Settlement in the World Trade Organization
Practice and Procedure
, pp. 310 - 315
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2004

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Brenner, Saul & Spaeth, Harold J., Stare Indecisis: The Alteration of Precedent on the Supreme Court (Cambridge, 1995)
Brownlie, Ian, Principles of Public International Law (4th ed., Oxford, 1990)
Carter, Barry E. & Trimble, Philip R., International Law (2d ed., Little Brown, 1994)
Chayes, Abram & Chayes, Antonia Handler, The New Sovereignty: Compliance with International Regulatory Agreements (Harvard, 1995)
Croome, John, Reshaping the World Trading System: A History of the Uruguay Round (World Trade Organization, 1995)
Dam, Kenneth W., The GATT: Law and International Economic; Organization (Chicago, 1970)
Damrosch, Lori F., Henkin, Louis, Pugh, Richard, Schacter, Oscar, Schmidt, Hans, International Law (2d ed., West, 2002)
David, Rene, French Law: Its Structure, Sources, and Methodology (Michael Kindred, trans.) (Louisiana State University Press, 1972)
European Commission, Report on United States Barriers to Trade and Investment (2002)
Evans, Malcolm (Ed), Remedies in International Law: The Institutional Dilemma (Hart, 1998)
Fitzmaurice, Gerald, The Law and Procedure of the International Court of Justice (Cambridge, 1986)
Franck, Thomas, Fairness in International Law and Institutions (Clarendon Press, 1995)
Gardner, Richard N., Sterling-Dollar Diplomacy in Current Perspective: The Origins and Prospects of Our International Economic Order (Columbia Univ. Press ed., 1980)
Gaskin, Richard H., Burdens of Proof in Modern Discourse (Yale, 1992)
Gray, Christine, Judicial Remedies in International Law (Oxford, 1990)
Hart, H. L. A., The Concept of Law (2d ed., Oxford, 1994)
Higgins, Rosalyn, Problems & Process: International Law and How We Use It (Oxford, 1994)
Hoekman, Bernard & Kostecki, Michael, The Political Economy of the World Trading System: From GATT to the WTO (Oxford, 1995)
Hudec, Robert E., Enforcing International Trade Law: The Evolution of the Modern GATT Legal System (Butterworth, 1993)
Hudec, Robert E., The GATT Legal System and World Trade Diplomacy (2d ed., Butterworth, 1990)
Hudec, Robert E., GATT and the Developing Countries (Trade Policy Research Centre, 1988)
International Law Commission, Report (United Nations, 2000)
Jackson, John H., The World Trading System (2d ed., MIT Press, 1997)
Jackson, John H., World Trade and the Law of GATT (Bobbs-Merrill, 1969)
Kazazi, Mojtaba, Burden of Proof and Related Issues: A Study on Evidence before International Tribunals (Kluwer, 1996)
Long, Oliver, Law and Its Limitations in the GATT Multilateral Trade System (Martinus Nijhoff, 1985)
MacCormick, Neil, Legal Reasoning and Legal Theory (Oxford, 1978)
Matsushita, Mitsuo, 5 Selected GATT/WTO Panel Reports: Summaries and Commentaries (Fair Trade Center, Tokyo, 1999)
Messerlin, Patrick, La Nouvelle OMC (Dunod, 1995)
Montaigne, Michel de, The Complete Essays of Montaigne (Donald M. Frame, Ed) (Stanford, 1965)
Oppenheim, Lassa, International Law (Jennings & Watts, Eds) (9th ed., Longman, 1992)
Paemen, Hugo & Bensch, Alexandra, From the GATT to the WTO: The European Community in the Uruguay Round (Leuven University Press, 1995)
Preeg, Ernest H., Traders in a Brave New World: The Uruguay Round and the Future of the International Trading System (Chicago, 1995)
Rosenne, Shabtai, The World Court (5th ed., Martinus Nijhoff, 1995)
Sands, Phillipe, Principles of International Environmental Law (Manchester Univ. Press, 1995)
Schott, Jeffrey J., The Uruguay Round: An Assessment (Institute for International Economics, 1994)
Shahabuddeen, Mohamed, Precedent in the World Court (Grotius, Cambridge, 1996)
Shaw, Malcolm N., International Law (Grotius, Cambridge, 1991)
Walker, David M., The Scottish Legal System (W. Green & Son, 1981)
World Trade Organization, Analytical Index, Guide to GATT Law and Practice (1995)
Bilder, Richard B., The Fact/Law Distinction in International Adjudication, in Richard Lillich (Ed) Fact-Finding before International Tribunals 95 (Transnational, 1991)
Charnovitz, Steve, Should the Teeth Be Pulled? An Analysis of WTO Sanctions, in Kennedy & Southwick (Eds) The Political Economy of International Trade Law: Essays in Honor of Robert E. Hudec 602 (Cambridge, 2002)
Davey, William J., A Permanent Panel Body for WTO Dispute Settlement: Desirable or Practical? in Kennedy & Southwick (Eds) The Political Economy of International Trade Law: Essays in Honor of Robert E. Hudec 496 (Cambridge, 2002)
Davey, William J., WTO Dispute Settlement: Segregating the Useful Political Aspects and Avoiding “Over-Legalization,” in Marco Bronckers & Reinhard Quick (Eds) New Directions in International Economic Law: Essays in Honor of John H. Jackson 291 (Kluwer, 2000)
Horlick, Gary N., Problems with the Compliance Structure of the WTO Dispute Resolution Process, in Kennedy & Southwick (Eds) The Political Economy of International Trade Law: Essays in Honor of Robert E. Hudec 636 (Cambridge, 2002)
Hudec, Robert E., Broadening the Scope of Remedies in WTO Dispute Settlement, in Friedl Weiss (Ed) Improving WTO Dispute Settlement Procedures: Issues & Lessons from the Practice of Other International Courts & Tribunals 369 (Cameron May, 2000)
Hudec, Robert E., The Role of the GATT Secretariat in the Evolution of the WTO Dispute Settlement Procedure, in Jagdish Bhagwati & Mathias Hirsch (Eds) The Uruguay Round and Beyond: Essays in Honour of Arthur Dunkel 101 (Springer-Verlag, 1998)
Jansen, Bernhard, Scope of Jurisdiction in GATT/WTO Dispute Settlement: Consultations and Panel Requests, in Friedl Weiss (Ed) Improving WTO Dispute Settlement Procedures: Issues and Lessons from the Practice of Other International Courts and Tribunals 45 (Cameron May, 2001)
Lafer, Celso, The World Trade Organization Dispute Settlement System (1996 Gilberto Amado Memorial Lecture, United Nations, 1996)
Mattoo, Aaditya & Mavroidis, Petros C., Trade Environment and the WTO: How Real Is the Conflict?, in Ernst-Ulrich Petersmann (Ed) International Trade Law and the GATT/WTO Dispute Settlement System (Kluwer, 1997)
Mavroidis, Petros C., Proposal for Reform of Article 22 of the DSU: Reconsidering the Sequencing Issue and Suspension of Concessions, in E. U. Petersmann (Ed) Preparing for the Doha Development Round 81 (European University Institute, Florence, 2002)
Mavroidis, Petros C., Amicus Curiae Briefs before the WTO: Much Ado About Nothing, in Armin von Bogdandy, Petros C. Mavroidis and Yves Meny (Eds) European Integration and International Co-ordination: Studies in Transnational Economic Law in Honour of Claus-Dieter Ehlermann (Kluwer, Leiden, 2002)
Palmeter, David & Alexandrov, Stanimir A., “Inducing Compliance” in WTO Dispute Settlement, in Kennedy & Southwick (Eds) The Political Economy of International Trade Law: Essays in Honor of Robert E. Hudec 646 (Cambridge, 2002)
Porges, Amelia, Step by Step to an International Trade Court, in Kennedy & Southwick (Eds) The Political Economy of International Trade Law: Essays in Honor of Robert E. Hudec 496 (Cambridge, 2002)
Shaw, Malcolm N., A Practical Look at the International Court of Justice, in Malcolm Evans (Ed) Remedies in International Law: The Institutional Dilemma 13 (Hart Publishing, Oxford, 1998)
Alexandrov, Stanimir A., Non-Appearance before the International Court of Justice, 33Columbia Journal of Transnational Law 41 (1995)Google Scholar
Anderson, Kym, Peculiarities of Retaliation in WTO Dispute Settlement, 1World Trade Review 123 (No. 2, July 2002)Google Scholar
Bartels, Lorand, Applicable Law in WTO Dispute Settlement Proceedings, 35Journal of World Trade 499 (No. 3, June 2001)Google Scholar
Bourgeois, Jacques H. J., Comment on a WTO Permanent Panel Body, 6Journal of International Economic Law 211 (No. 1, March 2003)Google Scholar
Carmody, Chi, Remedies and Conformity under the WTO Agreement, 5Journal of International Economic Law 307 (No. 2, June 2002)Google Scholar
Cartland, Michael, Comment on a WTO Permanent Panel Body, 6Journal of International Economic Law 211 (No. 1, March 2003)Google Scholar
Chang, Seung Wha, Comment on a WTO Permanent Panel Body, 6Journal of International Economic Law 211 (No. 1, March 2003)Google Scholar
Charnovitz, Steve, The WTO's Problematic “Last Resort” Against Noncompliance, Aussenwirtschaft 57 (2002)Google Scholar
Cottier, Thomas, The WTO Permanent Panel Body, 6Journal of International Economic Law 187 (No. 1, March 2003)Google Scholar
Croley, Steven P. & Jackson, John H., WTO Dispute Procedures, Standard of Review, and Deference to National Governments, 90American Journal of International Law 193 (April 1996)Google Scholar
Davey, William J., The Case for a Permanent Panel Body, 6Journal of International Economic Law 177 (No. 1, March 2003)Google Scholar
Davey, William J., Dispute Settlement in GATT, 11Fordham International Law Journal 51 (1987)Google Scholar
Ehlermann, Claus-Dieter, Six Years on the Bench of the “World Trade Court” – Some Personal Experiences as a Member of the Appellate Body of the World Trade Organization, 36Journal of World Trade 605 (No. 4, August 2002)Google Scholar
Grané, Patricio, Remedies under WTO Law 4, Journal of International Economic Law 755 (No. 4, December 2001)Google Scholar
Howse, Robert, Trade, Environment and the Role of NGOs, 4Journal of World Intellectual Property 277 (No. 4, March 2001)Google Scholar
Lacarte, Julio, Comment on a WTO Permanent Panel Body, 6Journal of International Economic Law 211 (No. 1, March 2003)Google Scholar
Lennard, Michael, Navigating by the Stars: Interpreting the WTO Agreements, 5Journal of International Economic Law 17 (March 2002)Google Scholar
Long, Russell, United States Law and the International Antidumping Code, 3International Lawyer 464 (1969)Google Scholar
Lugard, Maurits, Scope of Appellate Review: Objective Assessment of the Facts and Issues of Law, 1Journal of International Economic Law 323 (1998)Google Scholar
Marceau, Gabrielle, A Call for Coherence in International Law: Praises for the Prohibition against “Clinical Isolation” in WTO Dispute Settlement, 33Journal of World Trade 87 (No. 5, October 1999)Google Scholar
Martha, Rutsel Silvestre J., Presumptions and Burden of Proof in World Trade Law, 14Journal of International Arbitration 67 (No. 1, March 1997)Google Scholar
Martha, Rutsel Silvestre J., World Trade Dispute Settlement and the Exhaustion of Local Remedies Rule, 30Journal of World Trade 107 (No. 4, August 1996)Google Scholar
Mavroidis, Petros C., Remedies in the WTO Legal System: Between a Rock and a Hard Place, 11European Journal of International Law 763 (No. 4, December 2000)Google Scholar
Mavroidis, Petros C., Government Procurement Agreement: The Trondheim Case, 49Aussenwirtschaft 77 (1993)Google Scholar
McGivern, Brendan P., Seeking Compliance with WTO Rulings: Theory, Practice, and Alternatives, 36International Lawyer 141 (No. 1, Spring 2002)Google Scholar
Meagher, Niall P., The Sound of Silence: Giving Meaning to Omissions in Provisions of the WTO Agreements, 37Journal of World Trade 417(No. 2, April 2003)Google Scholar
Monnier, Pierre, The Time to Comply with an Adverse WTO Ruling, 35Journal of World Trade 825 (No. 5, October 2001)Google Scholar
Palmeter, David, The WTO as a Legal System, 24Fordham International Law Journal 444 (November–December 2000)Google Scholar
Palmeter, David, The WTO Appellate Body Needs Remand Authority, 32Journal of World Trade 51 (No. 1, February 1998)Google Scholar
Palmeter, David, The WTO Appellate Body's First Decision, 9Leiden Journal of International Law 337 (1996)Google Scholar
Palmeter, David, Section 337 and the WTO Agreements: Still in Violation?, 20World Competition No. 1 (September 1996)Google Scholar
Palmeter, David, A Commentary on the WTO Anti-Dumping Code, 30Journal of World Trade 43 (No. 4, August 1996)Google Scholar
Pauwelyn, Joost, The Role of Public International Law in the WTO: How Far Can We Go?, 95American Journal of International Law 535 (April 2001)Google Scholar
Pauwelyn, Joost, Enforcement and Countermeasures in the WTO: Rules are Rules – Toward a More Collective Approach, 94American Journal of International Law 535 (April 2000)Google Scholar
Pauwelyn, Joost, Evidence, Proof and Persuasion in WTO Dispute Settlement, 1Journal of International Economic Law 227 (1998)Google Scholar
Petersmann, Ernst-Ulrich, The Dispute Settlement of the World Trade Organization and the Evolution of the GATT Dispute Settlement System Since 1948, 31Common Market Law Review 1157 (1994)Google Scholar
Petersmann, Ernst-Ulrich, Dispute Settlement Proceedings in the Field of Antidumping Law, 28Common Market Law Review 69 (1991)Google Scholar
Quick, Reinhard, Trade, Environment and the Role of NGOs, 4Journal of World Intellectual Property 281 (No. 4, March 2001)Google Scholar
Roessler, Frieder, Comment on a WTO Permanent Panel Body, 6Journal of International Economic Law 211 (No. 1, March 2003)Google Scholar
Shoyer, Andrew W., Panel Selection in WTO Proceedings, 6Journal of International Economic Law 203 (No. 1, March 2003)Google Scholar
Thomas, J. C., The Need for Due Process in WTO Proceedings, 31Journal of World Trade 45 (No. 1, February 1997)Google Scholar
Trachtman, Joel P., The Domain of WTO Dispute Settlement, 40Harvard International Law Journal 333 (Spring, 1999)Google Scholar
Valles, Cherise M. & McGivern, Brendan P., The Right to Retaliate under the WTO Agreement: The “Sequencing” Problem, 34Journal of World Trade 63 (No. 2, 2000)Google Scholar
Wasescha, Luzius, Comment on a WTO Permanent Panel Body, 6Journal of International Economic Law 211 (No. 1, March 2003)Google Scholar
Weiler, J. H. H., The Rule of Lawyers and the Ethos of Diplomats: Reflections on the Internal and External Legitimacy of WTO Dispute Settlement, 35Journal of World Trade 191 (No. 2, April 2001)Google Scholar
Zonnekeyn, Geert A., The Appellate Body's Communication on Amicus Curiae Briefs in the Asbestos Case, 35Journal of World Trade 553 (No. 3, June 2001)Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • Bibliography
  • David Palmeter, Petros C. Mavroidis, Université de Neuchâtel, Switzerland
  • Book: Dispute Settlement in the World Trade Organization
  • Online publication: 05 March 2012
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139177931.012
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • Bibliography
  • David Palmeter, Petros C. Mavroidis, Université de Neuchâtel, Switzerland
  • Book: Dispute Settlement in the World Trade Organization
  • Online publication: 05 March 2012
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139177931.012
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • Bibliography
  • David Palmeter, Petros C. Mavroidis, Université de Neuchâtel, Switzerland
  • Book: Dispute Settlement in the World Trade Organization
  • Online publication: 05 March 2012
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139177931.012
Available formats
×