Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-skm99 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-27T22:10:50.622Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

7 - Exchange Processes

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 June 2012

David Knoke
Affiliation:
University of Minnesota
Franz Urban Pappi
Affiliation:
Universität Mannheim, Germany
Jeffrey Broadbent
Affiliation:
University of Minnesota
Yutaka Tsujinaka
Affiliation:
University of Tsukuba, Japan
Get access

Summary

In 1989 the U.S. Congress passed the first minimum wage hike in a decade, from $3.35 to $4.25 per hour over two years. The act also included a lower three-month “training wage” for teenagers. A more generous wage increase proposed by labor unions was defeated through hard lobbying by the Minimum Wage Coalition to Save Jobs, whose partners included the U.S. Chamber of Commerce, major corporations and small businesses, and 150 trade associations. The National Federation of Independent Businesses mobilized its half-million members to deluge their representatives with letters and telegrams describing the potential job losses in each congressional district. President Bush's earlier veto of a higher rate bill had forced the compromise that gave business firms a lower pay scale (CQ Almanac, 1989). The outcome of this policy fight illustrates the substantial impact of organized interest groups on national political economies. Explaining how organizations affect public policy decision is the ultimate objective of this chapter.

We confine our research to the impact of interest groups in civil society on legislative decisions. We realize that the relative importance of the national legislature in the total policy-making system varies from nation to nation. For instance, in Japan the ministries have a much stronger hand in making the content of legislation than do the departments in the U.S. And the Japanese ministries also have greater latitude in creating regulations and interpreting laws. Therefore, focusing our comparisons just on legislative politics produces a somewhat unbalanced analysis.

Type
Chapter
Information
Comparing Policy Networks
Labor Politics in the U.S., Germany, and Japan
, pp. 152 - 188
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 1996

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×