Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-ndmmz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-30T21:37:11.777Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

14 - Convention grounds

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 June 2012

John Vrachnas
Affiliation:
Deakin University, Victoria
Kim Boyd
Affiliation:
Deakin University, Victoria
Mirko Bagaric
Affiliation:
Deakin University, Victoria
Get access

Summary

Overview of grounds

Article 1A(2) of the Refugee Convention defines a refugee in terms of the reasons why a person fears being persecuted. A refugee must have a well-founded fear of being persecuted ‘for reasons of race, religion, nationality, membership of a particular social group, or political opinion’. After referring to Article 1 of the Convention, Gummow J explained in Applicant A v MIEA:

… [w]hilst as a matter of ordinary usage, a refugee might be one whose flight has been from invasion, earthquake, flood, famine or pestilence, the definition is not concerned with such persons. Accordingly, care is needed in resolving any apparent obscurity in the text of the definition by seeing the definition as reflecting, in a broad sense, humanitarian concerns for displaced persons.

Kirby J commented in the same case that the drafters of the Convention would not have included ‘categories of persecution’ in Article 1A(2) had they intended refugees to be defined as people who feared persecution for any reason.

In MIMA v Ibrahim, the High Court considered the meaning of ‘persecution’ in the context of the civil war that had prevailed in Somalia since 1991. In his discussion of the scope and purpose of the Convention, Gummow J cited observations made by Professor Hathaway on the restricted definition of ‘refugee’ contained in the Convention:

This phraseology was clearly adequate to comprise the traditional preoccupations of racial and religious minorities and would moreover bolster the condemnation of Soviet bloc politics through international law in two ways. First, the persecution standard was a known quantity, having already been employed to embrace Soviet bloc dissidents under the [International Refugee Organization] regime.[…]

Type
Chapter
Information
Migration and Refugee Law
Principles and Practice in Australia
, pp. 187 - 216
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×