Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-c9gpj Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-12T07:09:00.418Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

30 - Operational Considerations in an Analytic Environment for Systemic Risk

from PART X - COMPUTATIONAL ISSUES AND REQUIREMENTS

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 June 2013

Charles Worrell
Affiliation:
rue de l'Université
Samar Guharay
Affiliation:
Usa
Matt McMahon
Affiliation:
Usa
Len Seligman
Affiliation:
Usa
Rajani Shenoy
Affiliation:
Usa
Jean-Pierre Fouque
Affiliation:
University of California, Santa Barbara
Joseph A. Langsam
Affiliation:
University of Maryland, College Park
Get access

Summary

Abstract This chapter discusses some operational considerations relevant to managing a modeling environment for analyzing systemic risk. Challenges in data management, model hosting and data security are described. Suggestions for establishing a frame of reference for an assessment, and visualizing model outputs are presented. Three operating models for a risk modeling forum that would help decision makers build consensus around data driven analyses are described.

Introduction

The nation's exposure to financial risk arising from a broad range of diverse and additive effects has gained recent attention from leaders in government and the financial services industry. Models of the financial system are useful to help decision makers understand what is currently happening, and what conditions may exist in the future. They also play an important role in helping policy makers understand the potential impact of regulatory actions that they may consider.

There are numerous finance, economic, and risk models that have been developed to represent aspects of the nation's systemic risk. Many of those models are based on different assumptions, or focus on different aspects of the economy. At times, decision makers may seek to form aggregated views from a collection of disparate models. It can also be informative to compare outputs from related models to gain understanding of the ramifications of differing assumptions, and the range of uncertainty embedded in model outputs.

This chapter discusses a few of the operational considerations that must be managed to allow an array of those models to be brought together both to form aggregated views of the composite situation, and to perform unbiased comparisons of any conflicting forecasts that they might produce.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2013

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Acharya, V., Pedersen, L., Philippon, T., and Richardson, M. (2010). Measuring systemic risk. Federal Reserve Bank of Cleveland Working Paper 10–02.Google Scholar
Billio, M.Getmansky, M., Lo, A., and Pelizzon, L. (2010). Econometric measures of systemic risk in the finance and insurance sectors. National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper 16223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chan-Lau, J., Espinosa, M., Giesecke, K., and Sole, J. (2009). Assessing the systemic implications of financial linkages. In IMF Global Financial Stability Report, Chapter 2.Google Scholar
European Central Bank (2010a). New quantitative measures of systemic risk. Financial Stability Review Special FeatureE, December, 147–153.
European Central Bank (2010b). Recent advances in modeling [sic] systemic risk using network analysis. Summary of a workshop held in October 2009.
Gray, D. and Jobst, A. (2010). Systemic CCA – a model approach to systemic risk. Paper presented at conference sponsored by the Deutsche Bundesbank and Technische Universität Dresden, 28–29 October, 2010.Google Scholar
Haung, X., Zhou, H., and Zhu, H. (2011). Systemic risk contributions. Federal Reserve Board, Washington, DC, Finance and Economics Discussion Series working paper.Google Scholar
Nier, E., Yang, J., Yorulmazer, T., and Alentorn, A. (2008). Network models and financial stability. Bank of England Working Paper No. 346.CrossRef
Segoviano, M. and Goodhart, C. (2009). Banking stability measures. IMF Working Paper 09/04.
Werling, J. (2007). INFORUM. University of Maryland working paper. Available at www.inforum.umd.edu/papers/inforum/info/Inforum_Overview07.pdf.
Weyant, J. and Huntington, H. (2006). The energy modeling forum. Stanford University working paper. Available at gcep.stanford.edu/pdfs/SI3U6jOMPAIgwkaiBD_77Q/weyant_emf_ers06.pdf.

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×