Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-n9wrp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-22T15:14:13.771Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

10 - False Confessions and the Constitution

Problems, Possibilities, and Solutions

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 June 2014

John T. Parry
Affiliation:
Lewis and Clark College, Portland
L. Song Richardson
Affiliation:
University of Iowa College of Law
Get access

Summary

Introduction

On November 17, 1989, police in Peekskill, New York, discovered the body of fifteen-year-old Angela Correa, who had been raped, beaten, and strangled. On the basis of a detailed profile of the alleged offender prepared by Raymond M. Pierce of the New York Police Department, as well as behavior that they perceived to be highly unusual, Peekskill Detectives Thomas McIntyre and David Levine quickly locked in on Jeffrey Deskovic, a sixteen-year-old classmate of the victim who had been late to school the day after the victim disappeared, as their exclusive suspect. They sought to build a case against him by obtaining his confession to the crime.

Between December 1989 and January 1990, the detectives questioned Deskovic eight times. Throughout these contacts, the police used what they termed passive/active techniques, alternating from low-key questioning to high-stress, accusatory, and confrontational interrogation in an effort to induce Deskovic to confess. On January 25, 1990, the detectives gave Deskovic three polygraph exams and interrogated him for approximately eight hours. When they were unable to obtain a confession, even after falsely telling Deskovic that he had failed the polygraph tests, the detectives became more aggressive and confrontational. According to Deskovic, Detective McIntyre told him repeatedly that all the evidence, including the polygraphs, conclusively established his guilt and threatened that if Deskovic did not confess, he would go to prison. However, Detective McIntyre promised that if he confessed, he would receive psychiatric treatment and be allowed to go home.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2013

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Santos, Fernanda, Vindicated by DNA, but a Lost Man on the Outside, N.Y. Times, Nov. 25, 2007, at A11Google Scholar
Garrett, Brandon, The Substance of False Confessions, 62 Stan. L. Rev.1051 (2010)Google Scholar
Drizin, Steven & Leo, Richard A., The Problem of False Confessions in the Post-DNA World, 82 N.C. L. Rev. 891 (2004)Google Scholar
Leo, Richard A. & Ofshe, Richard, The Consequences of False Confessions: Deprivations of Liberty and Miscarriages of Justice in the Age of Psychological Interrogation, 88 J. Crim. Law & Criminology429 (1998)Google Scholar
Davis, Deborah & Leo, Richard A., Strategies for Preventing False Confessions and Their Consequences, inPractical Psychology for Forensic Investigations and Prosecutions121, 123–4 (Kebbell, Mark & Davies, Graham, eds., 2006)Google Scholar
Meissner, Christian & Kassin, S. M., “You’re Guilty, So Just Confess!” Cognitive and Confirmational Biases in the Interrogation Room, in Interrogations, Confessions and Entrapment 85 (Lassiter, G. D., ed., 2004)Google Scholar
Kassin, Saul, Drizin, Steven, Grisso, Thomas, Gudjohnsson, Gisli, Leo, Richard A. & Redlich, Allison, Police-Induced Confessions: Risk Factors and Recommendations, 34 Law & Hum. Beh. 3 (2010)Google Scholar
Duke, Steven, Does Miranda Protect the Innocent or the Guilty? 10 Chap. L. Rev. 551 (2007)Google Scholar
Stuntz, William, Miranda’s Mistake, 99 Mich. L. Rev. 975 (2001)Google Scholar
Leo, Richard A., Questioning the Relevance of Miranda in the Twenty-First Century, 99 Mich. L. Rev. 1000 (2001)Google Scholar
Leo, Richard A., Miranda and the Problem of False Confessions, In The Miranda Debate: Law, Justice and Policing 271 (Leo, Richard A. & Thomas, George C. III, eds., 1998)Google Scholar
Ofshe, Richard & Leo, Richard A., The Decision to Confess Falsely: Rational Choice and Irrational Action, 74 Denv. U. L. Rev. 979 (1997)Google Scholar
Leo, Richard A. & Ofshe, Richard, The Consequences of False Confessions: Deprivations of Liberty and Miscarriages of Justice in the Age of Psychological Interrogation, 88 J. Crim. Law & Criminology429, 438–9 (1998)Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×