Adams, R.A. & Fournier, J.J.F. (2003) Sobolev spaces. Academic Press, Kidlington, Oxford.

Agmon, S., Douglis, A., & Nirenberg, L. (1964) Estimates near the boundary for solutions of elliptic partial differential equations satisfying general boundary conditions. II. Comm. Pure Appl. Math. 17, 35–92.Google Scholar

Aubin, J.P. (1963) Un theoreme de compacite. C. R. Acad. Sci. Pari. 256, 5042–5044.Google Scholar

Bahouri, H., Chemin, J.-Y.,& Danchin, R. (2011) Fourier analysis and nonlinear partial differential equations. Springer, Heidelberg.

Bardos, C., Lopes Filho, M., Niu, D., Nussenzveig Lopes, H., & Titi, E.S. (2013) Stability of viscous, and instability of non-viscous, 2D weak solutions of incompressible fluids under 3D perturbations. SIAM J. Math. Anal. 45, 1871–1885.Google Scholar

Batchelor, G.K. (1999) An introduction to fluid dynamics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

Beale, J.T.,Kato, T.,& Majda, A. (1984) Remarks on the breakdown of smooth solutions for the 3-D Euler equation. Comm. Math. Phys. 94, 61–66.Google Scholar

Beirão da Veiga, H. (1985a) On the suitable weak solutions to the Navier–Stokes equations in the whole space. J. Math. Pures Appl. 64, 77–86.Google Scholar

Beirão da Veiga, H. (1985b) On the construction of suitable weak solutions to the Navier–Stokes equations via a general approximation theorem. J. Math. Pures Appl. 64, 321–334.Google Scholar

Beirão da Veiga, H. (1987) Existence and asymptotic behavior for strong solutions of the Navier–Stokes equations in the whole space. Indiana Univ. Math. J. 36, 149–166.Google Scholar

Beirão da Veiga, H. (1995) A new regularity class for the Navier–Stokes equations in ℝ n . Chinese Ann. Math. Ser. B. 4, 407–412.Google Scholar

Beirão da Veiga, H. (2000) On the smoothness of a class of weak solutions to theNavier– Stokes equations. J. Math. Fluid Mech. 2, 315–323.Google Scholar

Beirão da Veiga, H. & Secchi, P. (1987) L p -stability for the strong solutions of the Navier–Stokes equations in the whole space. Arch. Ration. Mech. Anal. 98, 65–69.Google Scholar

Benedek, A., Calderón, A.P., & Panzone, R. (1962) Convolution operators on Banach space valued functions. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 48, 356–365.Google Scholar

Bergh, J. & Löfström, J. (1976). Interpolation spaces. Springer-Verlag, Berlin.

Berselli, L.C. (2002) On a regularity criterion for the solutions to the 3D Navier–Stokes equations. Differential Integral Equation. 15, 1129–1137.Google Scholar

Berselli, L.C. & Galdi, G.P. (2002) Regularity criteria involving the pressure for the weak solutions to the Navier–Stokes equations. Proc. Amer.Math. Soc. 130, 3585–3595.Google Scholar

Berselli, L.C. & Spirito, S. (2016a) On the construction of suitable weak solutions to the 3D Navier–Stokes equations in a bounded domain by an artificial compressibility method. Commun. Contemp. Math., to appear.

Berselli, L.C. & Spirito, S. (2016b)Weak solutions to the Navier–Stokes equations constructed by semi-discretization are suitable. Contemp. Math., to appear.

Biot, J.-B. & Savart, F. (1820) Note sure le magnétisme de la pile de Volta. Annales Chim. Phys. 15, 222–223.Google Scholar

Biryuk, A., Craig, W., & Ibrahim, S. (2007) Construction of suitable weak solutions of the Navier–Stokes equations. In “Stochastic analysis and partial differential equations”. Contemp. Math. 49, 1–18.Google Scholar

Bogovskii, M.E. (1986) Decomposition of L p (Ω,ℝ n .) into the direct sum of subspaces of solenoidal and potential vector fields. Soviet Math. Dokl. 33, 161–165.Google Scholar

Bourbaki, N. (2004) Integration. Springer-Verlag, Berlin.

Caffarelli, L., Kohn, R., & Nirenberg, L. (1982) Partial regularity of suitable weak solutions of the Navier–Stokes equations. Comm. Pure. Appl. Math. 35, 771–931.Google Scholar

Calderón, C.P. (1990) Existence of weak solutions for the Navier–Stokes equations with initial data in L p . Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 318, 179–200.Google Scholar

Cannone, M. (1995) Ondelettes, paraproduits et Navier–Stokes. Diderot Editeur, Paris.

Cannone, M. (2003) Harmonic analysis tools for solving the incompressible Navier– Stokes equations. In Friedlander, S. & Serre, D. (eds.) Handbook of mathematical fluid dynamics, Vol. 3. Elsevier, Kidlington.

Cao, C. & Titi, E.S. (2008) Regularity criteria for the three-dimensional Navier–Stokes Equations. Indiana Univ. Math. J. 57, 2643–2661.Google Scholar

Castaing, C. (1967) Sur les multi-applications measurables. Rev. France Inform. Rech. Oper. 1, 91–126.Google Scholar

Chemin, J.-Y. (1992) Remarques sur l'existence globale pour le systeme de Navier– Stokes incompressible. SIAM J. Math. Anal. 23, 20–28.Google Scholar

Chemin, J.-Y. & Lerner, N. (1995) Flot de champs de vecteurs non lipschitziens et equations de Navier–Stokes. J. Differential Equation. 121, 314–328.Google Scholar

Chemin, J.-Y., Desjardins, B., Gallagher, I., & Grenier, E. (2006) Mathematical geophysics. Oxford University Press, Oxford.

Chen, C.-C., Strain, R.M., Yau, H.-T., & Tsai, T.-P. (2008) Lower bound on the blow-up rate of the axisymmetric Navier–Stokes equations. Int. Math. Res. Not. article ID rnn016.

Chernyshenko, S.I., Constantin, P., Robinson, J.C., & Titi, E.S. (2007) A posteriori regularity of the three-dimensional Navier–Stokes equations from numerical computations. J. Math. Phys. 48, 065204.Google Scholar

Chorin, A.J. & Marsden, J.E. (1993) A mathematical introduction to fluid mechanics. Third edition. Springer-Verlag, New York.

Chung, S.-Y. (1999) Uniqueness in the Cauchy problem for the heat equation. Proc. Edinburgh Math. Soc. 42, 455–468.Google Scholar

Constantin, P. (1986) Note on loss of regularity for solutions of the 3-D incompressible Euler and related equations. Comm. Math. Phys. 104, 311–326.Google Scholar

Constantin, P. & Foias, C. (1988) Navier–Stokes equations. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL.

Dacorogna, B. (2004) Introduction to the calculus of variations. Imperial College Press, London.

Danchin, R. (2000) Global existence in critical spaces for compressible Navier–Stokes equations. Invent. Math. 41, 579–614.Google Scholar

Dashti, M. & Robinson, J.C. (2008) An a posteriori condition on the numerical approximations of theNavier–Stokes equations for the existence of a strong solution. SIAM J. Numer. Anal. 46, 3136–3150.Google Scholar

Dashti, M. & Robinson, J.C. (2009) A simple proof of uniqueness of the particle trajectories for solutions of the Navier–Stokes equations. Nonlinearit. 22, 735–746.Google Scholar

De Giorgi, E. (1957) Sulla differenziabilita e lanaliticita delle estremali degli integrali multipli regolari. Mem. Accad. Sci. Torino. Cl. Sci. Fis. Mat. Nat. 3, 25–43.Google Scholar

De Lellis, C. & Székelyhidi Jr., L. (2010) On admissibility criteria for weak solutions of the Euler equations. Arch. Ration. Mech. Anal. 195, 225–260.Google Scholar

DiPerna, R.J. & Lions, P.-L. (1989) Ordinary differential equations, transport theory and Sobolev spaces. Invent. Math. 98, 511–547.Google Scholar

Doering, C.R. & Gibbon, J.D. (1995) Applied analysis of the Navier–Stokes equations. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

Duoandikoetxea, J. (2001) Fourier analysis. Graduate Studies in Mathematics 29. American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI.

Escauriaza, L., Seregin, G., & Šverák, V. (2003) L 3,∞-solutions of Navier–Stokes equations and backward uniqueness. Russian Math. Survey. 58, 211–250.Google Scholar

Evans, L.C. (1998) Partial differential equations. American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI.

Evans, L.C. & Gariepy, R.F. (1992) Measure theory and fine properties of functions. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL.

Fabes, E.B., Jones, B.F., & Riviere, N.M. (1972) The initial value problem for the Navier–Stokes equations with data in Lp . Arch. Ration. Mech. Anal. 45, 222–240.Google Scholar

Fabes, E.B., Lewis, J.E., & Riviere, N.M. (1977) Singular integrals and hydrodynamic potentials. Amer. J. Math. 99, 601–625.Google Scholar

Falconer, K.J. (1985) The geometry of fractal sets. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

Falconer, K.J. (1990) Fractal geometry. Wiley, Chichester.

Farwig, R. & Sohr, H. (1996) Helmholtz decomposition and Stokes resolvent system for aperture domains in Lq -spaces. Analysis. 16, 1–26.Google Scholar

Farwig, R. & Sohr, H. (1996) Helmholtz decomposition and Stokes resolvent system for aperture domains in Lq -spaces. Analysi. 16, 1–26.Google Scholar

Farwig, R., Kozono, H., & Sohr, H. (2005) A Lq . approach to Stokes and Navier–Stokes equations in general domains. Acta Math. 195, 21–53.Google Scholar

Fefferman, C.L. (1971) The multiplier problem for the ball. Ann. of Math. 94, 330–336.Google Scholar

Fefferman, C.L. (2000) Existence and smoothness of the Navier–Stokes equation. In The millennium prize problems, 57–67. Clay Math. Inst., Cambridge, MA.

Feynman, R.P., Leighton, R.B., & Sands, M. (1970) The Feynman lectures on physics, Volume II. Addison Wesley Publishing Co., Reading, MA, London.

Foias, C., Guillopé, C., & Temam, R. (1981) New a priori estimates for Navier– Stokes equations in dimension 3. Comm. Partial Differential Equation. 6, 329–359.Google Scholar

Foias, C., Guillopé, C., & Temam, R. (1985) Lagrangian representation of a flow. J. Differential Equation. 57, 440–449.Google Scholar

Foias, C. & Temam, R. (1989) Gevrey class regularity for the solutions of the Navier– Stokes equations. J. Funct. Anal. 87, 359–369.Google Scholar

Foias, C., Manley, O., Rosa, R., & Temam, R. (2001) Navier–Stokes equations and turbulence. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

Folland, G.B. (1999) Real analysis. Modern techniques and their applications. Second edition. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York, NY.

Friedlander, F.G. & Joshi, M. (1999) Introduction to the theory of distributions. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

Fujita, H. & Kato, T. (1964) On the Navier–Stokes initial value problem. I. Arch. Ration. Mech. Anal. 16, 269–315.Google Scholar

Fujiwara, D. & Morimoto, H. (1977) A Lr -theorem of the Helmholtz decomposition of vector fields. J. Fac. Sci. Univ. Tokyo Sect. IA Math. 24, 685–700.Google Scholar

Galdi, G.P. (2000) An introduction to the Navier–Stokes initial-boundary value problem. In Galdi, G.P., Heywood, J.G., & Rannacher, R. (eds.) Fundamental directions in mathematical fluid dynamics, 1–70. Birkhauser, Basel.

Galdi, G.P. (2011) An introduction to the mathematical theory of Navier–Stokes equations. Steady state problems. Second edition. Springer, New York, NY.

Galdi, G.P. & Maremonti, P. (1986) Monotonic decreasing and asymptotic behaviour of the kinetic energy for weak solutions of the Navier–Stokes equations in exterior domains. Arch. Ration. Mech. Anal. 94, 253–266.Google Scholar

Gallagher, I. (1997) The tridimensional Navier–Stokes equations with almost bidimensional data: stability, uniqueness, and life span. Int. Math. Res. Notice. 18, 919–935.Google Scholar

Giga, Y. (1983) Time and spatial analyticity of solutions of the Navier–Stokes equations. Comm. Partial Differential Equation. 8, 929–948.Google Scholar

Giga, Y. (1986) Solutions for semilinear parabolic equations in Lp and regularity of weak solutions of the Navier–Stokes system. J. Differential Equation. 62, 186–212.Google Scholar

Gilbarg, D. & Trudinger, N.S. (1983) Elliptic partial differential equations of second order. Springer, Berlin.

Grafakos, L. (2008) Classical Fourier analysis. Graduate text in mathematics 249. Springer, New York, NY.

Grafakos, L. (2009) Modern Fourier analysis. Graduate text in mathematics 250. Springer, New York, NY.

Guermond, J.-L. (2006) Finite-element-based Faedo–Galerkin weak solutions to the Navier–Stokes equations in the three-dimensional torus are suitable. J.Math. Pures Appl. 85, 451–464.Google Scholar

Guermond, J.-L. (2007) Faedo–Galerkin weak solutions of the Navier–Stokes equations with Dirichlet boundary conditions are suitable. J. Math. Pures Appl. 88, 87–106.Google Scholar

Hale, J.K. (1980) Ordinary differential equations. Kreiger, Malabar, FL.

Hardy, G.H. (1932) A note on two inequalities. J. London Math. Soc. 11, 167–170.Google Scholar

Hartman, P. (1973) Ordinary differential equations. Wiley, Baltimore.

Helmholtz, H. (1858) Über Integrale der hydrodynamischen Gleichungen, welcher der Wirbelbewegungen entsprechen. J. Reine Angew. Math. 55, 25–55.Google Scholar

Heywood, J. (1976) On uniqueness questions in the theory of viscous flow. Acta Math. 136, 61–102.Google Scholar

Heywood, J. (1988) Epochs of regularity for weak solutions of the Navier–Stokes equations in unbounded domains. Tohoku Math. J. 40, 293–313.Google Scholar

Hopf, E. (1951) Über die Aufgangswertaufgave fur die hydrodynamischen Grundliechungen. Math. Nachr. 4, 213–231.Google Scholar

Hörmander, L. (1960) Estimates for translation invariant operators in Lp spaces. Acta Math. 104, 93–139.Google Scholar

Iftimie, D., Karch, G., & Lacave, C. (2014) Asymptotics of solutions to the Navier– Stokes system in exterior domains. J. London Math. Soc. 90, 785–806.Google Scholar

James, R.C. (1964) Weakly Compact Sets. Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 113, 129–140.Google Scholar

Kahane, C. (1969) On the spatial analyticity of solutions of theNavier–Stokes equations. Arch. Ration. Mech. Anal. 33, 386–405.Google Scholar

Kato, T. (1984) Strong Lp -solutions of the Navier–Stokes equations in ℝ m with applications to weak solutions. Math. Zeit. 187, 471–480.Google Scholar

Kiselev, A.A. & Ladyzhenskaya, O.A. (1957) On the existence and uniqueness of the solution of the nonstationary problem for a viscous, incompressible fluid. Izv. Akad. Nauk SSSR. Ser. Mat. 21, 655–680.Google Scholar

Koch, H. & Tataru, D. (2001) Well-posedness for the Navier–Stokes equations. Adv. Math. 157, 22–35.Google Scholar

Kohn, R.V. (1982) Partial regularity and the Navier–Stokes equations. Lecture Notes in Num. Appl. Anal. 5, 101–118. (Nonlinear PDE in Applied Science U.S.–Japan Seminar, Tokyo, 1982.)Google Scholar

Komatsu, G. (1979) Analyticity up to the boundary of solutions of nonlinear parabolic equations. Comm. Pure Appl. Math. 32, 669–720.Google Scholar

Kozono, H. (1998) Uniqueness and regularity of weak solutions to the Navier–Stokes equations. In Recent topics on mathematical theory of viscous incompressible fluid (Tsukuba, 1996). Lecture Notes Numer. Appl. Anal.. 16, 161–208. Kinokuniya, Tokyo.

Kozono, H. & Sohr, H. (1996) Remark on uniqueness of weak solutions to the Navier– Stokes equations. Analysi. 16, 255–271.Google Scholar

Kozono, H. & Taniuchi, T. (2000) Limiting case of the Sobolev inequality in BMO, with application to the Euler equations. Comm. Math. Phys. 214, 191–200.Google Scholar

Kozono, H., Ogawa, T., & Taniuchi, T. (2002) The critical Sobolev inequalities in Besov spaces and regularity criterion to some semi-linear evolution equations. Math. Z. 242, 251–278.Google Scholar

Krylov, N.V. (1996) Lectures on elliptic and parabolic equations in Holder spaces. American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI.

Krylov, N.V. (2001) The heat equation in Lq ((0,T); Lp )-space with weights. SIAM J. Math. Anal. 32, 1117–1141.Google Scholar

Krylov, N.V. (2008) Lectures on elliptic and parabolic equations in Sobolev spaces. American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI.

Kukavica, I. (2008) Regularity for the Navier–Stokes equations with a solution in a Morrey space. Indiana Univ. Math. J. 57, 2843–2860.Google Scholar

Kukavica, I. (2009a) Partial regularity results for solutions of the Navier–Stokes system. In Robinson, J.C. & Rodrigo, J.L. (eds.) Partial differential equations and fluid mechanics, 121–145. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

Kukavica, I. (2009b) The fractal dimension of the singular set for solutions of the Navier–Stokes system. Nonlinearit. 22, 2889–2900.

Kukavica, I. & Pei, Y. (2012) An estimate on the parabolic fractal dimension of the singular set for solutions of the Navier–Stokes system. Nonlinearit. 25, 2775–2783.Google Scholar

Ladyzhenskaya, O.A. (1959) Solution “in the large” of the nonstationary boundary value problem for the Navier–Stokes system in two space variables. Comm. Pure Appl. Math. 12, 427–433.Google Scholar

Ladyzhenskaya, O.A. (1967) On uniqueness and smoothness of generalized solutions to the Navier–Stokes equations. Zap. Nauchn. Sem. Leningrad. Otdel. Mat. Inst. Steklov. (LOMI) 5, 169–185; English transl. Sem. Math. V.A. Steklov Math. Inst. Leningra. 5(1969), 60–66.Google Scholar

Ladyzhenskaya, O.A. (1969) The mathematical theory of viscous incompressible flow. Gordon and Breach, New York, NY.

Ladyzhenskaya, O.A. (1970) Unique solvability in the large of three-dimensional Cauchy problem for the Navier–Stokes equations in the presence of axial symmetry. Seminar in Mathematics, V.A. Steklov Mathematical Institute, Leningrad, 7, Boundary value problems of mathematical physics and related aspects of function theory, Part 2, Edited by O.A., Ladyzhenskaya, 70–79.

Ladyzhenskaya, O.A. & Seregin, G.A. (1999) On partial regularity of suitable weak solutions to the three-dimensional Navier–Stokes equations. J. Math. Fluid Mech. 1, 356–387.Google Scholar

Ladyzhenskaya, O.A., Solonnikov, V.A., & Uraltseva, N.N. (1967) Linear and quasilinear equations of parabolic type. American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI.

Lemarié-Rieusset, P.G. (2002) Recent developments in the Navier–Stokes problem. Chapman & Hall/CRC, Boca Raton, FL.

Leray, J. (1934) Essai sur le mouvement d'un liquide visqueux emplissant l'espace. Acta Math. 63, 193–248.Google Scholar

Lieberman, G.M. (1996) Second order parabolic differential equations.World Scientific Publishing Co., Inc., River Edge, NJ.

Lin, F. (1998) A new proof of the Caffarelli–Kohn–Nirenberg theorem. Comm. Pure Appl. Math. 51, 241–257.Google Scholar

Lions, J.-L. (1969) Quelques methodes de resolution des problemes aux limites non lineaires. Dunod Gauthier-Villars, Paris.

Lions, J.-L. & Prodi, G. (1959) Un theoreme d'existence et unicite dans les equations de Navier–Stokes en dimension 2. C. R. Acad. Sci. Pari. 248, 3519–3521.Google Scholar

Lions, P.-L. (1994) Mathematical topics in fluid mechanics, Volume 1: Incompressible models. Oxford University Press, Oxford.

Lunardi, A. (2009) Interpolation theory. 2nd edition. Edizioni della Normale, Pisa.

Mahalov, A., Titi, E.S., & Leibovich, S. (1990) Invariant helical subspaces for the Navier–Stokes equations. Arch. Ration. Mech. Anal. 112, 193–222.Google Scholar

Majda, A.J. & Bertozzi, A.L. (2002) Vorticity and incompressible flow. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

Marín-Rubio, P., Robinson, J.C., & Sadowski, W. (2013) Solutions of the 3D Navier– Stokes equations for initial data in H ½: robustness of regularity and numerical verification of regularity for bounded sets of initial data in H 1 . J. Math. Anal. Appl. 400, 76–85.Google Scholar

Masuda, K. (1967) On the analyticity and the unique continuation theorem for solutions of the Navier–Stokes equations. Proc. Japan. Acad. 43, 827–832.Google Scholar

Masuda, K. (1984) Weak solutions of Navier–Stokes equations. Tohoku Math. J. (2. 36, 623–646.Google Scholar

McCormick, D.S., Robinson, J.C., & Rodrigo, J.L. (2013) Generalised Gagliardo– Nirenberg inequalities using weak Lebesgue spaces and BMO.Milan J. Math. 81, 265–289.Google Scholar

McCormick, D.S., Olson, E.J., Robinson, J.C., Rodrigo, J.L., Vidal-López, A., & Zhou, Y. (2016a) Lower bounds on blowing-up solutions of the 3D Navier–Stokes equations in Ḣ 3/2, Ḣ 5/2, and Ḃ 5/2 2,1. arXiv:1503.04323. SIAM J. Math. Anal., to appear.

McCormick, D.S., Fefferman, C.L., Robinson, J.C., & Rodrigo, J.L. (2016b) Local existence for the non-resistive MHD equations in nearly optimal Sobolev spaces. arXiv:1602.02588.

Mihlin, S.G. (1957) Fourier integrals and multiple singular integrals. Vestnik Leningrad. Univ. Ser. Mat. Meh. Astr. 12, 143–155.(in Russian).Google Scholar

Miyakawa, T. & Sohr, H. (1988) On energy inequality, smoothness and large time behavior in L 2 for weak solutions of the Navier–Stokes equations in exterior domains. Math. Z. 199, 455–478.Google Scholar

Montero, J.A. (2015) Lower bounds for possible blow–up solutions for the Navier– Stokes equations revisited. arXiv:1503.03063.

Mucha, P.B. (2008) Stability of 2D incompressible flows in R3. J. Differential Equations 245, 2355–2367.Google Scholar

Muscalu, C. & Schlag, W. (2013) Classical and multilinear harmonic analysis. Volume I. Cambridge Studies in Advanced Mathematics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

Nečas, J., Ružička, M., & Šverák, V. (1996) On Leray's self-similar solutions of the Navier–Stokes equations. Acta Math. 176, 283–294.Google Scholar

Neustupa, J. (1999) Partial regularity of weak solutions to the Navier–Stokes equations in the class L ∞(0,T; L 3(Ω)3). J. Math. Fluid Mech. 1, 309–325.Google Scholar

O'Leary, M. (2003) Conditions for the local boundedness of solutions of the Navier– Stokes system in three dimensions. Comm. Partial Differential Equation. 28, 617–636.Google Scholar

Pettis, B.J. (1938) On integration in vector spaces. Trans. Amer.Math. Soc. 44, 277–304.Google Scholar

Planchon, F. (2003) An extension of the Beale–Kato–Majda criterion for the Euler equations. Comm. Math. Phys. 232, 319–326.Google Scholar

Pooley, B.C. & Robinson, J.C. (2016) Well-posedness for the diffusive 3DBurgers equations with initial data in H 1/2 . In Robinson, J.C., Rodrigo, J.L., Sadowski, W., & Vidal-López, A. (eds.) Recent progress in the theory of the Euler and Navier–Stokes equations, 137–153. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

Prodi, G. (1959) Un teorema di unicita per le equazioni di Navier–Stokes. Ann. Mat. Pura Appl. 48, 173–182.Google Scholar

Raugel, G. & Sell, G.R. (1993) Navier–Stokes equations on thin 3D domains. I: Global attractors and global regularity of solutions. J. Amer. Math. Soc. 6, 503–568.Google Scholar

Renardy, M. & Rogers, R.C. (2004) An introduction to partial differential equations. Second Edition. Springer-Verlag, New York, NY.

Robertson, A.P. (1974) On measurable selections. Proc. Roy. Soc. Edinburgh Sect.. 72, 1–7.Google Scholar

Robinson, J.C. (2001) Infinite-dimensional dynamical systems. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

Robinson, J.C. (2006) Regularity and singularity in the three-dimensional Navier– Stokes equations. Boletin de SEM. 35, 43–71.Google Scholar

Robinson, J.C. (2011) Dimensions, embeddings, and attractors. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

Robinson, J.C. & Sadowski, W. (2007) Decay of weak solutions and the singular set of the three-dimensional Navier–Stokes equations. Nonlinearit. 20, 1185–1191.Google Scholar

Robinson, J.C. & Sadowski, W. (2009) Almost everywhere uniqueness of Lagrangian trajectories for suitable weak solutions of the three-dimensional Navier–Stokes equations. Nonlinearit. 22, 2093–2099.Google Scholar

Robinson, J.C. & Sadowski, W. (2014) A local smoothness criterion for solutions of the 3D Navier–Stokes equations. Rend. Semin. Mat. Univ. Padov. 131, 159–178.Google Scholar

Robinson, J.C., Sadowski, W., & Sharples, N. (2013) On the regularity of Lagrangian trajectories corresponding to suitable weak solutions of the Navier–Stokes equations. Procedia IUTA. 7, 161–166.Google Scholar

Robinson, J.C., Sadowski, W., & Silva, R.P. (2012) Lower bounds on blow up solutions of the three-dimensional Navier–Stokes equations in homogeneous Sobolev spaces. J. Math. Phys. 53, 115618.Google Scholar

Roubíček, T. (2013) Nonlinear partial differential equations with applications. Second edition. Birkhauser, Springer, Basel.

Rudin, W. (1991) Functional Analysis. McGraw-Hill, New York, NY.

Scheffer, V. (1976) Turbulence and Hausdorff dimension. In Turbulence and Navier– Stokes equation, Orsay 1975, Springer Lecture Notes in Mathematics 565, 174–183. Springer, Berlin.

Scheffer, V. (1977) Hausdorff measure and the Navier–Stokes equations. Comm. Math. Phys. 55, 97–112.Google Scholar

Scheffer, V. (1980) The Navier–Stokes equations on a bounded domain. Comm. Math. Phys. 73, 1–42.Google Scholar

Scheffer, V. (1985) A solution to the Navier–Stokes inequality with an internal singularity. Comm. Math. Phys. 101, 47–85.Google Scholar

Scheffer, V. (1987) Nearly one-dimensional singularities of solutions to the Navier– Stokes inequality. Comm. Math. Phys. 110, 525–551.Google Scholar

Scheffer, V. (1993) An inviscid flowwith compact support in space–time. J. Geom. Anal. 3, 343–401.Google Scholar

Schonbek, M.E. (1985) L 2 decay for weak solutions to the Navier–Stokes equation. Arch. Ration. Mech. Anal. 88, 209–222.Google Scholar

Seregin, G. (2014) Lecture notes on regularity theory for the Navier–Stokes equations. World Scientific, Hackensack, NJ.

Seregin, G. & Šverák, V. (2002) Navier–Stokes equations with lower bounds on pressure. Arch. Ration. Mech. Anal. 163, 65–86.Google Scholar

Seregin, G. & Zajaczkowski, W. (2007) A sufficient condition of regularity for axially symmetric solutions to the Navier–Stokes equations. SIAM J. Math. Anal. 39, 669–685.Google Scholar

Serrin, J. (1962) On the interior regularity of weak solutions of the Navier–Stokes equations. Arch. Ration. Mech. Anal. 9, 187–195.Google Scholar

Serrin, J. (1963) The initial value problem for the Navier–Stokes equations. In Nonlinear Problem. (Proc. Sympos., Madison, Wis.), 69–98. Univ. of Wisconsin Press, Madison, WI.

Shapiro, V.L. (1966) The uniqueness of solutions of the heat equation in an infinite strip. Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 125, 326–361.Google Scholar

Shatah, J. & Struwe, M. (1994) Well-posedness in the energy space for semilinear wave equations with critical growth. Int. Math. Res. Notice. 1994, 303–309.Google Scholar

Shnirelman, A. (1997) On the nonuniqueness of weak solution of the Euler equation. Comm. Pure Appl. Math. 50, 1261–1286.Google Scholar

Shnirelman, A. (2000) Weak solutions with decreasing energy of incompressible Euler equations. Comm. Math. Phys. 210, 541–603.Google Scholar

Simader, C.G. & Sohr, H. (1992) A new approach to the Helmholtz decomposition and the Neumann problem in L q-spaces for bounded and exterior domains. In Galdi, G.P. (ed.) Mathematical Problems Relating to the Navier–Stokes Equations. Series on Advances in Mathematics for Applied Sciences, 11, 1–35. World Scientific, Singapore.

Simader, C.G., Sohr, H., & Varnhorn, W. (2014) Necessary and sufficient conditions for the existence of Helmholtz decompositions in general domains. Ann. Univ. Ferrara 60, 245–262.Google Scholar

Simon, J. (1987) Compact sets in the spac. Lp (0,T; B). Ann. Mat. Pura Appl. 146, 65–96.Google Scholar

Sohr, H. (1983) Zur Reguläritatstheorie der instationären Gleichungen von Navier– Stokes. (German) [On the regularity theory of the nonstationary Navier–Stokes equations. Math. Z. 184, 359–375.Google Scholar

Sohr, H. (2001) The Navier–Stokes equations: an elementary functional analytic approach. Modern Birkhauser Classics. Birkhauser/Springer, Basel.

Sohr, H. & vonWahl, W. (1984) On the singular set and the uniqueness of weak solutions of the Navier–Stokes equations. Manuscripta Math. 49, 27–59.Google Scholar

Sohr, H. & von Wahl, W. (1986) On the regularity of the pressure of weak solutions of Navier–Stokes equations. Arch. Math. (Basel. 46, 428–439.Google Scholar

Solonnikov, V.A. (1964) Estimates of the solutions of a nonstationary linearized system of Navier–Stokes equations. Trudy Mat. Inst. Steklov. 70, in: Amer. Math. Soc. Translations, Series 2, Vol. 75, 1–117.Google Scholar

Stein, E.M. (1970) Singular integrals and differentiability properties of functions. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.

Stein, E.M. (1993) Harmonic analysis: real-variable methods, orthogonality, and oscillatory integrals. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.

Struwe, M. (1988) On partial regularity results for the Navier–Stokes equations. Comm. Pure. Appl. Math. 41, 437–458.Google Scholar

Takahashi, S. (1990) On interior regularity criteria for weak solutions of the Navier– Stokes equations. Manuscripta Math. 69, 237–254.Google Scholar

Temam, R. (1977) Navier–Stokes equations. North Holland, Amsterdam. Reprinted by AMS Chelsea, 2001.

Temam, R. (1982) Behaviour at time t = 0 of the solutions of semi-linear evolution equations. J. Differential Equation. 43, 73–92.Google Scholar

Temam, R. (1983) Navier–Stokes equations and nonlinear functional analysis. SIAM, Philadelphia, PA.

Tychonoff, A.N. (1935) Uniqueness theorem for the heat equation. Mat. Sb. 42, 199–216.Google Scholar

Vasseur, A. (2007) A new proof of partial regularity of solutions to Navier–Stokes equations. Nonlinear Diff. Equ. Appl. 14, 753–785.Google Scholar

von Wahl, W. (1980) Regularitatsfragen fur die instationaren Navier–Stokesschen Gleichungen in hoheren Dimensionen. J. Math. Soc. Japa. 32, 263–283.Google Scholar

von Wahl, W. (1982) The equation u' + A(tu) = f in a Hilbert space and Lp -estimates for parabolic equations. J. London Math. Soc. 25, 483–497.Google Scholar

vonWahl, W. (1985) The equations of Navier–Stokes and abstract parabolic equations. Friedr. Vieweg & Sons, Braunschweig.

Weinberger, H.F. (1999) An example of blowup produced by equal diffusions. J. Differential Equation. 154, 225–237.Google Scholar

Yosida, K. (1980) Functional analysis. Springer Classics in Mathematics, Springer, Berlin.

Zhou, Y. & Pokorny, M. (2010) On the regularity of the solutions of the Navier–Stokes equations via one velocity component. Nonlinearit. 23, 1097–1107.Google Scholar

Zuazua, E. (2002) Log-Lipschitz regularity and uniqueness of the flow for a field in ( Wn/p+1,p loc (ℝ n )) n . C. R. Acad. Sci. Pari. 335, 17–22.Google Scholar