A selected reading list
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 05 April 2013
Summary
A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Shakespeare beyond DoubtEvidence, Argument, Controversy, pp. 241 - 248Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2013
References
. William Shakespeare: A Study of Facts and Problems, 2 vols. (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1930).Google Scholar
and . ‘And Then There Were None: Winnowing the Shakespeare Claimants’, Computers and the Humanities 30 (1996–7), pp. 191–245. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
. and . ‘Oxford by the Numbers: What are the Odds That the Earl of Oxford could have Written Shakespeare's Poems and Plays’, Tennessee Law Review 72:1 (2004), pp. 323–453. Google Scholar
and . ‘The Shakespeare Authorship Page: Dedicated to the Proposition That Shakespeare Wrote Shakespeare’.
Shakespeare's Lives (London: Oxford University Press, 1970; new, revised edn, Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1991).Google Scholar
. Shakespeare and His Betters: A History and Criticism of the Attempts Which Have Been Made to Prove Shakespeare's Works Were Written by Others (London: Max Reinhardt, 1958).Google Scholar
and The Shakespearean Ciphers Examined: An Analysis of Cryptographic Systems Used as Evidence that Some Author other than William Shakespeare Wrote the Plays Commonly Attributed to him (Cambridge University Press, 1957).Google Scholar
. The Shakespeare Claimants: A Critical Survey of the Four Principal Theories Concerning the Authorship of the Shakespearean Plays (London: Methuen; New York: Barnes and Noble, 1962).Google Scholar
. ‘Applied Historical Linguistics: Socio-Historical Linguistic Evidence for the Authorship of Renaissance Plays’, Transactions of the Philological Society 88 (1990), pp. 201–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
The Authorship of Shakespeare's Plays: A Socio-Linguistic Study (Cambridge University Press, 1994).
. ‘Determining Authorship: A New Technique’, Research Opportunities in Renaissance Drama 41 (2002), pp. 1–14.Google Scholar
Defining Shakespeare: ‘Pericles’ as Test Case (Oxford University Press, 2003).
‘A Lover's Complaint Revisited’, Shakespeare Studies 32 (2004), pp. 267–94.
. Shakespeare, A Lover's Complaint, and John Davies of Hereford (Cambridge University Press, 2007).Google Scholar
. ‘“A Lover's Complaint”, Cymbeline, and the Shakespeare Canon: Interpreting Shared Vocabulary’, Modern Language Review 103.3 (2008), pp. 621–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
‘The Authorship of “A Lover's Complaint”: A New Approach to the Problem’, Papers of the Bibliographical Society of America 102 (2008), pp. 285–313.CrossRef
An Appendix to ‘The Authorship of “A Lover's Complaint”: A New Approach to the Problem”: A Control Test’. BibSite: .
‘Shakespeare or Davies? A Clue to the Authorship of “A Lover's Complaint”’, Notes and Queries 56.1 (2009), pp. 62–3.
. Shakespeare, Co-Author: A Historical Study of Five Collaborative Plays (Oxford University Press, 2002).Google Scholar
‘Coauthors and Closed Minds’, Shakespeare Studies 36 (2008), pp. 101–13.
. The Philosophy of the Plays of Shakspere Unfolded (London: Groombridge and Sons, 1857).Google Scholar
. The Great Cryptogram: Francis Bacon's Cipher in the So-Called Shakespeare Plays (Chicago, New York and London: R. S. Peale & Company, 1888).Google Scholar
. ‘Shakespeare’ Identified in Edward de Vere the Seventeenth Earl of Oxford (New York: Frederick A. Stokes Company, 1920).Google Scholar
. It Was Marlowe: A Story of the Secret of Three Centuries (Chicago: Donohue, Henneberry, and Co., 1895).Google Scholar
. Shakespeare and His Betters: A History and Criticism of the Attempts Which Have Been Made to Prove Shakespeare's Works Were Written by Others (London: Max Reinhardt, 1958).Google Scholar
and The Shakespearean Ciphers Examined: An Analysis of Cryptographic Systems Used as Evidence that Some Author other than William Shakespeare Wrote the Plays Commonly Attributed to him (Cambridge University Press, 1957).Google Scholar
. The Shakespeare Claimants: A Critical Survey of the Four Principal Theories Concerning the Authorship of the Shakespearean Plays (London: Methuen; New York: Barnes and Noble, 1962).Google Scholar
. ‘Applied Historical Linguistics: Socio-Historical Linguistic Evidence for the Authorship of Renaissance Plays’, Transactions of the Philological Society 88 (1990), pp. 201–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
The Authorship of Shakespeare's Plays: A Socio-Linguistic Study (Cambridge University Press, 1994).
. ‘Determining Authorship: A New Technique’, Research Opportunities in Renaissance Drama 41 (2002), pp. 1–14.Google Scholar
Defining Shakespeare: ‘Pericles’ as Test Case (Oxford University Press, 2003).
‘A Lover's Complaint Revisited’, Shakespeare Studies 32 (2004), pp. 267–94.
. Shakespeare, A Lover's Complaint, and John Davies of Hereford (Cambridge University Press, 2007).Google Scholar
. ‘“A Lover's Complaint”, Cymbeline, and the Shakespeare Canon: Interpreting Shared Vocabulary’, Modern Language Review 103.3 (2008), pp. 621–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
‘The Authorship of “A Lover's Complaint”: A New Approach to the Problem’, Papers of the Bibliographical Society of America 102 (2008), pp. 285–313.CrossRef
An Appendix to ‘The Authorship of “A Lover's Complaint”: A New Approach to the Problem”: A Control Test’. BibSite: .
‘Shakespeare or Davies? A Clue to the Authorship of “A Lover's Complaint”’, Notes and Queries 56.1 (2009), pp. 62–3.
. Shakespeare, Co-Author: A Historical Study of Five Collaborative Plays (Oxford University Press, 2002).Google Scholar
‘Coauthors and Closed Minds’, Shakespeare Studies 36 (2008), pp. 101–13.
. The Philosophy of the Plays of Shakspere Unfolded (London: Groombridge and Sons, 1857).Google Scholar
. The Great Cryptogram: Francis Bacon's Cipher in the So-Called Shakespeare Plays (Chicago, New York and London: R. S. Peale & Company, 1888).Google Scholar
. ‘Shakespeare’ Identified in Edward de Vere the Seventeenth Earl of Oxford (New York: Frederick A. Stokes Company, 1920).Google Scholar
. It Was Marlowe: A Story of the Secret of Three Centuries (Chicago: Donohue, Henneberry, and Co., 1895).Google Scholar