Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-xm8r8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-07T01:23:42.532Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

4 - HIV incidence rates in South Africa

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 September 2011

Eleanor Gouws
Affiliation:
Medical Research Council in Durban
S. S. Abdool Karim
Affiliation:
University of KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa
Q. Abdool Karim
Affiliation:
University of KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa
Get access

Summary

TO FULLY UNDERSTAND TEMPORAL changes in the epidemic of HIV we need to know how incidence and mortality have changed over time. Unfortunately, incidence is difficult to measure directly for logistical and ethical reasons and mortality is difficult to measure directly because of the stigma associated with AIDS. Prevalence provides a measure of incidence and mortality averaged over the previous five to ten years so that it is much more difficult to interpret immediate changes in the dynamics of the epidemic using prevalence than it is using incidence. Estimation of HIV incidence is, therefore, essential for understanding the changing dynamics of HIV transmission, as well as for targeting prevention programmes and evaluating the impact of such programmes.

Unlike estimates of the prevalence of hiv in South Africa that are available from several data sources, including antenatal clinic surveillance, population and community based surveys, and studies among specific risk groups, few direct estimates of hiv incidence are available. Indirect incidence estimates have been obtained from mathematical and statistical modelling and from laboratory-based assays.

Several studies have shown very high rates of hiv incidence in South Africa. The unaids sponsored Col-1492 trial measuring hiv incidence rates directly among a cohort of sex workers in KwaZulu-Natal showed an incidence rate of 18% between 1996 and 1998. The incidence rate among young men aged 18–24 years participating in the anrs 1265 male circumcision trial in Gauteng was 1.5% per year between 2002 and 2004.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×